Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Dragonman wrote on Oct 9, 2009 9:40 PM:
George Soros wrote on Oct 8, 2009 11:08 AM:
Tax and hurt seniors by taking $500 Billion from Medicare.
Tax and hurt the uninsured by forcing them to spend 20% of their pay and buy Government Run Healthcare
Tax and hurt those with private insurance by forcing them to taxes on their employer health care plan.
megapotamus wrote on Oct 8, 2009 9:48 AM:
Any fair-minded review of what happened in Massachusetts would show that Gov. Romney succeeded in expanding access but they failed at containing costs.
Cmdr wrote on Oct 8, 2009 8:29 AM:
Get those “Shut down the Socialist VA and Medicare” banners made and show up at those tea bagger meetings. I’ll bet I’ll never see a sea of “close VA socialist hospital” banners on the nightly news, especially not the Fox no news channel.
Right wingers, prove me wrong or prove to the rest of us that your full of it!
Tanner Hamlett wrote on Oct 7, 2009 2:12 PM:
I am so glad that you came along to point out to me that my opinions are being controlled by a pharamaceutical/Republican conspiracy, and that I could not possibly have thought for myself without the Democrat/Government's help.
In fact, the reason I am against government intrusion is because of the pharmaceutical and Republican intrusion already present in my mind!
Thank you for pointing this out!
Of course, Democrat politicians NEVER serve special interests, nor would a Democrat politican EVER listen to a lobbyist.
Thank you, O Brave leader, for pointing ou the error of my ways!
viva la 2010 wrote on Oct 7, 2009 10:20 AM:
There was no ID verification in ANY legislation, never has been, never will be.
Don't ask, don't tell!!
metoo! wrote on Oct 7, 2009 9:45 AM:
People will never agree. There are too many who do not care enough to listen or vote. And the ones in power don't listen to anyone but themselves. What a mess.
just saying wrote on Oct 5, 2009 11:24 AM:
re: Illegal immigrants (not allowed), requirements to change coverage (inducement maybe, but no requirements), and proposed healthcare legislation - from FactCheck.org
http://factcheck.org/2009/09/obamas-health-care-speech/
Tag Urit wrote on Oct 5, 2009 6:47 AM:
FACT: The Hill reported, that the President has not met with House Republicans since April, and when Republican Leaders asked for a meeting to discuss health care in a May 14 letter, the President ignored the request. The Politico reported on the President’s response on June 5, saying, “he makes no mention of the request to meet in the letter, which he signs off by stating, “Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me and I look forward to further discussions on this critically important issue.” But those “further discussions” simply didn’t happen. The facts are clear: Blame for the lack of bipartisanship in the current health care debate lies squarely at the feet of Washington Democrats.
Tag Urit wrote on Oct 5, 2009 6:45 AM:
FACT: This marked an important change in the President’s language last night. He used to say, “If you like your health-care plan, you keep your health-care plan.” By now using the word “require,” the President’s admitting that they can’t guarantee Americans will keep their health plan. After both the Associated Press, ABC News and others have thoroughly debunked this claim, it’s not surprising the White House has made this shift. But the point is that no one knows for sure how many employers will drop their coverage altogether if their plan goes into effect. Experts at the Lewin Group estimate the number could be more than 100 million Americans. And $500 billion in Medicare cuts will obviously reduce the quality of care America’s seniors receive.
Tag Urit wrote on Oct 5, 2009 6:44 AM:
FACT: The non-partisan Congressional Research Service confirms in a report that there is no mechanism included in the bill to verify that individuals are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants before they receive government benefits. Furthermore, Republicans offered two amendments in the Ways and Means, and Energy and Commerce Committees that were rejected by Democrats. The first would have prevented illegal immigrants from being automatically enrolled into Medicaid and the second would have required better screening for applicants for federally-subsidized health care to ensure they are actually citizens or legal immigrants.
rcflyer wrote on Oct 4, 2009 9:04 AM:
viva la 2010 wrote on Oct 3, 2009 2:14 PM:
1.Take action to allow states to experiment with better ways of reaching the nation's health coverage goals rather than imposing a national plan on states and families.
2.Reform the tax treatment of health insurance to make it more equitable and efficient for taxpaying families.
3.Refocus employment-based coverage to promote family control and choice rather than mandating employers to offer government-defined coverage.
4.Use incentives and perhaps automatic enrollment in private plans, not government mandates, to foster wider coverage.
5.Create a level playing field of competing private plans and real choice, and do not allow a "public plan" to undermine your other commitments to Americans.
6.Be bipartisan-this is the main reason that America is in the economic shape it is; one side wants to be the winner!



The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines