Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
dan milburn wrote on Nov 14, 2009 4:45 PM:
rambo wrote on Nov 11, 2009 12:08 PM:
What is happening with the lawsuit ?
I suspect just more SMOKE/BS.
Just look at his hitory.
fairplay wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:22 AM:
Floyd wrote on Oct 28, 2009 10:28 AM:
How do you read facts out of a very slanted, slanderous story without all the facts. What you read is that some reporter wanted people to think she uncovered some big story, when in fact it demonstrated the inability of the world to print the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
In talking to people it is well noticed that no attorney comments were made, no contact with the MRS., no contact from the union. Most people are just laughing at the accusation that the MRS. did not get laid off as everyone knows she did. How many times do HR staff give out inaccurate information when they are not fully engaged with the process.
dan milburn wrote on Oct 26, 2009 10:04 AM:
That's what most of these comments seem to say to the WORLD newspaper. Thank goodness YOU COMMENTERS aren't on the council, the commission, City Manager's or the Mayor's office. But most of all, I'm glad you aren't running the NEWSPAPER. These political folks come and go but a FREE PRESS with a competent staff is the voice of truth and reason for ever.
HappyDay wrote on Oct 25, 2009 10:41 AM:
I was trying to say there are numerous possible explanations for why a family may need to file bankruptcy. My implication was that one of those reasons might be medical, but medical reasons would be protected and private under the HIPAA privacy act. Sorry, my words were not clear and that is why you were confused. Sorry!
Class of 72 wrote on Oct 24, 2009 2:30 PM:
Until this moment, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Let us not assassinate this man further. You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?
Justice for All wrote on Oct 23, 2009 5:57 PM:
It really is incredible how many people are okay with Stufflebean's lying ways.
TIRED OF THE BULL wrote on Oct 23, 2009 4:57 PM:
m00npenny wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:17 PM:
Why on earth are you using the HIPAA Privacy act to show the definition of privacy?
Follow me here ... d i c t i o n a r y.
Roger Ramjet wrote on Oct 23, 2009 3:12 PM:
tsunami wrote on Oct 23, 2009 11:06 AM:
Maxine wrote on Oct 23, 2009 9:55 AM:
rianza wrote on Oct 23, 2009 9:39 AM:
TIRED OF THE BULL wrote on Oct 23, 2009 7:22 AM:
Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 10:39 PM:
The motorhome is not there. Someone else may have purchased it, but the Stufflebeans do not own a motorhome. They are not hiding it. No one is hiding it for them. No one owns it and is letting them use it. Sorry, Marlee, no motor home!
HappyDay wrote on Oct 21, 2009 4:06 PM:
I have told you that Kathe had 3 jobs with the school district. She was laid-off from one, then rehired for a lower paying job. Of course, the public record said that she had continuous employment because of the other 2 jobs. This is another example of the public records not telling the whole story and another example of Meghan not asking questions to find out the truth. She needed to be more thorough, much more thorough.
Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 3:35 PM:
Just so you know, I was proud to be the "wife of a felon". He saved my life and those of our entire group. He's no longer a felon so watch what you say!
Plus, Laughinghard, my husband was convicted of a lessor charge as the judge ruled that he was acting in self-defense. The conviction was only for not putting the safety on his weapon as the attacking man charged him. It is ludicrous that the police chose to arrest the victim.
You choose to call him a felon, but our group believes he's "a hero." So, until you have been attacked by 4 crazed, trespassing young men on methamphetamine and alcohol 25 miles from police help, you have no right to criticize.
Just An Observer wrote on Oct 21, 2009 12:24 PM:
Joe Black wrote on Oct 21, 2009 12:23 PM:
Debts for alimony, child support and debts for taxes, and fully secured debts must be paid in full. The unpaid balances of other debts that are not paid are canceled upon completion of the "plan".
In other words, you don't have to pay everyone as you promised - you get to walk away from your responsibility. You get to keep your house and your car and all the cool stuff you bought but, hey, who cares about the people you borrowed the money from anyway?
They were just suckers.
dan milburn wrote on Oct 21, 2009 10:24 AM:
laughinghard wrote on Oct 21, 2009 9:36 AM:
Kathleen wrote on Oct 21, 2009 8:17 AM:
Anyone who has followed my blogs knows exactly where I come down on trust, honesty, integrity, and abuse of power in connection with any public official, especially those in law enforcement or the legal system. However, truthfulness in reporting is equally as important. I feel that Ms. Walsh did not do a through job. Public Records only tell part of the story. I don't believe Meghan Walsh ever even interviewed Kevin Stufflebean on this matter.
I have know Kathe Stufflebean for over 30 years and know information that others may not know or that might not show up on a public record. There are often very private reasons for a bankruptcy.
My heart goes out to Kevin and Kathe. I understand what it feels like to be persecuted and convicted by the press! Hang on and stay strong!
Kathleen Hosack
Casey wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:35 PM:
Amazed said "NOW you want to protect her privacy? I laughed outloud."
I actually laughed outloud too until I got mad thinking about how much this family has had to put up with. How much more can they take? It must be such a heavy load for them to carry. The paper really piled it on this time. How very, very sad! Hang in there Stufflebeans. Hold your head up high!They can't take the truth away. What goes around, comes around. Their turn is coming!
Casey wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:16 PM:
"4. The other party was ordered to pay legal fees in the custody case."
Did Ms. Walsh and the absolutely indisputable public records find out if "the party" did indeed pay the legal fees in the custody case? Did Ms. Walsh ask the party if she paid the one day legal bill? Did Ms. Walsh even interview the party who was ordered to pay the legal fees? Did Ms. Walsh have any idea how much the "entire custody dispute" cost the Stufflebeans?
Did Ms. Walsh ever ask if "the party" ever pays the child support due to the Stufflebeans?
In my view, the bankruptcy was news, while the reasons for the bankruptcy unless unlawful are not! I find it reprehensible that this paper would try to destroy a family without asking more questions. Public records do not tell the whole story.
Kevin 2 The World 0
HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:31 PM:
marlee wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:43 PM:
the whole moving around assests....he is an expert on that one! If you really want to know the truth, thalk to his family! They could tell you so much!
marlee wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:39 PM:
He may not have it listed in his name, but the motorhome there! He lived in it for a while after he sold both of his mother's and his houses! His neighborhood is a nice middle class neighborhood and his cars are very new for this economy. We have all had to make sacrifies, obviously Kevin hasn't. I am also glad that someone else caught on to Kevin's half truths about his education! So again Floyd what is your point?
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:22 PM:
m00npenny wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:20 PM:
Leigh wrote on Oct 20, 2009 2:26 PM:
amazed wrote on Oct 20, 2009 2:23 PM:
NOW you want to protect her privacy? I laughed outloud.
clairecat wrote on Oct 20, 2009 1:47 PM:
tsunami wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:50 PM:
dannygs wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:42 PM:
Editors Note wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:33 PM:
1313 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:28 PM:
clairecat wrote on Oct 20, 2009 12:10 PM:
coosbayite wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:48 AM:
HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 11:36 AM:
"The HIPPA Privacy Rule regulates the use and disclosure of certain information...It establishes regulations for the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI). PHI is any information held by a covered entity which concerns health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that can be linked to an individual. This is interpreted rather broadly and includes any part of an individual's medical record or payment history." That's why one must sign HIPPA release papers. My point was that there are always multiple reasons for a bankruptcy!
Of course, public records are "public"! However, a public record that says Kathe had continuous employment at the school district is misleading. Kathe had 3 school district jobs. She was laid-off of one and was later rehired at a lower paying part-time job. That's the whole truth. Meghan implies that Kevin is lying about Kathe's job. Meghan’s insinuation leads to a wrong conclusion!
Finally, when people attack with personal comments, its because they have no factual knowledge.
1313 wrote on Oct 20, 2009 10:31 AM:
floyd wrote on Oct 20, 2009 10:13 AM:
You must like to distort the truth as well as Meghan Walsh, as if you look in the bankruptcy filing, and I had to go look at it all because the World only printed the section they wanted us to see. They live on Juniper in Coos Bay, a very moderate middle class neighborhood, they have a 2003 car and a 2005 car, and no motorhome listed. Since they are 4 and 6 years old, we know that they didn't go a blow money at the last minute for new vehicles and have had them for sometime.
When did the rules change that we get to decide what someone can and cannot have in their home. I believe those people called bankruptcy appraisers determine if anything in their home was of antique value and was to be liquidated or not. you are only allowed to have so much in assets and those have to be reported.
Let me guess the Stufflebean's must of been out in the middle of the night moving assets in the dark.
m00npenny wrote on Oct 20, 2009 9:25 AM:
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA is about health insurance. You must be in pain, because it has to hurt to be that stupid.
Subjects do not need to be consulted, asked or even give permission for this information to be shared with anyone who wants it. When you work for the public, school district, courthouse, police and commissioner, everything you do is documented and available for public viewing. Even your wages and hours worked.
Meghan doesn’t need a “secret source” in the court house. Everything she has provided is public record. Bankruptcy filing documents are public record. She just knows what questions to ask and what forms to file. You don’t have to like it, but that’s the way it is... its called “transparency”. Suck it up and deal with it. Oh, and she doesn’t have to keep it a secret either. IT’S ALL PUBLIC RECORD. So take off your tin foil hat and go back to your cave.
HappyDay wrote on Oct 20, 2009 9:05 AM:
Ask Megan Walsh if she ever interviewed Stufflebean months ago at the time of the bankruptcy? Did she ever speak to the real reporter who did? Inexcusable! However, you don't care because you don't like Stufflebean.
As to your "innuendo" or "insinuation" about a fraudulent bankruptcy filing, I'm sure the federal judge who has already settled this case would be intrigued that you know more than he does about the Stufflebean's finances.
As to your Watergate comment, I have found that people without any real knowledge usually resort to name calling or insults.
Mark Smith wrote on Oct 20, 2009 8:28 AM:
FellowHuman wrote on Oct 20, 2009 8:17 AM:
laughinghard wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:31 AM:
Fed Up wrote on Oct 20, 2009 7:01 AM:
I checked Webster's, and I don't see where "innuendo" means anything resembling "when one's own statements contradict themselves."
Also, I wasn't aware that fraudulently filing bankruptcy was a legal right, rather than the criminal act that I always thought it was.
I could go on, but I'm sure you thought Watergate was a "witch hunt" as well...
Casey wrote on Oct 19, 2009 11:05 PM:
Kevin 1 The World 0
It certainly seems petty for the newspaper to make such a big deal of someone's misfortune. I am quite certain that there were numerous reasons for the bankruptcy. I also don't understand why this is such big news.
marlee wrote on Oct 19, 2009 6:52 PM:
Eastsider wrote on Oct 19, 2009 5:11 PM:
TruthTeller wrote on Oct 19, 2009 2:30 PM:
HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 1:59 PM:
Wrong! The COMMENTS HERE are saying Meghan’s witch hunt is the real issue and story here, not Commissioner Stufflebean. Why and for whose benefit she wrote the article is the news?! She is "creating the news" out of innuendos. You simply approve because you don’t like the Commissioner. In fact, this egregious article by Meghan is exactly why no one wants to run for public office!
Meghan and “The World” are also trying to criminalize a legal right given to all Americans. To file bankruptcy is an emotionally and financially difficult decision to make especially for one in public office. The Stufflebeans filed for Chapter 13, they will pay their creditors.
TruthTeller wrote on Oct 19, 2009 1:54 PM:
Justice for All wrote on Oct 19, 2009 12:25 PM:
Business as usual in Coos County.
Just An Observer wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:36 AM:
Kudos to The World for digging into the details. Please keep it up!
HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 10:26 AM:
Meghan, did Sheriff Jackson ever really file bankruptcy? If so, what kind? Maybe you should look into that. After all, Jackson is running for County Commissioner. Floyd, thanks for that information too. At least the paper could check to see if it is true! I know that I would like to know!
dannygs wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:55 AM:
yes, Commmissioner Stufflebean is a public figure, but I agree with him and many others - once is a story, twice (with no additional information) is just plain pathetic!
and if the Sheriff has indeed filed bankruptcy, why not cover that as well. yes, they are responsible for big budgets, but many families are struggling and unfortunately losing their homes and filing bankruptcy. there's no proof he's mismanaged the county's money, therefore no story.
HappyDay wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:41 AM:
Meghan, did you or your paper ever interview Kevin at the time of the bankruptcy? Did you actually speak to the Guard reporter who did? Could there be even more personally private reasons for a bankruptcy? Does HIPPA mean anything to you? Did you ever bother to interview Kathe? You attack her through Kevin, but have never spoken to her!
Did you realize that when people go before a bankruptcy judge that they must provide PROOF to the court of all financial records, income, and expenses? Did you realize that you must testify under oath as to the accuracy of your records? Did you contact the Stufflebean’s bankruptcy attorney? Perhaps if you had you would know that the case is indeed settled.
Meghan, who is your secret source at the courthouse? I repeat, the "why" of this article is the REAL story! I hope the Stufflebeans' sue you!!
floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:39 AM:
floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:16 AM:
What I see is a poor reporter (Meghan Walsh) who was on a witch hunt and printed very misleading information. The headline is Journalism 101, ask questions, then you are not making a statement and you can automatically direct peoples mind to believe that maybe he lied, maybe he didn't.
floyd wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:15 AM:
I guess the next article will be on the Sheriff’s Bankruptcy.
WOW wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:04 AM:
Mark Smith wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:28 AM:
Mark Smith wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:27 AM:
He handles tax money, he's lied of federal forms, he's lied directly, his integrity is questionable.
Get a clue people. This man co-manages large amounts of funds. He lied to get a bankruptcy and the proof is here. Is that the person you want to be running the show.
Stufflebean should have kept his mouth shut and stopped the email campaign and no one may have known, but he didn't and now it's biting him in the ass.
loventhecoast wrote on Oct 19, 2009 8:13 AM:
People - let this man do his job and take care of his family.
We are supposed to be a community - now we just look silly to others who look at our newspaper - and WOW - the front page!
swede wrote on Oct 19, 2009 7:53 AM:
richard cranium wrote on Oct 19, 2009 3:11 AM:
While a County employee's bankruptcy would seem to be news, it doesn't appear that this article makes the effort. We are instead treated to a numeric cant of his mis-statements or falsehoods.
If you are going to print this many inches on this kind of material that would seem to be on issues of character and not substantive, please make the effort to link this to harms to the public or some sort of news-worthy item.
HappyDay wrote on Oct 18, 2009 9:15 PM:
Meghan, were you aware that Kevin worked many, many overtime hours for the state which raised his salary considerably? Did you bother checking on that or adding that overtime into his income? Did you ask or is the truth not worth printing? Once again, a half-truth!
I am asking Meghan and "The World" why they chose this family to pick on. Yes, Kevin is a public figure, but Kathe and their son are not. And yes, the public has a right to know about elected officials, but knowing that he filed bankruptcy is all they need to know.
You are on a "witchhunt" accusing Kevin of lying. I know for a fact that he's not!
Now, I am accusing you of writing this story for a "purpose." And, WHY you wrote it is the real story. I guess, true journalism in our country is dead!
james wrote on Oct 18, 2009 8:18 PM:
HappyDay wrote on Oct 18, 2009 8:13 PM:
Here are 3 things I know for sure.
Having known Kathe for many years, there are facts that I can tell you without even discussing this article with her. I know for a fact that Kathe definitely was laid-off from the school district. I remember it!
At one point, Kathe worked 3 jobs for the school district combining them to make a full-time job. She lost one job teaching school swimming lessons. She was hired back later as a lower paid in-classroom aide. So yes, she had continuous employment with the school district, but she did lose the biggest job as well as considerable income. Meghan, half-truths do not a story make!!
Meghan, did you ask if the son's mother actually paid the one day court costs? Did you ask who paid all the rest of the considerable attorney fees? Once again, a half-truth!
Continued
dannygs wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:53 PM:
den wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:49 PM:
Kevin is in a public position where he manages millions of County Dollars, including tax dollars.
Sure is strange that it is seen as OK, to not be able to manage your own finances but, that qualifies you to manage Millions of the public money.
There is no wonder, our Country is in big trouble, and big debt, when the voters see this story as a personal attack on a public servant about facts not matching up, and these facts are of a financial nature.
If you are not lying, or misrepresenting what the problem with some facts.
Remember to take any public official words with a grain of salt and the very definition of a politician is: “How do you know when a politician is lying? His lips are moving." -- Favorite Old Joke
"Politicians are, by nature, liars." -- Dale Amon
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:25 PM:
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:23 PM:
orecoast007 wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:05 PM:
fawkina wrote on Oct 18, 2009 5:02 PM:
We are going through a horrible recession and millions are going bankrupt. I would never consider running for office in that rumor mill of a town.
How embarrassing for a family to have a witchhunt newspaper posting your financial problems on the front page. Meghan Walsh needs to find something more important to do with her life.
nb girl wrote on Oct 18, 2009 3:20 PM:
jeanine walker wrote on Oct 18, 2009 1:05 PM:
However, I am not in agreement that the World is getting worse and worse. I can speak firsthand that the World has been trying to use their pages to help. I am thinking of my own situation with the Band instruments, the Boy Scout Cabin and other big stories lately that have really made a difference helping others.
I hope the World chooses to keep focusing on important local stories that will affect our economy and our way of life. I also hope they keep reporting the humanitarian needs. This article, in my opinion, was not neccessary.
endpages wrote on Oct 18, 2009 11:21 AM:
South Coast wrote on Oct 18, 2009 11:17 AM:
Leave their personal lives alone.
FellowHuman wrote on Oct 18, 2009 9:42 AM:
1. They very rarely report both sides.
2. Are very good at twisting partial facts.
3. The World newspaper is getting more and more like the National Enquirer...which is sad.
Now how many of us would run for public office knowing that if you had a rough patch in your life, it will be plastered all over the paper. We must also remember that Kevin can not make moves by himself on county business, it has to be at least two of them that decide.
Kevin and Kathe, my heart goes out to you, how many other hundreds of people who file every day, we never hear about??? You guys hold your heads up you are paying back your debt (which is more than alot of others do)....
justrite wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:31 AM:
Joe Black wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:43 PM:
He lies.
And to all you people who say this is a personal matter: Do you REALLY want liars and cheaters in control of your community and your tax dollars? If he lies to the media and to the courts you better believe he's lying to everyone.
Maybe I'm one of the few people left who thinks honor, integrity and honesty are important. Seems too many of you now settle for much less. Too bad for you and too bad for our country.
teacher wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:05 PM:
And if one starts from a very small salary and it goes up some every year, that doesn't mean that one is making a lot of money. I saw a suspicious lack of facts at that point in the article.
The point? If the paper is shading the facts to make the Stufflebeans look bad in one instance, how can we trust the paper got it right the rest of the article? Not a trustworthy moment for The World.
Also, there were expenses and details that Kevin did not, and was not required to, share. If the reporter chose to present the lack of facts as proof, that is tabloid in nature.
Sorry Kathe and Kevin, so it begins again. People that actually think, and vote, know the truth.
rambo wrote on Oct 17, 2009 6:49 PM:
WHEN YOU RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE
YOUR LIFE IS A OPEN BOOK.
I just got my property taxes the other day, just like everybody else.
And it p***** me off knowing Im paying these clowns $60 thousand, plus bennys a year.
And Keven can't make it on 120 thousand.
Id say he has made some bad choices.
WHERE IS THE MISTRESS ? LOL
coos bay person wrote on Oct 17, 2009 6:39 PM:
WOW! wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:15 PM:
Pig Nuts wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:05 PM:
We have a lynch mob lead by the World over petty details that are really between Stufflebean & his creditors.
Did he just urinate away $126,000 of tax payer money for purposes of fulfilling a personal vendetta? Turn your head & cough Coos Bay City Council. Where is the outrage about that?
After BK reform in 2005, chapter 13 is a 3-5 year financial prison sentence. Stufflebean is above the average mean income. The reality is, he will pay all of his debts in a payment plan over the course of 5 years in full or face liquidation. He will have money to pay mortgage, power, water, vehicle expenses, insurance & food. End of story, every cent above & beyond will go to the creditors, period.
Civil service places a bulls-eye on your forehead. The guy is not quick on his feet when put on the spot with a litany of questions. He does not form coherent written responses to questions.
Pig Nuts wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:04 PM:
Folks, there are much bigger stories than this right now directly under your nose.
What was the motive for this story at this point in time? I don't get it, The World had the chance to eviscerate him when he destroyed the lives of 21 families with a last minute firing at the first of the year. Why now?
You can look in the floor of your chicken coop for what I think of this piece.
tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:29 PM:
tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:17 PM:
Dragonman wrote on Oct 17, 2009 4:00 PM:
carefree highway wrote on Oct 17, 2009 3:55 PM:
I see there are cats in here sharpening their claws, just to be mean. A leopard CAN NOT change its spots, so whatever has been, will be again. Kevin could be a great Commissioner and a lousy personal life accountant. Its for him and his wife to sort out, not public opinion. I love the 1st amendment, but this has gone too far.
fairplay wrote on Oct 17, 2009 2:01 PM:
IWanttoknow wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:51 PM:
Brenda wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:34 PM:
This is incredibly mean-spirited and unhelpful.
If I were the Stufflebeans, I wouldn't answer any of the reporter's questions either!
hiluix wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:14 PM:
krissy wrote on Oct 17, 2009 1:00 PM:
cisea wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:02 PM:
Shallow Al wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:36 AM:
This IS gossip.
As a County Commissioner, no one person can make a decision regarding expenses. The Commission is a three person body, and the decisions have to be agreed upon by at least two of the members.
It's called a majority.
What a person does with his own expenses is not an issue that can be considered news.
Want your personal expenses splashed across the newspaper?
I don't.
I wonder what the Editor of this newspaper's personal finances look like?
That too, is nobody's business but his own.
clairecat wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:29 AM:
m00npenny wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:25 AM:
This is a classic example of "transparent government". All those who take on the role of a governement leader need to know "someone is watching". If you dont have a clean slate or your just a liar, somewhere at sometime, its going to catch up with you and bite you in the a**. Dont give me the crap that we have no right to know what goes on in his personal life. Quite the opposite. How he conducts his personal life has a direct impact on how he handles the peoples trust. And their money. This is turning out to be a really bad episode of Springer. All we need is the mistress to come out now.
laughinghard wrote on Oct 17, 2009 11:25 AM:
Forgot wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:29 AM:
If you have an honest to goodness journalist (does the World? we'll see) going after a politician whose stories aren't matching up...then I'd say he is sunk.
changeisgood wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:12 AM:
tsunami wrote on Oct 17, 2009 10:12 AM:
Jess B. wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:16 AM:
coosbayite wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:16 AM:
Kay wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:12 AM:
"I will not discuss ANYTHING occuring more than 7 months ago, no I mean 4 months, no I REALLY mean 5 months ago".
"Yeah, that's the ticket".(The Pathological Liar - SNL)
Oh, and thanks to The World Editorial Board who supported and backed this clown in the recall effort.
Shallow Al wrote on Oct 17, 2009 9:07 AM:
Sound like news? Not to me.
This article should be read VERY carefully by anyone even toying with the idea of running for public office in Coos County.
Be careful what you get yourself into.
If the local newspaper takes a dislike to you evrything you ever do will be subject to biased and unfair rumor generating stories.
Right on page one.
Are tar and feathers deductible?
anneofOregon wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:56 AM:
whatintheworld wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:46 AM:
poloele wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:27 AM:




The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines