Mak's lawyer: Don't pull bar license
By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Saturday, July 11, 2009 |
An attorney representing Mak's Old City Hall Lounge says a judge and the city of Coos Bay are going too far in recommending denial of the night club's liquor license renewal.
The owners installed security cameras, hired security officers with lists of past trouble makers and bought a Breathalyzer to test people suspected of drinking before arriving. And of the 60,000 patrons served at the bar since it got its license in June 2007, only about 100 caused problems.
Coos Bay police say they have responded to about 85 alcohol-related calls in the area around Mak's in the past year. But attorney James Monsebroten says not all of those calls should be associated with Mak's.
He noted that some of the calls stem from incidents outside the bar, caused by men who were denied access to Mak's.
"I think Mak's had taken steps to avoid those kinds of things," he said. "They were trying to avoid catering to fighters."
An administrative law judge didn't think it was enough. He issued a ruling last month, finding the bar had a history of serious and persistent problems and recommended canceling the liquor license. He also found one of the licensees, Gregory Rudolfs, had pushed a patron, grabbed the patron by the throat and pushed himself off the man's face. The judge also found that bar employees had served alcohol to a minor.
At the urging of Police Chief Rodger Craddock, the Coos Bay City Council voted last week to recommend denial of the license. The Oregon Liquor Control Commission will decide the bar's fate on Aug. 20.
At a four-day hearing in April, Monsebroten argued the problems at Mak's didn't constitute serious problems. Whereas shootings and other serious injuries have occurred at other Coos County bars, Mak's never had an incident involving a serious felony assault or firearm. If those other bars weren't asked to forfeit their licenses, Mak's shouldn't either, Monsebroten said.
The licensees proposed a 30- or 60-day suspension and fine. Monsebroten said he was disappointed the judge went straight to the harshest penalty.
"It's unfortunate that there wasn't more of a compromise decision," he said.
Regarding the incident involving Rudolfs, Monsebroten said his client pleaded no contest to a harassment violation. And the minor who got alcohol at the bar apparently used her older sister's ID to gain entrance. At least that's what security guards said, Monsebroten said.
Embed This Article
Feel free to embed this article onto your website by copying the
code below and pasting it into your site's HTML.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines