State's winners and losers

By The Associated Press
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 | 7 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Some of the major bills approved by the 2009 Oregon Legislature:

JOBS

With Oregon's unemployment rate second highest in the nation, Democratic legislative leaders used state bonds and raised taxes to put thousands of people to work on public works projects. The biggest single program was Gov. Ted Kulongoski's $300 million-a-year transportation package, which will be paid for in part by a 6-cent-a-gallon gasoline tax increase. Also passed was a $175 million stimulus package that at last count had created or saved 3,200 jobs.

TAXES

Using their "supermajority status," the Democrats raised taxes for corporations, high income-earners, hospitals and health insurers - some of it to plug budget holes and prevent cuts to schools, public safety and human services programs. Anti-tax activists and some business groups vowed to mount a petition drive aimed at forcing a statewide vote on the income tax hikes.

CELL PHONES

Oregon will join other West Coast states that ban use of hand-held cell phones while operating a motor vehicle - with a maximum $90 fine. The new law does not apply to drivers using a cell phone equipped with a handsfree device.

HEALTH CARE

Lawmakers approved a move to extend state health coverage to 80,000 uninsured children and 35,000 low-income adults. The expansion will be financed by the increased taxes on the medical industry. Lawmakers also created a health agency called the Oregon Health Authority to oversee state efforts to rein in health care costs.

GREEN OREGON

Kulongoski had mixed success in his efforts to "green up" Oregon. His "cap and trade" plan to limit greenhouse gases got nowhere, undercut by a poor economy and national efforts to create a carbon trading system. He won approval of a bill for a new low-carbon fuel standard for cars and trucks. Lawmakers also approved measures to promote residential solar power and home energy efficiency.

ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTES

Lawmakers approved bills to phase out most field burning by grass seed farmers, set up two "fishing free" marine reserves off the Oregon coast, ban large-scale destination resorts in the Metolius River Basin in Central Oregon and create a surcharge on PacifiCorp customers to remove four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River.

SCHOOLS

A temporary moratorium on growth of statewide online schools that have drawn about 4,000 students statewide was passed. Legislators endorsed a bill to strengthen the law against bullying in the public schools. It requires school districts to establish clear policies on bullying and designate a "point person" to handle complaints.

CRIME

Lawmakers split on party lines in deciding to suspend most provisions of a voter-approved measure requiring longer sentences for repeat property and drug offenders. Democrats called it necessary to prevent cuts to the Oregon State Police and other public safety programs. Lawmakers toughened penalties for crimes against pregnant women, requiring a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for murder against a pregnant woman.

MENU LABELING

Chain restaurants will be required to display calorie counts for hamburgers, French fries and the rest of their offerings under a bill aimed at combatting a national obesity epidemic. It applies to Oregon restaurants with 15 or more outlets in the nation, effective in January 2011.

ANIMAL WELFARE

Lawmakers decided to crack down on puppy mills by setting a limit of 50 breeding dogs at production facilities. The Legislature approved a ban on large exotic pets in hopes of phasing out potentially dangerous exotic animals kept as pets, including primates, large exotic cats, bears and crocodiles.

Some of the issues left in the dust as the 2009 Legislature adjourned:

• Proposed beer and cigarette tax increases, which would have been in addition to the $733 million income tax package lawmakers passed to balance the next two-year budget.

• A further expansion of Oregon's pioneering bottle deposit law, which was expanded two years ago to include water bottles.

• A measure to allow some students who are not legal citizens to pay lower in-state tuition at Oregon's public universities.

• A proposed ban on smoking in cars when children are present.

• The continuing unresolved dispute about whether employers must accommodate medical marijuana patients who show up for work with the drug still in their systems.

• A bill to exempt teachers from a state law limiting the sale of soda pop and unhealthy snack foods in schools.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

everyman wrote on Jul 6, 2009 2:55 PM:

Good grief, Just Me...read the last line of my previous post, since it is obvious you didn't read it the first time!

1. I am not talking about those with legitimate need...help those who need it. But a VERY significant number of these lunches are doled out to children who don't "need" it.

2. NOTHING is free...there is always cost involved.

3. What would you know about my compassion or lack thereof??? A single post about our need for fiscal responsibility gives you about a tenth of a percent view into my care of others...so please shut your cake-hole.

The man...the myth...The Everyman

Just Me wrote on Jul 5, 2009 8:46 AM:

To Everyman: I am not clear on whether or not you are being sarcastic on your so called "free lunch" mentality, but I don't think you are. These kids need these lunches during the summer and it is not of their doing. It is that of their parents! I really doubt the kids even realize they are "free"! Even if they do, so what! If you have a problem with little kids being able to eat a meal when otherwise may have to go without, you sir have no compassion for anything or anyone! And you are saying "don't help the needy"!

everyman wrote on Jul 1, 2009 11:08 AM:

..so the "free lunch" has come home to roost, has it?

Tax dollars are not free, no matter how you slice them up and hand them out.

This is simply the "free lunch" mentality that we facilitate every summer manifesting itself into every facet of the economy. When we teach children that if it dosen't cost them anything, personally, then it's free...guess what? Those children grow up to believe exactly that...and we end up with the productive minority footing the bill for the dependant majority.

I'm not saying don't help the needy; I'm saying teach the needy to, if at all possible, help themselves.

kikilongbean wrote on Jul 1, 2009 8:44 AM:

What if you are using your cell phone to call for help? Or to report a dangerous driver?

swede wrote on Jun 30, 2009 9:34 PM:

WELL I'D SAY WERE ALL LOSERS. THE DEMS WENT ON A TAX RAMPAGE [LEAD BY VERGER] AND RAISED TAXES ON ALL OF US. I WILL REMEMBER ALL THIS WHEN THEY RUN FOR RE-ELECTION.

Mark Smith wrote on Jun 30, 2009 4:51 PM:

So the stimulus created or saved 3200 jobs. Let's do some math here 175,000,000 / 3,200 = 54687.50 per job. Does anyone really think that jobs are paying that much? And what of all the overhead on that. I'd wonder why we don't just pay that money out in cold hard cash and be done with this insanity. I cry foul on this wasted money.

TruthTeller wrote on Jun 30, 2009 4:14 PM:

With our tax dollars being spent on this, I'd say we are all losers. Can I get one of there jobs?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections