Locked out on LNG

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Saturday, June 06, 2009 | 3 comment(s)

As permit process progresses, locals have little say in the matter

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Federal officials could decide whether to approve the siting of a liquefied natural gas terminal in Coos County as early as June 18. Or it could be several more months before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gets around deciding on the local application.

No one can say for sure what the decision will be, but everyone agrees about the process: Locals have very little say.

Sure, you can go to meetings, deride the federal reports and put up signs and billboards. But FERC isn't considering whether the community wants the terminal. It's approval is based on whether the developer has met state and federal laws.

And FERC isn't alone in that effort. Another 28 state and federal agencies have a role in approving the LNG terminal and natural gas pipeline. It's the same story with these other agencies. Locals have very little say in their decisions.

Most of these departments aren't scheduled to complete their work until after FERC issues its LNG yea or nae. But like the FERC, all these agencies must make their decisions objectively.

So ultimately the battle becomes an issue of time. Proponents will fight to get the process done and over with quickly, while opponents' best option is to try and drag out the proceedings as long as possible in hopes the developer will lose interest and drop the project.

That's not likely, says Jordan Cove Project Manager Bob Braddock.

The company is confident energy companies someday will want to transport LNG to a terminal on the West Coast. Although news reports say the United States has a glut of natural gas, Northwest Natural President Gregg Kantor has said in the past that demand in the eastern part of the country could result in a need for imports of LNG on the West Coast. Any decision to stop construction, provided government agencies approve the project, would result from a shift in these energy markets - not from opponent delay tactics.

"It would require economic changes that make the project simply uneconomical and there is no indication of that, " Braddock said.

He concedes the proposed construction start date of September 2010 may change, due to the government approval process and court battles that come out of it. Jordan Cove's Coos County land-use application has been held up for nearly a year by a Eugene activist who appealed a question over tsunamis all the way to the Oregon Supreme Court. The high court decided not to hear the case.

"I never cease to be amazed at the ingenuity of opponents and their ability to manipulate the court system," Braddock said.

And there aren't just opponents who are calling for delays.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski recently complained about the FERC process. He wants FERC to wait until other federal and state agencies complete their reviews.  FERC listens to these other agencies by saying its approval is on the condition other agencies approve the project.

"We are saying that it doesn't seem to make sense to punt on all the other analysis," said Mike Carrier, the governor's natural resources policy director.

But that doesn't mean Kulongoski is opposed to LNG.

"He feels him adopting a policy position of that nature would create an awkward situation for state agencies to handle their cases," Carrier said.

One of those state agencies, the Department of Environmental Quality, hasn't received a completed application to allow the dredging for the LNG slip dock on Coos Bay's North Spit, said spokeswoman Julie Curtis. Once the application is completed, staffers will notify nearby landowners of the permit and take comments for 30 days. If questions arise that the department can't answer, it will ask the applicant, in this case the Port of Coos Bay, for more information.

"It is a public process and there is ample time for the public to weigh in," she said.

One local resident who has spoken out in opposition to the LNG project is Jolly Hibbits of Bandon. Despite what Carrier said, she thinks opponents have made a difference in the approach the state has had in the process.

"Kulongoski was pro-LNG until our group and a bunch of other people went up to Salem and made a scene," she said.

Carrier may say the governor hasn't taken a position on LNG, but Kulongoski has asked the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review FERC's decision on Bradwood Landing on the Columbia River. The governor is arguing FERC should have considered whether anyone needs the project.

The political maneuverings have enticed Tim Bishop to become involved in the LNG debate. A board member of Friends of New and Sustainable Industry, Bishop says it's important elected officials know there are people who want to see LNG come to Coos County.

"It's time for them to get behind instead of being a hindrance to the project," he said.



Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

dan milburn wrote on Jun 7, 2009 10:51 PM:

Why do you think they built a gas pipeline to the eastern part of the state? You "thought" you had a say then too. Fact is, you are all being manipulated and just a few of you are getting bonuses for it. This has been the story of this area for quite some time. It was Georgia Pacific, It was Weyerhauser, It was Evans, It was even partly Roseburg Lumber - but the results are the same - reap the resources and export them. For some there is a fat paycheck - for the rest of you it's like living on a strip-mine. How can you act the same and make the same bad choices and yet be be dumb enough to expect a different result each time? Why can't white people build a casino? And before you scream racist at me - I am a Native American so save your breath. This area is the largest exporter of children in the State. No future-no jobs. The greatest asset here is SWOCC. And yes, before I moved away - I got my degree there too! I went where my family went. Please quit exporting your future!

david_ormsong wrote on Jun 6, 2009 7:02 PM:

I live in Coos County and love it. The coast, the mountains the rivers, all year around. Floods rain, sun and clouds.

Since 1989 we have been going broke, between the lose of timber sales and fisheries we are bankrupt. I am the proud father of 4 and they are scattered from Portland, Iraq and San Fran. They are not here because they wanted a job. They want a future. Here there is gas and coal in the ground, there are trees and gold on the surface. We have a harbor, a rail-line and two highways. We also have space for a LNG Depot as well as controlled mining.

We can do this sensibly and we need the jobs, the Nation needs the energy, we need our children and grand children close to us.

From Coos Bay wrote on Jun 6, 2009 1:51 PM:

Our Port and County should have been working on bringing other manufacturing to the North Spit the last 10 years. SCDC has done NOTHING but cost its members a lot of money and have lots of meetings. All the years and time and meetings wasted on this horrific LNG terminal that could still be voted down and delayed even more. I much rather would have 10 different business, non-threatening, that hire 20-30 people than this 'all or nothing' invasive proposed LNG terminal. It could even get built, take hundreds of people's land and get mothballed like in the ones in the 1970's. What screwy leadership we have and screwy citizens that elect the same people in again and again to have the same problems.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections