District, teachers deadlock

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 | 8 comment(s)

Coos Bay leaders seek salary freeze

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY - Even with a new bargaining format, Coos Bay school officials remain at odds with the district's teachers over a contract for next school year.

Leaders from the teachers union met with school board members and administrators in an open meeting at the Sunset Middle School gym Tuesday.

After several hours of back and forth, the two sides still were deadlocked over salaries and contract language.

The district is asking for a salary freeze, which it got from the classified union as well as from administrators. Those two groups also got 8 percent increases in school district insurance contributions both years.

Those decisions won't influence the teachers, though, said teachers union president Lynda Sanders.

"We are going to negotiate for our people," she said. "If that's what they have chosen to do, that's what they have chosen to do."

Part of the reason the teachers union hasn't agreed to a contract is it's waiting to see the results of the state's budget forecast on Friday.

"Until May 15, we aren't going to know what's available," Sanders said.

State officials have said there could be as little as $5.4 billion set aside for K-12 education. That would mean Coos Bay still has at least $600,000 left to cut from next year's budget on top of proposed layoffs including 16 teachers.

There are clear philosophical differences between the two sides, said Superintendent Bob De La Vergne. The district wants to institute a salary freeze, while the union has proposed a pay raise.

If the two sides can't reach an agreement, teachers would automatically receive a small bump in pay, leaving the district with really only one option to balance its budget: more job cuts.

"We are being affected by market conditions," De La Vergne said. "There is no money in the system. We don't have many options left."

The teachers union understands the district has financial difficulties, Sanders said, but it isn't the union's fault. And while the district may have a good leadership and school board now, the union wants to ensure its contract includes protections should there be future leadership hostile to teachers.

School Board member Wally Hazen was critical of this line of thinking, suggesting it's more important to think about the problem at hand than what happens several years down the line.

"I hate to make long-term cuts for a short-term problem," he said.

While the teachers are waiting to see what happens Friday, the classified union ratified its contract with the district Monday.

Classified union President Linda Smith said her members recognized the crisis and wanted to settle so the focus could return to the students.

"We just hope the district remembers us when the money comes back, to bring back positions and hours," she said.

Prior to the meeting, Board Chairwoman Kathy Murray sent a mass e-mail to district employees, urging teachers to "join the classified and administrative groups in doing their part to preserve programs for our students and jobs for our truly valued staff members."

Barbara Anderson, representing the teachers union, said it wasn't appropriate for a board member to send a message to her members during their work day.

Jessica Knieling, of the Oregon School Boards Association, represented the district in negotiations.

There were as many as 60 teachers in attendance at one point, though the number fluctuated throughout the afternoon. Some paid close attention, while others graded papers, scanned through books or tried to keep children preoccupied.

Sanders said it's not unusual for it to take several meetings to hammer out a contract.

"It takes dialogue and that dialogue takes a long time," she said.
Union talks


Who's settled: Classified union and administrators have agreed to a salary freeze over the next two years.


Who's still negotiating: Teachers union proposes salary increases.


Why: In part, the teachers union wants to wait for Friday when the state plans to announce the May forecast.


What's next: The Coos Bay schools budget committee meets May 20. Bargaining with the teachers union is set for June 1-2
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

sig wrote on May 20, 2009 11:04 PM:

Teachers care about kids, or they wouldn't be in the business. Just like administrators, if you want to attract good teachers to this area, you're going to have to pay them decently. Funny how people never weigh in much on the contracts of other public workers like the police, firefighters, and city workers. Wishing that teachers earn less is only going to hurt kids.

fishslayer wrote on May 20, 2009 12:29 PM:

who's gonna win this battle the teachers or the children
its sad that teachers are blamed for this contract dialog, who wrote the contract, the teachers union
and the students who cares right!
coos bay, get it together

The Brutal Truth wrote on May 18, 2009 5:32 PM:

"The classified union has also left open the option of going back to the table if the teachers don't freeze salary, so it's not all what has been reported."

This is NOT true.

Tag Urit wrote on May 17, 2009 6:08 PM:

So, the teachers union should outweigh the "children"?

Isn't education about the children?

AnOldDude wrote on May 14, 2009 6:57 AM:

where is the union bashing?
no complaints on how great a teacher's life is ? how they are over paid?
Are you mad that "teach" assigned you some homework? (research)
Lets see an UNBIASED article.

teacher wrote on May 14, 2009 6:18 AM:

Since I'm on a roll, I think The World did a horrible job explaining some particulars of their statements.

For instance, when you stated that the teachers want a pay raise and no freeze, did you do ANY research why they may be asking for this?

There is a history you know that led up to this point. Cuts have been made, promises broken. But that would take research.
It's much more fun to lead the public to believe the teachers are being greedy during a financial crisis.

Secondly, yes, the negotiators were speaking of future problems....because the board chose to open over 30 articles of the contract for rewording.

Why didn't the paper research the rewording a little and ask why the board would choose to do this during such a complicated financial time?

If you want to be in the news game, it takes more work than getting a few quotes and being simplistic. Anything short of thorough in these situations is only making things worse.

teacher wrote on May 14, 2009 6:02 AM:

Please just stop. This article is somewhat on point, but not all the picture is being shown.
The teacchers HAVE taken pay freezes in the past, and still cuts were made. We are wary at best.

The classified union has also left open the option of going back to the table if the teachers don't freeze salary, so it's not all what has been reported.

Contract negotiations take a few sessions, this the first of 3 after all the budget cuts. Money wasn't even discussed until the bitter end because the board took 2 dinner breaks so the teachers who were there would leave.

Secondly, we have not voted on what provisions we will agree to, so to call us deadlocked is ridiculous. This is flame-fanning by our paper.

Thirdly, I don't understand why the paper chose to write whether they perceived the teachers were paying attention. Could this paper just even pretend to be professional and just report the facts and stop interpreting them?

Steve wrote on May 13, 2009 3:36 PM:

What ever happened to Union Brotherhood/Sisterhood? Why are those who are the least likely to lose their job, only interested in what they can get for themselves, when as Union Members they should be looking out for their Brethren/Sisters, and making concessions so all have jobs? And as teachers is even one of them thinking of the students, or is this just a job and they want all they can get for themselves?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections