State wants more say in pipeline routes

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Thursday, May 07, 2009 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
State officials want more of a say in determining where natural gas pipelines go. There's legislation in the works that would make that happen.

Oregon law currently requires power companies and public agencies to purchase property or get permission to use all the land along a route, whether it's a pipeline or a road, before seeking permits from the Department of State Lands. This can be problematic, said DSL director Louise Solliday. Companies often spend years getting property rights along a specific corridor, then, when they seek state permits, DSL suggests they reroute the line so it doesn't got through a wetland, or avoids a stream.

"Getting these projects in the door sooner gives us the ability to work with project proponents, to talk about the impacts to waterways," she said at a hearing in April.

Opponents of the project have suggested in mass e-mails that the bill is a gift to the LNG companies to get their projects fast-tracked for approval.

"We wholeheartedly disagree with the idea that HB 3058 is necessary, or will improve the permitting process." said Dan Serres, conservation director of the Columbia Riverkeeper, in an e-mail.

He also suggested LNG companies asked for the bill to make it easier and less expensive to build their pipelines.

"This is a pure give-away to the LNG industry," he wrote.

That's not the case, said Solliday.

If anything, getting the projects under review earlier will allow the state to give companies more direction in choosing a route.

"This bill has nothing to do with the changing hands of property," she said.

The bill has been moved into the Rules Committee, which is headed by Rep. Arnie Roblan, D-Coos Bay. He said there are several amendments being considered to the bill, after which there will be hearings in his committee. He understands there is concern about the bill's impact on LNG proposals, but Roblan emphasized the bill would simply allow applicants to get DSL permits. It won't allow anyone to go onto private property and begin construction.

"We are going to make sure that is very clear," he said.

Dan Lattin, the project manager for the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, said  his company is pursuing several permits already without getting the right to the property of the pipeline. HB 3058 would only bring the state's permitting process in line with those others.

"Obviously before we go on anyone's land, we will acquire the right-of-way fairly," he said.

Solliday said even with the change, applicants will have to wait four months to have their forms completed, including a 30-day public review period.



Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Common Sense wrote on May 8, 2009 10:46 AM:

Better question:

Why did someone create this bill, since it doesn't protect land owner"s rights? Something corrupt & wrong with this bill, unless you are the one trying to take something from someone...

Jody wrote on May 8, 2009 1:05 AM:

As if the threat of eminent domain is not bad enough. This bill would allow pipeline companies and other "linear utilities" to sneak around behind landowner's backs and take out permits on land they have no legal right to. Kind of hard for landowners to comment on a permit when they have no idea someone has taken one out on their property. This bill is about as underhanded and un-American as one can get. A sweet deal, however, for pipeline companies and a much easier process for the Dept of State Lands to legally be able to avoid the landowner.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections