Opponents of a liquefied natural gas terminal carry signs outside the Owen Building in Coquille on Thursday before a public hearing. The Coos County commissioners later approved changes to the LNG land use application and plan to issue a final decision next month. World Photo by Alexander Rich
COQUILLE — The company proposing a liquefied natural gas terminal on Coos Bay's North Spit has received a renewed vote of approval from Coos County commissioners.
The commissioners Thursday unanimously approved changes to the developers' land use application. The changes address concerns raised by Oregon's Land Use Board of Appeals, after opponents appealed the county's previous approval in 2007.
The commissioners' approval completes one segment of the complicated LNG approval process, unless opponents file an appeal of Thursday's decision. In the meantime, the decision allows the developer, Jordan Cove Energy Project, to turn its attention to state and federal permits.
The county agreed to enforce 50-foot setbacks from wetlands depicted in its inventory maps. The original plan called for same kinds of setbacks, but it used maps supplied by Jordan Cove.
The commissioners also ensured the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians can request a county hearing if they can't agree with Jordan Cove about protecting graves and other archaeological artifacts.
And the commissioners accepted the county staff's recommendations to clarify that the state will resolve questions about wastewater and foundation soils.
Not all decisions were unanimous among the commissioners.
While the Confederated Tribes didn't object to the proposed changes, they weren't happy about the meeting's scheduling. J.D. Williams, an attorney representing the tribes, said they are neutral on the project. However, if they can't reach an agreement with Jordan Cove on archaeological preservation, the tribes would oppose the project, he said.
He explained to the commissioners that the two sides have a conceptual agreement, but it might be several weeks before a final one can be completed. He asked that the record remain open until negotiations are completed.
"We want an opportunity to argue against the project if we don't reach an agreement," he said.
Commissioner Bob Main said he was in favor of keeping the record open until the two sides could complete their negotiations. That would have meant delaying the county's final decision.
But Chairwoman Nikki Whitty and Commissioner Kevin Stufflebean said the tribes have a right to appeal to the county if they haven't reached a decision by the time Jordan Cove requests a zoning compliance letter. They said that was enough and voted 2-1 to close the record.
In the hearing, opponents of the Jordan Cove project primarily focused on the map issue. They contend the county doesn't have the inventory map and is trying to pass off a different kind of map as the real one.
"They are not being honest here," said Jody McCaffree, the leader of local opposition to the LNG terminal.
Main asked about the map, and Planning Director Patty Evernden produced it from among the thousands of pages of material in the record. LUBA apparently failed to notice the map's inclusion in the county's initial documents, Main said.
"I think LUBA was confused," Evernden replied.
Several other opponents complained about the format of the meeting, insisting they should be allowed to talk about other aspects of the project beside the three issues specified by LUBA.
Ronnie Hearne compared the proceedings to a kangaroo court, with the county going along with whatever Jordan Cove's attorneys requested. Diane Phillips of Azalea questioned postponing a decision on the archeological issue, suggesting it assumes such problems can be readily resolved.
"It sets a bad precedent for dealing with archeological issues," she said.
No one aside from Jordan Cove' lawyers spoke in favor of the project, though a number of supporters sat in the audience. They applauded when the commissioners voted unanimously for the land-use application changes.
Main said he agreed to approve the changes to the application because the tribes accepted them. He suggested he might have voted differently if other aspects of the project had been up for discussion.
Jordan Cove Energy Project will write up the findings from Thursday's meeting for the commissioners to make a formal decision next month.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
No deliberately false information.
No obscenity or racially offensive language.
No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
No information that invades another person's privacy.
No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.
Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Now if we can just get the people in San Francisco to agree to the plan we can proceed. Who's paying for the anti-LNG signs? Some mob likely, or as they would call it a group or association or movement.
Coos County commissioners passing it again with the same MANY issues ignored that would mean rejecting this California LNG SCAM at Jordon Cove & Everyman (Bob Braddock's spokesperson) blindly supporting it again...
What our discussion need to turn to is how do we handle the economic bubble created buy the sudden appearance of several thousand workers in our community and more importantly their sudden departure when the the project is complete. That sudden departure will hit us all like a ton of bricks, if we do not figure a way to fill the void.
This dumping will give OPEC even greater position in the world and make this country even more dependent on them. While there are many good reasons not to have an LNG plant in our back yard, the greed of the few positioned to take advantage of this plant coming to Coos County and the desperation of a population caught in an economic downturn will surely win the day. Human nature.
Sad reality. OPEC been shipping it oil to customers all over the world. It has been left with a glut of natural gas which because of its inability to ship it beyond any member countries continental borders. Beyond what it has been able to supply via pipeline, it has had to burn its excess production. With the advent of LNG ships,ports and plants, OPEC will in effect be able to dump a product it otherwise burned on the world market.
Hmmmm...Um, 007, I have waited for a few days to post on here to see if anybody other than you was going to post...
You have been the only one who has commented on here, and then it was only to call out little ole me...how pathetic is THAT?
I can't speak for everyone, but personally, you won't see a PRO-LNG sign in my yard because, as I have said before, the screamers like yourself have proven a little too ..."unstable" to be confronted in anything other than an anonymous forum.
Did the so-called supporters get stage frieght? Where were the PRO-LNG signs at? If there are so many supporters for this LNG, where are their yard signs? (LOL)
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines