Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Common Sense wrote on Oct 30, 2009 3:51 PM:
1) Air polluter,
2) Increases USA dependence on foreign countries for future energy needs,
3) Located in Tsunami zone that violutes 2002 Oregon state law for safety,
4) 400 Oregon property owners will be forced to sell their land,
5) LNG is OVER 2X more expensive then gas used today by Oregon citizens,
6) NO local will qualify for any of the full time jobs at Jordon Cove.
MANY MANY more to the list too.
Dan...Don't say there isn't enough FACTS out there on this LNG SCAM to form an opinion, because you & I know there is & I've just listed just a few of them.....
dan milburn wrote on Oct 30, 2009 10:45 AM:
Just Me wrote on Oct 29, 2009 3:03 PM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 28, 2009 4:26 PM:
of any kind - that person must have Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) on hand to give out copies to anybody who asks for one, and those sheets should explain the dangers of those chemicals and the method to clean them up if they spill and how to respond to any emergency (fire, explosion, burns by contact etc). FEMA is the Federal Emergency Management folks who must respond to this case scenerio. Where is the information? How can you be for something without knowing all the true potential risks and whether or not an emergency plan is place if it blows up?
What if what I'm asking nobody cares about and instead they want profits from it no matter what? Which is it? Either I am wrong wait for the facts or I'm a fool to rush to judgement!
Common Sense wrote on Oct 28, 2009 1:02 PM:
Just given you some info that you obviously need to form an opinion on this land grabbing, air polluting, HIGH RISK SCAM this area & the entire USA doesn't need PERIOD! Just pointing out the "obvious" to everyone that you being so called "No opinion yet due not enough info on a decades old LNG issue" doesn't make SENSE....SORRY
Bottomline: LNG is as black & white an issue as any, either you are profiting from it somehow (PRO) or you are informed on the obvious FACTS out there on it & are against it (CON). No one can be neutral on this issue unless they are a hidden supporter of it...
dan milburn wrote on Oct 28, 2009 10:06 AM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 27, 2009 7:05 PM:
Where do you read here or anywhere that I am a follower of Braddock or am in favor of LNG? What kind of cheap wine have you been drinking? Even if it wasn't me you were slandering I'd still find your BS onjectionable. Makes me wonder where the rest of your "facts" come from.
For a Better Oregon wrote on Oct 27, 2009 4:55 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Oct 27, 2009 4:11 PM:
What part don't you understand:
1) Increases our dependence with hostile countries like Russia, Iran, etc for our future energy needs.
2) UNSAFE situation of LNG ships having known 2 mile hazard burn zone & traveling within a 1/2 mile of populated area here (affecting 17,000 people).
3) Placed in Tsunami zone that violates 2002 state safety requirements.
4) LNG is OVER 2X more expensive then natural gas used today by Oregon citizens.
5) How 400 Oregon property owners will be FORCED to sell their land.
6) Pollutes the air 24/7/365 days a year.
7) How LNG ship will have negative effect on fishing boats & NEW Airport flights.
8) How no local will qualify for any of the jobs at Jordan Cove.
Add it UP & this LNG SCAM is not worth the little tax money collected vs HUGE risks involved along with Oregon land taken away!
rianza wrote on Oct 27, 2009 1:37 PM:
The commission took testimony for nearly three hours...everyone who testified said they would like to see Costco in the Roseburg area, but a few didn't like the location."
Can you imagine a CostCo hearing in Coos Bay? Hundreds would show up in protest. I don't think we need to worry about the LNG project - or any other serious business projects - coming our way. Many in this town, and its leaders, have made it very clear - no new growth, no new business, no new jobs, no future.
Just Me wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:43 PM:
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 26, 2009 7:58 PM:
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 26, 2009 7:54 PM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 26, 2009 5:55 PM:
The time to decide whether you are for or against a project of this magnatude is AFTER you have enough information to base that decision on. That's why I'm asking questions. I will need lots more information before I have an opinion. There should be a FEMA report with a plan of action submitted before FERC should even consider it. If still not enough information is available then you need to let your local government officials know you aren't ready yet.
Steve Pickering wrote on Oct 26, 2009 3:10 PM:
Just Me wrote on Oct 26, 2009 12:37 PM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 26, 2009 10:14 AM:
Do you know the difference bewteen "start" and "stop"?
I'll bet you could ride an elevator all day huh!
Common Sense wrote on Oct 26, 2009 9:49 AM:
P.S. I LUV where old story teller Bob Braddock got caught with rubber stampin FERC (Tellin anyone/everyone how he had suppliers lined up & now crys the blues on now not havin them if his LNG SCAM isn't approved FAST) & now has to do damage control to "try" to get some creditability back!
dan milburn wrote on Oct 26, 2009 9:48 AM:
Brawny James Dio wrote on Oct 25, 2009 11:53 AM:
Just Me wrote on Oct 24, 2009 12:08 PM:
Holly wrote on Oct 23, 2009 4:05 PM:
Were you referring to the Gulf Oil facility in San Jaun Puerto Rico that blew up yesterday? You can read the story here http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33445763/ns/world_news-americas/
Steve Pickering wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:42 PM:
Kay wrote on Oct 23, 2009 2:06 PM:
Tijuana Dan.
As did all of California
Let Braddock put his outhouse in Canada where he lives.




The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines