Property owners along Rogue bemoan removal of dam

By Mark Freeman, (Medford) Mail Tribune
Friday, October 23, 2009 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
ROGUE RIVER — Jan Tarantino peers over her summer patio and dock on what used to be “Savage Lake,” looking down at the Rogue River flowing more than 15 feet below.

The dock was a fishing platform and diving board for the past 10 summers when Savage Rapids Dam backed the Rogue up to her dock and countless others along the 3-mile impoundment.

But the dam is gone now, and in its wake is a moonscape of river rock and mud with only a river running through it.

“It’s still going to be the Rogue River no matter what,” Tarantino said. “But it’s lost its factor. I guess we’ll have a new normal now.”

Tarantino is one of more than 100 riverside landowners now coming to grips with how they will deal with the new-look Rogue and their new backyards now that the 88-year-old dam and its summer lake are gone.

Docks that once moored jet skis and powerboats are 20 feet or more above the Rogue since Oct. 9, when demolition crews removed a temporary dam and sent the Rogue hurtling through its original channel for the first time since 1921.

Backyards once created to take advantage of the backed-up summer Rogue now offer virtually no easy access to the river. Boat ramps that once sat in the water are useless. And the new river edges are devoid of riparian vegetation, leaving banks unstable and at risk for erosion.

“It’s riverfront property,” Tarantino said. “But it’s not like it was.”

Help may be on the way for those who want assistance in transforming their former lakefront property into what is more commonly seen along the Rogue’s reach through Jackson County.

Armed with a state grant, an Ashland conservation group is ready to draft a plan to help willing landowners decide how to plant native vegetation and install riparian zones that will stabilize the banks and create better habitat for the Rogue and its salmon.

The National Center for Conservation Science and Policy will identify ways to jump-start riparian regeneration along the old impoundment’s edges before invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry or star thistle swoop in.

“What’s there now is aesthetically unpleasing and it’s unstable land,” said Brian Barr, who oversees aquatic habitat restoration programs for the center. “We don’t have trees and bushes and shrubs growing along the stream.”

By systematically adding bushes and trees, the banks can get firm, look better to residents and provide habitat for creatures ranging from birds and insects to the aquatic critters that rely on them.

“I think we’re in this boat together,” Barr said. “I think there are things we can do to help both our needs.”

The needs of upstream riparian zones was one of the few issues not addressed in environmental studies that led to the $39.3 million project to remove the fish-killing dam and install pumps to deliver Grants Pass Irrigation District water.

The federal Bureau of Reclamation was able to secure federal funding for the project, largely as a way to improve fish passage for the Rogue’s wild coho salmon, which are protected as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

After lengthy consideration, however, upstream riparian improvements to the unnatural lake became a secondary issue that didn’t get the immediate attention that dam-removal did, said Bob Hamilton, the bureau’s project manager.

“We can’t justify that as a fish-restoration activity,” Hamilton said.

So Barr’s center has spearheaded that effort, garnering a $23,300 grant from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and another donation from a private foundation to create the vegetation plan and reach out to interested landowners, Barr said.

The plan won’t help with extending docks or platforms, and it won’t pay for trees, Barr said. But it will provide a blueprint for creating a healthy riparian zone.

That might not be good enough for Tarantino.

She is considering a look more in tune to her well-tended yard.

The worthless concrete boat ramp might be turned into a stairway leading to a second, lower terrace closer to what now will be the more normal river elevation.

Tarantino isn’t interested in recreating Barr’s idea of prime riparian zone — trees and brush growing lush and high.

“I want it manicured,” she said. “I want it to where it looks like it’s a little loved.”

L.H. “Kirt” Kirtley has little love for the new-look Rogue outside his house of 47 years.

The strip of riverfront land that once housed his dock is more than 14 feet above the river now, and its look reopens old wounds over the fight by Kirtley and others to keep the dam and their summer lake.

“We had a three-mile lake there,” the 94-year-old Kirtley fumes. “Now, we got what amounts to a creek.”

Kirtley believes the lost lake harms the value of his property, and he wants it reappraised for taxes. He wants nothing to do with Barr’s riparian project.

Tarantino laments the loss of the slow water where her daughters swam and motored boats in the summer.

Her patio now overlooks a bouldered riffle that appears to be classic water to fish for the Rogue’s two runs of steelhead.

An ocean angler, Tarantino plans to learn how to fish rivers including the new run in her new backyard.

“It’s a lost thing, but a good memory,” she says of Savage Lake. “Now, we’ll find new memories.”
Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

amadeus wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:40 AM:

finally, that's what us environmentalists have been telling you for years...the environment IS more important than our trivial exhistances, sillyheads. Sounds like you finally agree. Good for you guys!!!!!

Shallow Al wrote on Oct 23, 2009 8:14 PM:

Another prime example of fixing something that wasn't broke.

Salmon are more inportant than humans!

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 23, 2009 6:29 PM:

Fish count. People don't. That's why the property owners who saw their dam reservoir waterfront property were not given any sort of reparations or environmental aid. Who cares about the people who were affected by the removal of the dam?


Certainly not the bureaucrats!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections