Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
pril wrote on Jul 22, 2009 8:39 AM:
Enforcer, there have been "incidents" with LNG. Skikda in Algeria, 2004. Trinidad, 2004. Staten Island in the late 90s.
I'm not one of the antiLNG folks at all, but I don't think pretending there's nothing dangerous about an LNG offloading facility is all that great of an idea. The stuff blows up. There is no such thing as 100% safe. LPG is less volatile but we still felt it 15 miles away when the Sensenena exploded at Port of LA in 1976.
I'm not one of the antiLNG folks at all, but I don't think pretending there's nothing dangerous about an LNG offloading facility is all that great of an idea. The stuff blows up. There is no such thing as 100% safe. LPG is less volatile but we still felt it 15 miles away when the Sensenena exploded at Port of LA in 1976.
Common Sense wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:03 AM:
Poor con man Bob Braddock, more delays, more lost $$$, more chance your California LNG SCAM won't happen...what a shame....
enforce wrote on Jul 17, 2009 1:57 PM:
I have got to agree all the good old boys will be screaming.Anything thats good for the area is rejected in the name of we want to be a resort area thats never going to happen.So let try doing something for the economy or is that to much to ask.L.N.G. would be a great asset to the bay area.Might even put some people to work unless they say it's Tribal land enough of the B.S. lets bring the area into the century 2000.Show where there has ever been a incident with L.N.G. there is a higher risk of and Meth explosion.
amadeus wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:15 PM:
with that said, at least Stufflebean and the logging protesters will be left in the cyber dust....and we get to see inside the brains of the opinionated usual suspects on a different subject...
FYI, I am pretty neutral on the LNG subject, so long as $$$ go into the local community to benefit ALL of us, especially those in real need during this economic dust bowl.
FYI, I am pretty neutral on the LNG subject, so long as $$$ go into the local community to benefit ALL of us, especially those in real need during this economic dust bowl.
Just Me wrote on Jul 17, 2009 12:06 PM:
To Everyman: AND YOU ARE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF IT, ENJOYING IT ALL! LOL!!
JUST ME OUT! ;)
JUST ME OUT! ;)
everyman wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:27 AM:
...and here come the screamers.
...with their bullet points and ALL CAPS SCREAMING, so get ready, reader.
Remember those old zombie movies?
Every time there is an article about the proposed LNG terminal, it's like they wake up, do the zombie-walk to thier computers, and begin typing...."Must stop LNG...must stop LNG...MUST STOP LNG!!!"
Just be ready...here they come.
Everyman out.
...with their bullet points and ALL CAPS SCREAMING, so get ready, reader.
Remember those old zombie movies?
Every time there is an article about the proposed LNG terminal, it's like they wake up, do the zombie-walk to thier computers, and begin typing...."Must stop LNG...must stop LNG...MUST STOP LNG!!!"
Just be ready...here they come.
Everyman out.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines