Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
tag urit wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:48 AM:
m00npenny wrote on Jun 11, 2009 8:02 PM:
lived9lives wrote on Jun 11, 2009 12:05 PM:
I have met far too many women who have also confronted this Judgement of Solomon situation. Most chose the partner.
I would ask you to consider this story when viewing this issue.
I am also appalled at the high numbers of abortions in our country. However, I believe the most effective long-term solution to vastly decrease the numbers is comprehensive sexuality education(teaching sexual responsibility), massive media marketing supporting this, unrestricted access to birth control and related protective legislation.
No truce necessary - all is good.
Steve Pickering wrote on Jun 11, 2009 11:15 AM:
And I am not afraid to use my real name. Anonymity has little credibility.
scc wrote on Jun 11, 2009 10:36 AM:
Koos Bayanian, I don’t think anyone would dispute the taking of a dead fetus or infant, or at least I would not hope so. I think the argument is over taking a life.
For the record I don’t justify the killing of abortion doctors or bombing of clinics. Two wrongs do not make a right. On the other hand couldn’t that be cincidered “late term abortion”?
Just Me wrote on Jun 11, 2009 8:01 AM:
Coquillian wrote on Jun 10, 2009 9:32 PM:
buttercup wrote on Jun 10, 2009 5:31 PM:
koos bayanian wrote on Jun 10, 2009 5:01 PM:
Just because one woman has the ways and means to support another life to term, another may not.
Just because one woman may not care when she has an abortion, another may.
Read on the internet why so many couples adopt children from other countries. Some people may not want a child to langish in an orphanage.
The Pro-Lifers who protest in front of the clinics do not just hold signs.
Do not get me wrong, I love children and there are reasons why women should be allowed to get the care they need. I know...I had a relative who had an abortion for an infant dead in the womb. and she would have DIED!
lived9lives wrote on Jun 10, 2009 4:02 PM:
You are the first pro-life poster I have ever heard say they have taken in foster children. You are to be commended. As far as what have I done? I have taken in 3 pregnant teens whose parents could not stand the embarrassment. I also worked with the mother in providing private adoptions such that her criteria (parents, live in country, parents are Catholic, parents have pets etc.) would be considered in the selection process. I was present at the births and delivered the babies to the new parents. In addition: I have worked with pregnant and parenting teens, sexually/physically abused children, foster parents, grandparents raising a grandchild/s, GLBT "thrown away" homeless teens, children exploited/raped/pregnant while in religous cults. Sorry, there's no more room. I did NOT intend for the "stupid" etc to be directed at you - only those who view women as such. Having worked with teens who have been scarred by such comments I do get angry(for them). Once again you and your partner are truly to be commended.
Scc wrote on Jun 10, 2009 1:07 PM:
Kay wrote on Jun 10, 2009 11:48 AM:
How many Americans and clinics have these fundamentalist terrorists killed and destroyed?
I hope they all go down for murdering innocent citizens.
buttercup wrote on Jun 10, 2009 9:54 AM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 10, 2009 8:54 AM:
The Brutal Truth wrote on Jun 10, 2009 8:01 AM:
Who else wants to chime in with an uneducated generalization?
COQUILLIAN wrote on Jun 10, 2009 6:58 AM:
Rebecca1 wrote on Jun 9, 2009 9:36 PM:
lived9lives wrote on Jun 9, 2009 4:12 PM:
It seems to me Pro-Lifers are also misoginists - haters of women. No pro-lifer ever addresses the MOTHER. All I hear on this post
is "stupid","poor", "lazy","sexing around" women. Yet these same stupid women are good enough to become parents? If you are so pro-life, there are 500,000 children langusihing in foster care. Go adopt one of them instead of promoting or adopting terrorist mentalities towards doctors. Pro-life is hypocrisy, unChristian and anti-women.
Q wrote on Jun 9, 2009 3:27 PM:
Yet - I see the pro-life opinions represented in full force - in an attempt to oppress others who view freedom of choice as their God given right. Whether we can agree or disagree isn't the point - not one single person here is without sin. To cast judgment or wish another soul to go to Hell is an abomination within itself.
I challenge those of you who approve of an overturning of Roe v. Wade to study how many women’s lives were lost prior to that monumental moment in the women’s rights movement.
So - you don't agree? That's your right. You don't have to. But that also means that others have the right to feel and do with their body what they choose, without the religious rhetoric and condemnation. Without the judgment of others who couldn't know what it is to walk in their shoes.
NB_Rez wrote on Jun 9, 2009 11:47 AM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 9, 2009 10:57 AM:
Kay wrote on Jun 9, 2009 9:50 AM:
TO KAY
It has been on many newscasts that Dr. Tiller performed over 60,000 abortions.
Do you listen to the news? ? ?
Just want you to know where the info came from, and I doubt ALL the newscasts are wrong.....
Although I feel that even one partial birth abortion is one too many...if the fetus is alive when done.
OH !!! YOU HEARD IT ON THE NEWS?
NO YOU DIDN'T YOU HEARD IT ON FOX MA'AM.
NOT NEWS.
Make an effort to verify what you "HEAR ON THE NEWS".
Especially if it's Bill O'Lielly the Fallafel Man "reporting" it, okay?
Makes the dialog a lot more interesting.
keen wrote on Jun 9, 2009 9:49 AM:
Kay wrote on Jun 9, 2009 9:48 AM:
Why do you keep trying to drag war in to this?
Totally off-topic and irrelavent.
Because of the hypocrits that worship cells in a womans body, and praise their sons who kill other mothers' children around the world. That's why.
Kay wrote on Jun 9, 2009 9:45 AM:
Kay I and I am sure alot of us on here find your comment very offensive to our country and our families that have sons, daughters, and other family members serving in our military to protect the very LAND that YOU and KEEN are standing on and the AIR that you breath! How dare you !
Wrap yourself in a flag and carry a cross and you can go half way around the world to kill people. And be proud.
We are not in Iraq to protect me or anyone else, or the air I breathe. Some of us can deal with reality, others can't.
Git used to it.
Citizen wrote on Jun 8, 2009 5:01 PM:
dadochipper wrote on Jun 8, 2009 3:26 PM:
Your ilk wants to categorize everything and everyone so you can have excuses when things dont go "your" way....
Must I also remind you (or did you selectively ignore) the fact that most people getting killed over there are NOT being killed by our forces, but rather Iraqis or other enemy (yes, ENEMY, not the politically correct and too polite "insurgent") forces...
You all are wayyy to predictable....
lived9lives wrote on Jun 8, 2009 2:04 PM:
WRONG: Late term abortion techniques are used when there is NO other option. Do you want the mother with a dead fetus inside her to DIE as it rots away? To suffer a torturous death from slow, steady, unstoppable infection? For medical reasons she physically CANNOT deliver naturally nor by C-section. If this is what you desire the cancel your membership in the pro-life club as you are advocating mandatory DEATH for mothers.
m00npenny wrote on Jun 8, 2009 1:12 PM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 8, 2009 11:20 AM:
The Brutal Truth wrote on Jun 8, 2009 10:28 AM:
Totally off-topic and irrelavent.
Kay wrote on Jun 7, 2009 10:33 AM:
hj wrote on Jun 6, 2009 6:41 PM:
1313 wrote on Jun 6, 2009 3:43 PM:
It has been on many newscasts that Dr. Tiller performed over 60,000 abortions.
Do you listen to the news? ? ?
Just want you to know where the info came from, and I doubt ALL the newscasts are wrong.....
Although I feel that even one partial birth abortion is one too many...if the fetus is alive when done.
standupgal wrote on Jun 6, 2009 2:15 PM:
KEEN: Are you telling the world that an unborn baby is not alive. How do you perform surgery on a non-living object? Why are people in jail for double murder for killing a pregnant woman? Why are people in jail for killing a baby in the womb? It is not a blob of unknown material!!
From Coos Bay wrote on Jun 6, 2009 1:39 PM:
dadochipper wrote on Jun 6, 2009 8:08 AM:
Obviously, you are not so "keen"
MindTwisted wrote on Jun 6, 2009 7:23 AM:
To even ask the above quoted question shows that your level of ignorance must have reached Guinness-book levels. Such tremendously ignorant thinking renders the rest of your argument useless. When people talk about Americans being stupid and lazy, they just may be speaking about people like you, Lena Cox. I don't mean that as an insult, just a matter of fact.
Partial birth abortions are only administered to save the life of the mother, or in the event that the baby has already died in the womb. It is never done by choice, and would never be done to a healthy baby. On the other hand, shooting a baby is quite clearly homicide. Of course, if you receive your education from any source other than faux news, you'd already know that.
Any other questions? Maybe next week we can go over why torturing people is illegal and immoral.
EastBayDrive wrote on Jun 5, 2009 10:40 PM:
This issue is probably more hotly contested and debated than anything political to come along since Roe vs. Wade.
One thing that can never be disputed: You're reading this because your mother was pro-life and wasn't brainwashed by the merchants of death
standupgal wrote on Jun 5, 2009 8:44 PM:
The Brutal Truth wrote on Jun 5, 2009 6:38 PM:
You can't kill it if its not born? You don't believe that a baby in the womb is alive?
There really isn't much more to add to that.
You've said WAY more to illustrate how uneducated you are than I could ever point out.
lived9lives wrote on Jun 5, 2009 6:25 PM:
Yes, PRO-LIFE unless it's someone you disagree with then it is PRO-DEATH. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Don't believe in abortion - don't have one. When were you ordained God's Gestapo of women's medical privacy?
lived9lives wrote on Jun 5, 2009 6:01 PM:
Fourth Amendment wrote on Jun 5, 2009 5:56 PM:
Fourth Amendment wrote on Jun 5, 2009 5:54 PM:
Just Me wrote on Jun 5, 2009 5:15 PM:
chilly wrote on Jun 5, 2009 4:30 PM:
jory wrote on Jun 5, 2009 3:42 PM:
keen wrote on Jun 5, 2009 3:16 PM:
poloele wrote on Jun 5, 2009 3:04 PM:
Tag URit wrote on Jun 5, 2009 12:26 PM:
CNN says that Tiller himself claimed to have done 60,000 abortions.
Q wrote on Jun 5, 2009 9:53 AM:
It isn't up to anyone to tell individuals what they are going to do with their body and life. If you don't like it - don't associate with it. If you have a problem with it - sure, voice your opinion...
But don't expect everyone to agree. Perhaps, in this same lesson, we could do a study on the thousands of women who lost their lives in the years before Roe v. Wade. There is a reason for that judgement - that many women stood up for their right to choose what to do with their body, and that of their unborn child.
It is a crying shame that anyone is faced with the decision to terminate the life of their child to save their own (it happens everyday!) to be faced with the discriminatory statements like that of those that Dr. Tiller should burn in Hell. No one, no matter the reason, should place that kind of judgement on ANYONE.
Just Me wrote on Jun 5, 2009 8:34 AM:
Kay wrote on Jun 5, 2009 7:28 AM:
Good job Lena. Partial birth abortion takes the life away from the essence of innocence. The so-called doctor Tiller performed as many as 60,000 of these procedures and made millions of dollars doing it. May he rot in HELL!!!
DOCUMENT IT STANDUP. YOU CAN'T YOU'RE JUST ANOTHER OF O'LIELLYS' LEMMINGS. YOU PRINTED IT AS FACT, SHOW ME THE FACTS THAT DR. TILLER PERFORMED 60,000 LATE TERM ABORTIONS.
STOP BEING A PARROT FOR IGNORANT RIGHT WING HATE MERCHANTS.
The Brutal Truth wrote on Jun 5, 2009 7:20 AM:
See here's the thing. Its not just some "other woman's" business.
Its taking a human life.
What does the "pro-choice" crowd not understand about that?
BTW before I'm labeled I'm not some evangelical right-winger. Far from it!
1313 wrote on Jun 4, 2009 5:54 PM:
I am sure that low income women can get birth control pills cheap and learn how to take them.
Does anyone know how to NOT GET PREGNANT ANYMORE?????? Abortion should not be used as birth control.
standupgal wrote on Jun 4, 2009 5:00 PM:
standupgal wrote on Jun 4, 2009 4:56 PM:
Coquillian wrote on Jun 4, 2009 1:59 PM:
cal girl wrote on Jun 4, 2009 1:25 PM:
1313 wrote on Jun 4, 2009 12:38 PM:
It breaks your heart thinking what happens to the poor baby.
Kay wrote on Jun 4, 2009 12:11 PM:
I'm shocked.
If you don't want one, don't have one. Keep your nose out of other womens' business Ma'am.
Thanks for the description though, maybe you can tell us how much Dr. Tiller bled in his church vestibule?
Got that yet?


The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines