Obama lifts Bush abortion gag rule

By Matthew Lee and Liz Sidoti, Associated Press Writers
Sunday, January 25, 2009 | 25 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday struck down the Bush administration’s ban on giving federal money to international groups that perform abortions or provide abortion information — an inflammatory policy that has bounced in and out of law for the past quarter-century.

Obama’s move, the latest in an aggressive first week reversing contentious Bush policies, was warmly welcomed by liberal groups and denounced by abortion rights foes.

The ban has been a political football between Democratic and Republican administrations since GOP President Ronald Reagan first adopted it 1984. Democrat Bill Clinton ended the ban in 1993, but Republican George W. Bush re-instituted it in 2001 as one of his first acts in office.

“For too long, international family planning assistance has been used as a political wedge issue, the subject of a back and forth debate that has served only to divide us,” Obama said in a statement released by the White House. “I have no desire to continue this stale and fruitless debate.”

He said the ban was unnecessarily broad and undermined family planning in developing countries.

“In the coming weeks, my administration will initiate a fresh conversation on family planning, working to find areas of common ground to best meet the needs of women and families at home and around the world,” the president said.

Obama issued the presidential memorandum rescinding the Bush policy without coverage by the media, late Friday afternoon. The abortion measure is a highly emotional one for many people, and the quiet signing was in contrast to the televised coverage of Obama’s announcement Wednesday on ethics rules and Thursday’s signing of orders on closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and banning torture in the questioning of terror suspects.

His action came one day after the 36th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion.

The Bush policy had banned U.S. taxpayer money, usually in the form of Agency for International Development funds, from going to international family planning groups that either offer abortions or provide information, counseling or referrals about abortion as a family planning method.

Critics have long held that the rule unfairly discriminates against the world’s poor by denying U.S. aid to groups that may be involved in abortion but also work on other aspects of reproductive health care and HIV/AIDS, leading to the closure of free and low-cost rural clinics.

Supporters of the ban say that the United States still provides millions of dollars in family planning assistance around the world and that the rule prevents anti-abortion taxpayers from backing something they believe is morally wrong.

The ban has been known as the “Mexico City policy” for the city a U.S. delegation first announced it at a U.N. International Conference on Population.

Both Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who will oversee foreign aid, had promised to do away with the rule during the presidential campaign.

Clinton said Friday evening that for seven years Bush’s policy made it more difficult for women around the world to gain access to essential information and health care services. “Rather than limiting women’s ability to receive reproductive health services, we should be supporting programs that help women and their partners make decisions to ensure their health and the health of their families,” Clinton said.

In a related move, Obama also said he would restore funding to the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA). Both he and Clinton had pledged to reverse a Bush administration determination that assistance to the organization violated U.S. law known as the Kemp-Kasten amendment.

Obama, in his statement, said he looked forward to working with Congress to fulfill that promise: “By resuming funding to UNFPA, the U.S. will be joining 180 other donor nations working collaboratively to reduce poverty, improve the health of women and children, prevent HIV/AIDS and provide family planning assistance to women in 154 countries.”

Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, executive director of the U.N. Population Fund, said: “The president’s actions send a strong message about his leadership and his desire to support causes that will promote peace and dignity, equality for women and girls and economic development in the poorest regions of the world.”

“We are confident that under the new president’s direction, the U.S. will resume its leadership in promoting and protecting women’s reproductive health and rights worldwide,” Obaid said in a statement issued at U.N. headquarters in New York.

The Bush administration had barred U.S. money from the fund, contending that its work in China supported a Chinese family planning policy of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization. UNFPA has vehemently denied that it does.

Congress had appropriated $40 million to the UNFPA in the past budget year, but the administration had withheld the money as it had done every year since 2002.

Organizations and lawmakers that had pressed Obama to rescind the Mexico City policy were jubilant.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the move “will help save lives and empower the poorest women and families to improve their quality of life and their future.”

“Today’s announcement is a very powerful signal to our neighbors around the world that the United States is once again back in the business of good public policy and ideology no longer blunts our ability to save lives around the globe,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Population Action International, an advocacy group, said that the policy had “severely impacted” women’s health and that the step “will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, abortions and women dying from high-risk pregnancies because they don’t have access to family planning.”

Anti-abortion groups and lawmakers condemned Obama’s decision.

“I have long supported the Mexico City Policy and believe this administration’s decision to be counter to our nation’s interests,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

“Coming just one day after the 36th anniversary of the tragic Roe v. Wade decision, this presidential directive forces taxpayers to subsidize abortions overseas — something no American should be required by government to do,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., called it “morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans to promote abortion around the world.”

“President Obama not long ago told the American people that he would support policies to reduce abortions, but today he is effectively guaranteeing more abortions by funding groups that promote abortion as a method of population control,” said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee.

———

AP White House Correspondent Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Isnt nice wrote on Feb 1, 2009 10:37 PM:

to have a divisive issue to argue over while the republicans looted the country? Are anti wage and jobs? You suckers fall for it every time. Some one elses abortion is the least of the middle classes worries. We have to scrape ourselves out of an economic hole, put here on purpose, for years. Why care about what we will never control? It's like wasting time on gays. Forget it! Focus on the wealthy that are draining us of the american dream. The fascists.

Opinions are like noses wrote on Feb 1, 2009 2:43 PM:

To Rob --- Having lived in Canada as a US citizen I can say with certainty that Yes! Canadians are often asked to pay for things they do not want. BTW, do not get me started on the supposed benefits of the Canadian Health Plan. Cheaper drugs? Maybe! Better health care? Not so much!

George wrote on Feb 1, 2009 7:38 AM:

No doubt many oppose abortion on noble moral grounds, but the real reasons our rich corporatsts and their Republican Party does has nothing to do with either.

tired of the ignorance. wrote on Jan 30, 2009 10:42 PM:

you all talk about how bad abortion is...you can have an opinion about it once you have had one.

it's not like it's some carefree proceedure.

every one complains about all the people having abortions,
but on the other hand, you complain about all the people on welfare that our tax dollars are supporting.

come on now...make up your minds.

honestly, some people would rather have this done, than not be ready to support another life.

and yes, i know how it is because i've had one.

not because i am too "immature" or i didn't use birth control and wanted to cover my mistakes.

i had one because i know that i can barely support myself, let alone another life. and personally, i would hate myself for not giving my child everything i could.

yes, i regret it. but on the other hand, when it's meant to be, it will be.

One of the few real females wrote on Jan 29, 2009 9:54 PM:

Now I ask you, who REALLY needs or wants an abortion, until we reach reality in Medicine(AMA) we all will continue to suffer and waste our hard earned money.

TRUCKER wrote on Jan 29, 2009 3:01 PM:

TO HA HA: You are absolutly right, he won the election fair and square (albeit he outspent his opponent 3 to 1.) Seems that he also outspent all his predecessors 4 to 1 on his inaguration "blow-out," and now he is outspending his immediate predicessor (the hated G.W.Bush) on an ill-conceived stimulis package that is just bursting with Democrat Pork!

Laugh if you must (you are probably short on words and are usually reduced to communicating by clicks and grunts and giggles) but B.O. has yet to find his stride (it's early yet) and seems to think the road ahead is paved with gold--- OUR GOLD!

Although he may have signaled that he was pro-abortion, he never mentioned that he wanted to send our money overseas to "treat" others to the proceedure!

stop your whining wrote on Jan 29, 2009 12:44 PM:

What's done is done. Everyone complaining can thank the bleeding heart liberals for anything that goes on from now on.

Ive asked this before wrote on Jan 29, 2009 12:21 PM:

What about the life of the unborn child?? Wouldn’t it be better to fund education and birth control instead of murder? And yes, "Local Lady", Murder, you said "True, abortion is taking a life" and the last I knew voluntarily taking a life was called murder.

Dont believe in it...... wrote on Jan 29, 2009 12:13 PM:

didn't vote for him

Local Lady wrote on Jan 29, 2009 11:21 AM:

This is an issue of the "lesser of two evils" here. Clearly these people in the third world countries are turning to people they should be able to trust to help them in times of larger crisis than we will ever see.

True, abortion is taking a life. But look at the bigger picture. Most women in the third world countries still live solidly under the thumb of their husband (a totally archaic practice). They barely have enough money to feed themselves let alone children. Birth control is not a traditional practice in those cultures. Why force them to bring another child into the world which would only be an extreme hardship and that child wouldn't even have a good life anyway? They would probably just die young anyway from starvation, poverty, and disease. End it before they have to suffer.

Besides, it's a woman's body. It's her choice, not yours.

No where to run... wrote on Jan 29, 2009 7:42 AM:

Its time to stand and fight against the corporate world takeover.

The people in Canada and the rest of the world are going thru the same problems we are. There is no where to run to.

Turn off your tvs and get involved.

Freedom isnt free.

Guess what wrote on Jan 29, 2009 7:30 AM:

Our money has gone overseas now for international planned parenthood for a very long time.

This is nothing new, obviously. Just another way to fleece money from us and control the world.

Time to wake up and get politically active instead of whining in blogs.

Rob wrote on Jan 28, 2009 11:15 PM:

Where the hell is the money gonna come from? There's an economic crisis, but we're gonna dish out money for abortions... Making me pay for something I don't believe in... Talk about the American Dream... Maybe I'll move to Canada-Do they make residents pay for things they don't want?

Interesting comments wrote on Jan 28, 2009 4:26 PM:

Seems murder is ok for some people. Even the Bishop waffles on this, I suggest he reads the Bible to gain understanding of what he represents. How many of you against abortion voted for this guy? He told you his position on abortion before he was elected. Sowe knew it was coming......

MURDER wrote on Jan 28, 2009 1:59 PM:

I am against it, and our tax $ shouldn't go to some 3rd world country. Why don't we have a choice as to where our tax dollars go? How could people put this guy in office? They publicize all the other stuff, but the sweep the abortion stuff under the rug and wash their hands of it...
pray that Obama makes decisions that benefit life and the Americans, not foreigners from countries we don't even know the funds are going to!!

ME wrote on Jan 28, 2009 12:09 PM:

It's been said in many ways, Abortion is NOT family planning, it is killing/murder of a human. How can we send money to any other cause or country when we "America" is borrowing from China? WHAT are we allowing to go on, loan out borrowed money, let's take that to a financial planer...

bishop Enoch wrote on Jan 27, 2009 11:04 PM:

I am praying for our new leader knowing he wont be perfect but he will be one of our greatest leaders, I dont agree with abortion but I feel its the womens body. and there will be less self abortions and we should not take funding away from a clinic that helps more people then it aborts. lets pray for our leader that he follows his heart.
God save and protect our leader.

C.marie wrote on Jan 27, 2009 10:57 PM:

why should my hard earned money go to some unknown country full of people with no concept of contraceptions when I don't even qualify for health care or government assistance. I am used to being screwed out of my money but at least keep it in the United States...
Teach the little Palin's of the country you can still be cool without a baby on your hip

sbear wrote on Jan 27, 2009 8:10 AM:

I agree the money should stay in the U.S. couldnt all this money go towards another stimulas pkg for all americans??think about it..$40 million to the UNFPA...what about CITIZENS OF US

betty wrote on Jan 26, 2009 6:10 PM:

there are so many things to do and yet this immoral practices are being prioritized.
i just hope it will not happen to his own daughter.

John Smith wrote on Jan 26, 2009 5:55 PM:

Abortions are cheaper than condoms.

HA HA wrote on Jan 26, 2009 3:55 PM:

"Remember, B.O. was widely recognized as THE MOST LIBERAL SENATOR!"

AND YET HE WON, HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAA

TRUCKER wrote on Jan 25, 2009 12:50 PM:

And now begins the dance that will soon be known as "THE OBAMA STOMP!" Any and all Conservative values will be crushed under B.O.'s tainted bootheel--- he dosn't need us in order to rule as he pleases, "dingey Harry" Reid and Nancy Pelosi (I must have a new jet plane to junket around in 'cause I am so important to the little people) will chanpion anything he wants. Remember, B.O. was widely recognized as THE MOST LIBERAL SENATOR!

Just Me wrote on Jan 24, 2009 9:25 AM:

YES WE CAN! LIE! His big speeches on his stands on reduces abortions and here we go people! I for one am against abortions, which as an American citizen is my right. Why should my tax $$ go around the world to perform these acts? Take this money and give them birth control, condoms teach them how NOT to get pregnant in the first place. Isn't that the way it should work? Abortion is NOT birth control people! Anymore than it is family planning.

Yikes wrote on Jan 24, 2009 8:54 AM:

Whether or not you agree with abortion or not, shouldn't the federal money be kept here to help our citizens?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections