'Big One' would cause catastrophic damage

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 | 22 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Homes would go dark. Water supplies would be cut. Buildings would topple. And help might not arrive for a long time.

A massive earthquake centered on the South Coast would have many scary outcomes, including being cut off from the rest of the world by road.

The rivers and sloughs that offer fishing holes, avenues for excursions and picturesque views also would prevent outside help from getting in if bridges fail.

Making bridges strong enough to withstand a huge quake is an expensive proposition, and state officials aren’t sure where to start.

They estimate they’ll need $3 billion to prepare Oregon’s bridges to withstand a major earthquake along the coast, far more money than they have. Without such repairs, a 9.0 temblor would leave U.S. Highway 101 impassable and state highways 38 and 42 in disrepair.

ODOT has long known an earthquake would cause catastrophic damage, said spokesman Dave Thompson. A study released in October, prepared by ODOT and Portland State University, quantifies what the damage would be.

“This report is confirmation that a major quake will do major damage,” he said.

The state’s next step will be to analyze what bridges are most in need of repairs and deserving of the state’s scant resources. The ODOT’s bridge section has established a basic priority list, ranking bridges along interstates 5, 405 and 84 as the top three. State Highway 42 has the fourth highest priority, while U.S. Highway 101 is seventh.

The state’s interest in retrofitting bridges on Highway 42 is because it would serve as a route for emergency vehicles following an earthquake, Thompson said. Highway 101, on the other hand, would be much more complicated.

“The problem with 101 is its length and the risk of slides,” he said. “Not only will the bridges be impassable, but the roads away from the bridges will be covered in slides.”

Even if slides prevent quick re-entry into the area, preventing bridges from collapsing or suffering extensive damage would be beneficial. Replacing a severely damaged bridge costs an average of $3 million, the report said.

State Highway 38 has the third lowest priority of highways under consideration, in part because it has some of the safest bridges in the state. ODOT replaced several bridges along the route connecting Reedsport with the I-5 corridor last year, but some require upgrades or replacement, including the Scottsburg Bridge.

People in Coos Bay and North Bend conceivably could be trapped if the area’s major bridges failed. Coos Bay firefighters would have limited access to Eastside and would possibly rely on Millington volunteers.

“Bridges are a concern to us,” said Battalion Chief Mark Anderson, with Coos Bay Fire. “I don’t think you can get to Coos Bay-North Bend without crossing a bridge somewhere.”

But bridges aren’t the only problem, said Jared Castle, an ODOT spokesman in Roseburg.

“Liquefaction is one of the issues,” he said. “An earthquake of the Cascadia Subduction Zone would have dramatic impacts to roads and to the approaches to bridges as much as the bridges themselves.”

They’d sink and buckle.

No one knows for sure when an earthquake will hit, but engineers have some idea how buildings would respond.

Researchers used a computer program that simulates damage to bridges in an earthquake. It can predict ground motions caused by an earthquake, as well as the resulting bridge damage and its cost.

In one scenario, an 8.3 magnitude earthquake centered on the South Coast, two bridges collapsed and 23 suffered enough damage that would require replacement. State officials anticipated such an earthquake would require $363 million simply to repair the bridges.

At greatest risk to damage are bridges built before 1974, when new design standards were established in the aftermath of an earthquake in San Fernando, Calif. While older bridges wouldn’t necessarily fall down, they’d likely suffer enough damage to knock them out of service. The list of susceptible bridges includes McCullough Bridge, Umpqua River Bridge in Reedsport and the Patterson Memorial Bridge in Gold Beach.

“The older bridges, as beautiful as they are, and as strong as they have been built, all of them would become impassable,” he said.

The McCullough Bridge is receiving cathodic protection, a process that was completed several years ago on Patterson, but it won’t strengthen the bridge for an earthquake.

There are two tiers of repairs the state considers useful for bridges. The first tier are less expensive, but may leave bridge’s susceptible to damage in a major quake.

Thompson said ODOT will hold meetings to discuss funding priorities. He also said there wasn’t a deadline to have the next round of analysis completed.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

rianza wrote on Nov 24, 2009 9:19 AM:

I find it highly amusing that many residents use the tsunami excuse as an argument against the LNG project.

Does this mean you're OK with death by drowning? I mean, seriously, if you were really concerned you wouldn't be living smack-dab in the middle of a tsunami zone! You would move to Bend!

Citizen2 wrote on Nov 24, 2009 12:29 AM:

I find it amazing that one branch of the State is pouring development money to a Port who is working to site a huge LNG bomb on sand flats that another branch of the state is saying is in the path of a Tusnami! Jobs are to be had preparing the beautiful Oregon coast for an earthquake. The LNG is a scam that will never be built. Smash and grab economics, rip off and UGLY!!

Pure_brandi wrote on Nov 23, 2009 9:01 AM:

Whoa whoa, these comments are getting pretty side-tracked from the topic at hand. God? Easter? I think its no big news to know that if an earthquake hit our podunk town that it would cause severe damage. Doesnt take a genius to figure that out. I have to agree with Mark Smith...the chances of that happening directly on our front porch is what? And how many other small ocean front towns would this effect? I don't understand why this is a Headline story...if you live here you have probably figured that out already, just like people in Oklahoma know what tornadoes do for Christ's sake

IWanttoknow wrote on Nov 21, 2009 12:52 PM:

Iwanttoknow Amadeus would you make fun of the Koran like you did with the Bible? Iwanttoknow are the Muslims talking about infidels like you, if so 'let them have you' and save the rest of us! Better, yet: I will pray for you to be saved that way when we both die (at least you, I believe in John 3:16 of the King James version Bible). if I'm wrong, Oh Well! If I'm correct we will debate the issue then! Just My Opinion, Bye. PS. (Sorry I don't usually get personal in my reply's, opinions)

orecoast007 wrote on Nov 20, 2009 6:51 PM:

CPW,The local cab company might be hiring if you need a job....

rianza wrote on Nov 20, 2009 1:01 PM:

Didn't the earth get hit by a meteor a couple of million years ago? Not sure what year...nonetheless, we probably should be building bunkers instead of homes because we're definitely going to get hit again. Right? How did we ever allow WalMart to build that building, knowing that it will, inevitably, get hit by a meteor?

amadeus wrote on Nov 20, 2009 11:45 AM:

The photo by Lou Sennick is very, well, cathedral-like. Gives me pause. What comes to mind is that the Religious Right, those who believe in the power of prayer and the buy-bull, who OPPOSE health care for the poor and sick and needy in favor of their corporate sponsors, those who are the most hypocritical should hold prayer meetings beneath ALL of Oregon's bridges and wait for the BIG ONE. Don't worry, santa, er, the tooth fairy, uh, I mean the easter bunny...no...oh, oh, God that is it ...God will protect you while he smites NON believers such as myself! so go, protect our bridges with your pious self righteousness...

IWanttoknow wrote on Nov 19, 2009 4:54 PM:

Iwanttoknow why the emergency dispatch center is not part of the new improved earthquake proof fire hall? What happen to the community meeting room at the new fire hall? Does the new fire hall have emergency fire boats on site? If not why not are they planning to swim to where the current dock is (use to be)? FEMA should have been relocated into the new fire hall, that way Federal Dollars could be used. Maybe, they would have emergency water transportation. Hope everyone can swim or tread water! Just my ideas and I'm stickin to them. Bye

Common Sense wrote on Nov 18, 2009 4:37 PM:

To Brawny James Dio & the rest of Bob Braddock "profiting$$$" followers....

I think the so-called trapper fell into his own black hole.....with nothing more to say then....NOTTA again (ZERO FACTS) in support of this California LNG SCAM at Jordon Cove & that by itself is the WORSE kind of trap...

P.S. Say hello to Bob Braddock for me (10X more Delays coming his way in the near future) & wishing him well after he leaves this area...

Brawny James Dio wrote on Nov 18, 2009 2:59 PM:

Hey Common Sense...you do realize you fell right into my trap, don't you? You and the rest of your rhetoric posters are so predictable. What part of THAT don't you understand?

Common Sense wrote on Nov 18, 2009 12:20 PM:

To Brawny James Dio & the rest of Bob Braddock "profiting$$$" followers....

What part of this California LNG SCAM NOT needed, NO local jobs, Air polluter, Increased dependence on foreign hostile countries like Russia, Algeria, Iran, etc. for our future energy needs, Accident waiting to happen in a Tsunami Zone, where EVERY poll taken in Oregon shows the MAJORITY against this, don't you understand?

P.S. I agree, Oregon's Attorney General office should be investigating every one of these LNG SCAMS trying to sneak into the back door....

1313 wrote on Nov 18, 2009 8:20 AM:

Nope Brawny James, nobody is paying me, thought it up all by myself, I am affraid of LNG, just another thing to worry about like the earthquakes !

Mr E wrote on Nov 18, 2009 1:16 AM:

I believe Mark could use a lesson or two on earthquakes, particularly the "big one" that routinely strikes this region. Sure, perhaps "we" won't experience a Cascadia earthquake, but earlier cultures in our region have felt these quakes (1700 being the most recent), and this region will be hit again and again and again.

One of the most interesting theories of the power of the local fault zone is the idea that the 1700 earthquake was the cause of the Bonneville slide in the Columbia River. Of course, the fact that many in Japan died as a result of the tsunami generated by an earthquake off of our coast should be evidence enough of the sleeping giant.

If it happens, we are officially in trouble. But the truth is, it really doesn't matter how much seismic strengthening is done, when half of the town is going to subside below sea level, and many areas are going to slide into the bay.

WOW1 wrote on Nov 17, 2009 9:53 PM:

I have a U.S. Geological Survey CD, done by Brian F Atwater in 2007.
It is titled "The Orphan Tsunami of 1700". Mr. Atwater alleges that an enormous earthquahe and tsunami hit Washington, Oregon and California, as well as Japan, in 1700.
The CD was produced by IRIS (incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology) and SSA (Seimological Society of America).

If the big one comes, we will be living on an island with no one on the way to help. We had better build a shelter on high ground. When the lights go out, Safeway will be closed.

Fed Up wrote on Nov 17, 2009 8:52 PM:

“This report is confirmation that a major quake will do major damage,” he said.


Hope they didn't spend too much money on this study... what a revelation... that a major quake can do major damage. Who'd of thunk?

Cpw wrote on Nov 17, 2009 7:05 PM:

NO LNG AND NO JOBS ???? JUST WHAT WE NEED..Oh wait Walmart is hiring right ????

pancho via wrote on Nov 17, 2009 5:51 PM:

We have nothing to worry around here if cut off from the outside. To start, a good portion of the locals could go several months fasting off of their own obese carcasses. For the rest of us there is an abundance of sea lions at Simpson Reef. Pop one of those & it would feed a family for quite some time. A natural disaster is the only thing that will clean up this man made disaster of a Blighted Town By The Bay... Given the time of year our best means in & out will be by sea. All kinds of supplies can be dropped by air. Just because there are no passable roads doesn't mean it will be as dire as represented. The biggest challenge is that the local leadership has rocks in their heads!

Brawny James Dio wrote on Nov 17, 2009 5:22 PM:

I think it is sad that the small group of anti-LNG posters on here have nothing better to do than to stop by every day, cut and paste the same rhetoric, and then proceed to flame anyone that disagrees with them. Almost like someone is getting paid to post.......

1313 wrote on Nov 17, 2009 3:39 PM:

This would be a nice thing to happen with an LNG ship coming into port here.

For a Better Oregon wrote on Nov 17, 2009 12:10 PM:

Yet this area & it's leaders would consider Lng terminals in a Tsunami zone, like the one at Jordon Cove? Corruption at it's BEST from top to bottom, you listening Oregon's Attorney General Office?????

Carl wrote on Nov 17, 2009 11:45 AM:

Reads like the entire Coos Bay area could use some sort of seismic retro- fit. Also the need to build up the area 3 to 8 feet to counter settling and flooding.

Mark Smith wrote on Nov 17, 2009 11:10 AM:

The US has had 9 earthquakes above an 8.0 since 1700. That leads me to believe there isn't much of a chance that we'd get a "big one"

This is a just to make a headline story


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections