VA doctor goes to bat for veteran denied benefits over AWOL


Sunday, May 24, 2009 | 14 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
Jolene Guzman, Staff Writer





COOS BAY — When Stacy McLain volunteered to go to Vietnam, he was a teenager — a 17-year-old eager to serve his country.

“I wanted to do the right thing,” he said.

Two years later, he returned to his country a man — and a different person.

The 56-year-old’s family had a history of military service. His father and mother served in the U.S. Navy during World War II. His brother was in the National Guard and another built equipment for the military. McLain’s mother, Betty Meister, 86, said she was proud of her son’s sense of service and encouraged him to go.

But now, she’s fighting a battle against the military to get him mental health care through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

War’s nightmare

McLain enlisted at a time when many men were being drafted, and also a time when many American men avoided the call.

Not McLain.

The U.S. Army sent him to Germany, but that wasn’t where he wanted to be. He wanted to go to the action —  to Vietnam. The Army granted his wish, making him a helicopter door gunner. He covered troops as they dropped into or pulled out of action zones. McLain returned fire at whoever shot at his aircraft. Sometimes he didn’t know whom he killed, whether they were soldiers or civilians. They were nameless, faceless, and McLain agonizes, blameless.

“You don’t always see what you are hitting,” he said. “I guess that is the bigger part of my nightmare.”

The thought of killing people trying to survive, not fight, in a war-torn country wore him down. The soldier’s environment was chaotic and substance abuse was rampant.

“I decided to be as crazy as the place and time,” he said. “I had to make that decision to keep doing it.”

It was a mindset he couldn’t wash off, even after leaving the war zone.

“When you come back, it’s still there.”

A different reality

The contemplative McLain is soft-spoken and kind, but the war and its aftermath still show in his pained eyes. The anguish has persisted since he left Vietnam in late 1971.

McLain returned to Ft. Hood, Texas, to await release from service. Without combat missions, McLain was left to think and dream. He couldn’t cope with the nightmares and constant thoughts of what he had done as a soldier.

He ran from the Army.

McLain was gone from January 1972 until August 1972, when he turned himself in. Facing a decision between court-martial and a quick, but “under conditions other than honorable” discharge, McLain opted to be released.

He has since been diagnosed with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. McLain and his mother maintain he went AWOL because of the service-related mental illness, yet the less-than-honorable brand that resulted has prevented him from getting treatment through Veterans Affairs.

 In 1977, according to a U.S. Army letter, the military upgraded his discharge to “general under honorable conditions,” but it hasn’t made a difference. He has been repeatedly denied benefits. Earlier this year, the VA sent him another letter: “Your claim was denied on September 18, 2008, as your discharge has previously been determined to be a bar to benefits.”

Challenging the law

Psychiatrist Dr. Rick Staggenborg, who specializes in treatment of PTSD for the VA and Coos County Mental Health, has made it his mission to help McLain. He’s got an idea for a bill to change Public Law 95-126 that governs who the VA  can treat.

The current law denies benefits to anyone who was AWOL for more than 180 days. Staggenborg believes, as military service was the source of their illness, vets like McLain deserve to be treated. PL 95-126 has an exception for those who can prove they were insane when they committed offenses. Coos County’s Veterans Service Director Mary Ann Sackett said McLain could appeal but only with proof or statements from fellow servicemen. Thirty-seven years later, McLain sees the application and appeal process as a way to discourage vets from seeking service and Staggenborg wants to eliminate the restriction altogether.

The current law has countless victims, Staggenborg said, and until it changes, they will continue to add up.

“I’m certain a large number of them are dead and more will die if nothing is done,” Staggenborg said.

With care, there’s hope

Without treatment, PTSD victims tend to be poor parents and spouses, and they seek relief with drugs and alcohol.

Typically, combat-related PTSD victims are constantly on high alert and may startle easily. They often re-experience traumatic events stemming from seemingly innocuous triggers and tend to avoid close relationships with people.

“They feel changed, and they have changed,” Staggenborg explained.

They also carry the weight of guilt.

“Killing a lot is hard to live with,” Staggenborg said.

Meister says she not only wants to help her son, but others who are in a similar situations.

“I’m sure there are people who have stopped trying,” she said. “Those are the people who are living in camps, the homeless people.” 

McLain said he is doing better than the vets who have given up. He lives with his mother and is getting some treatment through the county. But neither McLain or Staggenborg think the cash-poor mental health agency is equipped to deal with his type of PTSD.

He says he wants to be a productive citizen, to have a job, perhaps go back to school and find a way to help others, but he can’t do it alone. He needs comprehensive treatment and believes the VA should provide it.

“I just want to be stable and have a happy life,” he said. “A boring, simple life.”
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Reedsport wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:01 AM:

Why not just let the government take care of all of us? Bring on the Welfare and Health Care to every home!!
If we tried to pay off the national debt the bill would be over a 1/2 million for every household.
We are turning into a 3rd world country anyway with all of the counterfit money being printed on loans from China!

amadeus wrote on May 30, 2009 2:50 PM:

once again, you missed the point el stupido...he went AWOl as a result of the trauma...chrystonnacrutch, are YOU judge and jury...

orecoast007 wrote on May 29, 2009 3:15 PM:

AMADEUS, He chose to serve and go AWOL in 1972.... Benifits should only be for those who serve their FULL DUTY that they sign up for... Those are the people I SUPPORT.....

amadeus wrote on May 28, 2009 11:43 AM:

I have never been in the military but I still have some sense of humanity. This man served in a needless war. This man was traumatized...this man DESERVES the benefits that ALL service men and women deserve after combat and throughout the recovery process... what part of "support our troops" do you unsupportive morons not understand?

orecoast007 wrote on May 27, 2009 7:53 PM:

If Mr.McLain went AWOL in 1972 the why should he recieve ANY benefits from the the federal government????????

Proudmom wrote on May 27, 2009 4:33 PM:

tAG urIT wrote on May 27, 2009 5:39 AM:

"There are protocals to reversing discharges, the hearings are not that difficult to sit through.
Why wait 30 years until he "needs" the assistance?"

Have you sat through the hearings? It's loads of paperwork and red tape. I was there when Stacy received his upgraded discharge and that alone was a battle to get. We repeatedly tried to get him help through the VA and he was turned down. The upgraded discharge was worthless for him getting help. His battle to get help has lasted for 30 years. I suggest you re-read the article before you throw out your 2 cents.

cvdude wrote on May 27, 2009 7:23 AM:

To: LILADY384

Did you actualy read this artical? Or did you form an opinion have way through?

You say you have empathy for "these 2 veterans" What 2 are you talking about?

Stacy never once abandonded his post.
He was back from the war and awaiting discharge. But with the solider hating hippy's and the realization of what he did over there, along with no immidiate help, he ran to find a way to coupe. Because as far as the army and the american people at that time were concerned they were done with him and he should just go back to normal life.

You have empathy?, But yet you judge. He went through just as much crap over there as the next guy. Honorable or Dis-Honorable is just a title. He still saw things and did things that YOU can only dream of or you watch in movies. It is so easy for you to sit at your computer desk and critisize what you don't understand.

It is because of idiotic people like you that Stacy (My Dad by the way) Has to deal with meaningless titles, and suffer everyday of his life.

tAG urIT wrote on May 27, 2009 5:39 AM:

There are protocals to reversing discharges, the hearings are not that difficult to sit through.
Why wait 30 years until he "needs" the assistance?

carefree highway wrote on May 26, 2009 10:54 PM:

Any combat veteran deserves evaluation, treatment and compensation, especially since he volunteered.

Just Me wrote on May 26, 2009 11:01 AM:

To Lillady: Different time different place! My heart goes out to this man and I hope that you get the help that you deserve!

lillady384 wrote on May 25, 2009 7:29 PM:

As someone who has 3 brothers and a father who serve in the military and were honorably discharged, I can have empathy for these two veterans, but the fact is they both went AWOL. They abandoned their posts and their peers. Should they recieve the same benefits as those who remained faithful? I don't belive they earn the right to use the veteran's medical care as those who were served honorably.

m00npenny wrote on May 23, 2009 11:11 AM:

Saying "it will be okay" or "hang in there", what is a person to say to men who returned from Vietnam facing these new demons. My uncles served in Vietnam, and as a child remember there was never any discussion of that time, ever. Those years that they served have been posted as "do not go there", and I as the rest of the family have respected those boundries. My heart goes out to you as my prayers.

Proudmom wrote on May 23, 2009 10:21 AM:

The battle continues and I pray that finally this will get somewhere for not only Stacy but all the others currently fighting this battle. This mess from 30 years ago took away a very loving and caring father from his children and everytime I see the Vietnam Wall I can't help but think of the living dead from that war too. I'm proud of his service and that his daughter is also serving our country. He did nothing dishonerable during his service and that should be taken into account. Who could say they would still be sane after all he went through? Should our servicemen and women be shunned because of how they cope afterwards?

Pig Nuts wrote on May 23, 2009 10:13 AM:

Why make it a negative? Look on the positive side instead. You are a hero! You laid down the cover to allow thousands of your brothers to get to safety. So what if you wasted the enemy in the process. That was what was necessary to save yourself & the people that you did. Who cares what others think, anyone who speaks in opposition to your service is not worthy of the protection the Red, White & Blue of our country, the basis of what affords them the right to speak freely in the first place.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections