Bailed-out firms must slash pay for top executives

By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Thursday, October 22, 2009 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON — The Treasury Department is expected today to order seven companies that have not paid back last year’s government bailouts to halve their top executives’ average compensation.

The cuts apply to the 25 highest-paid executives at banks and other companies that received the most assistance, with salaries being slashed by as much as 90 percent, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Kenneth Feinberg, the special master at Treasury appointed to handle compensation issues as part of the government’s $700 billion financial bailout package, is making the pay decisions. He is scheduled to release the details this afternoon.

The seven companies are Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

Elizabeth Warren, who heads the Targeted Asset Relief Program’s oversight committee, said today on CBS’s “The Early Show” that reports of pending slashes in executive salaries are “real.”

Smaller companies and those that have repaid the bailout money, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., are not affected.

Tom Wilkinson, a GM spokesman, said Wednesday that the auto company was “currently in discussions with Mr. Feinberg’s office regarding executive compensation. We will have further information once those discussions have concluded.”

GMAC has “been working on a proposal that aims at embodying the principles set forth for compensation along with balancing the need to retain critical talent necessary to execute our turnaround. Until we receive notification about that plan, we have no further comment,” said Gina Proia, a spokeswoman.

Chrysler Group issued a similar statement. Representatives for Chrysler Financial, Bank of America, Citigroup and AIG declined to comment.

But company officials and lobbyists earlier this month said Bank of America, Citigroup, GMAC Financial Services and others were reworking their pay plans to ensure compensation reflects executive performance. They’re giving executives more of their compensation in stock and stock options, and spreading pay over a longer period. They are also adopting plans to recapture some pay when bets go bad.

The changes are not limited to those on Feinberg’s list. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also are compensating senior employees with more stock and less cash.

In the AIG trading division, the arm of the company whose risky trades caused its downfall, no top executive will receive more than $200,000 in total compensation, the person familiar with Feinberg’s plan said. The giant insurance company has received taxpayer assistance valued at more than $180 billion.

In an August filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, AIG disclosed that new CEO Robert Benmosche would be paid $7 million a year, with the potential to make millions more in performance-based incentives. According to reports from the time, the package included $3 million initially with $4 million in stock to be held for five years as well as performance bonuses.

As CEO, Benmosche’s pay would be considered outside of the $200,000 average compensation for AIG’s trading unit. But, according to reports at the time, Feinberg saw splitting the salary and future stock bonuses as a model because it tied compensation to the company’s long-range performance.

The administration will warn AIG that it must significantly reduce the $198 million in bonuses promised to employees in its financial services division, the person familiar with Feinberg’s decisions said.

The pay restrictions for all seven companies will require any executive seeking more than $25,000 in special benefits — things such as country club memberships, private planes and company cars — to get permission for those perks from the government.

Until now, these companies were only required to provide guidelines for the use of such luxuries. The inspector general at Treasury who oversees the bailout program found a range of standards.

GM, for instance, generally prohibits employees from flying in private jets for business travel. Bank of America, on the other hand, encourages senior management to use corporate aircraft “for safety and efficiency purposes.”

Feinberg’s decisions come days after administration officials voiced sharp criticism of plans by some firms, particularly those on Wall Street, to pay huge bonuses even as the country continues to struggle with rising unemployment and the effects of the recession.

Goldman Sachs, which has paid back its bailout money, has said it earmarked $16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $500,000 per employee. Citigroup is paying $5.3 billion in bonuses to its employees and Bank of America $3.3 billion.

Elsewhere, Freddie Mac is giving its chief financial officer compensation worth as much as $5.5 million, including a $2 million signing bonus. The government-controlled mortgage finance company doesn’t have to follow the executive compensation rules because it is being paid outside the TARP.

Congress passed legislation in February requiring Treasury to oversee pay at companies that took bailout money. Treasury created the pay czar’s office in June as one means of implementing that law.

Treasury’s rules require the special master to review pay for the 25 top earners at companies that received “exceptional assistance,” examining overall pay structures and recapturing payouts that go against taxpayers’ interests.

Feinberg on Tuesday told a Washington audience that negotiating with the companies was a study in contradictions.

“Perfect metrics, competitive pay, no excessive risk, loyalty to the company,” he said. “What I have to do under the law — and everyone’s waiting” is to create compensation packages “reflecting those often conflicting principals.”

Feinberg has until Oct. 30 to design pay packages for top earners.

————

Associated Press Writers Ken Thomas, Jim Kuhnhenn and Marcy Gordon contributed to this report.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Scribbler wrote on Oct 22, 2009 4:36 PM:

This is nothing but socialism. It will only make us all poorer in the end.

CB Lifer wrote on Oct 22, 2009 3:43 PM:

I agree that the companies getting "bailed out" should have first been made to make drastic pay cuts in the Executive offices first! I believe that the stipulations should have been put into place BEFORE they got any bail out money!! However, after the fact demands made by the government, seem to look more like a dictatorship. Who's wages will the demand be changed next. We let them do anything they want now, and just say "oh well". I'm a bit confused and disgruntled to say the least with my government.

1313 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 1:39 PM:

They still make too much. I was watching them tell about one person who got a bonus of around 37 million dollar bonus that was cut to 18 million dollars. Big deal, who even needs 18 million, nobody ! ! ! When a man in an office makes money for a company he makes millions. When a man in a mill, or any blue collar worker makes money for a company, he makes around $15.00 to $25.00 an hour. Doesn't make sense to me.

viva la 2010 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 12:23 PM:

If Congress attempts to force companies to set certain salaries via shareholders, then Congress should be willing to stop being hypocritical as it relates to their own salary & expenses. Here are some facts:
1) The American people are like the shareholders, they elect people to represent us in the corporation called the United States of America.
2) Congress is like the Board of Directors of a very large corporation
Congress should not be able to vote for their own pay scales and expenses without the permission of the shareholders, the American people. Therefore all congressional salaries and additional benefits must be voted on by the American people during the general election before Congress can receive such benefits.
For Congress to insist on companies to do what they are not willing to do is hypocritical and dishonest.

oh the drama of it all wrote on Oct 22, 2009 11:47 AM:

Those Companies should have been mandated to cut pay before the bail out, perhaps they would not have needed it.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections