State board considers more logging in northwest


Friday, November 07, 2008 | 1 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM (AP) — The Oregon Board of Forestry said Thursday it would rework its 2001 plan for managing the Tillamook and Clatsop state forests, but did not reveal any specifics.

Board members did not agree on whether to set new logging targets and did not OK a recommendation by the Oregon Department of Forestry to increase logging by relaxing some wildlife habitat goals.

A boost in logging would provide more money for Clatsop and Tillamook counties, but would come at the expense of habitat for struggling salmon and other wildlife.

The state Department of Forestry had set ambitious goals for creating more of the complex older forest stands favored by fish and wildlife. But in recent years it has found that it could not meet the timber goals set out in the Northwest Forest Management Plan — costing Clatsop and Tillamook counties a total of $36.5 million a year in their share of timber revenues.

The state took over the forests from counties decades ago following the series of wildfires known as the Tillamook Burn.

The board on Thursday heard from county leaders who said they have been counting on new revenue as the forests replanted after the Tillamook Burn mature to the point they can now turn out more timber and create jobs.

“We have been waiting for years for these forests to come on line,” Tillamook County Commissioner Tim Josi said. “It’s our feeling that they are on line and they’re being underutilized.”

But board members said they want to know how the logging might affect species that rely on the forests. If important species are jeopardized, board member Peter Hayes said, it could lead to federal protections that severely restrict logging.
Tags »
Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Native in the wood wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:24 AM:

The first course of action should be to hire someone that knows how to manage forests that doesnt have a negative impact on the ecology.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections