Man receives 30 days in rape case

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 27, 2009 | 62 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COQUILLE — The victim of a 22-year-old church volunteer’s sexual advances shared her story in court Monday, reading from a prepared statement in between sobs.

The victim focused on the emotional toll of sleeping with a man seven years her senior. She left it to Coos County District Attorney R. Paul Frasier to fill in the details of what happened and a Curry County judge to sentence the man, Damon J. Noel, on Monday to 30 days in jail and three years probation for the crime.

*Damon Noel, convicted


Noel picked her up at the Boys & Girls Club on Nov. 24. He took her back to his home and into his bedroom, where music was playing and candles were burning. They had sex.

Four days later, police arrested Noel. He pleaded guilty on Jan. 14 to a charge of third-degree rape.

Frasier said Noel established a relationship with his 15-year-old victim by volunteering at College Park Community Church in North Bend.

“He used his position to ingratiate himself with her,” he said following the hearing.

The teenager’s mom said her daughter appeared distraught in the days following her sexual rendezvous. The mother visited her daughter’s MySpace account, where a message was posted that something had happened between her and Noel. She then went to her daughter’s cell phone, where she found text messages from Noel that were extremely inappropriate, she said.

When she confronted the teenager with these things, she started crying, her mother said.

The whole family drove over to the North Bend Police Department, where officers asked that the girl call Noel to see how he would respond. Frasier said Noel suggested the girl should lie to police about what had happened.

“‘Well, I could go to jail if you tell the truth,’” Frasier read from transcripts of the phone conversation, which was recorded. “‘Please, God, lie your ass off.’”

Instead, the girl suggested meeting with Noel near Boynton Park, where police arrested Noel on Nov. 28. Frasier said Noel admitted to police that he had sex with the girl knowing she was younger than 16 (see definition below).

Judge Jesse Margolis stepped in to oversee the sentencing due to a scheduling conflict among Coos County judges. Before Margolis issued his ruling, Noel apologized to the girl, her family as well as his. He said he hadn’t intended to harm the girl, though he knew what he did was wrong.

“My actions were still very irresponsible,” he said.

The girl testified, describing the anguish of taking a rape exam, worrying about becoming pregnant and no longer feeling safe at church.

“Now my friends and family see a different me. ... They see a young girl just trying to hold it all together and not show the ugly feeling this crime put inside of me,” she said.

As part of his sentence, Noel will be registered as a sex offender and must take an HIV test. He also will be restricted from having contact with juveniles and the church. Frasier said the sentence was the maximum he could obtain given Noel’s relatively crime-free background.

At least half a dozen members of the church’s youth group attended the hearing. Corinna Warner, 18, said she considered Noel a really close friend when he was arrested but thought he should have gotten a harsher sentence.

“(She) is going to be shaken up about this for a lot more than a month,” she said, contrasting it to Noel’s punishment for the crime.

Tina Guetterman, the church’s youth leader, said the experience has been hard for the group and the church, though everyone has rallied around the girl.

“I think he messed up,” she said. “I think he made a terrible mistake.”

The girl’s mother said she was disappointed the crime doesn’t fall under the Measure 11 statute requiring harsher minimum sentences, though she takes solace in knowing that if Noel commits a future crime, he will face a stiffer penalty.

“We hope (she) is the last victim,” she said.

Noel’s aunt, the Rev. Barbara Fernell, of Marina, Calif., was in attendance at the hearing and suggested both Noel and the girl were victims, though the judge had to go by the law.

“A young girl shouldn’t go to a man’s house and a young man shouldn’t take a woman to his house. Children should think twice,” she said.
Defining rape


In Oregon, it’s illegal for an adult to have sex with someone younger than 16, even if it is consensual. If police find out, a person faces a charge of third-degree rape. If someone forcibly compels a person to have sex, that is first-degree rape.


In the Damon Noel case, District Attorney R. Paul Frasier said he couldn’t prosecute a first-degree rape charge.

“There was no allegation in this case that Noel forcibly compelled the girl to have sex,” he said.


Had Noel’s victim been younger than 14, he could have been charged with second-degree rape.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Double Standard wrote on Feb 23, 2009 5:56 PM:

This article reminds me of another article about a Coquille coach having sex with a student. Listen to you people, condemning this 22 year old man for having sexual relations with a 15 year old girl. I'd like to know how many of you also read that article and commented on how bad you felt for the coach. Oh boo hoo! she's innocent till proven guilty. She is 36 years old and I'm sure the victim(S) were about 15. I don't condone any sex with a minor, male or female. It makes me sick. let's try and show some fairness in our judgement.

Judges wrote on Feb 19, 2009 5:19 PM:

Yes...we should get some new judges..cause obviously...we(as the stupid people of Coos County) know way more about this than the judges and newspapers. We(obviously) were there for all of it. The air is better, the sun shines brighter, and praise God he may have been in the Lion's Den but he has delivered his child from it. From what I hear Damon is doing wonderful now and is looking forward to a new start. Maybe half this town should go to jail and learn something as well.

the system sucks wrote on Feb 7, 2009 9:46 PM:

To all of you bashing on Frasier, he does the best with what he has. Keep in mind we also don't know ALL the details of this case....I think 30 days is lame but that's not Frasier's fault. Blame our fabulous lawmakers and vote for harsher sentencing for this kind of crime, particularly when intent has nothing to do with it.

smd wrote on Feb 6, 2009 2:02 PM:

continued....
I am shocked and outraged at this petty ruling. That is NOT all you could have given him and why don't you just slap the young girl in the face and tell her its okay for someone you trust to use you and take advantage of you because that’s what that judge just did.

What a way to serve up a whole bunch of BS justice!

I seriously hope that her parents take this to a higher authority than the county judge. For crying out loud...Someone please protect our children as our community enforcements are obviously unable to.

I am outraged and I move to nominate some new judges in this county...THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS! 30 flippin days. Unbelievable!

smd wrote on Feb 6, 2009 2:01 PM:

What the French!

Are you kidding me?!?!? Someone please tell me I read this article wrong and that we are not sending a sex offender to jail for only 30 days!

I don't give two cents about that piece of trash. Having a sexual relationship with a minor child is morally wrong and just repugnant. You KNOW it is wrong as an adult and he knew what he was doing to manipulate a young girl to fornicate.

This is absolutely disgusting…10 years older and you slap him on the flippin’ wrist. Why don’t you give him a glass of wine and toast him for deflowering a young innocent girl and possibly ruining her life mentally and ruining any sexual kind of confidence she would have had as an adult woman.

Why don’t you give him a little bit of a vacation for taking advantage of a minor child who is unable to make a decision or say no to someone they are afraid of or trust.

That girl will NEVER be the same and I cry for her.

my 2 cents wrote on Feb 3, 2009 6:44 PM:

1. He didn't get a stiff sentence because it was not 1st degree rape. She was raped according to the legal definition. It was consensual although she's legally too young to give consent.

2. What on earth is a 22 year-old man doing with a 15 year-old girl? He must not be too bright.

darla wrote on Feb 3, 2009 1:22 AM:

Because the 15 year old GIRL made a bad decision, she is bad and deserved to be taken advantage of? (Gee, those silly lawmakers...what could they be thinking...15 year olds can make their own decisions and don't need our protection...)

And she had bad parents? Did they forget to put on her chastity belt? Or they just didn't keep her locked up well enough?

Join us back in reality. We miss you.

Totsoc wrote on Feb 2, 2009 6:24 PM:

I picked up my daughter at Boys and Girls club everyday. She was NOT allowed to leave with anyone else. Our daughter abused her cell phone and computer. She will never have access to a computer again until she is 18 and on her own. Cell phone? Only when we are gone for more than 24 hours will she have it. Parenting is tough, its not meant to be easy.

Jesus wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:31 PM:

Those who have never slept with a fifteen year old girl may throw the first stone.

To OH BOY wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:16 PM:

What do you mean you feel sorry for Noel because he told the truth. Did you not read the whole story where the girls parents have him on tape telling her to "lie her ass off" get a grip jerk. You're a typical redneck macho type of guy who thinks all women who get raped deserve it. Move to the hills of Kentucky where you will fit in better.

listen to nature wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:03 PM:

For thousands of years girls have been getting married soon after they start menstrating, and now all of a sudden you victorian prudes scream RAPE when a girl decides to sleep with a guy who is older. Who is damaging this girl, the guy she chose to sleep with, or all these people telling her she is the victim of a horrible crime?

Mr. Mojo Rising wrote on Feb 1, 2009 10:38 AM:

I don't understand the penal code or the laws surrounding this matter, nor do I have any inside information on this case. Having said that, perhaps someone can explain to me why a man that took explicit pictures of minors 16 to 17 years of age for his own personal use, with consent is looking at spending the rest of his life in prison and a this young man who actually had intercourse with a 16 year old, gets 30 days in jail and 3 years of probation. Same D.A., same county, same state, same laws. Which one of these two men caused more harm to their victims?

Victim wrote on Feb 1, 2009 10:36 AM:

Thia is a true trajedy. A trajedy for all families involved. It doesn't matter if it was consensual or wasn't, either way it was wrong morally and legally and consequences need to be had. I find it disgusting and very "scary" that this kind of relationship could have been "hatching" at church and at an after school club. He was and adult and she was a child. I am assuming he was there to mentor and befriend the children there. Let me just tell you, I will think twice before ever sending my daugther to a place where this kind of thing could potentially happen. Well... when you think about it, this thing could happen ANYWHERE... Kudos to the parents for snooping and investigating their daughter's social life. I guess it would have been better to be proactive rather than reactive. Hopefully we don't see Noel's name on the docket again.

fnord wrote on Jan 31, 2009 1:38 PM:

Born to Choose, what the heck is "pre-Maddona"? What are you trying to say? Something about what it was like before Madonna became a music star?! What does that have to do with anything?

Rocco St.Bruno wrote on Jan 30, 2009 7:51 PM:

He should have received 30 years.

Question wrote on Jan 30, 2009 5:02 PM:

I would like everyone to picture one thing.... Your 15 year-old daughter has been acting strange for days. You continuously ask her what is wrong, with no effect. You finally snoop and find out something has happened between her and a ADULT within your church. Inappropriate text messages were sent to your daughter, and pleas of guilt ridden anguish pleading for her to "lie your ass off" if EVER asked about it (a telephone call recorded by the police) and on top of it part of your church new there was something strange about him. You find that there are more victims, (admitted by Mr. Noel) but they are unwilling to come forward. As a parent, neighbor, and community what would you percieve of this? Did she climb into the car? Yes. Did she go into the bedroom? Yes. Did she concent to sex? Only two people know. I don't and I garuntee you don't.

Curious wrote on Jan 30, 2009 1:30 PM:

I think more people should think before they post.

I have to wonder why this girl, who was in a safe place at the Boys and Girls Club, left with this older guy and went to his home. Went inside his home and had sex with him. Later when mom snooped she found out what happened the whole family piles into the car for a field trip to the local PD.

Blame this guy if you want, he's not innocent but he is no more guilty than this girl and her family.

At 15 she should have been taught to be responsible for her behavior and to smart about this kind of guy.

It seems to me that young girls these days have no responsiblity for their part in having sex as long as they choose a partner over 18 so they can say they were raped (even though they were willing).

What a horrible message to send to our daughters. Do you really think they are that stupid?

Mr B wrote on Jan 30, 2009 12:52 PM:

Gotta go with NB Rez... makes the most sense here.

lived9lives wrote on Jan 30, 2009 9:52 AM:

Amazing! We still live in a culture that believes girls ask to be raped!? This same mind set probably believe that 80 year old rape survivors "ask" for it by wearing "Madonna-like" nightgowns. Blame the girl for her appearance? Women ought to be able to walk down the street NAKED without being attacked by men. It is men's responsibility to control their own bodies and behave with dignity.
Rape is a crime of anger and power NOT sex. This girl was raped by a man who manipulated her. Most rapists target the innocent or naive which is generally the life-experience is of a 15 year old.
Blame the parents? Gee, where was she? With a "man of God". Last time I checked churches are supposed to be safe places for parents to send children.
There's a word for all of this - misogyny-hatred of women or things perceived as female. No girl/woman asks to be manipulated, penetrated, violated, assaulted, battered, beaten, raped or killed.
I wonder how all the "blame the survivor" people would have responded if this had been a young boy? The cause probably would have been his sexy tennis shoes.

get help wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:32 PM:

Can their school help the kids with questions? I know that this kind of situation is confusing to many. We want all of our community's children to understand that it is not their fault if they are victimized. That they should get help.

When we blame the victim, we teach our kids not to tell, to have shame.

We need show compasion for the victim, for what she went through, and as all victims of this kind of crime, what she will go through dealing with the aftermath of this process.

Coersion wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:20 PM:

Coersion is tantamount to brainwasing. She was a victim of a predator. This was not a consentual act.

remember wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:17 PM:

What we have to remember when reading the paper, watching the news, etc., is we don't get the whole story. There are reasons that some charges don't get filed, and that could be for a quick plea and for the victim to get closure, avoid trial, etc. (IE- He was willing to plea to this offense, but would he if the whole rape 1 charge had been there?)Does this conviction help with another case? I think the DA knew what he was doing.

This girl was victimized by a predator that built trust and groomed her (and others) over time. She was not a willing participant. We have to be careful saying that because a predator builds trust and does "his job" "well" that it is not rape. That would be the same as any child being raped by a family member (predator) "wanted" it. This is just not true.

This is also not her parents fault. This man is a sexual predator who did his job well and has an unfortuante victim in this girl, other girls, their families, their church family, and obviously this community.

born 2 choose wrote on Jan 29, 2009 5:24 PM:

Has anyone ever read to kill a mocking bird? Does this sound all to familiar to anyone else (racism aside)?? look at these postings... it looks like everyone here has experienced some injustice that can relate to; one side of the issue or the other. its the RESPONSIBILITY of BOTH parties to prevent these situations. The girls PARENTS should look after their sexually experimental PRE-MADDONA daughter, The young girl needs to understand and be held responsible her sexuallity & vulnerability a little more, and the young man shoould know that HE is soley responsible for the actions of his member. That aside YOU PARENTS NEED TO SHUT OFF THE TV, AND QUIT LETTING YOUR LITTLE PRINCESS' DRESS LIKE PROSTITUTES. take the initiative sheeple!!!!

wow wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:51 PM:

In response to "Been There": You my friend are an idiot. YOU are the reason laws like this are passed, forbidding adults from having sex with little children... something which virtually everyone (except yourself of course) feels is common sense anyhow.

I only hope you don't have children, and if you do then I hope they don't "Consent" to your perverted desires.

You people f*king amaze me. When under a certain age, consent has NOTHING to do with it. It's up to the adult to screw people their own age, unless of course they are so socially inept that they have to shop 10 years younger in the kiddie section. If your 8 year old daughter "consented" to this pervert, would you still be sticking up for him?

Steve wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:35 PM:

to all the people who think this isnt a crime .She is under 18 and CAN NOT give consent she is a child he is an ADULT it is NOT ok for them to have sex, adults are supposed to make decisions for children they dont make their own. Its a crime. If I were her father I would be in jail myself right now, both for whoopin her butt and kicking his ass into intensive care. 30 Days, wow why bother at all.

Crazy wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:31 PM:

Why wasn't she yelling rape while he was lighting the candles and selecting the music. It's tragic for both. She got caught and so did he and for a each of them they may never know how to handle a sexual relationship with the next partner. They both knew what they were doing.

Been There wrote on Jan 29, 2009 9:03 AM:

When both parties consent to sex it is not rape! This is a stupid law and should be tossed out!

When people think a teenager consenting to sex with a YOUNG adult is rape it diminishes what forcable rape is and does to someone.

It would be better to have a shot gun wedding than to consider this rape!

POed wrote on Jan 29, 2009 1:45 AM:

What about that 18 yr old young man from Hauser_I beleve-from 4 or so years ago that was sentenced to the Mandantory Meaure 11 - 7 years-no early parole-for having consensual sex w/his 14 or 15 yr old GIRL FRIEND? This Guy had friends in 'High Places' because of his Church connections, otherwise he would be doing time in the OS Prison in Salem.

Gwen wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:48 PM:

This was a 15 year old girl consenting to sex with a young adult before she was legally allowed. If this is a crime for him it also should be one for her because she should have known better.

It is obvious from her behavior that her parents failed to teach her the good solid moral values they spew. It's really easy to blame someone else but how about taking some responsibilty here instead of making the tax payers pay the bill?

She obviously did it for the attention because she posted it for everyone to see! Maybe as a replacement for attention she is not getting at home?

ASHAMED wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:20 PM:

HOW EMBARASSING TO HAVE THIS PLASTERED ON THE FRONT PAGE OF OUR LOCAL PAPER AND ON THE INTERNET. I'M SURE PEOPLE CONSIDERING MOVING TO OUR AREA WILL JUMP ON THE MOVE AFTER READING THAT AND SEEING WHAT A BACKWARD JUSTICE SYSTEM WE HAVE HERE IN COOS COUNTY. IT'S ASHAME WHAT HAPPENED EVEN IF IT WASN'T FORCED SEX. SHE'S LEGALLY A CHILD AND HE'S WELL PAST THE YEARS OF BEING AN ADULT. IT'S THE LAW. DID HIS CHURCH TAKE UP A COLLECTION FOR A PAYOFF?

oh boy wrote on Jan 28, 2009 1:32 PM:

Well all I got to say is Parents talk to your children and let them know the laws on dating older people and try to educate them on sex. If your a parent who has teenages we all know how sneaky they can be. Some parents chose not to know what their child is doing others do. It sounds like to me the young lady was lying to her parents and when they found out she cried out RAPE now this young man will have to live with this for the rest of his life. I feel sorry for Mr.Noel and one thing I can say is at least he didnt lie about the whole thing, and lets keep in mind that she wanted sex as much as he did.

Linda wrote on Jan 28, 2009 11:47 AM:

Hey RC, wrong Frazier goes after who he wants. Fact!

Serious wrote on Jan 28, 2009 10:17 AM:

Look back in the older days when women were marring much older men and having kids at 15. No one ever thought twice about that! My grandma got pregnant at 14 and then got married shortly after at 15! Seriously????? Was that all rape? Was my aunt conceived during rape? I think not!

abhored wrote on Jan 28, 2009 10:15 AM:

How dare the courts to allow such a thing. The girl was underage. He knew that. It is against the law PERIOD!!. Former crime record... bull whacky.....now he has a record and it is just a slap. He not only made a mockery of the Police Dept, but society as well. Oh he belongs with the Church, SO WHAT!!! That gives him the right do the horrible wrong. Even with the candles and I am sure the sweet talk, it was wrong.

HELLO wrote on Jan 28, 2009 9:33 AM:

TO HMMMM:::::::I'm well aware of how the system works.Rest assured you wouldn't want me to discuss that on here. Punishment for certain crimes need to be left for a jury.It's generally harder to sway 12 people versus a judge or da to go lenient on certain crimes,and circumstances.And yes I do believe the judge or da could been more harsher,i believe the rules or laws do account for that.You sound as if yourself may be connected to the legal system.DA'S OFFICE?OR,PUBLIC PRETENDERS OFFICE?Was your posting,on your time or your employers?There needs to be serious changes in our laws,rules ,regulations.AS far as him knowing the law, better than me,thats why we all should be concerned.Can be very scary,to say the least.

OH CMON wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:27 AM:

Restraining orders are never forced on anyone. There's paperwork and a court appearance. If someone does not want to get a restraining order, they simply do not ask for one. A no contact order is state mandated when there has been an arrest. While I agree that someone charged with rape should get more time, this person was NOT charged with rape. I doubt that it was anything more than consensual sex and a big mistake on both parts. But, the older male should have known better. Under 18 and you could end up a registered sex offender for life. Wake up boys/men!!

NB Rez wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:14 AM:

Let's look at the facts, first of all it was not forcible rape and obviously there had to have been some level of consensualizm here. It's a 7 year age difference and even though Noel should have known better, so should of the girl. And although a 30 day jail term may not seem long enough for some, let's not forget he's a registered sex offender for life. That's a big punishment in and of itself.

Tragic all around wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:11 AM:

Young people make stupid choices and while I think he deserves more of a sentence I think some revisions to the law needs to be made.I have heard of a 17 yrs old girl giving birth and saying she didnt know who the father was so he wouldnt get charged with rape.He was 18.

taxpayer wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:03 AM:

recall the DA people -

RC wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:01 AM:

People need to educate themselves before they make stupid statements about the law. The DA cannot make up his own Laws and Punishments. Laws and the punishments are created by the state legislature and then enforced by the DA. This is a tragic crime and has been dealt with in accoradance with the laws of the state of oregon. I applaud the DA for moving forward with this case and punishing the offender with jail, felony probation, and being a registered sex offender for the rest of his life. Hopefully the victim gets the help and support she needs to move on with her life. The offender will be reminded of his offense whenever he is denied for employment due to being a registered sex offender.

Just Wondering wrote on Jan 28, 2009 7:30 AM:

"Noel picked her up at the Boys & Girls Club on Nov. 24. He took her back to his home and into his bedroom, where music was playing and candles were burning. They had sex."

And where did her mother think she was during all of this time?
Can the Boys/Girls Club be held liable for early release to a boyfriend?

thomas wrote on Jan 28, 2009 6:55 AM:

30 F`n days for a life time of torment!!? wheres a vigilante when you need one!!

...... wrote on Jan 28, 2009 5:56 AM:

It sounds to me like that girl knew EXACTLY what she was doing! And only turned it around once her parents found out. Seriously, is everyone reading the same story I am? They had a relationship and she voluntarily went to his house and voluntarily to the bedroom and voluntarily has sex with him, and now she is saying it rape? Geez

Ridiculous wrote on Jan 28, 2009 1:30 AM:

This girl made a choice. I had consensual sex with a 22 year old when I was 15. Did I regret it? Sure. Did I blame the manchild? No. Because at 15 I realized that I am responsible for my own consensual sexual activities. I can't blame the participant just because my parents find out, and I don't want to look easy. The real question here is: Was she smart enough to make him wear a condom? Had her loving parents bothered to teach her basic safe sex technique? I hope so.

RRRIIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTT wrote on Jan 28, 2009 12:38 AM:

Sounds like your D.A. doesn't have much for BRASS. This would never happen in C.O. If our D.A. had him in his sights, he would have gotten at least five years. Maybe we should send our D. A. your way. Would solve your bouncy-bounce problem.

DISCUSTED wrote on Jan 27, 2009 9:32 PM:

If a rapest only gets 30 days for that crime they might as well let everyone else out of jail. The justice system in Coos County has seen it's better day and we should all be concerned and maybe fear what has happened lately. If this rape happened in the county no one would have responded due to lack of funding so maybe it's lucky this guy got charged and sentenced at all. Putting it on the front page of The World doesn't help either. This only lets other criminal minds realize this crime was only a slap on the wrist. WOW! Now that's a crime.

Which witch is which wrote on Jan 27, 2009 9:13 PM:

Why would a GOD fearing woman state that children need to think twice. Doesn't it state in the BIBLE that adults will modle the behavior and LEAD the children?

Alicia E wrote on Jan 27, 2009 8:46 PM:

Using his affiliation with a church is especially sick and devious. I wish he would have gotten a longer sentence. Young girls always have men interested in them and need to be on guard but church is the last place that should be a concern.

Totsoc wrote on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 PM:

Let me try this again. I spent 70 days in jail for violating a Restraining Order that was corruptly forced upon my family and the family asked to be removed. A rapist gets only 30 days? Wrong priorities by out of date DA and court system.

RE Hello wrote on Jan 27, 2009 7:47 PM:

The DA says the most he could receive,because of his crime free background.That's a bunch of BS.If the DA couldn't do any more than that, then it should have been left up to a jury.He would have gotten his dues then.

Juries only decide guilty or not guilty, they have no say in how much jail time a person gets.

Al the Pal wrote on Jan 27, 2009 6:58 PM:

He's lucky he didn't poach a deer or litter, he would have been in REAL trouble then!

cisea wrote on Jan 27, 2009 6:51 PM:

He got off very easy....and the fact that she went to the guy's home should have nothing to do with what happened to her. Geeze what a OLD way of thinking, I really thought Coos County might be more progressive than that. Why not have her wear a red letter!

justabuddy wrote on Jan 27, 2009 5:39 PM:

you cant rape the willing duh!

Ummm Hello wrote on Jan 27, 2009 5:28 PM:

Your absolutely incorrect, Whether is found guilt or pleads guilty the judge is bound by law to the Sentencing Guidelines which states he receives 30 days.

JUSTICE wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:56 PM:

It's amazing that this parasite don't have to go to some mental drs.He obviously needs some serious mental help.Is there not enough women out there his age?Or does he like playing with little kids?Hopefully,that mere 30 days he gets,someone may give him a reality check.How many other children has he done this to?Did the DA go back and do and research?SICK,,,SICK,,,,SICK.My thoughts and prayers are with the victims,not the abuser.

Hmmm... wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:23 PM:

To Hello: You might think it's a bunch of BS, however, Noel pleaded guilty, which means there is no jury trial (why would you have a trial to prove his guilt, when he already admitted to it?). It's not up to the DA whether there is a jury trial or not. Had he pleaded not guilty, well then, there is a choice between a jury trial or judge trial. You might not agree with Fraiser, but he knows the law a whole lot better than you. Noel appears to be a opportunistic weasel who has wreaked havoc on a young girl's psyche. Her sentence will last far longer than his. The law is the law however, and remember, the judge had final say in this case.

huh wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:22 PM:

Is this a joke?

Cora wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:01 PM:

Then why did my son get 90 days for giving a girl a hickey? He was 18 she was 16. Frazier nedds to be recalled.

Gene wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:54 PM:

It is sad hello but the law is the law. It might need to be changed and that is done in Salem. If a judge can't be free to make decisions based on all the circumstances, it wouldn't be a free and just system. We, as World readers, don't have anywhere near all the facts about the cases we read. Yes, the girl is going to have to carry a lot of shame for awhile while the guy will carry the shame for the rest of his life, no matter where he moves. Think how that will effect his life for one stupid action. I feel sorry for both of them.

WOW wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:51 PM:

Thirty days?!!! Thats it.... wow.. what a justice system we have.. but then again what a bunch of permiscuous little girls we have around this town.. Where were her parents when she went to his house...hmmm shame on her parents...

distraught wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:33 PM:

30 days , Whopee! Wonder who his next victim is and then he can get his hands slapped again.
Wonder if it was the judge's daughter what kind of sentence he would get.

HELLO wrote on Jan 27, 2009 12:12 PM:

The DA says the most he could receive,because of his crime free background.That's a bunch of BS.If the DA couldn't do any more than that, then it should have been left up to a jury.He would have gotten his dues then.This COOS COUNTY justice system is more screwed up than a football.It's to the point that,there needs to be a real house cleaning over there at the courthouse,not just the criminal system.either.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace


Special Sections

More Special Sections