Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Oregon parents face charges in child's death
By William McCall, Associated Press Writer
Monday, June 15, 2009 | No comments posted.
PORTLAND - A couple charged with manslaughter claim they were within their constitutional rights when they decided to pray for their 15-month old daughter rather than take her to a doctor to treat her pneumonia.
But legal experts believe that Carl and Raylene Worthington will likely have a difficult time arguing freedom of religion over the state's duty to protect children from harm.
A pre-trail hearing is scheduled for today in the case against the Worthingtons, whose toddler Ava died in March 2008. The state medical examiner said Ava could have easily been treated with antibiotics.
The trial, scheduled to start June 23, comes about a decade after the Oregon Legislature amended state law to restrict an exemption for faith healing and to bar arguments that religious beliefs prevent seeking medical help.
The revision in state law came in response to an investigation into a series of deaths of children whose parents belonged to the church and suffered from untreated illnesses that were curable.
A small church cemetery is lined with the graves of dozens of children - suggesting an extraordinary increase over the average death rate for children in the United States, according to Dr. Seth Asser, a Boston pediatrician who has studied the practices of faith healing groups for years.
He said such deaths are far more common among fringe groups with small congregations that stand apart from mainstream churches.
The deaths also typically involve young children because "by the time kids are school age, there are others involved in their lives - friends, neighbors, family, teachers that may be aware if there's a serious issue," Asser said.
Prosecutors have declined comment on the case and the attorney for the Worthingtons, John Neidig, was unavailable on Friday.
The judge in the case, Clackamas County Circuit Judge Steven Mauer, said at a hearing in January that "I do not feel we are on unplowed legal ground" before he rejected a defense motion to dismiss the charges.
A number of legal experts agree the law is fairly well settled when it comes to requiring medical treatment for children.
"Faith healing practitioners and individuals who believe in faith healing have had a lot more difficult time, if not almost impossible time" defending themselves in the deaths of children, said Steven Green, a Willamette University law professor.
Green, the former general counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the legal standard for state intervention in medical care of children had been a "compelling" interest in protecting their health and welfare.
But legal experts believe that Carl and Raylene Worthington will likely have a difficult time arguing freedom of religion over the state's duty to protect children from harm.
A pre-trail hearing is scheduled for today in the case against the Worthingtons, whose toddler Ava died in March 2008. The state medical examiner said Ava could have easily been treated with antibiotics.
The trial, scheduled to start June 23, comes about a decade after the Oregon Legislature amended state law to restrict an exemption for faith healing and to bar arguments that religious beliefs prevent seeking medical help.
The revision in state law came in response to an investigation into a series of deaths of children whose parents belonged to the church and suffered from untreated illnesses that were curable.
A small church cemetery is lined with the graves of dozens of children - suggesting an extraordinary increase over the average death rate for children in the United States, according to Dr. Seth Asser, a Boston pediatrician who has studied the practices of faith healing groups for years.
He said such deaths are far more common among fringe groups with small congregations that stand apart from mainstream churches.
The deaths also typically involve young children because "by the time kids are school age, there are others involved in their lives - friends, neighbors, family, teachers that may be aware if there's a serious issue," Asser said.
Prosecutors have declined comment on the case and the attorney for the Worthingtons, John Neidig, was unavailable on Friday.
The judge in the case, Clackamas County Circuit Judge Steven Mauer, said at a hearing in January that "I do not feel we are on unplowed legal ground" before he rejected a defense motion to dismiss the charges.
A number of legal experts agree the law is fairly well settled when it comes to requiring medical treatment for children.
"Faith healing practitioners and individuals who believe in faith healing have had a lot more difficult time, if not almost impossible time" defending themselves in the deaths of children, said Steven Green, a Willamette University law professor.
Green, the former general counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the legal standard for state intervention in medical care of children had been a "compelling" interest in protecting their health and welfare.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines