Worn tracks pose new rail problem

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 12, 2009 | 19 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Workers could begin repairing tunnels along the Coos Bay Rail Link as soon as next month. But aging bridge trestles and worn tracks also need repairs before the line can open. Port officials don't have any money for that.

The port got $2.5 million in federal stimulus funds to repair tunnels 13, 15 and 18 along the 111-mile line. It was safety concerns regarding those tunnels that led Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad to shut down the line in September 2007.

The state has imposed a deadline of the middle of June to put the project out to bid. But there is no timeline for additional repairs.

The minimum amount of work to restore service is estimated at between $6.5 million and $9.5 million, said Martin Callery, director of communications for the Port of Coos Bay. The entire length of track would be passable, but there would be stretches of track where train cars would have to slow down to 10 miles per hour.

This could affect operations, Callery said, because train crews can't work for more than 12 hours at a time. Without more extensive repairs, trains could make it from North Bend to Eugene in 10 hours, but making stops at sites along the route could get workers to 12 hours without reaching the end of the line. That would force the railroad operator to hire a second crew to complete the trip.

This problem could be avoided if the port upgrades the entire line to allow trains to travel up to 25 miles per hour the entire length of track. Those upgrades would take $34 million, including the $2.5 million already allocated for tunnel repairs. But the port doesn't have the money.

Both projects would take about the same amount of time, Callery said. Once funding is in place, the port expects the less expensive project to take between 12 and 15 months. The more extensive project could take an additional three months.

"The determining factor will be the sources of funding," he said.

The port wants to apply for a Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing loan, Callery said, but it's in a holding pattern. The Federal Railroad Administration distributes the loans, but expects applicants to demonstrate a revenue stream before work starts.

Making repairs once train service is restored will slow additional upgrades and be more expensive. I's because crews would be forced to stop their work to allow trains to pass, Callery said.

The port has been learning more about the line since buying it in March. It hired Dan Lovelady, who once oversaw the railroad, as a part-time operations manager. Callery said Lovelady has been out to inspect the line and will do more of it as potential tunnel repair contractors inspect the line.

"Bit by bit we are learning more about the condition of the rail," said Callery. "In the past month, he's seen as much of the rail as he could."

Local shippers are remaining patient.

Ray Barbee, vice president of sales and marketing for Roseburg Forest Products, said his company is supportive of the port's efforts.

"We've had to utilize other forms of shipping for nearly 18 months," he said. "We'll continue to cope with it. We have no choice."

His one concern is whether the track from Coos Bay to the Roseburg Forest Products mill in Coquille will be up and running by the time the port has its line operating.

Union Pacific owns that stretch and Callery isn't sure of its plans.

A Union Pacific media relations specialist did not immediately return a voice mail message or e-mail.
Tunnel project


What: The Port of Coos Bay will begin repairs to three tunnels on the Coos Bay Rail Link.


When: The project could be under contract by the middle of June.


Cost: $2.5 million.


Next hurdle: Before the line can open, the port needs at least another $6.5 million to repair bridge trestles and tracks.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Pig Nuts wrote on May 21, 2009 8:06 PM:

Mickey 1052

Sold to you buddy! Sorry but post peak peak post & high oil prices were due to a speculative bubble. There is plenty of oil. Don't you get it? We didn't run out so now they are telling you that you are melting the polar ice caps because of using it. It is about creating bubbles to speculate in. You think oil is going to $10 a gallon? You are probably the same guy who thought your 1,200 sq. ' house was really worth 400K too. Or is it the post peak real estate era too? The arrogance of man to believe he can consume all & destroy anything. Maybe we are in the peak mankind era? See a pattern here?

singlejacker wrote on May 19, 2009 6:35 PM:

Couldn't at least one person look at these tracks before we purchased them? Any old moron could look at see that they are worn down. What's the deal?

MIKEY1052 wrote on May 19, 2009 10:57 AM:

"Post peak oil era" is the one variable that makes the argument in favor of refurbishing the railroad something we dare not do without...

MIKEY1052 wrote on May 19, 2009 10:53 AM:

It is widley held that we are now entering the era of post peak oil and the days of carefree happy motoring are numbered and that the cost of gas last summer was but a harbinger of the things that lie ahead perhaps not mor than 5 to 15 years. When those time are upon us it may well be too late to even think about refurbishing the railroad. Doing so today is a hardship but a rail line will prove to be critical in the future.

MIKEY1052 wrote on May 19, 2009 10:46 AM:

It’s widely believed we are now entering the post peak oil era. (Our days of carefree motoring with cheap plentiful gasoline are numbered and last years gas prices were only a harbinger of what lies ahead). If that assumption proves correct, and I believe the evidence is overwhelming, the need for a usable rail service will be critical in the not too distant future possibly within the next 5 to 15 years. Resurrecting the rail service today will be an expensive undertaking however if we wait too long it will prove to be even more expensive and perhaps well near impossible...

1313 wrote on May 18, 2009 5:36 PM:

Get real, this is not the time to be doing anything for the future, with all the unemployment and people with no money, because if they did have any they probably lost it in the stockmarket. Nothing is going good now financially for anyone, so don't expect our taxes to pay for future projects. Too many people can't even pay their taxes or their property taxes, so where is all this money going to come from to pay for your big pipe dreams, PORT PEOPLE ! ! ? ? ? ? ! ! ! !? ? ? ?

Common Sense wrote on May 17, 2009 9:40 AM:

Another glowing report on the Ghost Rail Line going to brokesville, Coos Bay!

I'd say these Port clowns are worth the $$$ they are paid, but I'd lying since they are costing this area, this state & the USA citizen tax payer tons of $$$!

P.S. Don't get me wrong, Gov Ted is the puppet master of these Port clowns & the real problem here! Wake up Gov Ted, let the Ghost Rail line rest in peace or resign!

Gene wrote on May 15, 2009 12:26 PM:

I was wondering who you were. Now that I have had a chance to read your glowing report on the future of Coos Bay as a major shipping port again, I realize you are another of the people in this area who somehow can't come to grips with reality. I am glad you expressed your thoughts. It makes it easier for me to pick someone to vote for.

Steve Pickering wrote on May 15, 2009 10:17 AM:

The railroad was not saved for today. It was not saved for instant gratification. The money was not spent for your satisfaction right now. It was spent, and will be spent, for the future, for the children and grandchildren to come, and those who will come after us when this port is all it can be, with a return of industry, shipping, and jobs on the bay. If we had lost this railroad, it would never return.

Yes I know there are those who would rather the land was used right now for instant, give it to me right now, gratification, condos, and a bike trail for a few dozen health advocates. But this was, is, and will be again, a shipping port, and a railroad is a must have for the future.

The Brutal Truth wrote on May 14, 2009 10:52 AM:

I just don't understand who is going to be using the rail for shipping enough to make all this spending worthwhile.

1313 wrote on May 14, 2009 9:40 AM:

I am no business genious at all and I knew the minute they wanted to buy the railroad that it was a stupid mistake. Where in the world are they going to get enough money to do repairs and keep it repaired over time and make enough money from this area to make it worthwhile?????? If it was a moneymaker and in good repair, the last "owner" wouldn't have gave up on it.
We must have the most incompetent port in the whole country....they keep buying unworkable things thinking they can make it work and it never does...!
I would love a rail line coming in here and especially a passenger train but it's not going to happen because we don't have the money to fix the line, keep it in repair, or to run the train if it does get going. In this economy where did the Port think the money was going to come from anyway.???????
Such pipe dreams they have !!!!!!!!!!!!

AnOldDude wrote on May 14, 2009 7:37 AM:

abandon-to walk away from an item with no percieved value and to forfiet all claims of ownership.
16M+2.5M+6.5M to 9M= no value????

TruthTeller wrote on May 13, 2009 10:37 AM:

So let me guess,mmmmmmmmmmm They are going to ask us for money.

Pig Nuts wrote on May 12, 2009 6:25 PM:

They want to put us in debt further with a loan. This is laughable. They bought this without a business plan. Lets say it was a lightning fast rail ready to go. What are you going to ship? There isn't anything! Why do we let these people operate with ZERO accountability? Do you not realize that there is a fee attached to everything they do? Who do you think is getting cart blanch for all the leg work being done? Legal, Real Estate, Lobbying, Construction Consulting... Ding Ding Ding, they have an open checkbook to do what ever they please & they do not have to share with you what it is or why. Let alone ask anyone's permission. They take trips all over the world on so called "business" & stick us with the bill! When are we going to put a stop to this unacceptable behavior? We can't seem to find the money for education, police & fire but we turn around & blow millions on dilapidated rust buckets! This needs to end...

tsunami wrote on May 12, 2009 3:00 PM:

central oregon & pacific railroad ignored the needed repairs, milked it for all it was worth and then bailed out

JVW wrote on May 12, 2009 12:01 PM:

I think it is critical for this area to have rail transportation. It's unfortunate, but not a huge surprise, that the costs keep mounting. Had the various shippers banded together to help pay for the repairs (to the former owners) when this all first started, we would have all been ahead. "Penny wise pound foolish" as the saying goes.

swede wrote on May 12, 2009 11:04 AM:

When Southern Pacific let the rail line go in 1982 they knew it was a pig in a polk then. Now these people think they can get it going again. But it's gonna cost dearly.

Mark Smith wrote on May 12, 2009 10:53 AM:

The important thing is we the tax payers own it and owe for it. The rest are just little details.

I wonder if they are going to spray weed retardant on the track sometime before or after trees take root.

Gene wrote on May 12, 2009 10:48 AM:

Now, they want to learn about the railroad. What a bunch of clowns! This waste of taxpayer money is just about the biggest boondoggle this port has ever managed to place on the backs of the locals.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace


Special Sections

More Special Sections