Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
kikilongbean wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:01 AM:
Big Brother is here. It's going to get worse until we all stand up and say no.
Wait til the 2010 census comes out. It's bad news.
Buttercup wrote on Jun 29, 2009 4:14 PM:
mzenz wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:36 AM:
Comparing drunk driving to talking on a cell phone? Please!
mzenz wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:35 AM:
Comparing drunk driving to talking on a cell phone? Please, let me know how many people have been killed because of both, I would like to know just how much higher drunk driving is, to think that's it's the same is absurd
dan milburn wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:28 AM:
dan milburn wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:20 AM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 28, 2009 8:19 AM:
AnOldDude wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:23 AM:
Reedsport wrote on Jun 27, 2009 8:47 PM:
Oh, that's right you can't smoke in the car, it's illegal!
Big Brother's in the back seat
bigmommasdaddy wrote on Jun 27, 2009 1:22 PM:
I constantly see our local police officers talking on cell phones while driving in their patrol cars...Now they might have to hand up their phone long enough to cite regular citizens for doing the exact same thing..
If it applies to us, it should apply to them!
barack obama wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:52 AM:
Coquillian wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:41 AM:
Mr E wrote on Jun 26, 2009 4:42 PM:
It IS dangerous, but there are many other distracting habits seen by drivers.
catman wrote on Jun 25, 2009 4:50 PM:
nogod wrote on Jun 25, 2009 1:42 PM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 25, 2009 8:30 AM:
realitybites wrote on Jun 24, 2009 3:53 PM:
I, on the other hand, do it often and have had no close calls or crashes.
Sen. Kruse is correct. If the legislature is going to ban one potential distraction, it should ban all of them.
A better idea would be to make the driver licensing test harder, to weed out those who are less able to block out distractions, regardless of whether it's hot coffee, screaming passengers or a cell phone. That would make roads actually safer, rather than just bowing to the noisiest constituency or doing something to be more like California or Washington.
Just Me wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:48 PM:
Justaguy wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:57 PM:
tsunami wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:00 PM:
Just An Observer wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:48 AM:
Kruse is a knee-jerk conservative in any case. There's a difference between "nanny state" and laws for the greater public safety Jeff.




The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines