Runway expansion could take years

By Nate Traylor, Staff Writer
Sunday, August 23, 2009 | 10 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news

Related Links

NORTH BEND — The Southwest Oregon Regional Airport’s manager has big plans for bigger planes, but it will take a bigger runway.

Should the project come to fruition, airport officials likely would face stringent government oversight and maybe opposition. At least that’s what happened when the airport extended one of its runways in the late ’80s. The city controlled the airport then.

Timm Slater, executive director of the Bay Area Chamber of Commerce, was the mayor of North Bend at the time.

“It’s a pretty extensive process,” he said. “The greatest challenge is assessing what the impact to the bay would be.”

Slater said airport officials could expect to deal with multiple federal and state agencies to mitigate any environmental concerns. Any impact to estuaries is a particularly sensitive issue, he said.

Two decades ago, despite one individual’s very vocal concern about impacts, the community was largely in favor of the expansion, Slater said.

He estimates the project took three to four years to complete.

Airport Executive Director Gary LeTellier wants to get a jump on the process. He is encouraging the Coos County Airport District board to do environmental studies now.

SkyWest owns 50-seat jets, but they don’t land here because there’s not enough demand, said Mike Lehman, board chairman.

That could change.

Come next summer, the airport may need a larger carrier during peak travel time. SkyWest’s CRJ200 would accommodate more passengers and significantly more cargo than its current 25-seat plane, Lehman said. The plane also would cut travel time by an hour, he said.

Lehman said the north/south runway is long enough to support the larger plane, but only under ideal conditions. Skies must be clear blue and the runway bone dry. The airport’s east/west runway, however, would have to be extended by several hundred feet.

That would require construction and paving near wetlands.

“We can make that extension without significant infill,” he said.

Regardless, the feds would require the airport to do a study on the environmental impacts. That would take about two years.

Study money likely would come from the Federal Aviation Administration, he said. Federal grants are also available to support an eventual runway extension project.

The assessment also might look at the possibility of extending a runway by several thousand feet should the airport someday need to accommodate cargo planes.

If the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay is successful in getting a container terminal, it would “almost certainly bring demand” for a cargo plane, Lehman said.

Martin Callery, port spokesman, said APM Terminals, AP Moeller Maersk subsidiary, still is interested in building a container terminal on Coos Bay. But the poor economy has put the project on hold.

“I wouldn’t say it’s off the table,” Callery said.

The port hasn’t discussed cargo planes as a supplement to a container terminal. He said it’s possible to transfer cargo from boats to planes, but the decision would be up to shippers. Air cargo is one of the most expensive ways to move cargo.

“It would have to be a high-value commodity to benefit from air freight,” Callery said.

Of course, plans for an airport expansion are very preliminary, Lehman stressed. Other than the environmental assessment, there is no need for immediate action.

“We’re looking far down the road, but starting the planning process,” Lehman said.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Krissy wrote on Aug 24, 2009 4:40 PM:

Oh by the way Queen Elizabeth can't get into the area because the RUNWAY IS TOO SHORT!

Krissy wrote on Aug 24, 2009 4:39 PM:

Come on Kay you cannot be so simple minded as to think the only thing that utilizes the Airport is Bandon Dunes. No wait ... maybe you are. I don't know where you work but where I work we depend on visitors in the community. When you have better access you get more people shopping in your stores, eating in your restaurants, visiting your community, and oh yeah having conferences in this town. Do you realize that if we had better access this would bring in larger conferences. This puts guests in your hotels and more money to promote the community with the tax dollars raised. But wait a minute you are probably against that too!

Kay wrote on Aug 24, 2009 9:57 AM:

This airport and the Port/Lionel Train/LNG sandbox, will be profitable the day after Queen Elizabeth dines at my abode.

More millions down the rabbit holes, and not a dime for the local citizens, schools, hospitals, roads, etc.

Funny how that works, year after year, after year isn't it?

Unless ya got a teat ta hang off of.

Instead of bashing the messenger, show me I'm wrong, please?

Steve Pickering wrote on Aug 24, 2009 9:43 AM:

I support the expansion. Get it started now as it will take a few years for the permits. And a container Facility. Yes I am 100% behind that also. (LNG? No way.) People first I say.

enforce wrote on Aug 24, 2009 6:47 AM:

I really like the mention of containers in the future.Thats what we really need with them comes a future.It's just a Ancestral Thought Economy means Money and that leads to better times !!!

dan milburn wrote on Aug 23, 2009 1:32 PM:

Why not use seaplanes and just land and take off in the bay? The bay is plenty long enough and the Port Commission is already in charge. There are already docks at the terminal.

Bosis wrote on Aug 23, 2009 12:05 PM:

If I were teaching a college psychology course I would provide all my students with copies of Kay's posts. Doing so would lead to some interesting discussions on neurological disorders.

Citizen wrote on Aug 22, 2009 10:37 PM:

This is great news for construction workers. I am not sure what it will bring to the local economy at this point. It's a good thing those democrats put their money where their mouths are. I mean with global warming does it make sense to expand an airport built nearly at sea level?

Kay wrote on Aug 22, 2009 12:29 PM:

With that reasoning, I can FINALLY realize my goal of hosting the Queen of England in my home. In order to do that, I need,oh let's just say.....about $70 million dollars to buy accutremonts for my plebian home. I need a red carpet(not cheap),new crystal,china,silver,fine carpets, artwork,etc. THAT is just the beginning, I think with that amount of money, when Liz does come for dinner, I'll be whoppin ready for her visit. It may take twenty years, but hey you guys,ya kain't think too far ahead, especially when you don't even have to use yer own money !!!!!

AND I won't even have to account for it?

Sweeter still.

Great idea, where is that Grant Writer?

Kay wrote on Aug 22, 2009 11:11 AM:

Wow, what an ambitious project. Sounds wonderful !!! Yeah !!!!

Since the regular public can't come close to filling the seats, let's be perfectly clear, this is wanted, and wanted and wanted by one entity.

Bandon Dunes.

Um, since Bandon Dunes is pushing this on the taxpayers, perhaps a better solution would be for Bandon Dunes to take some of that Enterprise Zone money, made off our backs and pay for his own runway. Doesn't Bandon have an airport?

What am I thinking !!!!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections