Local senator blasts cell phone ban


Wednesday, June 24, 2009 | 22 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM (AP) - One of the South Coast's state senators objected vigorously to an ban on using hand-held cell phones while driving.

The Oregon Senate narrowly approved the ban on Tuesday, but not before Sen. Jeff Kruse bashed it as a "stupid bill, to say the least."

"This is more Nanny State. Let's leave the people of Oregon alone, for God's sake," said the Roseburg Republican, whose district includes southern Coos County. "This is an issue of distracted driving. Singling out cell phones as the only bad thing people do while they are driving is absurd."

The Senate vote puts Oregon a step closer to joining other West Coast states that already ban driving while phoning. It would impose a maximum $90 fine on drivers caught texting or talking on a hand-held cell phone.

The measure, House Bill 2377, now returns to the House for action on amendments. It cleared its last major hurdle after supporters said drivers who become distracted by using hand-held cell phones are a menace to themselves and others on the road.

The bill does not apply to drivers using a cell phone equipped with a handsfree device. It also has exceptions for certain drivers, including those working in public safety.

Sen. Ginny Burdick and other supporters of the bill say traffic crashes involving drivers talking on cell phones cause 2,600 deaths a year and thousands more injuries nationwide.

She cited one study estimating that 80 percent of the nation's cell phone users talk and drive at least some of the time.

"We have to get a handle on this. It's not just drivers at stake; it's the innocent victims. Drivers using cell phones really are impaired," the Portland Democrat said.

If the measure wins final approval, Oregon will join Washington and California in restricting the use of hand-held cell phones while driving.

There are similar bans in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York.

In 2007, Oregon lawmakers made it illegal for teenagers younger than 18 to talk and drive, but the law said police could ticket teens only if they had been stopped for another traffic violation.

Local police have said that provision made the law difficult to enforce.

The bill that won approval Tuesday would still prohibit teens from driving and talking, even on a handsfree set, and make it a primary offense for drivers of any age to text or use a hand-held cell phone.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

kikilongbean wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:01 AM:

Does this mean you can't use your cell phone to call for help while driving? What about reporting dangerous drivers?

Big Brother is here. It's going to get worse until we all stand up and say no.

Wait til the 2010 census comes out. It's bad news.

Buttercup wrote on Jun 29, 2009 4:14 PM:

Thanks Sen Kruse for being willing to speak up against this. The government's job is NOT to protect people from themselves. People, use common sense and be a defensive driver. Ocassionally sh** happens and life's not fair. Expensive, worthless legislation isn't going to change that.

mzenz wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:36 AM:

Many states have what is called an inattentive driving law (unsure of proper name). It cites drivers that are being inattentive can be pulled over, and fined, makes sense, right? This can be lighting a cig, putting on makeup, reading, messing with a stereo, and yes, texting or talking on a cell phone.

Comparing drunk driving to talking on a cell phone? Please!

mzenz wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:35 AM:

Many states have what is called an inattentive driving law (unsure of proper name). It cites that drivers that are being inattentive can be pulled over. So, if someone is doing anything that is causing them to drive with less caution than is necessary, they can be pulled over and fined. This can be lighting a cig, putting on makeup, reading, messing with a stereo, and yes, texting or talking on a cell phone.

Comparing drunk driving to talking on a cell phone? Please, let me know how many people have been killed because of both, I would like to know just how much higher drunk driving is, to think that's it's the same is absurd

dan milburn wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:28 AM:

Other distractions? A few years ago a teenage girl in a Honda car hit a Logging truck in front of Bob Angel's shop - on the straight stretch in Eastside - while eating a bowl of fruitloops on her way to school! Lucky for both their were no injuries.

dan milburn wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:20 AM:

Here is your chance to see your future! Here in Washington cell-phone's use is banned while driving. Results? People are still using them. Why? It's too big to enforce. Officer - "here's a ticket for cell-phone use" - " I wasn't talking - I was turning it off". It's impossible to enforce. However-Your butt will be in a big sling if you are in an accident whether it's your fault or not because the first thing they do is get a copy of your phone record! If you get rear-ended while you were on your cell-phone - it could be "your" fault. It's a catch 22 waiting to happen.

Just Me wrote on Jun 28, 2009 8:19 AM:

BARACK OBAMA: Please reread your statement and get back to me and tell me if it makes any sense at all! Thank you! You are really contradicting yourself.

AnOldDude wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:23 AM:

I have had more close calls with drivers and hamburgers than with drivers and cell phones

Reedsport wrote on Jun 27, 2009 8:47 PM:

With looking at themselves in the rear view mirror to put on lipstick while holding a cup of hot coffee between their legs and a cell phone in the other while trying to light a cigarette, I say SOME blondes ought to be banned from the road!
Oh, that's right you can't smoke in the car, it's illegal!
Big Brother's in the back seat

bigmommasdaddy wrote on Jun 27, 2009 1:22 PM:

Why is it that this new law will not apply to public safety employees?

I constantly see our local police officers talking on cell phones while driving in their patrol cars...Now they might have to hand up their phone long enough to cite regular citizens for doing the exact same thing..

If it applies to us, it should apply to them!

barack obama wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:52 AM:

I think that cell phones should be banished all together. I was walking down the street and a guy bumped into me while talking on a phone. Seriously people!!! Stop letting the government control your lives. These little bills here and there add up. Sooner than you think we are going to be living in a police state. Just watch.

Coquillian wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:41 AM:

A person I worked with was killed in a car crash where the other driver crossed the center line an hit her head on. When the accident was investigated his cell phone records show that he had been on the cell phone. I am fine with the law. Should be a no-brainer. Now if we could just get people to have manners with their cell phones in public, that would be great.

Mr E wrote on Jun 26, 2009 4:42 PM:

He's absolutely right, in that it is somewhat amusing that we are singling out cell phone use.

It IS dangerous, but there are many other distracting habits seen by drivers.

catman wrote on Jun 25, 2009 4:50 PM:

AS a 20 Year Truck Driver, I support the ban of any and all cell phone use, unless you are stopped or (in very limited other occassions). This only a first step. Allow cops to ticket any use of cell phones. This needs to be done NOW. We can always work on other distractions later. A cell phone user is equal in disability, to a drunk driver. OUTLAW ALL cell phone use in vehicles. Park it or LOSE IT

nogod wrote on Jun 25, 2009 1:42 PM:

Great bill I was rear ended by an idiot texting 2 years ago and still have life long injuries due to it.Screw Kruse he's probably being lobbied by a telecom

Just Me wrote on Jun 25, 2009 8:30 AM:

This law has absolutly nothing to do with California and Washington. It has to do with safety! Just because you "do it often and have had no close calls or crashes", doesn't mean it isn't going to happen! I myself really don't want to be on the other end of your "crash". And to those of you that think public safety officers should not have them are stupid! If you read the article, they really are not banning them, they say get a hands free device, so what is the big deal?

realitybites wrote on Jun 24, 2009 3:53 PM:

Having watched Ginny Burdick work, I agree with her that she couldn't operate a car while talking on a cell phone.
I, on the other hand, do it often and have had no close calls or crashes.
Sen. Kruse is correct. If the legislature is going to ban one potential distraction, it should ban all of them.
A better idea would be to make the driver licensing test harder, to weed out those who are less able to block out distractions, regardless of whether it's hot coffee, screaming passengers or a cell phone. That would make roads actually safer, rather than just bowing to the noisiest constituency or doing something to be more like California or Washington.

Just Me wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:48 PM:

In my opinion, I believe that this law should be instated. I have seen many close calls of people driving while talking on cells, such as driving over the line, almost rear ending other people etc. I am not against cell phones, but when they endanger other people it is time to just pull to the side of the road to take your call. And to ICARE, public safety people HAVE to have them at all times, give me a break!! I also can't understand how you can SAFELY TEXT and DRIVE?? Solve the problem and get a headset and quit complaining.

Justaguy wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:57 PM:

Wow.......Jeff Kruse is such an idiot. How do guys like this ever get elected?

tsunami wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:00 PM:

i think people with cell phones should have them surgically implanted in their ears

Just An Observer wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:48 AM:

Proving a driving while distracted ticket is a lot tougher than proving someone was holding a cellphone to their ear, thus the need for this law. The only stupidity here is Kruse's. Cellphones and drivers make a bad combination and are the cause of plenty of accidents. That's why California and Washington passed those laws along with several other states.

Kruse is a knee-jerk conservative in any case. There's a difference between "nanny state" and laws for the greater public safety Jeff.

Icare wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:22 AM:

This law is obsurd....if the everyday citizen can't use a hand held cell phone, than no one should be able to, not even public safety. NO Exceptions!!!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections