Group opposes toxin study

By Jo Rafferty, Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 05, 2009 | 10 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COQUILLE - Residents of the Seven Devils area near Bandon have sought to prevent development of a chromite mining operation for more than two years, with their latest argument focusing on how one of Oregon Resources Corp.'s own studies show a toxic substance is present in low levels in the company's wells.

Sharon Comden presented her evidence to Coos County commissioners. It was a 2008 report prepared by the URS Corp. on wells in the Whisky Run Beach area, which indicates hexavalent chromium is approaching the toxic level for aquatic species, but not for people drinking the water.

Oregon Resources Director of Geology Joseph Drew said tests did find the toxin, but at concentrations at about half the level that would harm fish.

Commissioners have hired their own geologist to study profitability of precious metals found in the mining holes.

"Monitoring well testing is a procedure I'm not familiar with," said Gold Beach geologist Russell Ralls. "The amount of natural hexavalent in place is probably not exorbitant."

But he admitted he is not an expert on the subject.

Opponents in the Bandon Woodlands Community Association that represents 250 neighborhood households have been talking with scientists to help make their case, said member Jack Jones. They include Dr. Chris Oze and the U.S. Geological Survey Senior Hydrogeochemist Dr. D. Kirk Nordstrom, along with Dr. Dan Bain and geo-hydrologist Greg Kupillas.

"They are concerned that the loss of soil structure and dispersion of groundwater during mining could release even higher levels of CrVI (hexavalent chromium) into our shallow groundwater," Jones said in a statement.

Ralls believes otherwise, saying the black sand in which the chromite is found has gone through a natural battering by the rivers and ocean over millions of years. The only way to create the hexavalent chromium is through exposure to acids or extreme heat.

That's not what ORC will do. Mining company officials said they'll separate the chromite, zircon and garnet from the sand using only centrifugal force and water - not heat or chemicals.

Ralls said houses in Bandon sit on black sand deposits - the same as those near the beach where Oregon proposes to explore.

"If it was toxic, we'd all be dead," he said.

The geologist made a presentation Friday in Coquille on the area's mining history and fielded questions about whether mining for minerals on ancient beach terraces would significantly disturb aquifers.

"There are limited connections between the bodies of water, because any fractures would not hold much water," Ralls said.

Commissioners hired Ralls for an initial consulting fee of about $600 to determine if Coos County could profit off precious metals in the ground.

"Right now we need money to staff our jail and other things," said commissioner Nikki Whitty.

Oregon Resources Chief Operating Officer Dan Smith said his company doesn't want those metals, which would be returned to the mining sites as tailings to fill bore holes.

"Unless the county wants to pay for its separation," he said.

Drilling could cost the county millions, and Smith said it would require another step and installation of special equipment at the plant to separate the metals.

"There are very small quantities of gold and platinum," Drew said, "and when we bring up the soil, it's difficult to separate."

By allowing ORC to mine county land, the county could make an estimated $32,000 a year in royalties per acre, Smith said.

Coos County Forester Bob Laport said, in the current market, timber harvests bring $15,000 to $30,000 an acre in annual revenue. He said timber money is guaranteed, but the mining company is only offering estimates at this time.

He warned that if he followed Oregon Resources' schedule, timber stands too young to create revenue would be cut down and old growth would have to be harvested for little revenue considering the bad market.

"My huge concern is, No. 1, keeping the integrity of county forests," Whitty said.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

wake up wrote on May 8, 2009 3:33 PM:

ehm... orc isn't introducing foreign substances into the process... If its toxic, its already there and in the water supply. wake up people.

wake up wrote on May 8, 2009 1:58 PM:

Anyone else realize ORC isn't putting any foreign substances into the ground? So any "TOXINS" or harmful substances are naturally occurring there. PLUS!!!! When has ORC ever claimed to intend to mine hexavalent chromium? Chromite is completely different. Oh and hexavalent chromium is a natural substance you are exposed to everyday.

IWanttoknow wrote on May 6, 2009 11:42 AM:

IWTK: If the county don't want to mine for precious metals, could individual miners file for a 'mining claim'? If they can, somewhere (according to legion) there is a 'Mother Load' in them thar hills. Just my opinion and I'm stickin' to it.

Paying Attention wrote on May 6, 2009 11:30 AM:

OK...let's get a very critical issue out in the open: Poisonous hexavalent chromium can be produced during the mixing of ALREADY PRESENT materials. ORC plans to mix said already present materials. The presence of iron obviously hasn't prevented the formation of hexavalent chromium,as ORC's own report shows. Seems that ORC is talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Paying Attention wrote on May 6, 2009 11:27 AM:

Thanks to Bob LaPort for keeping to the subject he knows best and is paid to protect: Forest resources. As for the County-hired geologist? I suggest the county hire someone who is familiar with the task at hand. Smooth.

Just An Observer wrote on May 5, 2009 8:10 PM:

It looks like a real gray area for chemical dangers to the water. We'd better play it safe and say no to this mining company unless we can be guaranteed in stone that we have no harm come our way.

white savage wrote on May 5, 2009 5:47 PM:

In Feburay 2009, ORC's geologest Joseph Drew said that hexavalent chromium could not occur in the Seven Devils area because of the high iron content of the soil. Now they say that there is hexavalent chromium in small amounts in their test wells. I think that someone's pants may be on fire. What are they, ORC, not telling us? Do the people at ORC know what they are talking about? Can the people of Coos County trust ORC with our health and well-being?

Earl E. Never wrote on May 5, 2009 2:23 PM:

I'm sorry, but why would you hire a person who, admittedly, is not an expert on the subject? Ok, I'm done for now.

You may put your head back in the sand.

Earl E. Never wrote on May 5, 2009 2:20 PM:

I think your article meant to say, "Group Opposes Toxin"

Earl E. Never wrote on May 5, 2009 1:53 PM:

Shouldn't your HUGE CONCERN be keeping this area from being ANOTHER Erin Brockovich story? Shouldn't it be protecting the residents from harm? Aren't you the slightest bit skeptical that Smith suggests you could make slightly more mining than with trees? Isn't the REAL story here that THERE IS HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN THE WATER. NATURALLY. IT DOESN'T HAPPEN EVERYWHERE LIKE THAT. Wake up!!!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections