Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
We need citizen reviewers
Friday, June 19, 2009 | 1 comment(s)
Never underestimate the wisdom of Oregon voters. That is a guiding premise behind an experiment in having a group of citizens critique proposed ballot measures.
The Oregon Senate approved the proposal, sending House Bill 2895 to Gov. Ted Kulongoski for his signature.
As a pilot project, it would authorize a panel of randomly chosen citizens to review one to three initiatives on the 2010 ballot. Those citizens would meet for several days, look at the pros and cons of a measure, and write an evaluation for inclusion in the Oregon Voters Pamphlet.
The concept is that voters can make better decisions when they have straightforward, unbiased information from a source they can trust: their fellow Oregonians.
The Voters Pamphlet has grown so thick with pro and con arguments for initiatives that it routinely requires two volumes.
Sorting through that maze of information and argumentation can be a confusing.
This is the kind of experiment in citizen democracy Oregonians tend to embrace: It's not telling them how to vote; it's giving them more information on which to base their vote. And it tests the concept on a small scale.
If evaluations show the pilot project was fruitful, the "citizens initiative review" could substantially improve Oregon's election process.
(Salem) Statesman Journal
The Oregon Senate approved the proposal, sending House Bill 2895 to Gov. Ted Kulongoski for his signature.
As a pilot project, it would authorize a panel of randomly chosen citizens to review one to three initiatives on the 2010 ballot. Those citizens would meet for several days, look at the pros and cons of a measure, and write an evaluation for inclusion in the Oregon Voters Pamphlet.
The concept is that voters can make better decisions when they have straightforward, unbiased information from a source they can trust: their fellow Oregonians.
The Voters Pamphlet has grown so thick with pro and con arguments for initiatives that it routinely requires two volumes.
Sorting through that maze of information and argumentation can be a confusing.
This is the kind of experiment in citizen democracy Oregonians tend to embrace: It's not telling them how to vote; it's giving them more information on which to base their vote. And it tests the concept on a small scale.
If evaluations show the pilot project was fruitful, the "citizens initiative review" could substantially improve Oregon's election process.
(Salem) Statesman Journal
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines