Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
somethoughts wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:54 PM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 16, 2009 2:18 PM:
Your "spin" could have been written by wild bill himself on FOX news. Though slippery slopes prevail under your feet one fact remains - the decision has already been made and all that is needed is a rubber stamp!
dan milburn wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:05 AM:
Obviously you are NEW here. You have no idea what it is like to have Japanese vessels at the dock and swarms of "non-english speaking tourists" wandering all over town - looking for a GOOD TIME. The standing joke was to sneak up on people's porches and change their light bulbs to RED. Who needed a Seaman's center - when you could all meet at Snappy's, Gussy's or the Eltoro.
Bunkerhill on a Saturday night with all the Docks filled with ships looked like Disneyland with free passes. Not one passport check point, no visas, and who could understand the ID? I can't wait to see the looks on you newbe's faces when the ships come back!
whatintheworld wrote on Oct 16, 2009 8:42 AM:
WOW!! Any person on this or the planet that you are from can read these comments. We look like bumpkins to the outside world already; no more help needed.
Please learn about LNG. It is not the natural gas available from NW natural in Coos County. Learn about transporting LNG by vessel and by pipeline. Mastec did not put in any "plumbing". The county commissioners did not pay fifty million for the pipeline from Roseburg, nor for the laterals within the county. The majority of the expense was paid by the taxpayers. Commissioner Main is opposed to LNG. Pipelines don't know if they are going east or west. FERC does have a chairman and that government body makes decisions frequently. "Tanks" were never planned for Roseburg.
worldview wrote on Oct 15, 2009 11:04 PM:
dan milburn wrote on Oct 15, 2009 4:13 PM:
Citizen wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 PM:
Citizen2 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 1:58 PM:
1313 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 7:31 AM:
Why do "you people" think because someone does not want LNG, they are from out of town or anti everything. I have lived here my whole life, over 60 years, and want business and jobs and a healthy community.
The people YOU commend are the Problem here. WHAT have they done to bring anything here. Nothing ! Now because they want a dangerous LNG you think they are great, real funny ! !
I don't know Jody but I certainly agree with her and like the fact, SHE doesn't give up on something she believes in.
I am from a logging, fishing, longshoring background so I am not against good jobs or industry, just LNG.
1313 wrote on Oct 14, 2009 7:20 AM:
I don't know anyone that is for LNG, except a few, very few people that comment here. I guess I know the intelligent people. Not the ones who want us to take the dangerous trashy industy jobs that will end up not paying
enough to make the danger worth it.
WOW1 wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:16 PM:
There is a part of me that really hopes that the project succeeds. I want to see what CB/NB looks like on a Saturday night with 900 construction workers looking for a little action. I hope I get to hear your comments then. As for the sixy jobs, how many skilled LNG workers are there in this area?
I trust the lady who has done her homework.
firefly wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:45 PM:
Hiluix wrote on Oct 13, 2009 12:04 PM:
whatintheworld wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:24 AM:
Citizen2 wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:09 AM:
CBRezident wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:00 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:16 PM:
1) Increases our dependence with hostile countries like Russia, Iran, etc for our future energy needs.
2) UNSAFE situation of LNG ships having known 2 mile hazard burn zone & traveling within a 1/2 mile of populated area here (affecting 17,000 people).
3) California & many areas have rejected LNG for being a air polluter.
4) LNG is 2X more expensive then natural gas used today by Oregon citizens.
5) How 400 Oregon property owners will be FORCED to sell their land to foreign investors.
6) Pollutes the air 24/7/365 days a year.
7) How LNG ship will have negative effect on fishing boats & NEW Airport flights.
8) How no local will qualify for any of the jobs at Jordan Cove.
This LNG SCAM is not worth the little tax money collected from vs HUGE risks involved! Every poll taken & even Oregon's Dept of Energy says NO to this SCAM!
Just An Observer wrote on Oct 12, 2009 10:38 PM:
Citizen2 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:52 PM:
1313 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:44 PM:
what wonderful jobs do you think you are going to get?
I guess a toxic waste dump would employ some people too, but do you want one here? What about an ammunition dump where they store bombs of all sorts and all kinds of explosives, want that here if it provides jobs? My Dad worked at one when I was a young child, but I would not want to live by one now. I know we need jobs but my gosh, why do we need an LNG terminal that nobody else wants. Are we the "black sheep" that gets the throw away industrys? And I would say "good luck" on very many local good paying jobs at LNG.
Citizen wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:16 PM:
everyman wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:09 PM:
The number of screamers who post has DRAMATICALLY been reduced since The World went to member ID's and passwords...funny how that happens...
I AM EVERYMAN...BUT I AM NOT ALONE!!!!
Keep screaming, Jody...keep screaming.
somethoughts wrote on Oct 12, 2009 2:58 PM:
c.b. businessman wrote on Oct 12, 2009 2:43 PM:
1313 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 2:23 PM:
Oh yes, here comes the "mean" comments about us NIMBY people .... oh my ! ! !
hiluix wrote on Oct 12, 2009 1:03 PM:
Richard Cranium wrote on Oct 12, 2009 12:17 PM:
I'm not sure how anything Jody says is worthy of printing. Today, she's talking about the internal thinking of FERC. You'd think that after all her effort to demonize and alienate FERC it would be clear that she has *NO IDEA* what FERC thinks on the matter.
Hiram1999 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:23 AM:


The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines