Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Coquillian wrote on Jun 1, 2009 6:14 PM:
Odd how people on here who post do not believe that anyone else has a right to a different opinion. I am married 25+ years, have great children and a wonderful family. So, Rambo before you start hacking like that maybe you should think. She has admitted to adultery with two young males, and they were 18 barely...Remember this is a small town and we do know what goes on. Not much of a step for anyone to believe that she could have sex with a younger male. You may not agree with me, but at least I am polite and I don't make cracks about whether or not someone has a family or a life. You comment as often as I do, and it is part of our rights as Americans, freedom of speech.
coqtransplant wrote on May 29, 2009 8:51 AM:
First of all, her attorney said she had a relationship with one former student and a co-worker, not 2 former students. Second of all, IF she did that, which isn't illegal or over half of this community would be in jail, that is between her, her husband and God. No one else's business!!! If she had been a 35 year old male and had an affair with an 18 year old female, no one would say anything about it. So she is not perfect... Can any of you that want to condemn her claim perfection?? I think not!! Third of all, there is a HUGE difference between 17 and 18, ILLEGAL and LEGAL!!
Polygraphs are a lot better these days than they used to be. And IF they are so easy to pass then why does the "alleged victim" not just take one cause he should be able to pass too!!!FYI - Even the Oregon State polygrapher who works directly for the DA signed off on her polygraph. So maybe, we should be spending our taxpayer dollars on our schools which are in much need instead of a witch hunt which has already ruined her regardless of her innocence.
Polygraphs are a lot better these days than they used to be. And IF they are so easy to pass then why does the "alleged victim" not just take one cause he should be able to pass too!!!FYI - Even the Oregon State polygrapher who works directly for the DA signed off on her polygraph. So maybe, we should be spending our taxpayer dollars on our schools which are in much need instead of a witch hunt which has already ruined her regardless of her innocence.
rambo wrote on May 28, 2009 2:44 PM:
What a shame, Coquillian.....
You are a JOKE.
QUIT PICKING ON THIS LADY.
SHE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED..
EXCEPTED BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
WHO HAVE NEVER HAD A LIFE.
IM BETTING YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED
AND HAVE NO FAMILY.
YOU JUST TREAT PEOPLE AWFUL.
You are a JOKE.
QUIT PICKING ON THIS LADY.
SHE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED..
EXCEPTED BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
WHO HAVE NEVER HAD A LIFE.
IM BETTING YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED
AND HAVE NO FAMILY.
YOU JUST TREAT PEOPLE AWFUL.
CB Lifer wrote on May 28, 2009 2:14 PM:
I really hate admitting I live here sometimes. First of all, IF she's guilty, she should be charged to the full extent of the law. IF she is not, the boy should be charged. Let the boys take their own lie detector test, arranged by their own attorneys. Innocent until proven guilty. There are many, many people in prison who did not do what they were accused of. Take advantage of everything you can to prove guilt or innocence. There is so much hate here. The sad thing REALLY is, that BOTH familys are being hurt, and if it turns out to be all a lie, it will all be for nothing. Sad. I wish people would quit hanging people before their trial.
amadeus wrote on May 28, 2009 11:49 AM:
okay...first of all "innocent until proven guilty"...second...how can you pass judgement and participate in destroying someone's life and career on what COULD be a lie. third...Give this woman some pride and dignity and quit offering your ridiculous speculation...
Coquillian wrote on May 28, 2009 11:46 AM:
She admitted to adultery twice with two former students. Now in my book when you are married that is called lying and cheating on your family. Why do any of you think that it was a big step to be with someone under age? She is not squeaky clean by any means, and to suggest the boy was "bragging". And how many of you would actually trust your son alone with her? Just because he was MALE does not mean he wasn't a victim. And if she had sex with a 17 year old that is AGAINST THE LAW. Why should there be a double standard?
standupgal wrote on May 28, 2009 10:06 AM:
Thank you Jethro. Maybe we should also ask Coquillian and Coquiller why they are determined that she is guilty. A 17 year old waiting 3 years to brag about it???? YOu have got to be kidding. To Gone: You have never had a coach get upset when the kids were slacking. Get over it. Polygraphs are quite accurate. Ask a reputable polygrapher. Even Drew Peterson couldn't pass one, and he obviously has no conscience.
Jethro wrote on May 27, 2009 6:37 PM:
Wendi didn't take a plea.
Innocent people should never take pleas.
Good move.
In the old style polygraph tests, it might have been possible to fake one, but it was hard, very hard. Now, there are more factors involved, including body reactions to lying we cannot ever control.
I'd like to challenge any of you goglers to beat a current polygraph.
Innocent people should never take pleas.
Good move.
In the old style polygraph tests, it might have been possible to fake one, but it was hard, very hard. Now, there are more factors involved, including body reactions to lying we cannot ever control.
I'd like to challenge any of you goglers to beat a current polygraph.
Coquiller wrote on May 27, 2009 9:00 AM:
I just actually gone done reading a book about a Murderer that when the police conviscated his computer he actually did searches on how to "Pass a Lie Detector", not saying that Wendi did this, just wanting to tell a few of you that it can be done!!
COQUILLIAN wrote on May 26, 2009 12:35 AM:
Look up information about polygraphs on the internet and tell me you would stake anything on one. I wouldn't! They are not admissable for a reason. And unless you know what the questions were that were asked, you know nothing. Questions can be slanted, and so can the answers.
GONE wrote on May 24, 2009 10:09 PM:
To Standupgal:
That is wrong I know plenty of people who came into the school to complain about Wendi's coaching. She was too snoopy and got into to too many peoples business. And when she got mad everybody better watch out cause she'll snap and yell her head off. So to say that she had no complaints would be a LIE!!!
That is wrong I know plenty of people who came into the school to complain about Wendi's coaching. She was too snoopy and got into to too many peoples business. And when she got mad everybody better watch out cause she'll snap and yell her head off. So to say that she had no complaints would be a LIE!!!
Coquiller wrote on May 23, 2009 6:17 PM:
Have we all forgot that she did ADMIT to having relations with 18 yr olds???? I'm sorry but if you'll do things with an 18 yr old....thats just as bad in my book, legal or not!
Coquillian wrote on May 23, 2009 12:05 PM:
Love the blame the victim mentality here. Yes, lets give all a polygraph. Might be interesting! And even if he is retired law enforcement, he was hired by her and her atty. And if she flunked, we would never hear that!!
rambo wrote on May 22, 2009 4:43 PM:
Yes, give it a rest, coquillian.
Why are you so willing to convict ?
Wouldn't you like to hear all of the facts ?
Or, why not stay out of other people business, and just let god sort it out..
Why are you so willing to convict ?
Wouldn't you like to hear all of the facts ?
Or, why not stay out of other people business, and just let god sort it out..
CoqTransplant wrote on May 22, 2009 1:45 PM:
How do you practice for a Lie Detector test? This test she took was done and confirmed by two professionals on the west coast! Why would they risk their reputation? This whole case is a bunch of crap! It is a he said she said deal. (better known as liars poker.) She showed her hand now lets see his! He should also take a lie detector test! I am a man and have spoke with several other men around the community and they said if they were seventeen and had slept with a good looking 34 year old their buddy's would have known no later than the next day! So why wait three years????? Get Real Alleged "Victim"!! Stand up, do whats right and tell the truth! If you really have nothing to hide, go take the test like she did!
standupgal wrote on May 22, 2009 11:07 AM:
To Coquillian:
Why are you so determined to find this innocent woman guilty? Do you not stop and think what this has done to her, her immediate family, and her parents? The attorney cost thousands of dollars, and if you read the story, it was a retired state police officer that conducted the test. Why would he risk his reputation for someone he did not know? This woman has volunteered hours at the schools, has coached several sports, and has worked in the schools with absolutely no complaints. Give it a Rest!!! How about going after the young man that filed a false report?
Why are you so determined to find this innocent woman guilty? Do you not stop and think what this has done to her, her immediate family, and her parents? The attorney cost thousands of dollars, and if you read the story, it was a retired state police officer that conducted the test. Why would he risk his reputation for someone he did not know? This woman has volunteered hours at the schools, has coached several sports, and has worked in the schools with absolutely no complaints. Give it a Rest!!! How about going after the young man that filed a false report?
Thnxalot wrote on May 22, 2009 10:46 AM:
Many pathological liars, sociopaths, and criminal minds have passed lie detector tests.
Swede wrote on May 22, 2009 7:40 AM:
Kids like to bragg on how they made someone. Give the boy the test.
Swede wrote on May 22, 2009 7:39 AM:
Let them give Bryant and Ulmer and Jacks the test and see how they fair.
Coquillian wrote on May 21, 2009 7:21 PM:
Hmmm...polygraphs are not admissible in court for a reason. And she has had PLENTY of time to "rehearse" for a performance.
ExDevil wrote on May 21, 2009 6:37 PM:
Go Wendi Go,
Your a great distance runner. You'll only have a little more to go to win.
Your a great distance runner. You'll only have a little more to go to win.
gored wrote on May 21, 2009 4:49 PM:
I would bet that the "lie detector" test that she took was one that her attorney "arranged" and not one with the police. I would like to see her take one from the police and see what happens.
staying informed wrote on May 21, 2009 2:56 PM:
Truthteller:
Haven't you learned by now that this county doesn't care if people are innocent or if they will never work again in their profession? It's all about the story and the gossip. I've come to realize that the people here would much rather see someone burned at the stake than care about the truth. Afterall...the truth is not nearly as interesting.
Haven't you learned by now that this county doesn't care if people are innocent or if they will never work again in their profession? It's all about the story and the gossip. I've come to realize that the people here would much rather see someone burned at the stake than care about the truth. Afterall...the truth is not nearly as interesting.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines