Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Praying wrote on Mar 6, 2009 3:49 PM:
coquille wrote on Feb 27, 2009 8:26 PM:
Wendi Smith and she graduated from Coquille high school aprox in 1990.
Out of town wrote on Feb 26, 2009 2:49 PM:
Clueless In Coquille wrote on Feb 23, 2009 8:45 AM:
Bottom line: the accused is just that. Just accused. The case has to be tried, and perhaps a verdict rendered.
We have a very good new Police Chief not from this area. He is doing his job. Our City Fathers who hired him better stay the straight and narrow . . .
CHECK IT OUT..... wrote on Feb 22, 2009 1:33 PM:
kick in cb wrote on Feb 21, 2009 3:06 PM:
Im Ill wrote on Feb 21, 2009 2:19 PM:
winston wrote on Feb 21, 2009 8:27 AM:
Steve wrote on Feb 20, 2009 9:58 AM:
feeling lucky wrote on Feb 20, 2009 7:45 AM:
DO YOU REMEMBER wrote on Feb 19, 2009 2:10 PM:
completley exagerated and added onto of how the story started???
HOPE YOU ALL GET THE POINT!
THIS COULD HAPPEN TO ANY OF YOU!
The Facts wrote on Feb 19, 2009 12:24 PM:
Observer wrote on Feb 19, 2009 11:49 AM:
wrote on Feb 19, 2009 9:06 AM:
The truth will come out wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:39 AM:
Rick wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:36 AM:
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:19 AM:
I don't think she needs the names of the ones accusing her. I am sure she already knows who they are. I mean she had intimate contact with them right??
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:14 AM:
We all are well aware of the fact that he did it willingly, that is not the question. What is wrong is that #1 he was underage and #2 she took advantage of her position as an authority figure over him!!!!!!
Really..... wrote on Feb 18, 2009 11:00 PM:
HOT PINK GAL wrote on Feb 18, 2009 9:30 PM:
To those of you that know her wrote on Feb 18, 2009 7:57 PM:
Move it or Lose it wrote on Feb 18, 2009 6:55 PM:
This town sucks.
Friend wrote on Feb 18, 2009 5:51 PM:
QWCS wrote on Feb 18, 2009 5:34 PM:
Hazel Motes wrote on Feb 18, 2009 5:30 PM:
A lot of folks have come forward to proclaim the coach is a fine person. I suspect those same folks would be quick to say that she is the type of woman that would never have an affair also. But she is clearly having sex outside of her marriage on a more than infrequent basis. Maybe you all don't know your neighbor as well as you think. Is it really so difficult to imagine someone already engaged in multiple affairs to be involved in a third? Think about it. A willing woman can always find someone to oblige her, and she's clearly been willing. What's so hard to believe?
LC wrote on Feb 18, 2009 4:20 PM:
Former Resident wrote on Feb 18, 2009 4:18 PM:
That same teacher was into the students even in my day - some years later. Students would complain - but nothing happened. And how about the teacher at Millicoma that gave my best friend a candy bar to take a shower after class?
It was reported - and no one did a thing.
In light of other guilty parties - let's remember that there's due process here. And Wendy is entitled to it. Considering the counterparts that come before her, she's owed it. They never even had to answer for their actions...
Former Dolphin wrote on Feb 18, 2009 3:07 PM:
Listen Up wrote on Feb 18, 2009 2:48 PM:
Ridiculous wrote on Feb 18, 2009 2:37 PM:
Rick wrote on Feb 18, 2009 2:31 PM:
Ben wrote on Feb 18, 2009 11:11 AM:
Ben wrote on Feb 18, 2009 11:11 AM:
Coming back to Wendy and her sex issues, administrators or anyone who has contact with these kids consistently should be above question. In other words, these "adults" should be above reproach. Wendy is not. I personally know many people who have known her like I have and we all got the "creepy" feeling and stayed clear of her. I guess we know why now.
The Terms wrote on Feb 18, 2009 10:55 AM:
Second-degree sexual abuse: Intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse or penetration and victim does not consent. Actor less than three years older than victim; also
(penetration is part of a medically recognized treatment or diagnostic procedures, or is accomplished by a peace officer to search for contraband or weapons)
Contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor:
Intercourse, deviant intercourse and perpetrator 18 or older and victim under 18. Actor less than three years older than victim.
Sexual misconduct:
Intercourse or deviate sexual intercourse with unmarried person under 18. Actor less than three years older than victim AND victim was at least 15.
To Vonnie wrote on Feb 18, 2009 10:31 AM:
To Kris-Feb 18th wrote on Feb 18, 2009 10:03 AM:
I am so tired of hearing it be said,that (he/she is quilty) we just couldn't prove it! This is how it is even after people go to trial and are judged by a jury and found innocent! It's so wrong!
I would like to know why the young man's name is not being given since he is an adult now. Even if he was 17 when this incident may have happened? If he is an adult bringing forth such an allegation then he needs to stand before others and be seen. She is.
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Feb 18, 2009 9:51 AM:
fishslayer wrote on Feb 18, 2009 8:45 AM:
Former Coquille Grad wrote on Feb 18, 2009 8:35 AM:
Vonnie wrote on Feb 18, 2009 8:34 AM:
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Feb 18, 2009 7:37 AM:
MIkey wrote on Feb 18, 2009 6:49 AM:
kris wrote on Feb 18, 2009 6:40 AM:
There is a due process in place, this is small area, jury pools are small. This needs to been kept in mind in the event of a potential trial.
Put yourselfs in ALL of the parties involved places.
Kris wrote on Feb 18, 2009 6:38 AM:
PEOPLE ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. HAVE YOU NEVER HEARD OF THE CONSTITUTION????
This narrow minded attitude is one of the BIGGEST reasons I couldn't wait to "get out of dodge" so to speak.
Really wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:54 PM:
Really wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:44 PM:
Have you all lost your mind wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:40 PM:
Have you all lost your mind wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:37 PM:
SUPPORTIVE wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:09 PM:
wishn I was the victim wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:50 PM:
Coq Mom wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:19 PM:
Be Patient wrote on Feb 17, 2009 8:29 PM:
Athletics Supporter wrote on Feb 17, 2009 8:18 PM:
OUTRAGEOUS wrote on Feb 17, 2009 7:14 PM:
Track Mom wrote on Feb 17, 2009 6:43 PM:
awd2 wrote on Feb 17, 2009 6:03 PM:
brenda wrote on Feb 17, 2009 5:18 PM:
Former Resident wrote on Feb 17, 2009 5:05 PM:
If she did do it - shame on her. She will carry the burden of her shame for the rest of her life. Especially if she continues to live in Coos County - the biggest gossip mill I have ever seen.
And if she didn't - shame on that young man for slandering her. She has a family. How do you think her husband feels? I can only imagine it will take years to repair the damage this situation has caused. How terrible for that.
Wendi - stand up for what is right. If you are committed to the truth, walk through fire either way. The right thing to do is never easy. Especially when you have your back against the wall.
There are those who will stand beside and wait to find out who you really are. They won't crucify you beforehand. I hope due process is served to you here.
WOW wrote on Feb 17, 2009 4:55 PM:
WEBSTER wrote on Feb 17, 2009 4:50 PM:
Frustrated wrote on Feb 17, 2009 3:54 PM:
Coquille Father wrote on Feb 17, 2009 3:44 PM:
I will support you either way.
Chris wrote on Feb 17, 2009 3:17 PM:
INFORMATION wrote on Feb 17, 2009 1:43 PM:
KELCEY wrote on Feb 17, 2009 12:56 PM:
just 1 minute wrote on Feb 17, 2009 11:28 AM:
Mom of Coquille Students wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:26 AM:
What a Shame wrote on Feb 17, 2009 10:04 AM:
What a Shame wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:55 AM:
Surprised wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:40 AM:
HOW DARE YOU wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:33 AM:
Karen wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:18 AM:
Be fair.
just me wrote on Feb 17, 2009 9:07 AM:
listen up wrote on Feb 17, 2009 8:47 AM:
JASON wrote on Feb 17, 2009 8:34 AM:
Toothless Cajun wrote on Feb 17, 2009 8:18 AM:
Gee Whiz wrote on Feb 17, 2009 7:53 AM:
I dont understand why wrote on Feb 16, 2009 10:54 PM:
well well well wrote on Feb 16, 2009 9:59 PM:
Nate wrote on Feb 16, 2009 9:20 PM:
nate wrote on Feb 16, 2009 9:17 PM:
holy cow wrote on Feb 16, 2009 8:57 PM:
Irritated wrote on Feb 16, 2009 7:36 PM:
Lori wrote on Feb 16, 2009 7:35 PM:
Classmate wrote on Feb 16, 2009 6:07 PM:
A MOM wrote on Feb 16, 2009 5:38 PM:
joe wrote on Feb 16, 2009 5:08 PM:
joe
KELCEY wrote on Feb 16, 2009 3:17 PM:
Whoa wrote on Feb 16, 2009 3:00 PM:
Cory wrote on Feb 16, 2009 2:37 PM:
We basically have a new police department. I trust they will get to the bottom of this. Thanks for remembering my daughter but with the new Chief in charge I think and hope we will all see a change. I agree with Mikey - we need to make sure she is guilty before we crucify her.
Totsoc wrote on Feb 16, 2009 2:18 PM:
I hope she is innocent tho.
ridiculous wrote on Feb 16, 2009 1:53 PM:
ashamed wrote on Feb 16, 2009 1:26 PM:
what wrote on Feb 16, 2009 12:15 PM:
Concerned wrote on Feb 16, 2009 12:11 PM:


The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines