Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Double Standard wrote on Feb 23, 2009 5:56 PM:
Judges wrote on Feb 19, 2009 5:19 PM:
the system sucks wrote on Feb 7, 2009 9:46 PM:
smd wrote on Feb 6, 2009 2:02 PM:
I am shocked and outraged at this petty ruling. That is NOT all you could have given him and why don't you just slap the young girl in the face and tell her its okay for someone you trust to use you and take advantage of you because that’s what that judge just did.
What a way to serve up a whole bunch of BS justice!
I seriously hope that her parents take this to a higher authority than the county judge. For crying out loud...Someone please protect our children as our community enforcements are obviously unable to.
I am outraged and I move to nominate some new judges in this county...THIS IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS! 30 flippin days. Unbelievable!
smd wrote on Feb 6, 2009 2:01 PM:
Are you kidding me?!?!? Someone please tell me I read this article wrong and that we are not sending a sex offender to jail for only 30 days!
I don't give two cents about that piece of trash. Having a sexual relationship with a minor child is morally wrong and just repugnant. You KNOW it is wrong as an adult and he knew what he was doing to manipulate a young girl to fornicate.
This is absolutely disgusting…10 years older and you slap him on the flippin’ wrist. Why don’t you give him a glass of wine and toast him for deflowering a young innocent girl and possibly ruining her life mentally and ruining any sexual kind of confidence she would have had as an adult woman.
Why don’t you give him a little bit of a vacation for taking advantage of a minor child who is unable to make a decision or say no to someone they are afraid of or trust.
That girl will NEVER be the same and I cry for her.
my 2 cents wrote on Feb 3, 2009 6:44 PM:
2. What on earth is a 22 year-old man doing with a 15 year-old girl? He must not be too bright.
darla wrote on Feb 3, 2009 1:22 AM:
And she had bad parents? Did they forget to put on her chastity belt? Or they just didn't keep her locked up well enough?
Join us back in reality. We miss you.
Totsoc wrote on Feb 2, 2009 6:24 PM:
Jesus wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:31 PM:
To OH BOY wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:16 PM:
listen to nature wrote on Feb 2, 2009 4:03 PM:
Mr. Mojo Rising wrote on Feb 1, 2009 10:38 AM:
Victim wrote on Feb 1, 2009 10:36 AM:
fnord wrote on Jan 31, 2009 1:38 PM:
Question wrote on Jan 30, 2009 5:02 PM:
Curious wrote on Jan 30, 2009 1:30 PM:
I have to wonder why this girl, who was in a safe place at the Boys and Girls Club, left with this older guy and went to his home. Went inside his home and had sex with him. Later when mom snooped she found out what happened the whole family piles into the car for a field trip to the local PD.
Blame this guy if you want, he's not innocent but he is no more guilty than this girl and her family.
At 15 she should have been taught to be responsible for her behavior and to smart about this kind of guy.
It seems to me that young girls these days have no responsiblity for their part in having sex as long as they choose a partner over 18 so they can say they were raped (even though they were willing).
What a horrible message to send to our daughters. Do you really think they are that stupid?
lived9lives wrote on Jan 30, 2009 9:52 AM:
Rape is a crime of anger and power NOT sex. This girl was raped by a man who manipulated her. Most rapists target the innocent or naive which is generally the life-experience is of a 15 year old.
Blame the parents? Gee, where was she? With a "man of God". Last time I checked churches are supposed to be safe places for parents to send children.
There's a word for all of this - misogyny-hatred of women or things perceived as female. No girl/woman asks to be manipulated, penetrated, violated, assaulted, battered, beaten, raped or killed.
I wonder how all the "blame the survivor" people would have responded if this had been a young boy? The cause probably would have been his sexy tennis shoes.
get help wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:32 PM:
When we blame the victim, we teach our kids not to tell, to have shame.
We need show compasion for the victim, for what she went through, and as all victims of this kind of crime, what she will go through dealing with the aftermath of this process.
Coersion wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:20 PM:
remember wrote on Jan 29, 2009 10:17 PM:
This girl was victimized by a predator that built trust and groomed her (and others) over time. She was not a willing participant. We have to be careful saying that because a predator builds trust and does "his job" "well" that it is not rape. That would be the same as any child being raped by a family member (predator) "wanted" it. This is just not true.
This is also not her parents fault. This man is a sexual predator who did his job well and has an unfortuante victim in this girl, other girls, their families, their church family, and obviously this community.
born 2 choose wrote on Jan 29, 2009 5:24 PM:
wow wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:51 PM:
I only hope you don't have children, and if you do then I hope they don't "Consent" to your perverted desires.
You people f*king amaze me. When under a certain age, consent has NOTHING to do with it. It's up to the adult to screw people their own age, unless of course they are so socially inept that they have to shop 10 years younger in the kiddie section. If your 8 year old daughter "consented" to this pervert, would you still be sticking up for him?
Steve wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:35 PM:
Crazy wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:31 PM:
Been There wrote on Jan 29, 2009 9:03 AM:
When people think a teenager consenting to sex with a YOUNG adult is rape it diminishes what forcable rape is and does to someone.
It would be better to have a shot gun wedding than to consider this rape!
POed wrote on Jan 29, 2009 1:45 AM:
Gwen wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:48 PM:
It is obvious from her behavior that her parents failed to teach her the good solid moral values they spew. It's really easy to blame someone else but how about taking some responsibilty here instead of making the tax payers pay the bill?
She obviously did it for the attention because she posted it for everyone to see! Maybe as a replacement for attention she is not getting at home?
ASHAMED wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:20 PM:
oh boy wrote on Jan 28, 2009 1:32 PM:
Serious wrote on Jan 28, 2009 10:17 AM:
abhored wrote on Jan 28, 2009 10:15 AM:
HELLO wrote on Jan 28, 2009 9:33 AM:
OH CMON wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:27 AM:
NB Rez wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:14 AM:
Tragic all around wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:11 AM:
RC wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:01 AM:
Just Wondering wrote on Jan 28, 2009 7:30 AM:
And where did her mother think she was during all of this time?
Can the Boys/Girls Club be held liable for early release to a boyfriend?
thomas wrote on Jan 28, 2009 6:55 AM:
...... wrote on Jan 28, 2009 5:56 AM:
Ridiculous wrote on Jan 28, 2009 1:30 AM:
RRRIIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTTT wrote on Jan 28, 2009 12:38 AM:
DISCUSTED wrote on Jan 27, 2009 9:32 PM:
Which witch is which wrote on Jan 27, 2009 9:13 PM:
Alicia E wrote on Jan 27, 2009 8:46 PM:
Totsoc wrote on Jan 27, 2009 8:17 PM:
RE Hello wrote on Jan 27, 2009 7:47 PM:
Juries only decide guilty or not guilty, they have no say in how much jail time a person gets.
Al the Pal wrote on Jan 27, 2009 6:58 PM:
cisea wrote on Jan 27, 2009 6:51 PM:
Ummm Hello wrote on Jan 27, 2009 5:28 PM:
JUSTICE wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:56 PM:
Hmmm... wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:23 PM:
Cora wrote on Jan 27, 2009 4:01 PM:
Gene wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:54 PM:
WOW wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:51 PM:
distraught wrote on Jan 27, 2009 3:33 PM:
Wonder if it was the judge's daughter what kind of sentence he would get.
HELLO wrote on Jan 27, 2009 12:12 PM:
Damon Noel, convicted


The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines