Advocates oppose human services cuts

By Brad Cain, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 | 3 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM — Human services advocates are urging Oregon lawmakers to dip into the state’s rainy day fund to avoid cuts to programs for the needy.

That suggestion came Tuesday night as the Legislature’s budget-writing panel began hearings on what could be the first round of cuts to social services and other programs in the midst of the deepening recession.

The current two-year budget, which ends June 30, must be cut by as much as $800 million over the next few months to keep it balanced as required by law.

Gov. Ted Kulongoski proposes to reduce child care subsidies for low-income working families, eliminate dental and vision benefits for adults on the Oregon Health Plan and slice funding for community-based mental health and drug and alcohol treatment programs.

Social services advocates say those steps would cause too much hardship and that lawmakers should dip into the state’s $350 million rainy day fund instead.

“More families need our help at the very time we are proposing cuts,” said Cathy Kaufmann of Children First for Oregon, one of the advocacy groups that urged lawmakers to spend from the state’s reserves.

That idea has yet to find favor with Kulongoski and legislative leaders. They say things could get even worse in the next two years and the money will be needed then.

Kulongoski also is banking on congressional passage of the federal economic stimulus plan, with increased Medicaid payments and new general aid to states.

But the social services groups who testified Tuesday said Oregon can’t wait for federal action. Patti Whitney-Wise of the Oregon Hunger Relief Task Force said cutting dental benefits for 100,000 Oregon Health Plan patients, for example, could ultimately cost the state down the road, if it has to pay for the emergency treatment of severe dental problems.

“We have people who can’t eat the food we provide them” at food banks because of advanced dental disease, Whitney-Wise said.

Similarly, David Hidalgo of Multnomah County mental health and addiction services, said cutting funding for community-based programs to treat mentally ill people could boomerang on the state.

“Without those services, they will end up in our local hospitals, our jails, and ultimately on the streets,” Hidalgo said.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

This is wrong wrote on Feb 12, 2009 7:51 AM:

Kulongoski is making the same cuts as Bush did in his first days in office.This didnt help one bit and it wont work now.If the low income cant afford childcare they will be forced to stay home and end up using more of the welfare system.If they can impeach Illinios gov.for selling a seat then why cant we impeach our Gov for selling us out.

Sue wrote on Feb 11, 2009 4:56 PM:

Cutting services for US residents living in Oregon and on the OHP, should not be the first, middle or last people cut in benefits. Dental and vision benefits should be maintained since gum diseases and other conditions can lead to serious medical conditions. People who are disabled need the benefits that were cut last fiscal year and deserve to retain the current benefits. OHP health plan should be for US residents only in OR ! Take all the non-residents currently using the OHP off the plan. Residents that are handicapped should receive all benefits.

For People wrote on Feb 11, 2009 2:06 PM:

SOME CUTS WOULD PROBABLY BE PRUDENT, BUT OBVIOUSLY THE LESS FORTUNATE ARE LESS CARED ABOUT. WHY DO CUTS RESEMBLE PUNISHMENT FOR THOSE IN NEED, AND NECESSARY SERVICES? HOW ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE ACCOUNTS, SALARIES, AND OVERRUNS ON BIDS FOR CONSTUCTION, ETC.? THOSE IN OFFICE ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS, AREN'T THEY.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections