Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Duncan wrote on Mar 17, 2009 11:46 AM:
Truth Squad wrote on Mar 17, 2009 10:14 AM:
If you'll notice, I have not once claimed this administration to be anything at all, good, bad, otherwise. READ what I have written, I have simply pointed out the weaknesses in other's argument. For all I know the Obama admin will fail. My point is this, offer facts of value, not open-ended and vague name-calling "fits of emotions."
Still waiting on my fact challange to anyone. And the offer for real debate on finance, etc.
TRUCKER wrote on Mar 17, 2009 1:10 AM:
As B.O.'s screwups continue to multiply we can expect you to become even more shrill and ineffective in your panic and confusion. But hey, relax, this to shall pass (the sooner the better.)
Tag Urit wrote on Mar 16, 2009 4:38 PM:
William Lynn, is a former lobbyist for defense contractor Raytheon, a pick Obama made in contradiction to his much-heralded anti-lobbying rules.
Hey truth squad wrote on Mar 16, 2009 4:30 PM:
if you are a "squad" of one, you need to GET A LIFE!!!
Truth Squad wrote on Mar 16, 2009 2:21 PM:
Trucker and Louis throw out accusations. I point out that they are accusations with no link to it's source and point out that Trucker is making a medical diagnosis (a serious claim in the medical world if not a doctor, but whatever).
I then point to the right-sided leaders and their very obvious flaws.
I am then attacked as untruthful and a plagarist. The plagarsim claim was clearly debunked immediately, but the untruthful claim continues to be tossed out there with zero proof. Back up your claims if really expect anyone to believe your argument. Unless of course you are TRYING to look like a knee-jerk reactionary who is simply unable to write with intelligence.
What is worse, is no one can actually muster a decent conversation about banks/finance, correction to earmarks or job growth, not a single actual attempt at debating these issues. Why? Aren't these things more important to America and our county than faulty attacks?
Truth Squad wrote on Mar 16, 2009 2:02 PM:
Check your facts first, before attempting to slander.
Speaking of slander, it is always desperation at it's worst. I challenge you to prove I have said anything untrue. I've beaten you dogs before (see the plagarism comments).
And, if by chance my sources or facts wind up false, I will admit it. Prove it though. I challenge you. Take your time, I can wait.
Check your facts wrote on Mar 16, 2009 12:26 PM:
Fact Check AIG insures Congress Pensions, it is a scam e-mail!!!
Obama excuses the contract writers of AIG wrote on Mar 16, 2009 11:09 AM:
Then several months later AIG, the huge insurance company, announced it too was in financial difficulty. Congress did a 180 turn in their philosophy and provided bail out money for AIG. Why the change of heart? Was it out of concern for the tens of thousands of citizens who might loose money? Or perhaps Congress was suddenly concerned for the economy as a whole. Well, it was nothing that complicated.
AIG INSURES THE PENSION TRUST FUND FOR MEMBERS OF........
THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS!!!
Truth Squad wrote on Mar 16, 2009 10:36 AM:
Jobs are the issue.
I love the attack of the "MSM." It is attacking the messenger, as is always the last ditch effort in desperation to get your wayward point across.
The internet is great thing, if for nothing else, for the ability to diversify your news resources. Failure to use or recognize this, is purely your choice. Disappointment with your impression of MSM says nothing specific about a particular news agency or particular story told. The remedy, if you wish, is to develop an all-new, website/cable news with no bias. Good luck sir.
Dr. Adrian Rogers wrote on Mar 16, 2009 6:43 AM:
You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
"MSM" is the main stream media.
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 14, 2009 6:21 PM:
I did not make myself as clear as I could in reference to the rushing in of legislation.
Instead I quickly drew comparison to last president's flaws with a rush to remedy. That wasn't a crystal clear analogy to see. But I absolutely do agree with too much too soon, simply because each bill is loaded with pork and certainly at risk for not being well developed due to it's expediting.
You have a fault though too. The nationalism/bank remarks are questions I pose. They are not my "ideals." Notice the "?" in my previous comments.
It could though run out the crooks, but it is anti-capitalistic and anti-business. I am just wondering aloud if there is some degree of merit to it, perhaps not. I just have yet to hear anyone, anywhere offer much that sounds plausible to really get our economy going again and to prevent the banks from doing it again.
to Truth squad wrote on Mar 14, 2009 7:31 AM:
while this letter that is being commented on will not.
Point to be made is that if you will embrace the "urgency" of the economic situation to push through the horrible legislation that the Obama Administration has been doing in 52 days.
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 13, 2009 12:19 PM:
Just because some random website offers opinions that are similar to my comments does not constitute plagerism. Feel free to look up the definition.
What surprises me is that you sank to that depth, simply because you disagree.
This is typical though, attack the messenger and do not offer a rational reason why you disagree. I'm entirely open to discuss and/or defend the merits of anything I write. I'll even admit if you have a good point, or if am beginning to see why your idea is better. This can only happen if the dumb attacks stop and a real discussion of issue(s) begin.
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 13, 2009 11:43 AM:
Your link is the first time I've ever seen, heard, or looked at that daily kos website.
If you still think I plagerized, give the quote I took (and somewhow wrote with ESP), and the line number (or even approx. place location) from the website page you claim.
I'm anxiously awaiting to see how accurate my ESP is!! This will be awesome!
Joseph Stiglitz wrote on Mar 13, 2009 7:37 AM:
At least you aren't plagerizing word for word information from the
"Daily Kos" so much for being truthful,
"Truth Squad"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/9/14316/26025/353/695269
To the Editor wrote on Mar 13, 2009 7:27 AM:
Reading the quarreling between "Truth Squad" and Trucker are off subject!!!
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 12, 2009 11:01 PM:
Yes, there is a rushing in of agenda. As did Bush to his war on civil rights. Both have spent money with no gold standard. This means we CAN spend all we want with few risks. If inflation rises we lose. If not, we get the new roads, schools, and people to work for free. The absurd earmarks are certainly a problem, and is a serious detriment.
What does Cuba and Russia have to do with anything? Each party would love to be a majority forever. Duh.
Should we nationalize the banks and then privatize in about 5 years time to the highest, qualified bidder? It's the SnL all over again. Would a capitalism model work again once we have a decent GNP? It would be a good clearing house for the crooks running the banks. It's also what the IMF recommends.
Clear and present danger wrote on Mar 11, 2009 7:49 PM:
Appearing to be an insider, Soros suggested to CNBC that the Obama administration plans to "save up" $100 billion from the TARP, with a plan to "leverage these funds up" by utilizing Federal Reserve assets to reach a total of a new $1 trillion to rescue banks, without going to Congress with a request for a new $1 trillion in TARP funds.
Soros suggested this new $1 trillion "will help relieve the situation," but he doubted even this additional $1 trillion would be "enough to turn the situation around."
"In the end, we will have to nationalize the banks, if we want the banks to start lending again," Soros finally admitted to CNBC toward the end of his interview.
full link @http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89761
Truth squad is a little off subject wrote on Mar 11, 2009 7:46 PM:
The long term goal is to make it impossible for the Dimwit Party to ever again lose an election.
Just like North Korea, the "People's Republic" of China, Castro's Cuba, Hugo's Venezuela, and the old USSR, we're set to become a nation of libtards who tromp to the polls as ordered to vote for The One Party that "takes care of us".
To Trucker wrote on Mar 11, 2009 5:40 PM:
TRUCKER wrote on Mar 11, 2009 5:04 PM:
Lingua Latine would come in handy to read my credentials, degrees, and licenses, however.
TRUTH SQUAD A NON-MISNOMER wrote on Mar 11, 2009 1:58 PM:
TRUCKER wrote on Mar 11, 2009 12:51 PM:
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 10, 2009 8:59 PM:
I could say the same things Louis said, but instead say them ABOUT Louis. I have no facts, but if I wanted to scare people I could do it.
The fall of Rome was at the hands of a military spread too thin. Never has a major world power fallen because money was spent to instigate job growth or health care reform.
If the country is dividing it is because some people are believing everything said by Rush Limbaugh (think: Oxycodone addiction) and Anne Coulter (aka "I'm a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it")
louis wheeler wrote on Mar 10, 2009 9:40 AM:
He seems bent on enacting every bad Democrat Party idea and proceeding at a headlong pace to get them enacted before a public backlash can develop. Stimulus packages which are payoffs to his cronies.
He talks down the economy.
He spreads lies and deceit.
He initiates programs intended to grow into Leftist monsters which will steal away our freedom in ten or so years. And all this without any debate or without the electorate knowing what booby traps await us.
One of two things are likely to happen: either the Democrat Party will be destroyed from this or America will.
An America which tries to become a Social Democratic State like the European Union will be poor, backward, demoralized and militarily weak.
There is no certainty that America will even hang together.
The Red and Blue states could go their separate way or a new Civil war develops.
But, the path that Obama wants to take us down is the same one that Robert Mugabe took Zimbabwe.
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 9, 2009 10:57 AM:
So everyone at Harvard is a thieve and a scoff-law? Perhaps many in the Senate are. But there's the rub, we need people who are not lifelong politicians, just new to the game. I believe he is most at fault for following the lead of R. Emanual. Obama however has never been accused of thievery or scoff-lawing!
It seems you are making a medical diagnosis as well. Your a doctor and a truck driver? I have no problem with driving a truck, thought about it myself, seems relaxing. But don't pretend to be something your not. If you are doctor, I'd like to see your credentials and academic history please.
TRUCKER wrote on Mar 8, 2009 3:12 PM:
Illinois wrote on Mar 8, 2009 12:37 PM:
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 7, 2009 12:35 PM:
1) It is just and fair to balance the wealth. Anyone who disagrees is wealthy and/or lacking in compassion.
2)Victimology is being played by the wealthy as well, see above #1.
3) You are not accurate. There are tax cuts for Americans, just as campaigned. See: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/congress_stimulus
4) You say Obama has "invoked that he won the election to dissenting Republicans"... ? Where did you see this? We all saw the polls well before election day, up by double digits. The young and independent saw a better candidate. It was a massive increase in Dem registration which proved the election decisive.
It seems you are invoking slander.
Tom wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:49 AM:
The Obama program is all about class warfare and the same “victimology” practiced in the inner city of Chicago by Jeremiah Wright and other Obama associates.
Obama could have unified the country by producing a bipartisan bill which included some elements of Republican ideas (tax cuts for Americans and businesses) as well as “New Deal” type work programs that Democrats support.
In my opinion, Obama never considered a bipartisan approach to the stimulus bill. There is an arrogant “call to greatness” attitude in his domestic policy.
He has repeatedly invoked that he “won” the election to dissenting Republicans.
TRUTH SQUAD wrote on Mar 5, 2009 3:36 PM:
And socialist/fascist? The truth is our gov't has always been a blend of socialized and capitalistic goals. The post office is socialized. Social Security, is guess what? A form of socialism. As is unemployment, and our Timber Revenues we all want back, myself included. It makes up where capitalism fails or can't work.
If we can employ more Americans with gov't infusion or if more Americans can have adequate health care, we all win.
The only cost is the money. With the absence of the gold standard, we can make all we want with the only risk being global $ devalue or inflation. Both are well check right now.
Every administration pushes some envelope. After last envelope pushing (torture, constitutional amendments) I welcome an attempt to balance helping others and capitalism.
No Representation in USA wrote on Mar 3, 2009 9:06 AM:
The concern about Obamas so called innocent associations, upbringing, voting record, hidden school records and talking points were put down as being "racist".
This historic president is on a mission to be the the Messiah along with the DC power crazed unhwholly alliance of socialist/fascist in Congress and the cowards in business who think they will be immune down the road...
North Bend Guy wrote on Mar 2, 2009 7:37 PM:
Oscar wrote on Mar 2, 2009 9:55 AM:
Who else has fooled such a large audience into thinking he is the character he played for the last two years – a "leader" who can take charge?
Salal wrote on Mar 1, 2009 8:27 PM:
Stand up and debate a true argument or stay off the comments!
Mams wrote on Feb 28, 2009 2:54 PM:
All into the great sinkhole....going..going....gone>>>>>>
Taylor wrote on Feb 25, 2009 10:22 PM:
Learn from the past wrote on Feb 25, 2009 8:50 PM:
No More Bail Outs.........
Mr E wrote on Feb 25, 2009 7:29 PM:
Wow, thank you for providing three Republican principles that are NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY THE MAJORITY OF PARTY MEMBERS. I'm sorry, but it's not 1960 anymore.
Fiscal responsibility (while introducing "spend, spend, and spend some more on credit" economics into American politics, THREE DECADES AGO)? Free enterprise (while arresting individuals like Tommy Chong, who, regardless of their recreational habits, did NOTHING illegal by selling blown glass products)? The best government is that which governs least (I guess that doesn't count if you're invading ANOTHER country, or if you're attempting to legislate things like religious dogma 2000-year-old ideas of "morality"... how about the tens of billions successfully spent on the "war on drugs?)?
I'm sorry, but you're describing the LIBERTARIAN PARTY (personal and economic freedom, free enterprise, small government). Please update your talking points memo, and your voter registration.
Mr E wrote on Feb 25, 2009 7:20 PM:
I'm sorry, but after Bush and his administration, ANYTHING is an improvement. Even another Clinton.
Frankly, I don't think anyone who is going to write garbage like this should bother opening their mouth for another few years. You lost. GET OVER IT.
Um.. wrote on Feb 25, 2009 7:02 PM:
Jon Favreau wrote on Feb 25, 2009 4:52 PM:
Mr. Obamam has out spent the 8 year Bush administration in about one month!!
It looks very much as if the president is oblivious to everything we've learned about social programs and educational reforms in the last 40 years-they don't work. He reads a good speech though.
Greg wrote on Feb 25, 2009 4:50 PM:
Scaredy Cat wrote on Feb 25, 2009 4:38 PM:
Obama's a great stylist, a great orator, who gave a (Jon Favreau's wrote it) great speech last night.
America is about to get all the charisma it can handle and still have someone who will make matters worse in this country.
winston wrote on Feb 25, 2009 4:33 PM:
Paul K wrote on Feb 25, 2009 3:09 PM:
And leaving aside the chutzpah of casting the failure of his own party’s governance as proof that government can’t work, does he really think that the response to natural disasters like Katrina is best undertaken by uncoordinated private action? Hey, why bother having an army? Let’s just rely on self-defense by armed citizens.
The intellectual incoherence is stunning. Basically, the political philosophy of the GOP right now seems to consist of snickering at stuff that they think sounds funny. The party of ideas has become the party of Beavis and Butthead.
Im just going to... wrote on Feb 25, 2009 1:11 PM:
And of course they own most all of our politicians, 1/2 of the planet and most major corporations including the worldwide media. Oh yes, they also own 1/2 of the worlds gold.
They are very nice Zionists, who created Isreal. Our VP, Joey Biden, just admitted to Shalom TV he wasnt a jew, but he was a zionist!(check him out on youtube!).
We all need to WAKE UP and see where the real power lies in this world.
Truth Squad wrote on Feb 25, 2009 10:47 AM:
They make any Dem or Indy look so much better.
Have we forgotten who.. wrote on Feb 25, 2009 10:36 AM:
Gary wrote on Feb 25, 2009 8:49 AM:
Thomas wrote on Feb 24, 2009 6:47 PM:
History will probably blame the failure to prosecute America's most illegal and corrupt administration ever of the crimes they committed for our downfall.
TRUCKER wrote on Feb 24, 2009 6:47 PM:
To BS wrote on Feb 24, 2009 3:57 PM:
FunnyWoman wrote on Feb 24, 2009 12:57 PM:
To bad... wrote on Feb 24, 2009 10:36 AM:
CC wrote on Feb 24, 2009 10:32 AM:
The Bush Administration took decisive action to keep the country safe after 9/11. I only hope that the new administration takes their responsibilities as seriously.
The Emperor has no clothes wrote on Feb 24, 2009 10:27 AM:
After all, while the Democrats bear a lot of responsibility for the knee-deep toxic mess, the bulk of the responsibility has to rest on the shrugging shoulders of Obama’s immediate predecessor and those that came before him.
Early though it may be, however, it’s not too early to come right out and say what needs to be said: when it comes to the steps being taken to address the current crisis, Obama has no clothes.
Chris wrote on Feb 24, 2009 10:21 AM:
How Sad wrote on Feb 23, 2009 9:39 PM:
longroot69 wrote on Feb 23, 2009 9:27 PM:
George wrote on Feb 23, 2009 7:57 PM:
Hey Earthkid wrote on Feb 23, 2009 5:01 PM:
You forgot... wrote on Feb 23, 2009 11:20 AM:
It sends a chill down my spine to see this man in control of our food supply. He’s all for dangerous, untested, unlabeled genetically engineered crops. Named top Bio-tech Governor by the biotech lobbyists.
It’s all about the corporate money for both sides, the Reps and Dems. Time to find a third choice. One that isn’t controlled by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and other influences.
ObamaBush No difference wrote on Feb 23, 2009 10:33 AM:
EarthKid wrote on Feb 23, 2009 10:16 AM:
1) free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity: A totally free market creates slavery, it is most profitable.
2) government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn. Let the rich make bigger and bigger piles of money wile everyone else suffers.
3) the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least. No government means anarchy, of course the rich will support a military to keep the poor enslaved.
EarthKid wrote on Feb 23, 2009 10:08 AM:
moonpenny wrote on Feb 23, 2009 9:44 AM:
Since when have you been able to say "wow, look what Bush/Obama/Anyone did for me today", "My life is wonderful and prosperous because of my political leader".
Take care of yourself and your family, when it comes down to it, our goverment is too busy fixing their own screw ups to even care about the people.
Local Lady wrote on Feb 23, 2009 9:05 AM:
now that is entertainment wrote on Feb 23, 2009 8:39 AM:
Starting at 1:11 AM "Agitated"
"This Letter makes me sick" 1:16 AM
"As I See It" 1:38 AM
until "Regression" 1:47 AM
I'll bet there is a head ache involved...
the audacity of hype wrote on Feb 23, 2009 7:52 AM:
Under qualified and given the position because of his race, which is pretty much correct. No Caucasian candidate would have ever been elected with his lack of experience.
For those who blindly followed the audacity of hype let this be a wake up call.
ABC wrote on Feb 23, 2009 7:49 AM:
Wright wrote on Feb 23, 2009 7:43 AM:
By the way, I will watch whatever I want to on TV/Cable/Internet
IT IS STILL A FREE COUNTRY!!!!!
Own your home part 2 wrote on Feb 22, 2009 9:32 AM:
Wake up, america!
Own your home part 1 wrote on Feb 22, 2009 9:30 AM:
Gives a great summation of economics in the US since 1820s. Speaks of the disparity of workers pay to consumerism, to profit increase due to capitalism. People have awoken to a new economic reality, that wages have frozen since the 1970s, consumption was stagnant as money wasn't available, so workers/housesholds began to work more, households began to fall apart, US people consume more drugs than any other country, people began charging with money that they didn't have. The execs saw this shift in consumption and charging for "stuff" that we "had" to own. So they started lending the working class money, so we work for them, they lend us money with interest. We started owning collateral, we could put loans on that collateral, so the lending bonanza was blowing out of control. Incomes did not increase, but lending went out the roof.
all the same wrote on Feb 22, 2009 8:52 AM:
They are both loaded full of greedy people/crooks. I say OUTLAW BOTH PARTYS. Why not let more than 2 people run ?
Rotten wrote on Feb 21, 2009 8:55 PM:
Right wronged wrote on Feb 21, 2009 12:24 PM:
This is called tit for tat!!
I can not wait till 2010 to vote these jokers out of Congress.
2 high minded wrote on Feb 21, 2009 9:37 AM:
Gary wrote on Feb 21, 2009 9:22 AM:
Wade wrote on Feb 21, 2009 8:48 AM:
1) free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.
2) government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.
3) the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.
Convicted republicans wrote on Feb 21, 2009 8:21 AM:
http://www.google.com/search?q=republicans+convicted&btnG=Search&hl=en&sa=2
Hey Tag wrote on Feb 21, 2009 8:17 AM:
Tom Delay is convicted of consipracy to violate Texas state campaign finance laws. SYSOP 9/29/2005 7:26:06 AM. Tom Delay is convicted of consipracy ...
Tom DeLay, the former House GOP majority leader whose connections to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff brought scandal and disgrace to the ...
The republican party is more corrupt with each passing year. Carolyn Cheney's opinion is just smoke & mirrors.
High Minded wrote on Feb 20, 2009 10:42 AM:
Progression wrote on Feb 20, 2009 7:54 AM:
The progression is clear as day.
Too High Minded wrote on Feb 19, 2009 5:51 PM:
She has not been convicted of ANYTHING
High Minded wrote on Feb 19, 2009 12:21 PM:
And the Republicans are the "moral" party?
We suffered through 8 years of Republican mistakes, everybody should relax a little and see if President Obama can get things going in the right direction. I doubt that any of you can argue President Obama doesn't represent a big step up in intelligence over the previous administration.
CB wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:56 AM:
Your all going to pay dearly for it and pay and pay and pay. For generations to come......
TAg wrote on Feb 19, 2009 7:51 AM:
Those who were during the past 8 years:
Scooter Libby was the only one inside the Bush Administration.
Hey Wade wrote on Feb 18, 2009 10:04 PM:
Who's throwing the first stone?
not that theres anything wrong with Socialism or is there wrote on Feb 18, 2009 10:01 PM:
Now! Shall we put up the list of convicted criminals the right gave us...just in the last 8 years? I've seen it. It's huge. Delay, Abramoff, Libby...
Mountain...mole hill. Get it?
Samuel wrote on Feb 18, 2009 4:34 PM:
I can almost bet that the multitude who voted for Obama were not expecting this mess to come about!
Wade wrote on Feb 18, 2009 4:23 PM:
Sadly, all this matters little to the left.Politics now is simply based upon how to fool the ignorant and uninformed. Democrats know it and practice it using the selfishness of human nature to purchase votes while Republicans still think principle matters.
What F'n principles Wade? Name three, okay?
You forgot one wrote on Feb 18, 2009 2:14 PM:
Jenna wrote on Feb 18, 2009 2:03 PM:
This is the society the American people have chosen; a place where terrorists are treated with humanity and unwanted babies are thrown out with the trash. And it won't be improving any time soon, now that liberals are making the rules the rest of us are required to live by.
Wade wrote on Feb 18, 2009 12:15 PM:
Founding Father wrote on Feb 18, 2009 12:14 PM:



The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines