Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
COQUILLIAN wrote on Apr 23, 2009 6:13 AM:
First off, he was NOT protected by Reaves. The city let his wife go, and that was supported by Chief Reaves. You have to receive a verifiable complaint in order to proceed. And remember Sullivan, Brenden and Morin? All "dealt with" by Reaves. Things like this can happen in ANY department. Dannel's not "cleaning" out anything. Verifiable complaints happened during his tenure, and it is that simple.
living in coos bay now wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:37 PM:
It's about time they got into trouble for this. I know for a fact they give alcohol to minors. But what do you do when you see that...call the police?
To Rocco wrote on Apr 17, 2009 3:53 PM:
He resigned from the P.D. because he admitted to being guilty! So sorry, you don't know what your talking about!!
Hal wrote on Apr 17, 2009 10:50 AM:
Coquille is much better without this person. Hope he gets his big time.
Linda wrote on Apr 17, 2009 10:39 AM:
He'll just geta little wack and protective custody. Heck he probably get to play video games and eat donuts with the rest of the crew. I say put them in the general population just like anyone else committing a crime.
What a Shame wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:38 AM:
If the police would check a little deeper, then would find a lot more charges to bring against both of these people. I incourage Bryant's other victims to please come forward NOW. There is nothing to be ashamed of and YOU would probably feel a lot better seeing both of these behind bars for a while where they both belong for what they did now and what they have done in the past. Think about it girls, and come forward and tell the new Chief, he is your friend and will get justice for you.
Remembering Corky wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:35 AM:
Let's reflect further on that Coquille PD roster from the '80s: Pettingill, King, Blue Lou et. al. You could have had a TV series with that crew. I'd even pay to see a "where are they now?" deal.
Dave P wrote on Apr 17, 2009 1:37 AM:
Well it's about time this bird stands in court for his crimes. For to long he was protected by the former chief.
Disgusted wrote on Apr 16, 2009 7:42 PM:
What were these girls charges with? MIP? Don't tell me they are innocent because they wouldn't have accepted alcohol before the legal age to drink if there were.
Here we go creating another generation of VICTIMS.
Here we go creating another generation of VICTIMS.
Just An Observer wrote on Apr 16, 2009 4:32 PM:
How weird is is that one alcohol to minors charge has such a much heavier possible sentence than the sexual delinquency charge. My head is spinning and I need a drink...LOL!
Rocco St.Bruno wrote on Apr 16, 2009 3:02 PM:
He didn’t do it, he’s innocent I tell you. This is a travesty of justice.
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines