Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Bev1971 wrote on Mar 26, 2009 10:05 PM:
This poor child wrote on Mar 20, 2009 10:17 PM:
TO THE EDITOR... wrote on Mar 19, 2009 11:18 PM:
Not from here wrote on Mar 19, 2009 6:49 PM:
To both replies to not from here.... wrote on Mar 19, 2009 11:33 AM:
Obviously you don't know what is going on. Not from here hit it on the head!
There are physical and mental disabilities other than autism. Any child with developmental or mental disabilities can go to a school or class for those disabilities. They do not have to be autistic. Autism is just one of many disabilities. And just because he goes to a school like that does not mean he has autism. He obviously has disabilities, but unless you have actually seen a written doctor's diagnosis backed up by testing, you can't assume it's autism. It has to be diagnosed by a medical professional or educational professional, not the newspaper. Sorry...but you're incorrect.
Second reply to Not From Here wrote on Mar 19, 2009 7:22 AM:
DUH wrote on Mar 18, 2009 11:40 PM:
paymenoworpaymelater wrote on Mar 18, 2009 11:17 AM:
REPLY TO NOT FROM HERE wrote on Mar 18, 2009 10:02 AM:
Sister in law wrote on Mar 18, 2009 8:53 AM:
Are you serious wrote on Mar 18, 2009 8:33 AM:
A MOM wrote on Mar 18, 2009 7:10 AM:
DUH wrote on Mar 17, 2009 9:17 PM:
Justice League wrote on Mar 17, 2009 6:36 PM:
Actually, it was your friends at the ACLU that ended up putting all the mental patients on the streets. They contended that their rights were being violated by being confined to an institution. Reagan just happened to be President at the time of the lawsuit. Hopefully, this will encourage you to do your research before repeating left wing dogma.
Too bad we could not help this young man and have gotten him off the streets and into treatment were it not for well meaning left wingers. The law of unintended consequences is often cruel.
Not from here wrote on Mar 17, 2009 6:24 PM:
Think forward wrote on Mar 17, 2009 6:01 PM:
Get Real.. wrote on Mar 17, 2009 3:29 PM:
No Name Needed wrote on Mar 17, 2009 2:56 PM:
What a Shame wrote on Mar 17, 2009 1:36 PM:
The ADULTS who knew and was around this person are the ones that are wrong.
Agrred so ignorant wrote on Mar 17, 2009 1:12 PM:
Hmmm. . . wrote on Mar 17, 2009 1:04 PM:
You wonder why everyone is commenting on your postings, but I wonder if you read the article. No one is suggesting that Cozad should be released back to the community. If he is shown to be mentally incompetent to stand trial he will be held at the Oregon State Mental Hospital for the rest of his life. . .
To Come On wrote on Mar 17, 2009 1:03 PM:
To No Name Needed wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:59 PM:
Just me wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:50 PM:
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:35 PM:
To No name needed wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:33 PM:
Brianna wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:26 PM:
I know that in jail and prison they have tennis courts etc. Do I think that is right? NO.
I do know several children with autism. But whether or not they have a disability does NOT excuse him for the crime. That is why there is a court system to figure out what is the best treatment/punishment for his individual case.
Maybe if something was done after the attack on the teacher/teacher aide this could of been prevented?
Or should we ignore this too because he has autism and let him out in the society with no help or treatment?
No Name Needed wrote on Mar 17, 2009 12:06 PM:
come on wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:47 AM:
Gene wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:42 AM:
Sister in law wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:37 AM:
sadly wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:28 AM:
Kay wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:18 AM:
I think the taxpayers were thrilled when Ronnie R. emptied the mental hospitals if I remember correctly.
What is your brilliant advice?
TO BRIANNA wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:17 AM:


Henry Cozad, accused of murder


The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines