Tide shifts again on wave energy project

By Susan Chambers, Staff Writer
Friday, November 07, 2008 | 2 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY—“This is the beginning of a process,” said Herb Nock, the vice president of business development and marketing for Ocean Power Technologies.

It was an optimistic sign.

Nock’s comments came at the beginning of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission-mandated public hearing on a potential project to install 200 wave energy buoys off the North Spit. The project is proposed by Oregon Wave Energy Partners I, a subsidiary of OPT, which is designing the technology for the buoys.

His comments set a different tone from previous meetings at which some negotiations between OPT and commercial fishermen resulted in terse comments, frustration and distrust.

OPT also is proposing a smaller array at Gardiner, but is looking to the Bay Area for larger project and to better the relations between the community and the company.

Nock, who worked with other energy companies and developers for years, joined OPT in January. This is the first time he’s addressed local residents in a public forum. Repeatedly, he said OPT wants to work with the community and that no buoys would go in until the community is behind the project.

Oregon’s goal is to have 25 percent of the state’s electricity generated by renewable resources by 2025, Nock said. Most of the concentration is on solar, wind and biomass energy, but wave energy can be a part of that. The country is on the renewable energy path, too, with the new administration that will be in place for the next four years, Nock added.

Wave energy also represents “significant opportunities for economic development along the coast,” Nock said.

But the biggest hurdle to overcome is debate about ocean space shared by commercial fishermen and the concerns they have over placement of buoys, mooring lines and 165-ton anchors, three of which will be required for each buoy.

If a buoy sinks — and one will, Charleston fisherman Shawn Ryan said — does OPT have a plan for getting it out of the water?

“I don’t want to get stuck with a mess,” Ryan said.

Nock said plans for removing the buoys from the ocean floor at this point are sketchy, but that’s where local citizens can take part in OPT’s plans.

“We will have these discussions with the community,” Nock assured the audience of about 50 folks.

Other attendees had questions about the economic displacement of fishermen, how many jobs the wave park could generate, how the placement of the arrays could affect ship traffic coming into the port and concerns about how fast OPT is moving to put buoys in the water.

Nock said more public meetings will be held and final plans to FERC won’t even be submitted until 2010, with only a few buoys in place in 2011. The most important thing, he reiterated, was the community’s respect for OPT.

Years from now, Nock said, “I hope, if nothing else, that you’ll be ale to look back at the company and say, ‘They did it right.’

“That’s all that counts.”

OPT was holding another public hearing this morning at the Red Lion Hotel and a site visit to see where the wave farm would be placed off the North Spit.
OPT by the numbers




• 130 to 160: the number, in feet, of the height of each buoy.




• 50 to 60: the number, in feet, of the diameter of the largest part of each buoy.




• 35: the number of optimum years of the lifespan of a wave energy buoy.




• 200: the number of buoys in Ocean Power Technology's proposed project off the North Spit.




• 4: the number of arrays of 50 buoys in the wave farm.




• 3: the number of vessel (i.e., fishing boats) transit lanes between the arrays.




• 25,800: the number of homes that could be powered by the 200-buoy array off the North Spit.




• .935: the number of square miles of space the 200 buoys would cover.




• 5: the number of linear miles of the 200-buoy array.




• 1000: the approximate number of feet, in width, of the 200-buoy array.




• 3: the number of rows of buoys that would be parallel to the shoreline.




• 25 percent: the amount of electricity Oregon would like to see generated by renewable sources by 2025.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Thanks Susie wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:47 PM:

Yes, Ron, our local lady of the paper is Susan Chambers. She is the champion of fishermen and we know if Susie wrote it, we can count on it. I look forward to all of your articles involving our ocean, fishermen, wave energy, and other difficulties. You rock, Lady!

Ron wrote on Nov 7, 2008 1:01 PM:

Once again, Susan Chambers gets to fan the embers of an unfolding and welcome story for the local community. I am sure she will be as thorough and thoughtful as in the series on the removal of the New Clarissa. Go get 'em again, SC!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections