County OK's flooding Kentuck Golf Course

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 23, 2009 | 15 comment(s)

Main votes no, cites pollution concern

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1

Related Links

COQUILLE - Developers of a local liquefied natural gas terminal have cleared another hurdle in addressing environmental concerns, as they try to move forward with the project.

The Coos County Commissioners approved a zone change Tuesday for the Kentuck Golf Course to exclusive farm use. The switch would allow the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay to use the land, if it builds a docking area in conjunction with the Jordan Cove Energy Project LNG terminal on the North Spit.

The commissioners added three conditions to the project to limit costs to the county and damage to the environment, but the three-person vote was divided. Commissioner Bob Main voted no, in light of concerns he said he had about pollutants washing into the bay. Commissioners Nikki Whitty and Kevin Stufflebean voted yes.

Developers have devised a plan that would flood the back nine holes of the course to satisfy government wetland replacement requirements for the LNG project. They would remove part of the dike west of the course and build a bridge for East Bay Road.

Main said he was concerned that a former methamphetamine lab in a house in the area had contaminated the course and would leach into the bay if the mitigation plans proceeded. Oregon’s Department of Health Services has a house  on Golf Course Lane listed as unfit for use.

Mike Gaul, deputy executive director, said Main’s comments were the first he’d heard of a meth lab.

Main’s fellow commissioners and the port’s lawyer tried to reassure Main, noting that state and federal agencies would check into those issues through a biological assessment and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review. Main remained opposed.

“I’m not comfortable that they will check that potential problem,” he said.

Mark Whitlow, a Portland attorney representing the port, said it was premature to discuss the runoff issue, because the primary purpose of the meeting was the zone change.

“Until the port’s project goes forward, there is no project proposal for the site,” he said.

The commissioners still imposed some conditions assuming the site would eventually be used as mitigation. Commissioner Kevin Stufflebean asked that the port build the East Bay Road bridge using sheet piling, which he said would reduce maintenance costs for the county road. He also proposed a condition saying that a proposed tidegate on Kentuck Slough would be maintained by the port. If the work isn’t done, the county can fix any problems that arise and then bill the applicant.

The last condition came out of concerns raised by Jody McCaffree, a local  opposition leader to the LNG project. She suggested the county require the port to have oversight from an independent committee.

“We need someone who is really looking out for our interests,” she said.

 The port agreed that there should be a technical advisory committee, such as the one it already has, including leaders from the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve and Coos Watershed Association.

McCaffree didn’t like this idea. She suggested having an in-house oversight committee could lead to another dilemma like the construction of the county gas pipeline by MasTec Inc.

Stufflebean said that’s unlikely since the port will need to meet government guidelines that will be monitored.

“Regulatory agencies tend to pick on government entities more than private companies,” he said.

Gaul also took exception to the comparison, noting that the port has a history of completing projects without environmental damage.

“We are not MasTec,” he said. “We are the Port of Coos Bay.”

Jordan Cove is paying for the land use application process, as well as the land if it comes to it. The Culp family, which owns the course, has signed an option with Jordan Cove to sell either half or the entire 137-acre property.

The LNG developer only needs 36 acres of wetland, while the entire property could produce about 100. The port will have the option to buy unused land through its agreement with Jordan Cove.



What’s next?


What: Jordan Cove Energy Project is still waiting for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to rule on its application. FERC is scheduled to meet in October, but hasn’t announced whether the Coos Bay liquefied natural gas project is on its agenda.

Ending: Coos County commissioners approved Jordan Cove’s land-use application in August. Opponents had 21 days to appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. The state received nothing as of Tuesday, a spokeswoman said. Jordan Cove Energy Project project manager Bob Braddock said the deadline had passed.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

dan milburn wrote on Sep 30, 2009 12:31 PM:

You are being duped daily. The pipeline Mas-tec put in was never pointed towards you to bring natural gas in - in was pointed outward to suck gas out.
All of this was already decided and you can entertain with all the smoke and mirrors you want - but Big Oil always wins and you always lose. The Natural gas fields are off the coast. The pipeline will go under the bay or else right smack in the middle of the road going out to horsefall. Is there any third grader out there who can draw a line from Horsefall Road to Kentuck? You want advice? Invest in Natural Gas stocks.

QWCS wrote on Sep 29, 2009 3:11 PM:

Tired of Her Act: Kentuck has been more of a wetland than a golf course for years now, so this really sholdn't change much.

Common Sense wrote on Sep 29, 2009 2:36 PM:

What part of the following don't you understand Bob Braddock's people:

1) Increases our dependence with hostile countries like Russia, Iran, etc for our future energy needs.

2) UNSAFE situation of LNG ships having known 2 mile hazard burn zone & traveling within a 1/2 mile of populated area here (affecting 17,000 people).

3) California & many areas have rejected LNG for being a air polluter.

4) LNG is 2X more expensive then natural gas used today by Oregon citizens.

5) How 400 Oregon property owners will be FORCED to sell their land to foreign investors.

6) Pollutes the air 24/7/365 days a year.

7) How LNG ship will have negative effect on fishing boats & NEW Airport flights.

8) How no local will qualify for any of the jobs at Jordan Cove.

This LNG SCAM is not worth the little tax money collected from vs HUGE risks involved! Every poll taken & even Oregon's Dept of Energy says NO to this SCAM!

m00npenny wrote on Sep 28, 2009 8:23 PM:

Build the damn thing already. All this dust being kicked up and nothing is getting done. Cut the locks off and start letting the trucks through. Lets get some work done.

richard stroker wrote on Sep 26, 2009 11:09 PM:

LNG isn't driving people out of Coos County it's the lack of work and political B.S.

orecoast007 wrote on Sep 26, 2009 5:18 PM:

Since no one else is willing to set up shop here, because they are chased off by the local city councils.....I say to Bob Braddock bring LNG to the local area... I vote YES!!!! There are risks in everyday of our lives.....

Pig Nuts wrote on Sep 26, 2009 9:47 AM:

As I recall this swamp land was purchased by the Port for $100,000 an acre.

We permit the Port to operate with no accountability, how long are we going tolerate this?

They were in a big hurry to rush out & pay top dollar for a dilapidated rail, now they are pandering for a buyer.

For every transaction they make there is a list of good ole boy insiders who are used repeatedly to process their purchase. They have an open checkbook to collect their fees from.

Makes for a nice front.

You can find much of this buried in their minutes.

CBRezident wrote on Sep 26, 2009 5:43 AM:

Isn't this like putting the cart before the horse?Whos to say that the LNG will ever get the go ahead to build anyways.I for one still have doubts.

everyman wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:22 PM:

Well, add Villarios to the growing number of "us"...

We don't scream...WE WORK!

Stand up!

Be counted!

Like Everyman!!

villarios wrote on Sep 24, 2009 11:22 AM:

A vibrant American economy demands a variety of fuels for commerce, industry and private residences.

Those who war against proven fuel sources -- be it extraction, transmission or sales -- are in essence declaring war on you, you family, your jobs and homes.

Stand up, take time to get involved and tell the naysayers Begone!!!

Their tax-payer supported jobs (through so-called non-profit activist agencies) has the sole goal of disrupting our economy and everything you hold near and dear.

From Eureka to Grays Harbor, we've seen the socialists and statists destroy our jobs, communities and families. It's time to stand up and be counted.

everyman wrote on Sep 24, 2009 10:43 AM:

Hmmm...maybe they could flood it with the tears of all the screamers who are going to have to flee the area when the dreaded LNGzilla arrives!!!

Lions and Tigers and LNG, oh my!
Lions and Tigers and LNG, oh my!

Weeeeeee're off to California...
to see what they won't allow...

and if they don't like LNG,
then we're gonna have a cow!!!

Be strong! Be alive! Be like Everyman!

Common Sense wrote on Sep 24, 2009 10:41 AM:

"We are not MasTec,” he said. “We are the Port of Coos Bay.”?????

Yeah, you Port clowns are the ones wasting USA citizens tax payers $$$ again on something NOT needed as usual! This & the Ghost rail line goin to brokesville, Oregon FAST....

enforce wrote on Sep 24, 2009 7:44 AM:

Something good for the community it's about time. And just think it's not just good for the tribal Federation we might even get some Tax revenue Back.

tired of her act wrote on Sep 23, 2009 3:24 PM:

What a waste of a golf course. Another blunder for Coos. Why not flood downtown Coos Bay and North Bend? They are eyesores.

justopinion wrote on Sep 23, 2009 12:18 PM:

Suprise!!!! Main voted NO. Everyone wants to talk about the CB mayor not letting big guys in because of his ego look at Main! He should let the State do their jobs as they do everyday addressing these issues!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections