No four-legged pets for former horse owner

By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Sunday, November 22, 2009 | 9 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1

Related Links

COQUILLE — Chickens.

They’re the only kind of animal Bobbye Cikanek can own for the next five years, according to her sentence for abusing and neglecting her 10 horses.

“You can keep your chickens,” Judge Michael Gillespie told Cikanek at her hearing Friday morning.

The North Bend woman, convicted of first-degree animal abuse and 10 counts of second-degree animal neglect, cannot own livestock or domestic animals during her five-year probation, except for 20 chickens living on her property.

She’ll also have to pay courts fees and $5,182 in restitution, for the cost of caring for nine horses and a foal for two months. Coos County animal control officers and sheriff’s deputies removed the animals from her property on May 13 and placed them with community members and at the Coos County Fairgrounds. She forfeited the animals in mid-July.

The payment will go toward farrier, feed and veterinary bills, said Coos County Assistant District Attorney Shani Krumholz. That doesn’t include donated veterinary services, hours put in by volunteers or donated feed for the Tennessee walking horses.

“A lot of money was put forth by the community that will never be accounted for,” Krumholz said.

At the beginning of the hearing, Cikanek told the judge that she should keep the 14 pugs that are part of a dog-breeding operation at her home near the Kentuck Slough. Selling puppies is a big part of her income, she argued.

Gillespie questioned how much she actually made from the animals. But then Cikanek and her attorney told him the dogs belonged to her roommate, who also co-owns their home. Gillespie admonished her for failing to provide that information earlier.

“Do you know what an oath is, ma’am?” Gillespie asked her. “That’s where you promise to tell the truth.”

Cikanek said she raised the dogs and tried to explain her partnership with her roommate. Gillespie didn’t buy her story, comparing her to former President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal.

“You never talk the same language twice,” he said. “Half the truth is still a lie.”

Cikanek replied that she was just nervous.

The judge said she can live in the same house with the pugs and other pets that belong to the roommate. She just can’t act like an owner.

Cikanek had been concerned that being banned from owning animals would force her to move back to Winnemucca, Nev., or find a separate home. She noted that she had chronic bronchitis and severe allergies in Nevada.

“Three days in Oregon, and it all went away,” she said as defense attorney Allen Goldman patted her shoulder. “I would like to stay here because I’ve felt so much better.”

That won’t be a problem if the animals are under her roommate’s name. But the judge warned Cikanek:

“You take a dog to a vet, you’ve got a problem. You take a cat to a vet, you’ve got a problem,” Gillespie said. “They’re not your pets. They’re her pets.

“She can do what she wants in her house, but that doesn’t include you.”

He told her he won’t hesitate to lock her up if she breaks his rules.

To pay restitution and other fees, Cikanek and Goldman said she would sell her property in Winnemucca. The public defender asked the judge to give her time for the sale to go through to pay. In response, Gillespie extended probation from two years to five.

He set another hearing at 8:30 a.m. on July 16 to reschedule payments if Cikanek’s sale goes through.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bubu Sissy wrote on Nov 25, 2009 11:05 AM:

The pictures of those horses were horrible, I'm glad to see that something was done about this woman. One could only hope she spends the next 5 years realizing that she should not own animals and does not do so once her probation is up.

I'm curious to know why the roommate has not been brought up on anything, perhaps I missed where the police cleared her of being involved. I don't know all of the details but one would think that if these women shared a home and shared responsibilities of the puppies being referred to that the roommate would have been involved in the care of the horses, or at the very least was aware of their conditions. I find it hard to believe they lived together and this person didn't know the horses were in such need of care. I hope that for the sake of the puppies she was fully investigated as well and that she thinks hard on separating herself from this woman.

Pure_brandi wrote on Nov 25, 2009 8:24 AM:

I'm fairly new with this story, reading up on it recently, I don't think this woman should be allowed around ANY animals whether its voluntarily, by employment, roomate, etc. She had that chance & its not like she kicked her dog once in front of someone who called in (in which case that would STILL be bad ok) but she consistantly neglected multiple horses for an extended period of time in which some died. That should call for a perminant life-decision by the court system...not a measely five years! ugh...dumb...Our only hope is karma comes back ten fold on this horrible ignornant hillbilly (the bad kind)

carefree highway wrote on Nov 24, 2009 4:24 AM:

Maybe a Restraining Order is in order?

loventhecoast wrote on Nov 23, 2009 8:20 AM:

If she can not be with animals - does this mean that when her so called roommate leaves - she has to have someone else in the house caring for the animals? It is just not right - she not even be allowed to be living with animals. She obviously lies - just read the stories she has told.

clutch69rs wrote on Nov 22, 2009 4:34 PM:

"The judge said she can live in the same house with the pugs and other pets that belong to the roommate. She just can’t act like an owner."

She didn't act like a pet owner before, what makes anyone think she'll act like one now? Puppy mills should be banned. ASPCA should keep an eye on this case.

Shallow Al wrote on Nov 22, 2009 1:42 PM:

I'd add time just because of her face!

Damn!

DMA wrote on Nov 22, 2009 8:23 AM:

This sentence is waaaay too soft! The damage this woman has caused is horrible and her efforts to scam the courts only shows that nothing has changed. Cruelty to animals should be dealt with in a much more severe way. Go back to Nevada, stay there, and live with what you have done!

Retired wrote on Nov 21, 2009 4:09 PM:

she shouldn't even own a goldfish...it takes money to feed the dogs and take care of them properly. She is scamming the courts. Let her go back to Nevada and stay there.

orecoast007 wrote on Nov 21, 2009 2:27 PM:

Good job Judge. However, I feel no animals should be allowed in that household no matter who they belong too!!!!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace


Special Sections

More Special Sections