Audit identifies college weaknesses

By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 03, 2009 | 50 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Southwestern Oregon Community College is working to rectify issues brought up in its recent audit that revealed a number of weaknesses and problems experienced under its prior administration.

The audit, conducted by Wall & Wall Certified Public Accountants, covered the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, and was completed over the past two months.

CPA Rob Wall said the college did follow generally accepted accounting principles, was determined to be a low-risk auditee and received the top score in auditing standards.

 “The college did comply with GAAP, which resulted in an unqualified clean audit report,” Wall said.

However, the audit uncovered 10 significant deficiencies regarding internal controls, including six material weaknesses relating to its bookkeeping and financial records.

Although he didn’t want to conjecture on how problematic the significant deficiencies and material weaknesses are to an organization, they are something to pay attention to.

“I would think I would have some things to improve on and correct,” he said.

A significant deficiency is one that adversely affects an entity’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process or report financial data. It can lead to a higher chance that a misstatement of its finances can go undetected, the audit states.

The college also overspent during 2007-08. It didn’t accurately calculate cash projections or provide them on a timely basis. And its staff improperly monitored cash flows, the audit said.

Wall said some of the deficiencies are likely the result of a decision to cut the college’s business manager position in July 2007.

That meant the understaffed business office didn’t have anyone to oversee operations and to enforce policies and procedures. Wall compared it the problem to running a hospital filled with nurses but no physicians.

“It would be like a big corporation not having a CFO,” Wall said.

The lack of a business manager resulted in materially misstated liabilities within the college’s books of record in accordance with GAAP.

“If you eliminate that position, you don’t have someone with the technical ability to either perform those high-level accounting tasks, nor does the existing accounting personnel have someone to go to answer the higher level questions,” Wall said.

This issue appears repeatedly throughout the audit. Wall has recommended the college’s board of directors fill that position and that the college’s accounts payable be thoroughly reviewed by someone other than the preparer.

Linda Kridelbaugh, Southwestern’s interim vice president of administrative services, said the college is already working on its internal controls. It recently sent 10 staff members to an Oregon Budget Law workshop. A response from the college included in the audit also blames the prior administration for overspending.

“I think these were expected findings,” she said. “I don’t necessarily agree with the severity of each of the findings individually. I feel that many of the controls we’ve had in place for years and it’s never come up as a finding.”

The college is implementing an integrated online purchase order system to track encumbered monies so administrators will have a better sense of cash flow at any point. Additionally, only four key staff members now have the authority to approve purchases.

“Prior to this change, every budget manager had a minimum signing authority; below that threshold, no additional approval or oversight was required,” college staff responded in the audit statement.

Kridelbaugh said the business office is short-staffed and its business office director, Ron Olson, is essentially filling two jobs.

Administrators will talk with the business department to determine the work load and what staff members feel is missing before the college takes the next step.

“It’s not clear yet, what if any technical skills or job functions are not being done,” she said.

But that gives way to another issue. Kridelbaugh isn’t sure the college can afford to hire a business manager. Southwestern recently announced it will lay off seven faculty positions and it's proposing an across-the-board 5 percent pay reduction.

“Therein lies another problem,” she said.

Wall said he believes the college is working to rectify the audit issues, but won’t know for sure how effective the changes will be until the following audit.

“I think that they are concerned and they’re doing what they can to correct these deficiencies we reported on,” Wall said.

Another issue that appeared during the audit shows that the college district made a deal to buy property without first seeking full board approval. One was $495,000 for bare land on Newmark Avenue in North Bend on the east side of campus, and the other for $140,000 to acquire a parking lot in Curry County.

Kridelbaugh said this occurred under former college president Judith Hansen.

“That is not what’s going to happen now,” Kridelbaugh said. “These expenditures are part of the internal budget problem that we faced in the fall.”

 Southwestern responded to the item by acknowledged that the prior administration — Hansen and the Vice President for Administrative Services Sheldon Meyer — entered into the agreements or expended funds for purchase that violated Board of Education policy.

“College and Board of Education policies and procedures did not adequately safeguard the college,” the college responded in the audit. “The current college administration is committed to fully complying with College and Board of Education policies; however, there must be additional oversight to monitor compliance.”

It went on to say that the Board of Education established a finance subcommittee — made up of two board members and two budget committee members — to provide additional monitoring of college finances, and oversight of the president and financial management of the college.

“The college is taking this information and we’re using it and we’re going to move on and hoping to find zero to two findings next year,” Kridelbaugh said.  “We’re taking that audit very seriously.”

 Click here to download SOCC Audit in PDF format (9MB) * Adobe Acrobat Required
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Bright Idea wrote on Mar 14, 2009 11:21 AM:

Since athletics is so very important and shant be cut, can a student earn an associate in athletic science? Maybe you could have an athletic school and charge more, like you do the OCCI students.

This way, the athlete pays for their program, not the general public!!!

Former Employee wrote on Mar 12, 2009 8:42 AM:

Thank you Ike...well said!

Ike wrote on Mar 11, 2009 10:14 PM:

Trim the fat from top managment first before you ask the little guy to give what he hasn't got.

If a managers salary is cut, he might not be able to buy a new gas guzzler each year. If the little guy's salary is cut he will not be able to feed his family or pay his rent.

What kind of parents would sent their son or daughter to a school whose employees are hungry and homeless?

Maybe an out of state tuition is not such a bad idea.

If you build it they will come wrote on Mar 11, 2009 7:08 PM:

To Nevadan in Oregon: You are missing the point. A few certain individuals built this college up to support athletics and and out state students WHO ARE RECRUITED FOR AND COME HERE BECAUSE OF THE SPORTS! This college was created for the community members.

This college is now in financial hurt because they have to pay for all they buildings and they have not charged out of state tuition for years.

So what if you PAY for housing. I'll bet all students pay for it. Since you obviously sent your daughter to school to play a sport instead of getting an education, would you be willing to give up the tuition waiver and pay double tuition because you are out of state?

Would your daughter have chose this school if we had no sports programs?

I don't know why I bother, you'll never get it!

Nevadan in Oregon wrote on Mar 10, 2009 9:37 PM:

People Please!
My daughter chose your school to further her education and play ball for argueably the best S-ball Coach in the state. It is not a free ride.The dorms are not gifted to athletes, they PAY for them. Your State has an agreement with our State that allows us to be able to afford to send her to your awesome community and take advantage of the academics and sports.
By the way softball has had at least two deep money cuts and they have had to fundraise to make ends meet. We spend plenty in your state and y'all would make even more money off me if you charged me (sales) tax. I'd still come.

To Cut Athletics wrote on Mar 10, 2009 4:54 PM:

Not all athletes are bad, not all are out of state. I do agree cuts should be made in this program before cutting instructors and other staff/employees.

The college should cut the Athletic Director and his secretary. These wasteful and very expensive positions were created under Steve Kridelbaugh and need to go away.

Maybe the World could do some investigative reporting and find out exactly why these positions exist and why the college gives them preference over classroom instructors.

Former Employee wrote on Mar 10, 2009 9:58 AM:

I fail to see how a 5% across the board pay cut is fair to all employees. This is a big hit to those making under $30,000 a year. I think a better plan would be to cut pay according the size of salary. Lower paid employees would be cut 1 or 2% while the highest paid employees would be cut 8 to 10%. Most administrators are way over paid anyway considering their qualifications.

CUT ATHLETICS wrote on Mar 9, 2009 10:22 PM:

The college has laid off teachers and staff instead of trimming the athletic program.

They are eliminating the jobs of our local people (who pay taxes) instead of charging out of state tuition.

The financial mismanagement of the college began with the building of the recreation center, soccer field/track and dorms and other buildings along with the elimination of out of state tuition.

Now we are stuck with the buildings but we could still make it work for us. Make the dorms low-income housing for local students. Rent out the gym and athletic fields to schools. Charge out of state tuition. Fill the classroom with those who want to learn.

This college needs to work for it's community.

Steve Pickering wrote on Mar 9, 2009 11:26 AM:

When I attended Central Arizona College, they had (have) dorms also, but Out-of-State Students paid a premium to attend. Arizona Schools are funded differently than Oregon schools so In-State Students pay the same.

Originally intended to house the northern Native American student population, they (the dorms) also were taken over by mostly track and baseball students forcing academic students to live off campus.

Resident wrote on Mar 9, 2009 10:50 AM:

Why are so many tuition waivers given out? Even out of state people get free tuition with a 3.75 grade point. This was not offered to even locals in the 80s.

Tuition wrote on Mar 9, 2009 8:10 AM:

Steve, The reason SWOCC does not charge out-of-state tuition is because they need to fill the dorms. Dorms are also a big reason why athletics haven't been cut. The dorms should be known as Steve K's folly. This is a COMMUNITY college!

why not wrote on Mar 7, 2009 10:51 PM:

the admin is currently trying to get through this mess...as an employee, I see the good work that SWOCC does every day. Judith brought this college to its knees...and yes it doesn't take long...she did the same thing in kansas...why do I know, because I lived in the Midwest when this went down...so believe me Patty, Linda and the lot are doing all that they can...I would go after the board...they really were the ones that screwed up...vote them out...

Steve Pickering wrote on Mar 7, 2009 1:57 PM:

Why are Out-of-State or Out-of-District students paying the same per credit hour and tuition as In-District students? I have attended 4 other colleges and 1 university, and this is the first I have ever heard of that didn't charge more for Out-of-District or Out-of-State.

FORMER ATHLETE wrote on Mar 7, 2009 1:19 PM:

Thank goodness for the athletic department. If it wasn't for them I would have never attended nor completed my degree at SWOCC.

Citizen wrote on Mar 6, 2009 5:24 PM:

Once SWOCC goes down, it will be just more topic of "used to be's" here Coos County....used to be cheap to fly out of North Bend but the airport is closed down, used to be a community college here in town but it closed down, used to be good paying wages here in town but too many businesses closed down,used to be great education at the high school level until too many cuts were made due to lack of funds, used to be, used to be.....get my drift? How sad!

Concerned wrote on Mar 6, 2009 10:03 AM:

I will have to honestly concede that it appears Patty Scott's forte isn't the President's position.

Cut Athletics wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:46 AM:

SWOCC needs to keep the teachers in the classroom and cut its Athletic Program. This college was not created to pander to out of town athletes. This college was created to educate THIS community!

Adding the athletic programs was a dumbing down of SWOCC!

Get a new President wrote on Mar 5, 2009 7:35 PM:

Cut the corruption in managment before you cut the teachers and staff.

Lana wrote on Mar 5, 2009 7:26 PM:

I agree that athletics should not be kept at the expense of educational programs. Thank God I sent my son to Lane. This place is a mess!

Curious wrote on Mar 5, 2009 6:16 PM:

What is wrong with the board? I thought morale was supposed to be better because of the new leadership but that's not what I'm reading. If even a fraction of what I am reading is true, this interim president needs to go and the old president's wife needs to go with her! Find a way to hire the new leadership and retire the old.

Jethro wrote on Mar 5, 2009 3:51 PM:

We are supposed to be good cattle and not ask questions. Just Moo contentedly and give up your pound of flesh, right?

WRONG!

It is your duty as a member of your community to police your community. Ask tough questions! Your taxes go to this college as well as to many other things in this community. Never be contented to empty your pockets without asking why.

RE Concerned wrote on Mar 5, 2009 1:54 PM:

That's how we deal with things in Coos County. Close your ears and eyes, and hope for the best. Simple questions are being asked regarding the board's decisions, and your solution is to not ask the questions? No wonder this place is such a mess

Jethro McConnegal wrote on Mar 5, 2009 12:37 PM:

Sounds to me like there's been a bit of skimming somewhere. Why else would you cut the one position that could provide oversight and prevent such an occurance.
Unchecked corruption on all levels in this community spells doom.

New Leadership wrote on Mar 5, 2009 9:09 AM:

Patty and Linda are not qualified for thier positions...especially given the need for fiscal oversight. Facts are facts: Steve Kridlebaugh bought the college into a hole. Judith was not able to pull the college out of it. Patty is digging that hole deeper by making poor choices on the cuts...7 faculty positions?!? Athletics is bleeding money...

You Betcha wrote on Mar 5, 2009 6:19 AM:

I vote no confidence for the Interim President! She just does not have what it takes to run this college.

How about we take that fat raise away from her and save a job?

Stunned wrote on Mar 4, 2009 10:01 PM:

I notice no athletic programs got cut but theater did. What next? The art or music department? Heaven help us, cut anything but the athletic department!

What will happen to the Hales Center for Performing Arts?

Time for change wrote on Mar 4, 2009 9:27 PM:

If you want to make a change then run for the board of education. Four seats will be up for election this spring and I believe the deadline is drawing near.

Busted wrote on Mar 4, 2009 9:18 PM:

I'm confused. I thought for years the college planned on a campus in Curry County. Instead of building one they built Stensland Hall, the Newmark Center, Student Dorms, Culinary School, New Gym and track. Did I miss anything?

These were all done at the hand of Steve Kridelbaugh. So, Why does Curry County not have a campus? What really happened to the money?

It looks to me that wifey-poo is trying to hide what her husband did by blaming Judith and Sheldon.

To Concerned Parent wrote on Mar 4, 2009 8:25 PM:

Paying by the term is the way to go. That way there are no misunderstandings.

Disgusted wrote on Mar 4, 2009 6:56 PM:

I thought Linda and Patty were doing okay. I supported them but it didn't take long for the tides to turn!

They just cut some of the finest people on campus and seem to have no remorse!

Students are upset over not receiving Financial Aid and now this.

Why not cut Patty's raise? That could save a job and she isn't serving us as well as we thought.

Go Lakers wrote on Mar 4, 2009 6:36 PM:

Who needs an audit to identify the college's weakness? Open the door to the President's Office and you will see the weakest link.

Jane wrote on Mar 4, 2009 6:00 PM:

Sure, Patty and Linda, etc. inherited a big mess, but they haven't been so great about fixing it, have they? Hansen, for all her flaws, did not fire anyone, but that's where Patty etc. went first. God forbid, they cut atheletic programs instead letting go of people. They are running SWOCC into the ground.

Re More Questions wrote on Mar 4, 2009 2:03 PM:

Yes!! Thank you for your input, right on the money! People say to support and trust them but it's hard to given situations such as these.

Concerned wrote on Mar 4, 2009 1:46 PM:

To More Questions: Because the majority of us want good honest people on the Board, like the current members, rather than people like you, who are just trying to cause problems.

more questions wrote on Mar 4, 2009 12:59 PM:

Hansen purchased property she had no authority to buy. Yet the board signed off on that process. So, the board approved the business manager's departure and the property purchase. Why? And why is this current board still allowed to govern?

TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 4, 2009 12:01 PM:

Guess what? My Financial Aid was way behind too. And yes, they need help.

But do kill it all?? Ridiculous.

The school is still an overall benefit. And by far. Sure students will choose elsewhere as problems have arisen, and certainly more so if they persist.

Let's not bandwagon hate and kill the college over some bad apples that can be replaced. To suggest so is a very pessimistic viewpoint, and I hope ya'll get some professional counseling on that.

c.b.businessman wrote on Mar 4, 2009 9:44 AM:

I believe the College Board and Linda Kridelbaugh are doing a good job in trying to do what is right. They need our support now, as much as at anytime, and our community should assist them in a positive manner, however possible. Keep up the good work College employees, Board, Linda, and Patty! We appreciate all you're doing for us.

Re Truth Squad wrote on Mar 4, 2009 7:41 AM:

As you can see from student posts here, and in prior articles, the negligience of admin and the board is impacting the students to the point they aren't going to be able to receive their education locally. Especially with financial aid 5 months overdue. I've love to see an article ont that topic. No money = no attendance = no degree. With the way things are going, it's only a matter of time before students start going elsewhere.

dear truth squad wrote on Mar 4, 2009 7:32 AM:

lol, can you see a joke when it is right in front of you?

TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 3, 2009 10:11 PM:

Dear HOW:
If your advise is taken HOW does that help Coos County become a better place? Will we have replacement nurses for those who retire? Will we have replacement firefighters? What about the mechanical guys who weld, construct and fix our county's business equipment? Will we have students who earn credentials for acceptance to OSU or UO and return to Coos Country with knowledge as so many do now? The goal of a college is to improve our people, services, thus helping our people... even you someday.

Management can (has been, and maybe should continue to be) replaced. But to claim the whole lot is rotten is not looking far past your own nose.

Student in despair wrote on Mar 3, 2009 6:13 PM:

Again, it isn't mentioned that most students have not received their financial aid yet - FROM FALL TERM! That is over 5 months overdue, not to mention no financial aid in sight for the current winter term. Thousands and thousands of dollars out there owed to students and where is it? I wish I would have never attended SOCC for this reason. I'm in the nursing program, which in itself is wonderful, but I made a big mistake in choosing SOCC due to their lack of responsibility.

DD wrote on Mar 3, 2009 5:50 PM:

well seeings how Linda K. likes to point fingers, why doesn't she reveal how much her husband spent on the OCCI building?
kind of a conflict on interest having her at SOCC, as her husband was former president and all

No Name wrote on Mar 3, 2009 5:04 PM:

Of course Linda will blame Judith. Certainly we didn't think she would blame her husband and former college president, Steve, for building when we could not afford to do so?

What a Shame wrote on Mar 3, 2009 3:44 PM:

Why is it that everytime I comment on SWOCC, University of Empire District, the World sensor will not print it. What is the matter World newspaper, you not used to hearing facts. That is why is it called the local garbage can linner.

Newmark Employee wrote on Mar 3, 2009 3:40 PM:

Even if Judith Hansen wasn't the business manager, she surrounded herself with people who followed her directions and didn't think for themselves. Sheldon was smart to take a job somewhere else before things hit the fan.

Hansen sure didn't seem concerned that things weren't following the correct procedures as far as board approval and board of education regulations.

Concerned Parent wrote on Mar 3, 2009 2:18 PM:

One thing that really gets me is that the bills that they send are never correct. We went in begining of winter term, figured how much we had to pay for the rest of the year and are making payments as per figured. Now my daughter recieves a bill that says we owe over $1700.00 and doesnt show her loan or scholarships... sooo how much do we owe.... it is so confusing... if this is the way they run their business office no wonder they are in trouble.. HELP!!!!!

how wrote on Mar 3, 2009 2:08 PM:

how did the college fall into such disrepair? was it just one president that did the whole thing in? I've never seen anything like this in my life! close it down and turn it into low income apartments - the WHOLE THING.

C Serim wrote on Mar 3, 2009 2:00 PM:

Seems to me that when Harvey Crim was the business manager, there were no oversights or descrepancies in anything. His job was well done and hasn't been done nearly as well since his retirement. He's the type of man with true discipline and good, consistant decision making. I know he's retired now, but why not see if he could offer any support or advice? If the college administrators truly care about the future of SWOCC, go find Harvey Crim.

What a Shame wrote on Mar 3, 2009 12:48 PM:

What the weakness is with this college is: The college has to realize that all it is, is a back water town "community college" NOT a university. The college leaders should realize that. This is NOT
THE UNIVERSITY OF EMPIRE.

why wrote on Mar 3, 2009 11:48 AM:

why was the previous business manager position eliminated, and why did the board sign of on that move? Kridelbaugh's "that's the way we've always done it" outlook is outdated and unproductive.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections