Did he lie? Stufflebean's bankruptcy explanation doesn't add up

By Meghan Walsh, Staff Writer
Sunday, October 18, 2009 | 120 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1

Related Links

Coos County Commissioner Kevin Stufflebean's public explanation of his recent bankruptcy filing contains factual discrepancies, The World has learned.

In July, Stufflebean and his wife filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection in federal court in Eugene. In a subsequent interview with Eugene's The Register-Guard newspaper,Stufflebean mentioned five factors contributing to his financial wreckage.

Information available from public records, however, raises questions about each of the five factors. Stufflebean has defended his statements in recent interviews and e-mails to The World, but he has provided neither full details nor any documents to support his contentions.

"I have no comment on issues of personal matters that are over five months in the past regarding my bankruptcy, and my family," Stufflebean wrote in an e-mail to The World last week. "I have already advised you to contact my attorney if you have questions. Matters of me are news once, and I am not going to contribute to your constant dredging up of past information that is no longer news."

Though a public official's personal bankruptcy is essentially a private matter, apparent misstatements in Stufflebean's public comments call into question the cause of his financial difficulty.

Here's what Stufflebean has said about each of the five factors, along with information available in public records:

n Pay cut - In The Register-Guard article, a version of which was reprinted in The World, Stufflebean said he took a $28,000 annual pay cut in 2007, when he left the Oregon Department of Human Services to become a county commissioner. According to the state, however, Stufflebean earned about $46,000 a year as a program analyst. County commissioners are paid just over $60,000 a year. That would mean he received a $14,000 annual salary increase.

"My salary and compensation package was much better then (sic) now," Stufflebean wrote in an e-mail to The World. "My salary and additional compensation was a drastic change. My wife and I totally lost money."

n Layoff - Stufflebean told The Register-Guard his wife lost her job a few years ago. In response to questions from The World, he said she lost her job with the Coos Bay School District a few years ago and also stopped giving private lessons at the Coos Bay City Swimming Pool, where she is the manager.

"She was a teacher's aide, lost her job, then got hired back on months and months and months later as a educational assistant and took a $6 pay cut," Stufflebean said in a subsequent interview with The World.

Donna Thomas, human resources specialist for the school district, reported that Kathryn Bourell-Stufflebean has been employed continuously since 1998. Initially hired as the district's swim program assistant, she was transferred in 2003 to become a part-time educational assistant. In addition, Bourell-Stufflebean has coached the swim team since 1986. According to payroll records, her gross income as a teacher aide, swim coach and pool manager has risen steadily over the past decade.

Stufflebean told The World his wife also held two other jobs, but he would not say where. In an e-mail, he directed all questions about his wife to her lawyer, whom he did not identify.

n Recall costs - Stufflebean told The Register-Guard in July that the May recall election was another financial strain. He recently told The World he incurred extensive fuel bills driving to functions related to the recall campaign.

His campaign finance report to the Oregon State Elections Division, however, listed no financial contributions from Stufflebean to his campaign. The campaign received a total of $5,935 in cash contributions from other people.

Stufflebean reported to the state that he spent $5,499, leaving $436 in the account after the election.

A spokeswoman for the elections office said Stufflebean legally could have spent that leftover money on gas and other campaign costs. Stufflebean dismissed that idea in his e-mail to The World: "$439 is nothing, that would not (have) even covered the gas putting up campaign signs," he wrote.

Stufflebean did not say how much he drove during the campaign. But $436 would have paid for considerable travel.

Gas prices averaged $2.25 per gallon in April. Assuming Stufflebean's sport utility vehicle averaged at least 15 miles per gallon, $436 would have carried him more than 2,900 miles. That works out to the equivalent of 35 round trips between Myrtle Point and Lakeside, requiring about 70 hours of driving.

n Job expenses - Stufflebean told The Register-Guard in July he personally had been paying expenses related to his county job.

"I took about a $3,000 per month loss in revenue," Stufflebean said.

If that's true, then Stufflebean essentially donated more than 60 percent of his salary back to the county. Since he began accepting county reimbursements in 2009, however, he has averaged slightly more than $400 a month in reported expenses. He refused to give The World a list of 2007 and 2008 travel expenses.

In bankruptcy court documents, the couple said they spent $650 a month on travel costs as commissioner and swim coach.

"I have drastically reduced my travels this year as I cannot afford it," Stufflebean responded in an e-mail. "Also gas was much more expensive in the previous years then (sic) now. I cannot say how much I am spending now as I have not been keeping track of it."

n Custody fight - Stufflebean told the Register-Guard he ran up expensive legal fees when the mother of his son filed for custody. Court papers in the case list $1,201 in fees from Stufflebean's lawyer, which the judge ordered the mother to pay.

Stufflebean wrote, "The fees that she was ordered to pay were for a specific court date and very little costs associated with after the trial. She has not paid that amount to me. I had to pay for all the attorney fees and costs associated with the preparation for the trial." He would not specify the amount of any additional fees.

Stufflebean won the recall election and continues to serve as a county commissioner. His wife remains employed at Coos Bay School District. In bankruptcy documents filed this summer, they reported annual income of $122,143. The case awaits settlement before a federal judge.

Records contradict explanations for bankruptcy


Coos County Commissioner Kevin Stufflebean listed five factors that led to his personal bankruptcy, but evidence doesn't support his statements.




What he said in July:


1. He took a $28,000 annual pay cut when he left his state job to become a county commissioner.


2. Until this year, he spent $3,000 of his own money each month on county business.


3. His wife lost her job a few years ago.


4. A custody battle led to extra legal fees.


5. The recall election cost a significant amount of money.




New information:


1. State records show his salary in January 2007 was $3,847 a month, or about $46,000 a year. His salary as a commissioner is around $60,000.


2. Since he started filing for reimbursement in 2009, he has averaged just over $400 a month in expense claims.


3. Public records show his wife was not laid-off from Coos Bay School District or the city pool.


4. The other party was ordered to pay legal fees in the custody case.


5. He didn't report any personal contributions, and there was a $435 cash contribution surplus to cover recall expenses.




His response:


1. "Between my wife and I, we have lost expendable income. My salary and compensation package was much better then now. My salary and additional compensation was a drastic change. My wife and I totally have lost money."


2. "I have drastically reduced my travels this year as I cannot afford it. Also gas was much more expensive in the previous years then now. I cannot say how much I am spending now as I have not been keeping track of it."


3. "My wife has or has had other jobs that are not a tax payer supported entity and are private employers. My wife is no longer running year around swim lessons which was a large chunk of her income."


4. "My attorney can verify there was more then what she was ordered to pay but she will not release how much total as that is a personal matter."


5. "Since I am an elected official I can and did things that were only because of the recall and would not of incurred those costs had it not been for them trying to recall me. Had I wanted we could have been reimbursed for expenses but the money was not there. $439.00 is nothing, that would not of even covered the gas putting up campaign signs."



Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

dan milburn wrote on Nov 14, 2009 4:45 PM:

Public Official means you are constantly under Public scrutney. That's the way of public life. If the public newspaper isn't interested or making inquireys then who is going to? The local pub? The editor "is" involved in local government. That is to the publics advantage. Who else is better suited? Who else has a better means to inform the public. Questions are always healthy for the public. Printing the answers for the "public" is healthy. Public discussion is healthy. What isn't healthy is blaming the newspaper for printing the answers that you might disagree with. The newspaper isn't making this stuff up. You have black and white answers to questions and you have many notable discepencys. You should be very concerned when you have a public official exposing himself as untruthful, inaccurate and obviously incompetent when exposed to inquiry. If you choose to blame the messenger of the facts rather than hold your public official accountable you are making a big mistake. You will be as guilty of misuse of the public's trust as the public official.

rambo wrote on Nov 11, 2009 4:50 PM:

History. lol or his stories. LOL

rambo wrote on Nov 11, 2009 12:08 PM:

Sorry, I don't get to listen to much local radio news.

What is happening with the lawsuit ?

I suspect just more SMOKE/BS.

Just look at his hitory.

fairplay wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:22 AM:

To Dan Milburn...There is a difference between Public Notices and Articles. Apples & Oranges. Listening to the radio news, the Stufflebean's have sent a letter to The World and Lee Corp. demanding a retraction within a specific time, or legal action will be taken. The answer to all these comments may reside in a courtroom.

Floyd wrote on Oct 28, 2009 10:28 AM:

Mr. Milburn:

How do you read facts out of a very slanted, slanderous story without all the facts. What you read is that some reporter wanted people to think she uncovered some big story, when in fact it demonstrated the inability of the world to print the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

In talking to people it is well noticed that no attorney comments were made, no contact with the MRS., no contact from the union. Most people are just laughing at the accusation that the MRS. did not get laid off as everyone knows she did. How many times do HR staff give out inaccurate information when they are not fully engaged with the process.

dan milburn wrote on Oct 26, 2009 10:04 AM:

DON'T ASK - DON'T TELL!
That's what most of these comments seem to say to the WORLD newspaper. Thank goodness YOU COMMENTERS aren't on the council, the commission, City Manager's or the Mayor's office. But most of all, I'm glad you aren't running the NEWSPAPER. These political folks come and go but a FREE PRESS with a competent staff is the voice of truth and reason for ever.

HappyDay wrote on Oct 25, 2009 10:41 AM:

Moonpenny: I finally figured out why I confused you. You thought I was using the HIPAA privacy act for privacy involving public records. That's not what I was implying, but I now see how you thought that. I do realize public records are public.

I was trying to say there are numerous possible explanations for why a family may need to file bankruptcy. My implication was that one of those reasons might be medical, but medical reasons would be protected and private under the HIPAA privacy act. Sorry, my words were not clear and that is why you were confused. Sorry!

Class of 72 wrote on Oct 24, 2009 2:30 PM:

To The World's Editor:

Until this moment, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Let us not assassinate this man further. You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?

Justice for All wrote on Oct 23, 2009 5:57 PM:

I have a feeling that all of you would be signing a very different tune if this article focused on President Obama or someone in his administration.

It really is incredible how many people are okay with Stufflebean's lying ways.

TIRED OF THE BULL wrote on Oct 23, 2009 4:57 PM:

THE PAPER DID REPORT WHEN THEY FILED THEIR CHAPTER 13. BANKRUPTCIES ARE PUBLIC RECORD SO GET OVER IT IF YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE HAVING THEIR LIVES INVADED. AND AS FAR AS STALKING..NO ONE IS FOLLOWING THEM AROUND OR PARKED IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE. AND FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT MAY NOT REMEMBER, THE WORLD PRINTED EVERYONES NAME IN THE PAPER THAT FILE D BANKRUPTCIES YEARS AGO. ALMOST ONCE A MONTH. SO THIS IS NOT NEW FOR THEM. LIKE I SAID PUBLIC RECORD. HE IS A PUBLIC OFFICIAL AND PEOPLE THAT DID AND DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM ARE GOING TO WATCH HIS EVERY MOVE TO SEE IF THEY MADE THE RIGHT CHOICE. WELL I VOTED FOR HIM AND NOW WISH I HADN'T. LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT ELECTION. THIS TIME I WILL BE A LOT MORE CAREFUL WHERE I CAST MY VOTE.

m00npenny wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:17 PM:

Happyday:
Why on earth are you using the HIPAA Privacy act to show the definition of privacy?
Follow me here ... d i c t i o n a r y.

Roger Ramjet wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:12 PM:

This kind of reportage is inexcusable. This paper has reached a new in its slide into the media oblivion. Why is this story even being covered? I probably need to stop reading these blogs since I let my subscription to the paper lapse some time back. Show your approval by letting your subscription lapse too!

tsunami wrote on Oct 23, 2009 11:06 AM:

i'd like to know what's so special about stufflebean that the world cant report on a public figure as was the case when the oregonian reported on the portland mayor filing for bankruptcy. are public figures in the bay area more special than they are elsewhere?

Maxine wrote on Oct 23, 2009 9:55 AM:

People: The Stufflebeans filed bankruptcy and now you want to destroy them. I am hearing from all of this, people who lost their jobs because of "The Commissioners" not just Kevin. And poeple who have alot of time on their hands watching the Stufflebeans. Would that be stalking? There is alot of positive things this family has done. The thousands of kids Kathe has touched and sent them into adulthood, still come back and visit her. Leave this family alone. Get over it!

rianza wrote on Oct 23, 2009 9:39 AM:

In don't care who the person is or what the circumstances: this is hachet-job of the worst kind. It's embarrassing to see what is publicly transpiring amongst our city leaders, this newspaper and our citizens.

TIRED OF THE BULL wrote on Oct 23, 2009 7:22 AM:

SO MANY LIES ARE BEING TOLD ALL THE WAY AROUND. fIRST IT'S THEY NEVER OWNED A MOTORHOME, NOW IT'S THEY MAY OF SOLD IT. IF THERE WAS NO MOTOROHOME,TRAILER,CAMPER WHATEVER, THEN WHAT DID THEY STAY IN WHEN THEY CAMPED IN GOLD BEACH? STOP ALL THE LIES. IF YOU DON'T WANT YOUR PRIVATE LIFE PUBLIC THEN DON'T BE IN A PUBLIC OFFICE OR IN THE PUBLIC EYE. IF YOU CAN'T TAKE THE HEAT THEN GET OUT OF OFFICE. IN MY OPINION THEY ARE LIARS. iT ALSO SAID SHE HAD 3 JOBS, LOST ONE AND GOT HIRED FOR A LESSER SALARY. THAT MEANS THEY LIED BECAUSE SHE WAS STILL EMPLOYED.

I know wrote on Oct 22, 2009 1:37 PM:

That the swim team pays for travel expenses for Kathe.

Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 10:39 PM:

To Marlee:

The motorhome is not there. Someone else may have purchased it, but the Stufflebeans do not own a motorhome. They are not hiding it. No one is hiding it for them. No one owns it and is letting them use it. Sorry, Marlee, no motor home!

HappyDay wrote on Oct 21, 2009 4:06 PM:

The editor said, "The World reviewed Kathe Stufflebean's public payroll records back 23 years with the Coos Bay School District. She has been employed each month for the past 11 years by the district without interruption."

I have told you that Kathe had 3 jobs with the school district. She was laid-off from one, then rehired for a lower paying job. Of course, the public record said that she had continuous employment because of the other 2 jobs. This is another example of the public records not telling the whole story and another example of Meghan not asking questions to find out the truth. She needed to be more thorough, much more thorough.

Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 3:35 PM:

Laughinghard: I really don't care what you think about me. I know who I am. And, I know that you could not find a single person who knows me that would ever believe that I would lie. But you keep calling me names, because that's what small-minded people do when they have no facts.

Just so you know, I was proud to be the "wife of a felon". He saved my life and those of our entire group. He's no longer a felon so watch what you say!

Plus, Laughinghard, my husband was convicted of a lessor charge as the judge ruled that he was acting in self-defense. The conviction was only for not putting the safety on his weapon as the attacking man charged him. It is ludicrous that the police chose to arrest the victim.

You choose to call him a felon, but our group believes he's "a hero." So, until you have been attacked by 4 crazed, trespassing young men on methamphetamine and alcohol 25 miles from police help, you have no right to criticize.

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 21, 2009 12:24 PM:

Dan Milburn, you hit the nail on the head! The Fourth Estate's job is to rake in the muck and let us know what's going on. There's plenty of muck to rake in Coos and Curry counties, that's for sure!

Joe Black wrote on Oct 21, 2009 12:23 PM:

For all you people who think Chapter 13 requires that all debts be repaid: It does not.

Debts for alimony, child support and debts for taxes, and fully secured debts must be paid in full. The unpaid balances of other debts that are not paid are canceled upon completion of the "plan".

In other words, you don't have to pay everyone as you promised - you get to walk away from your responsibility. You get to keep your house and your car and all the cool stuff you bought but, hey, who cares about the people you borrowed the money from anyway?

They were just suckers.

dan milburn wrote on Oct 21, 2009 10:24 AM:

Public Official means you are constantly under Public scrutney. That's the way of public life. If the public newspaper isn't interested or making inquireys then who is going to? The local pub? The editor "is" involved in local government. That is to the publics advantage. Who else is better suited? Who else has a better means to inform the public. Questions are always healthy for the public. Printing the answers for the "public" is healthy. Public discussion is healthy. What isn't healthy is blaming the newspaper for printing the answers that you might disagree with. The newspaper isn't making this stuff up. You have black and white answers to questions and you have many notable discepencys. You should be very concerned when you have a public official exposing himself as untruthful, inaccurate and obviously incompetent when exposed to inquiry. If you choose to blame the messenger of the facts rather than hold your public official accountable you are making a big mistake. You will be as guilty of misuse of the public's trust as the public official.

laughinghard wrote on Oct 21, 2009 9:36 AM:

Coming from the wife of a convicted felon that is one person I would believe to tell the truth! But I bet they appreciate your support Kathleen

Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 8:17 AM:

The paper has gone way too far in "DID HE LIE".

Anyone who has followed my blogs knows exactly where I come down on trust, honesty, integrity, and abuse of power in connection with any public official, especially those in law enforcement or the legal system. However, truthfulness in reporting is equally as important. I feel that Ms. Walsh did not do a through job. Public Records only tell part of the story. I don't believe Meghan Walsh ever even interviewed Kevin Stufflebean on this matter.

I have know Kathe Stufflebean for over 30 years and know information that others may not know or that might not show up on a public record. There are often very private reasons for a bankruptcy.

My heart goes out to Kevin and Kathe. I understand what it feels like to be persecuted and convicted by the press! Hang on and stay strong!
Kathleen Hosack

Casey wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:35 PM:

I agree with AMAZED when speaking about the Editor's Note. The editor said they did not publish the documents online to protect Kathe's privacy.
Amazed said "NOW you want to protect her privacy? I laughed outloud."

I actually laughed outloud too until I got mad thinking about how much this family has had to put up with. How much more can they take? It must be such a heavy load for them to carry. The paper really piled it on this time. How very, very sad! Hang in there Stufflebeans. Hold your head up high!They can't take the truth away. What goes around, comes around. Their turn is coming!

Casey wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:16 PM:

Walsh's article states under New Information:
"4. The other party was ordered to pay legal fees in the custody case."

Did Ms. Walsh and the absolutely indisputable public records find out if "the party" did indeed pay the legal fees in the custody case? Did Ms. Walsh ask the party if she paid the one day legal bill? Did Ms. Walsh even interview the party who was ordered to pay the legal fees? Did Ms. Walsh have any idea how much the "entire custody dispute" cost the Stufflebeans?

Did Ms. Walsh ever ask if "the party" ever pays the child support due to the Stufflebeans?

In my view, the bankruptcy was news, while the reasons for the bankruptcy unless unlawful are not! I find it reprehensible that this paper would try to destroy a family without asking more questions. Public records do not tell the whole story.

Kevin 2 The World 0

HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:31 PM:

Yes, Moonpenny, I know that I spelled HIPAA incorrectly. I did it because I'm "stupid."

marlee wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:43 PM:

Oh and Floyd...
the whole moving around assests....he is an expert on that one! If you really want to know the truth, thalk to his family! They could tell you so much!

marlee wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:39 PM:

RE: Floyd!

He may not have it listed in his name, but the motorhome there! He lived in it for a while after he sold both of his mother's and his houses! His neighborhood is a nice middle class neighborhood and his cars are very new for this economy. We have all had to make sacrifies, obviously Kevin hasn't. I am also glad that someone else caught on to Kevin's half truths about his education! So again Floyd what is your point?

orecoast007 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:22 PM:

SWEDE,It wouldn't do any good to say put new faces on the BOC, just look at the candidates we have to chose from in 2010.... LOL

m00npenny wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:20 PM:

It all comes down to equity. If you dont have enough equity in your home or your cars, the bankruptcy trustee wont pursue their sale. If you do have enough equity, then you should consider chapter 13 or more than likely it will be sold to pay your creditors. As far as household items, unless you have a few Faberge' eggs or a Ming vase, the trustee again wont pursue it as it will take too much time to sell off your sofa and favorite recliner. Its hard to also attach retirement funds. They are fairly safe from the trustee, unless you have over $1,095,000.00 Anything over that amount in your retirement fund can be attached for sale.

Leigh wrote on Oct 20, 2009 2:26 PM:

I don't have an opinion on Mr. Stufflebean one way or the other. However, I do have to agree that the real story here is "why". I would expect the paper to report when an elected official files for bankruptcy (although it seems not all are reported by this paper). But when several months later a reporter obtains a copy of the bankruptcy filing and tries to disprove statements, that makes me wonder why. And this paper is writing editorials about Fox new bias. Incredible!

amazed wrote on Oct 20, 2009 2:23 PM:

Editor's Note: "We chose not to publish those actual documents online to protect her privacy."

NOW you want to protect her privacy? I laughed outloud.

clairecat wrote on Oct 20, 2009 1:47 PM:

Tsunami: great point. You point out a double standard. The mayor of Pland is a homosexual and had sex with a minor (male) last year and lied about it. He'll get a pass though because of his sexual orientation. I wonder if Kevin was gay if we would even hear about this?

tsunami wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:50 PM:

i will point out that the newly elected mayor of portland, sam adams, filed for bankruptcy last winter and it was reported by the oregonion. this certainly isnt a one of a kind instance of reporting. thanks world

dannygs wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:42 PM:

Chapter 13 means he will pay his debts, usually over 5 years. Chapter 7 means all the debt gets wiped out, which means you don't keep all your nice stuff cuz the companies want something for the money. how is everyone so stupid? and the comment about HIPPA - DUH. wow, this county is ridiculous. did anyone go to school?

Editors Note wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:33 PM:

Editor's Note: The World reviewed Kathe Stufflebean's public payroll records back 23 years with the Coos Bay School District. She has been employed each month for the past 11 years by the district without interruption. Her pay has consistently increased over that time, according to the records. We chose not to publish those actual documents online to protect her privacy.

1313 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:28 PM:

If your just on Social Security alone, but own a home, and you just have to many bills to pay and big credit card bills you are having a hard time paying, do you lose your home and car? If you can no longer work at all due to bad health and are 70 years old, do you get kicked out of your home. This happened to a friend of mine, to pay off his bills. Doesn't seem fair. When other people have good jobs and declare bankrupycy and don't lose anything but the bills they owed. I thought credit card bills were unsecured loans. So how can they lose their home to pay the credit card company?

clairecat wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:10 PM:

To all: In a chapter 13 the creditors get paid back a percentage of what is owed by the debtor. I know from personal experience that going through a chpt 13 is living financial hell. I know people assume that Kevin didn't manage his finances properly, but sometimes things happen that are totally out of your control. I challenge all of you to take a hard look at your own finances and see how long you could live on half or none of your current income.

coosbayite wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:48 AM:

I shouldn't be surprised at how little so many people know about bankruptcy but, I am. Truth has little to do with it. If you go to the right attorney who specializes in bankruptcy, it is just a matter of saying yes or no while filling out the computerized forms. The only way the lies are discovered is if some creditor complains and get action. This doesn't happen very often. As to loosing a house or car, you get to reaffirm any outstanding debts like those. If it is done right, the only losers are those that lent the money, or credit, in the first place. Why do you think our housing crisis is such a problem for our economy? It is caused by cases just like this one. As to his filing being private, he shouldn't have run for a public office. You can not separate private mismanagement form public mismanagement if it is the same person. It is sad that so many people in this area want to blame The World for reporting on a local political problem that needs to be covered for the good of all the community.

CB Lifer wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:40 AM:

DUHHHH!!

HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:36 AM:

Moonpenny, I may be "stupid" but I can read! I read the section under HIPPA where privacy is explained.

"The HIPPA Privacy Rule regulates the use and disclosure of certain information...It establishes regulations for the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI). PHI is any information held by a covered entity which concerns health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that can be linked to an individual. This is interpreted rather broadly and includes any part of an individual's medical record or payment history." That's why one must sign HIPPA release papers. My point was that there are always multiple reasons for a bankruptcy!

Of course, public records are "public"! However, a public record that says Kathe had continuous employment at the school district is misleading. Kathe had 3 school district jobs. She was laid-off of one and was later rehired at a lower paying part-time job. That's the whole truth. Meghan implies that Kevin is lying about Kathe's job. Meghan’s insinuation leads to a wrong conclusion!

Finally, when people attack with personal comments, its because they have no factual knowledge.

1313 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 10:31 AM:

If you declare bankruptcy don't you lose your home your cars and anything else of value. That is what I was told. If he has the nice house, nice cars and a motor home, and also a house full of nice furniture, etc. won't he lose all this to pay off any debts. Or is he like all the other rich people that go bankrupt and keep everything and just get out of paying their bills?? I am really curious about this. I guess it depends on who your lawyer and Judge happens to be, and he does have a lawyer in the family.

floyd wrote on Oct 20, 2009 10:13 AM:

Marlee:

You must like to distort the truth as well as Meghan Walsh, as if you look in the bankruptcy filing, and I had to go look at it all because the World only printed the section they wanted us to see. They live on Juniper in Coos Bay, a very moderate middle class neighborhood, they have a 2003 car and a 2005 car, and no motorhome listed. Since they are 4 and 6 years old, we know that they didn't go a blow money at the last minute for new vehicles and have had them for sometime.

When did the rules change that we get to decide what someone can and cannot have in their home. I believe those people called bankruptcy appraisers determine if anything in their home was of antique value and was to be liquidated or not. you are only allowed to have so much in assets and those have to be reported.

Let me guess the Stufflebean's must of been out in the middle of the night moving assets in the dark.

m00npenny wrote on Oct 20, 2009 9:25 AM:

HappyDay:
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA is about health insurance. You must be in pain, because it has to hurt to be that stupid.
Subjects do not need to be consulted, asked or even give permission for this information to be shared with anyone who wants it. When you work for the public, school district, courthouse, police and commissioner, everything you do is documented and available for public viewing. Even your wages and hours worked.
Meghan doesn’t need a “secret source” in the court house. Everything she has provided is public record. Bankruptcy filing documents are public record. She just knows what questions to ask and what forms to file. You don’t have to like it, but that’s the way it is... its called “transparency”. Suck it up and deal with it. Oh, and she doesn’t have to keep it a secret either. IT’S ALL PUBLIC RECORD. So take off your tin foil hat and go back to your cave.

HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 9:05 AM:

To Fed Up---Insinuation and innuendo are one and the same and that is exactly what Meghan did in this article. "DID HE LIE?" is an example of an insinuation. Meghan couldn't say "HE LIED!" because that would be libelous. She could only imply that he lied. She "manufactured her whole article" with half-truths and half of the truth is not the whole story. Her goal was to lead people to the conclusion that "HE LIED" without actually printing the libelous statement. She is manipulating the reader!

Ask Megan Walsh if she ever interviewed Stufflebean months ago at the time of the bankruptcy? Did she ever speak to the real reporter who did? Inexcusable! However, you don't care because you don't like Stufflebean.

As to your "innuendo" or "insinuation" about a fraudulent bankruptcy filing, I'm sure the federal judge who has already settled this case would be intrigued that you know more than he does about the Stufflebean's finances.

As to your Watergate comment, I have found that people without any real knowledge usually resort to name calling or insults.

Mark Smith wrote on Oct 20, 2009 8:28 AM:

A lot of people think you can't lie on a bankruptcy, but that isn't true. A lot of what happens is between the trustee and the judge. If a judge trusts the trustee it is so much easier, and if the lawyer and the trustee work well together it's smooth sailing. I know that I had a bankruptcy at the same time as a friend. He owed less than we did, had more reasons to file and he got payments almost double ours and ours was 3 years, his was 5. Our lawyer and the trustee were really good friends.

FellowHuman wrote on Oct 20, 2009 8:17 AM:

First of all how do you file a fake bankruptcy??? You have to have proof of all income hmmm...I know from expierence that filing is not a fun process. That once you do file, everyone that knows is judging you on how you spend your money,( gosh they should not be eating out, they shouldnt be in that store shopping.) It is none of anyones business why they filed. This procedure is there for people who need it, not want it, but need it! I dont know how many of us would want someone looking over our shoulders for the next five years! People have some compassion! This could be you next year because you have had a medical emergancy, lost your job, death in the family.... anything could happen to place anyone of us there.

laughinghard wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:31 AM:

Has anyone noticed it is Kathe that makes more money according to the filing? Casey this is not the first time Kevin has stretched the truth. I seem to remember that a while back he misrepresented his educational background and then claimed it was a misunderstanding.

Fed Up wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:01 AM:

In response to Happyday,

I checked Webster's, and I don't see where "innuendo" means anything resembling "when one's own statements contradict themselves."

Also, I wasn't aware that fraudulently filing bankruptcy was a legal right, rather than the criminal act that I always thought it was.

I could go on, but I'm sure you thought Watergate was a "witch hunt" as well...

Casey wrote on Oct 19, 2009 11:05 PM:

As a teacher, I remember distinctly that Kathe was laid-off from one school district job several years ago. I believe the job she had was as a swimming program assistant, TA3 or Teaching Aide 3. She then had some job interviews with the district before she was rehired as a part-time EA1 or Educational Aide 1. Under the contract, I believe Kathe would have had to be laid-off of a TA3 position in order to reapply at a lower level EA1 position. Those are the rules. Certainly, Kathe would have been continuously employed by the school district because of her other school jobs, however, she was laid-off and then rehired. Obviously a part-time EA1 does not make as much as a TA3. Kevin was factual on this point!
Kevin 1 The World 0

It certainly seems petty for the newspaper to make such a big deal of someone's misfortune. I am quite certain that there were numerous reasons for the bankruptcy. I also don't understand why this is such big news.

marlee wrote on Oct 19, 2009 6:52 PM:

WOW....he lives in a very nice house in a very nice neighborhood, swimming pool,etc., has a house full of antiques and collectables, mostly belonging to his deceased mother....A huge motorhome, nice vehicles, and you people wonder why he is filing bankruptcy....duh! And he is responsible for allocating how much money?

Eastsider wrote on Oct 19, 2009 5:11 PM:

It galls me a great deal to admit that I agree with Pig Nuts. The World has committed nothing less than a cruel character assassination. I am sure that an investigation into Ms. Walsh's personal finances would be every bit as relevant.

TruthTeller wrote on Oct 19, 2009 2:30 PM:

It wouldn't matter who's in office, we've all got skeletons in our closets. It's how we change ourselves that matters. He's just as good as anyone else sitting on that bench.

HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 1:59 PM:

Just an Observer said, “The comments here show plenty of people who don’t care if their leaders are not all the way up to snuff. Is it any wonder we keep getting the kinds of people in public office we do?”

Wrong! The COMMENTS HERE are saying Meghan’s witch hunt is the real issue and story here, not Commissioner Stufflebean. Why and for whose benefit she wrote the article is the news?! She is "creating the news" out of innuendos. You simply approve because you don’t like the Commissioner. In fact, this egregious article by Meghan is exactly why no one wants to run for public office!

Meghan and “The World” are also trying to criminalize a legal right given to all Americans. To file bankruptcy is an emotionally and financially difficult decision to make especially for one in public office. The Stufflebeans filed for Chapter 13, they will pay their creditors.

TruthTeller wrote on Oct 19, 2009 1:54 PM:

So don't print my comment. We don't want to discuss something that really matters.

Justice for All wrote on Oct 19, 2009 12:25 PM:

Stufflebean lied and no one cared.

Business as usual in Coos County.

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:36 AM:

Keep electing leaders of less-than-outstanding quality and keep getting results of less-than-outstanding quality. The comments here show plenty of people who don't care if their leaders are not all the way up to snuff. Is it any wonder we keep getting the kinds of people in public office we do?


Kudos to The World for digging into the details. Please keep it up!

HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:26 AM:

Floyd: Your points are great! Thank you for standing up for truth in reporting! Factual reporting is something missing in today's political climate!

Meghan, did Sheriff Jackson ever really file bankruptcy? If so, what kind? Maybe you should look into that. After all, Jackson is running for County Commissioner. Floyd, thanks for that information too. At least the paper could check to see if it is true! I know that I would like to know!

dannygs wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:55 AM:

if 'The World' wants to retain any credibility in our community, they will pull this article and its place run an apology. this is an insult to our intelligence.

yes, Commmissioner Stufflebean is a public figure, but I agree with him and many others - once is a story, twice (with no additional information) is just plain pathetic!

and if the Sheriff has indeed filed bankruptcy, why not cover that as well. yes, they are responsible for big budgets, but many families are struggling and unfortunately losing their homes and filing bankruptcy. there's no proof he's mismanaged the county's money, therefore no story.

HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:41 AM:

Mark Smith: Overtime pay is just that, it is over and above your base pay. Maybe its different for you.

Meghan, did you or your paper ever interview Kevin at the time of the bankruptcy? Did you actually speak to the Guard reporter who did? Could there be even more personally private reasons for a bankruptcy? Does HIPPA mean anything to you? Did you ever bother to interview Kathe? You attack her through Kevin, but have never spoken to her!

Did you realize that when people go before a bankruptcy judge that they must provide PROOF to the court of all financial records, income, and expenses? Did you realize that you must testify under oath as to the accuracy of your records? Did you contact the Stufflebean’s bankruptcy attorney? Perhaps if you had you would know that the case is indeed settled.

Meghan, who is your secret source at the courthouse? I repeat, the "why" of this article is the REAL story! I hope the Stufflebeans' sue you!!

floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:39 AM:

Very poor reporting by Meghan Walsh, and I think “WOW” is right, they have it in for Stufflebean so he probably should watch out. I agree with “JENINE”, Kevin and Kathe keep the faith, as most people can see through this tabloid report.

floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:16 AM:

I know bankruptcy, and I know you have to prove everything and without proof it does not get counted. Not only do you have to prove it, you are sworn under oath with all your documentation. Obviously, the Stufflebean’s were able to proof everything or they would not have been allowed the claims. I see that Meghan made reference to $650.00 in the bankruptcy paperwork, and it looks like they have been allotted a $650.00 travel allowance off their current budget. Does not show anything from before bankruptcy, and the article does not clarify that, but you would have to be intelligent to figure that out.

What I see is a poor reporter (Meghan Walsh) who was on a witch hunt and printed very misleading information. The headline is Journalism 101, ask questions, then you are not making a statement and you can automatically direct peoples mind to believe that maybe he lied, maybe he didn't.

floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:15 AM:

I think someone is going to be laughing all the way to the bank on this one. Meghan Walsh has done a good job trying to impress upon us that Stufflebean lied. But there is no proof in this article, just alot of half information and half facts. I did notice that there are no comments from Stufflebeans wife, and no comments from the stufflebean's attorney or attorney(s). Is there a reason for that, oh yeah, if you know all the facts then you can’t mislead people half the facts are better then the whole truth. I agree with the majority of the blogs, Meghan Walsh and the World went overboard on this one and will end up costing them in the long run. I agree with Stufflebean, (first time for anything), that the first time it is news the second time it is not, Meghan Walsh did nothing to tie this article into anything related to the county other then he is an elected official who filed bankruptcy.

I guess the next article will be on the Sheriff’s Bankruptcy.

WOW wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:04 AM:

I just love how the World is keeping up with the comments on this one. They are eating it up for sure. Usually it takes them a bit on weekends....lol Watch out, Stufflebean! the World has got you in its sights!

Mark Smith wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:28 AM:

Happyday, overtime is part of a salaried position and it doesn't raise your salary.

Mark Smith wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:27 AM:

Just let him do his job, let this go, it's personal. Okay no problem, let me throw out some one liners.

He handles tax money, he's lied of federal forms, he's lied directly, his integrity is questionable.

Get a clue people. This man co-manages large amounts of funds. He lied to get a bankruptcy and the proof is here. Is that the person you want to be running the show.

Stufflebean should have kept his mouth shut and stopped the email campaign and no one may have known, but he didn't and now it's biting him in the ass.

loventhecoast wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:13 AM:

Now i have looked in the court records and i see many others filing bankruptcy in this area... why are they not splattered on the front page of the newspaper?
People - let this man do his job and take care of his family.
We are supposed to be a community - now we just look silly to others who look at our newspaper - and WOW - the front page!

swede wrote on Oct 19, 2009 7:56 AM:

PLEASE GiVE ME A CHANCE TOLIVE ON $60,000+

swede wrote on Oct 19, 2009 7:53 AM:

Everybody seems shocked over the curruption at the BOC. Well don't be! It's been going on for years. They never thing the peons can do anything about it . Whitty , Main and Stufflebean are there to SERVE THEMSELVES.

richard cranium wrote on Oct 19, 2009 3:11 AM:

Good lord. The choice to put this above the bar is as seriously suspect as the composition.

While a County employee's bankruptcy would seem to be news, it doesn't appear that this article makes the effort. We are instead treated to a numeric cant of his mis-statements or falsehoods.

If you are going to print this many inches on this kind of material that would seem to be on issues of character and not substantive, please make the effort to link this to harms to the public or some sort of news-worthy item.

HappyDay wrote on Oct 18, 2009 9:15 PM:

Continued:

Meghan, were you aware that Kevin worked many, many overtime hours for the state which raised his salary considerably? Did you bother checking on that or adding that overtime into his income? Did you ask or is the truth not worth printing? Once again, a half-truth!

I am asking Meghan and "The World" why they chose this family to pick on. Yes, Kevin is a public figure, but Kathe and their son are not. And yes, the public has a right to know about elected officials, but knowing that he filed bankruptcy is all they need to know.

You are on a "witchhunt" accusing Kevin of lying. I know for a fact that he's not!

Now, I am accusing you of writing this story for a "purpose." And, WHY you wrote it is the real story. I guess, true journalism in our country is dead!

james wrote on Oct 18, 2009 8:18 PM:

People never seem to blow my mind!!!! Everybody defending this man? This is a private matter? This man deals with our tax money? Why wouldn't we hold Kevin to a higher standard as a commissioner? No different than a police officer or ETC.... He is supposed to be representng us. This information is all public information? Now things again aren't adding up with his storys and he's caught in his own lies and your making excuses for him! Disgusting! It's no wonder our country is going to crap!!!!

HappyDay wrote on Oct 18, 2009 8:13 PM:

Meghan, why? The why is the real story here! Why and for whom did Meghan write this story? This is nothing but a hateful, mean-spirited "witch hunt" with no real purpose!

Here are 3 things I know for sure.

Having known Kathe for many years, there are facts that I can tell you without even discussing this article with her. I know for a fact that Kathe definitely was laid-off from the school district. I remember it!

At one point, Kathe worked 3 jobs for the school district combining them to make a full-time job. She lost one job teaching school swimming lessons. She was hired back later as a lower paid in-classroom aide. So yes, she had continuous employment with the school district, but she did lose the biggest job as well as considerable income. Meghan, half-truths do not a story make!!

Meghan, did you ask if the son's mother actually paid the one day court costs? Did you ask who paid all the rest of the considerable attorney fees? Once again, a half-truth!

Continued

dannygs wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:53 PM:

wow, talk about a grand effort to run Kevin out of town.......

den wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:49 PM:

I like it when The World does investigative reporting, with facts to back it up. Kudos to Meghan Walsh.

Kevin is in a public position where he manages millions of County Dollars, including tax dollars.

Sure is strange that it is seen as OK, to not be able to manage your own finances but, that qualifies you to manage Millions of the public money.

There is no wonder, our Country is in big trouble, and big debt, when the voters see this story as a personal attack on a public servant about facts not matching up, and these facts are of a financial nature.

If you are not lying, or misrepresenting what the problem with some facts.

Remember to take any public official words with a grain of salt and the very definition of a politician is: “How do you know when a politician is lying?  His lips are moving." -- Favorite Old Joke

"Politicians are, by nature, liars." -- Dale Amon

orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:25 PM:

How about writing a story on Mr.Walworth's (The Editor) personal finances... (LOL).............

orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:23 PM:

Steve, Just a reminder your exact words to Meghan Walsh on 09/08/09....."I'm as up on what is happening in this county as any councilor or commisioner is". Some city councilors can barely keep track as to what is happening in their city, let alone the county..

orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:05 PM:

I wonder what Steve Pickering is thinking since he is just as up to date just as any city councilor/commisioner on what is happening in our county.

fawkina wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:02 PM:

This "article" has just confirmed my beliefs that The World is nothing more than a trashy tabloid. I understand there isn't much going on in Coos Bay, but how is this even news?

We are going through a horrible recession and millions are going bankrupt. I would never consider running for office in that rumor mill of a town.

How embarrassing for a family to have a witchhunt newspaper posting your financial problems on the front page. Meghan Walsh needs to find something more important to do with her life.

nb girl wrote on Oct 18, 2009 3:20 PM:

why was this a front page story? it read like a high school senior's term paper but without a good thesis to support the argument. jeers to picking this family apart.

jeanine walker wrote on Oct 18, 2009 1:05 PM:

I do not agree with the paper's take on the Stufflebean situation. Kevin and Kathe, keep the faith. This was not fair.

However, I am not in agreement that the World is getting worse and worse. I can speak firsthand that the World has been trying to use their pages to help. I am thinking of my own situation with the Band instruments, the Boy Scout Cabin and other big stories lately that have really made a difference helping others.

I hope the World chooses to keep focusing on important local stories that will affect our economy and our way of life. I also hope they keep reporting the humanitarian needs. This article, in my opinion, was not neccessary.

endpages wrote on Oct 18, 2009 11:21 AM:

You, WORLD NEWSPAPER, are becoming slowly more and more disreputable and more and more unsupportive of our community over time. I remember back to Editor Walworth's piece about what a lovely place he thinks Coos County is...how we need to appreciate the good things in life around here. Who are you, Mr. Walworth? You speak out of both sides of your mouth. You expect us to smile, enjoy life, think positive about our community and our environment, but you continually use your newspaper to report UN-NEWSWORTHY items intended to either incite big arguments, spread rumors and cast doubt upon our community's members, or just plain sell a crappy 50 cent rag of a newspaper - similar to the National Enquirer. When you prove Mr. Stufflebean has mishandled taxpayer's funds and screwed up the county somehow, THEN you can write an article. I would think you should already know that. Stop trying to be the Don Imus of Coos Bay. Hey - ever heard that you can attract more flies with honey? Probably might sleep better at night, too.

South Coast wrote on Oct 18, 2009 11:17 AM:

I have known many people in my life who are very high funtioning at work, but their personal lives are a mess.

Leave their personal lives alone.

FellowHuman wrote on Oct 18, 2009 9:42 AM:

How many of us over the last five years has not had some kind of bump in the road. It doesnt matter your income we all have bumps. I believe that The World Newspaper is and will always be one sided,(lets just hope you are on the good side of the paper). Facts we must remember when reading the newspaper.
1. They very rarely report both sides.
2. Are very good at twisting partial facts.
3. The World newspaper is getting more and more like the National Enquirer...which is sad.
Now how many of us would run for public office knowing that if you had a rough patch in your life, it will be plastered all over the paper. We must also remember that Kevin can not make moves by himself on county business, it has to be at least two of them that decide.
Kevin and Kathe, my heart goes out to you, how many other hundreds of people who file every day, we never hear about??? You guys hold your heads up you are paying back your debt (which is more than alot of others do)....

justrite wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:31 AM:

This is a new low for The World. Maybe he can't keep his house in order on 120,000 a year (i wish) but what about the other 2 clowns down there. The World paper never did cover Whitty or Mains troubles. Or the corrupt DA office. Semms the paper picks on just someone they don't agree with. What about the Coos County judge that got the DUII in Salem. Not a word.

Joe Black wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:43 PM:

Can we trust anything this man says or does? When he said he took a pay-cut going from a state welfare worker to county commissioner I thought that had to be wrong – and now it appears it was.

He lies.

And to all you people who say this is a personal matter: Do you REALLY want liars and cheaters in control of your community and your tax dollars? If he lies to the media and to the courts you better believe he's lying to everyone.

Maybe I'm one of the few people left who thinks honor, integrity and honesty are important. Seems too many of you now settle for much less. Too bad for you and too bad for our country.

teacher wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:05 PM:

Those of us who know Kathe know that, yes, while she might have been employed continuously, working VERY part-time is different than working full-time.

And if one starts from a very small salary and it goes up some every year, that doesn't mean that one is making a lot of money. I saw a suspicious lack of facts at that point in the article.

The point? If the paper is shading the facts to make the Stufflebeans look bad in one instance, how can we trust the paper got it right the rest of the article? Not a trustworthy moment for The World.

Also, there were expenses and details that Kevin did not, and was not required to, share. If the reporter chose to present the lack of facts as proof, that is tabloid in nature.

Sorry Kathe and Kevin, so it begins again. People that actually think, and vote, know the truth.

rambo wrote on Oct 17, 2009 6:49 PM:

Boy, I can't believe there is so many folks out there that didn't realise that

WHEN YOU RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE

YOUR LIFE IS A OPEN BOOK.

I just got my property taxes the other day, just like everybody else.

And it p***** me off knowing Im paying these clowns $60 thousand, plus bennys a year.

And Keven can't make it on 120 thousand.

Id say he has made some bad choices.

WHERE IS THE MISTRESS ? LOL

coos bay person wrote on Oct 17, 2009 6:39 PM:

If you run for public office you better think twice if you don't want your life to be an open book. I would like to know if the truth is being told about the county expenses, since there isn't much left of the sheriffs dept and the road crew.

WOW! wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:15 PM:

Why is this such an important subject in Coos Bay? There is so much negativity in the paper, it is almost intolerable to read. The firing of the city-manager, the outlandish acts of the football team and now more on Stufflebean. I implore you to come up with positive things to report on and leave this family alone.

Pig Nuts wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:05 PM:

Amazing...

We have a lynch mob lead by the World over petty details that are really between Stufflebean & his creditors.

Did he just urinate away $126,000 of tax payer money for purposes of fulfilling a personal vendetta? Turn your head & cough Coos Bay City Council. Where is the outrage about that?

After BK reform in 2005, chapter 13 is a 3-5 year financial prison sentence. Stufflebean is above the average mean income. The reality is, he will pay all of his debts in a payment plan over the course of 5 years in full or face liquidation. He will have money to pay mortgage, power, water, vehicle expenses, insurance & food. End of story, every cent above & beyond will go to the creditors, period.

Civil service places a bulls-eye on your forehead. The guy is not quick on his feet when put on the spot with a litany of questions. He does not form coherent written responses to questions.

Pig Nuts wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:04 PM:

In this instance did he cause harm to the taxpayers? Did he create ill gotten gains for himself or one of his constituents? Did he have anything to gain by the irregularities in his statements? Nope.

Folks, there are much bigger stories than this right now directly under your nose.

What was the motive for this story at this point in time? I don't get it, The World had the chance to eviscerate him when he destroyed the lives of 21 families with a last minute firing at the first of the year. Why now?

You can look in the floor of your chicken coop for what I think of this piece.

tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:29 PM:

i suspect Gwendolyn Sherbondy stands a good chance of being one of the next coos county commissioners

tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:17 PM:

if stufflebean can fabricate explanations about his lack of controlling his personal finances i'm sure he's near world class with county finances. no wonder the county and bay area are doing so poorly. ya'll got what you deserve. makes me wonder why oregon requires publication of polititians finances. doomed to die

Dragonman wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:00 PM:

Does The World seem more like Fox or MSNBC here? Ah political finger pointing. The game we wish were not part of the equation. It is though from top to bottom. There should be a law! LOL

carefree highway wrote on Oct 17, 2009 3:55 PM:

I TRULY dont know anything about Kevin.
I see there are cats in here sharpening their claws, just to be mean. A leopard CAN NOT change its spots, so whatever has been, will be again. Kevin could be a great Commissioner and a lousy personal life accountant. Its for him and his wife to sort out, not public opinion. I love the 1st amendment, but this has gone too far.

fairplay wrote on Oct 17, 2009 2:01 PM:

I'm not a fan of Stufflebean, but The World does seem to have a cheap vendeta against him. The article was also, in my opinion, poorly written.

IWanttoknow wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:51 PM:

Iwanttoknow, why yesterdays' news is today's headlines. Hmmmm, let remember,oh yes; Yesterday's new stated Kevin was a murderer! Remember? The 'Court of Public Opinion' had Kevin tried and convicted, only the logical voters saved him. If folks will do this to a local wonder what they are capable of with an import like myself. Other memory game: Chapter 13 of the current bankruptcy laws is designed to give a debtor time to pay his/her creditors overtime. Not to renege on lawful debts. It protects the debtor from harassing phone calls. But, one may not know that when a person is granted 13 status he/she picks up a new boss called a, Trustee. This person becomes your personal banker and you must follow all of his/her rules, plus pay them for that service. Really, don't sound like a 'bed of roses' to me! Besides, roses have thorns! Be nice folks and I'm sure Kevin and his wife will take care of their personal business and be transparent with their professional life's. Just my opinion. Bye (PS) If I'm wrong prove it!!

Brenda wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:34 PM:

Really?? This is a front page story? The World Newspaper thinks it knows more about someone's private finances than the person in question knows?

This is incredibly mean-spirited and unhelpful.

If I were the Stufflebeans, I wouldn't answer any of the reporter's questions either!

hiluix wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:14 PM:

Don't worry if I am on the jury in December (for which I am scheduled to be on jury duty in December) I ain't putting anyone in jail for any non violent crimes , hum should I state that on the questionnaire ?

krissy wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:00 PM:

This is a private personal matter and should be treated as such. Leave the man alone this is humiliating enough as it is. How would any of you feel if you were in the same position? I am not a Kevin Stufflebean fan but I do believe that everyone should be allowed some privacy with matters like this one!

cisea wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:02 PM:

And what's your point Meghan? If things are getting so boring in Coos County that it is necessary to destroy peoples reputations in the local paper then I'm sure glad I moved! By the way thanks for your ex-city manager. He was greeted with open arms here in the Tri-Cities.

Shallow Al wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:36 AM:

Tsunami:

This IS gossip.

As a County Commissioner, no one person can make a decision regarding expenses. The Commission is a three person body, and the decisions have to be agreed upon by at least two of the members.

It's called a majority.

What a person does with his own expenses is not an issue that can be considered news.

Want your personal expenses splashed across the newspaper?

I don't.

I wonder what the Editor of this newspaper's personal finances look like?

That too, is nobody's business but his own.

clairecat wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:29 AM:

Why in the hell would anyone want to run for city council in the same city as "The World?" This is clearly a smear campaign and if the citizens of CB can't see that then we're all stupid. Leave this guy alone. Bankruptcy is hard enough to go through as an individual. To broadcast his personal info like this is bad journalism, if you can call it that. Everyone makes mistakes.

m00npenny wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:25 AM:

It's okay Anne, put your rose colored glasses back on and go about your merry way.
This is a classic example of "transparent government". All those who take on the role of a governement leader need to know "someone is watching". If you dont have a clean slate or your just a liar, somewhere at sometime, its going to catch up with you and bite you in the a**. Dont give me the crap that we have no right to know what goes on in his personal life. Quite the opposite. How he conducts his personal life has a direct impact on how he handles the peoples trust. And their money. This is turning out to be a really bad episode of Springer. All we need is the mistress to come out now.

laughinghard wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:25 AM:

Well it looks like the paper has got it's information backed up ny paperwork to prove it. So how do all the Kevis backers want to explain an elected official lying on a federal document. Also what kind of individual cant survive on 120,000 income that they listed?

Forgot wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:29 AM:

Well, I have no opinion regarding this guy, but smells fishy. i'll say this:

If you have an honest to goodness journalist (does the World? we'll see) going after a politician whose stories aren't matching up...then I'd say he is sunk.

changeisgood wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:12 AM:

The World has gone too far this time. I for one will never run for any office again. Another GREAT JOB by our newspaper. Keep up the local bickering!

tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:12 AM:

some of you just dont get it. this is not gossip, this is how a county commisioner runs his life. he fabricates explanations for his inability to spend his own money wisely. what the heck do you think he's doing with the counties budget if he cant handle and be truthful about his own.

Jess B. wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:16 AM:

Maybe this should be in a gossip column? I don't see how this is news. I really don't care one way or another about some guy's bankruptcy filing, unless it is directly related to local city politics. I don't see any direct link given here, only gossip about his personal life.

coosbayite wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:16 AM:

It doesn't appear to be a question of lying. It does however, be a question of signing a federal document that states he is telling the truth. That should be a case for the District Attorney to proceed with.

Kay wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:12 AM:

"I AM NOT A CROOK"

"I will not discuss ANYTHING occuring more than 7 months ago, no I mean 4 months, no I REALLY mean 5 months ago".

"Yeah, that's the ticket".(The Pathological Liar - SNL)

Oh, and thanks to The World Editorial Board who supported and backed this clown in the recall effort.

Shallow Al wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:07 AM:

I'll bet he's gotten up in the morning on a day off and not shaved. Or maybe once in a while his socks don't match.

Sound like news? Not to me.

This article should be read VERY carefully by anyone even toying with the idea of running for public office in Coos County.

Be careful what you get yourself into.

If the local newspaper takes a dislike to you evrything you ever do will be subject to biased and unfair rumor generating stories.

Right on page one.

Are tar and feathers deductible?

anneofOregon wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:56 AM:

Wow...can you say 'Witch Hunt' anyone? This is offensive.

WOW wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:52 AM:

And why wasn't he recalled when we had the chance?

whatintheworld wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:46 AM:

We were shocked when Kevin blamed his woes on his wife. If this report is fact, and we believe that the part about Kathryn is, this is the best investigative report the World has published in the past 10 years.

poloele wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:27 AM:

The facts speak for themselves: he obviously is lying through his teeth. We should have recalled him. He can't even run his family finances, what in the dickens qualifies him to handle my hard earned taxes????

laughinghard wrote on Oct 17, 2009 7:29 AM:

Duh, i cant remember that I made 18 thousand dollars that stated your honor.
I also cant remember that my wife made and extra thousand or so a month coaching Gold coast Swim Team duh and...


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections