Let’s be ready for LNG terminal


Thursday, May 07, 2009 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
A liquefied natural gas terminal is like a spring rainstorm. It will fall on us or it won’t. Our opinions about moisture won’t matter much.

Instead of arguing the merits of precipitation, we should start shopping for umbrellas and planting petunias.

Last week’s conclusion of an environmental impact statement moved the Jordan Cove project, and the associated pipeline, a smidgen closer to reality. The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concluded the project would cause “less-than-significant” harm.

Though important, this report is just one step in a long journey. The commission itself still has to rule, and the project needs a stack of other permits. Court appeals will be inevitable. Pipeline easements will trigger condemnation battles.  Probably most important, the developers need commitments from future customers.

Bay Area citizens will be mainly spectators, not participants, in these decisions. We can holler ourselves hoarse without affecting the outcome. So, instead of hollering at one another about LNG, we should invest some energy in preparing for its possible arrival.

If the terminal is built, we’ll see a three-year spike in construction jobs, averaging about 470 at any given time. How will these jobs affect schools, medical care and government services? Those institutions should start thinking about how they’ll cope.

How many of those jobs can be filled by local workers? Can Southwestern Oregon Community College help locals cash in by offering specific training?

If the plant is built, it may create opportunities for additional industry on the North Spit. Economic development organizations need to be ready to capitalize on those opportunities. Local and state government should begin thinking about minimizing potential ill effects.

Many decisions about this proposal remain to be made, but now is not too soon to look ahead. If the terminal comes, supporters and opponents will need to work together, making the best of a situation we didn’t create.
Tags » editorial, ferc, lng



Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Common Sense wrote on May 8, 2009 10:38 AM:

Let's not forget the 1970's Oil embargo, where the USA was denied Oil from OPEC, where ALL Oil products including Gasoline went up drastically in a short period of time for ALL USA citizens which created extreme hardship on them! The USA should of learned their lesson & decreased their dependence on fossel fuels from foreign hostile countries that will blackmail/embargo the USA again in the future! The USA has enough natural gas by itself & it's over 2 times cheaper then importing LNG from hostile foreign countries like Russia, Algeria, Iran, etc! Keep up the good work Jody on getting the facts out there on this California LNG SCAM that Oregon or the USA doesn't need or want!

Jody wrote on May 8, 2009 2:19 AM:

You really messed up on your title here. It should read, "Lets be ready for another WPPSS or ENRON fiasco if LNG companies don't prove "NEED" first."

WPPSS (Washington Public Power Supply System) and their failed power plant projects resulted in a 2.6-billon dollar bond default in the early 80's. The plants never operated one single day and cooling towers some 480 feet tall still scar the landscape in Elma and Satsup Washington. I think Washington State learned their lessons well as you sure don't see any LNG import terminals being proposed there.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections