Airport is working to become self-sufficient


Tuesday, March 03, 2009 | 6 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Since its formation in 2004, the Coos County Airport District has enjoyed mostly good news. The number of plane landings and passengers through the airport has doubled in 10 years. Funding for a new terminal was obtained, with a grand opening in July of 2008. A new traffic control tower was built. Sky West Airlines commenced service to San Francisco in July 2008.

Then there followed a lot of bad news in 2008 and 2009. Passengers and landings declined as fuel prices shot up. Horizon Air announced they were ending service to Portland.

So, many are led to wonder if the airport commissioners are as smart as they looked  from  2004 to 2007 or as dumb as they looked in 2008 and 2009. The answer is probably somewhere in the middle. My guess is that had the board in 2004 known that fuel prices would double, the economy would go into a recession and Horizon would opt out of this market, they would have considered other options for the new terminal. But those decisions were made when the demand on the airport was increasing dramatically.

Where does that leave us now?

First, of an annual operating budget of approximately $3.5 million, only about $800,000 is from local property tax dollars. The bulk comes from airport usage fees, as well as grants and special federal contracts. The Airport Board has had as a goal eliminating the local property tax as a revenue source and to rely on user fees. This has been the reason we have opted to charge for parking.

Second, virtually no local tax dollars were used in the construction of the new terminal or tower. Of the $ 19.4 million spent on the new terminal, $3 million came from an FAA grant, $10.6 million from Oregon Lottery Dollars and $5.9 from a loan that will be paid back with money received from the FAA. The point is that local taxpayers have benefited from bringing these state and federal dollars back to the Bay Area.

Third, the new terminal and new tower had little, if anything, to do with Horizon leaving the Bay Area. In meeting with the CEO of Horizon last spring, he was clear that fuel prices and the fact they were switching to larger aircraft were the motivating reasons for pulling out of this market.

Where are we going?

Air service still remains a concern. We have committed a guarantee of $650,000 for flights to San Francisco. The first $400,000 is a federal grant and the rest is airport funds. So far, we have spent a total of $62,000 and are very optimistic we will not exceed the $400,000 grant. So, none of our local money should be at risk.

Service to Portland is a bigger problem. We have guaranteed $700,000 with the Airport District being on the hook for the first $400,000 and the remainder being guaranteed by the city of Portland and local businesses. We paid $14,000 in October and expect to pay the maximums of $58,000 in November and December. 

On a positive note, Sky West has dropped fares on flights to Portland and the district implemented a program to spur interest in the flight.

It is important to note that we will receive about $370,000 per year from Sky West for landing fees, space rental and passenger fees. In large part we are taking the money we receive from Sky West and using it to pay the subsidy.

The positive news is that we still have air service to Portland and, for the first time in over 25 years, we have service south to San Francisco. The bad news is that if we do not see an increase in passengers we may not have service to Portland next year.

From a financial standpoint the district is still solid. With revenue from parking, rents from the old terminal, tenants and landing fees we can cover these costs this year. At the same time, we realize we cannot sustain these kinds of costs forever, so we have reduced staff costs, cut noncritical purchases and are continually looking for way to cut costs and/or increase revenues.

These are difficult times and our goal is to end 2009 with north and south air service, a new terminal fully utilized, a functioning traffic control tower and one step closer to being a self supporting entity not relying on property tax dollars.

We appreciate the support the community has given us, as well as the thoughtful criticism. We will need an abundance of both to get us through 2009.

Mike Lehman is chairman of the Coos County Airport District Board of Directors.
Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Steve Pickering wrote on Mar 18, 2009 4:49 PM:

Nothing is going to change unless you stop voting for people with the same attitude. The board’s job is to see that the hired help manages things in a proper manner. Most of what was done can not be changed now, but the future management of the airport can be redirected and closely monitored. There were some things done that should not have happened. You need to vote for someone who will (is willing to) look into the back room and stir up some dust.

ok wrote on Mar 6, 2009 9:36 AM:

But those decisions were made when the demand on the airport was increasing dramatically.

HOW INSULTING MIKE, YOU DON'T TELL THE TAXPAYERS THAT INCREASE WAS ONLY GOLFERS NOW DID YOU? VERY CLEVER, BUT WE SEEM TO BE ON TO YOU.

LIPSTICK MUCH?

Common Sense wrote on Mar 5, 2009 8:05 AM:

Mike...

Explain why:

1) Remodel old airport without securing long term carrier besides Horizon.

2) Horizon announces it's leaving, then Skywest is picked up with LESS flights then Horizon had.

3) Building a NEW Airport without securing another carrier with a long term contract, thus only having Skywest & their fewer fligts then Horizon had with the OLD Airport.

4) A new traffic control tower was built, without securing new carrier to justify it's need of existance.

5) 530K Parking Fee machines (Having a 7-10 yr life, then have to replace them)that only locals will use if they can't catch a ride from friend or family member, since it costs NOTHING to be dropped off at front door.

6) Finally, Skywest your ONLY carrier having a guaranteed contract $$$ with you if they have customers or NOT! Been running in the negative for months now!

Bottomline Mike: If it wasn't for the USA tax payer, you & your clowns would be out of business long ago! Finally do a good decision for the airport & the area...RESIGN






Lets see now what's happened in the last

Sherm wrote on Mar 4, 2009 9:12 AM:

If Letellier wrote that for the commissioner he should be gone. Time we got then truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Anyone using the airport knows the truth. Thank goodness its election time and we have a choice.

Bart wrote on Mar 3, 2009 8:21 PM:

I'm not surprised by the cover your behind letter. A terminal that was not needed and so much more that should be shoved under the rug. The airport was formed by the voters in 2002 not 2004. And the facts stated do not agree with facts provided by the county tax office. Where did our money go? The airport got more than a million dollars of local tax money last year not $800,000. Why not more income from landings. They reported almost 35,000 last year. That's 100 average every day and thats not fact eiither. The lower Sky West fare is for a brief time. And, we are state and federal taxpayers also.

Pilot Joe wrote on Mar 3, 2009 5:58 PM:

Mike, your going to step up and take the hit. Sorry Mike, I have to do this from hind sight. You All, did it from, “four” site. Yup, you brought them federal and state dollars back to the community. Completion of short term, construction projects with doubtful sustainable future services. Now, with all that money spent you have to try to maintain an operation and pay your water/sewer and heating bills.

Your airport board “had as a goal eliminating the local property tax as a revenue source and to rely on user fees. This has been the reason we have opted to charge for parking.” Catch that word “had” must have changed the goal now and opted for both the tax dollars and the parking fees

The great accomplishment here is a new albatross airport terminal, higher air fairs to Portland with reduced flights, poor scheduling, and subsidizing a new air carrier for the benefit of some special interest groups. OH, and the golfers are now in, out of the rain at the old remodeled terminal.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections