Coos County: No to tax levies

By Jolene Guzman and Elise Hamner, Staff Writers
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 | 12 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Coos County voters turned down two tax levies on Tuesday, one to fund public health services and the other to reopen a dark section of the county jail.

Voters also refused to place a cap on spending out of the Coos County Forest Fund — but by a narrow margin. The final forest fund vote was 13,189 no, 12,717 yes.

Coos County District Attorney R. Paul Frasier was not surprised the jail levy failed.

“I thought it had a 50-50 chance before federal money came up. I felt at that point it probably wasn’t going to be successful,” he said. “Voters would say, ‘You have the federal money. Why do you want more?’”

The county got notice last month it would receive almost $6.2 million of federal funding in lieu of timber payments this coming year, with smaller payments for the ensuing three years.

With nearly all votes counted, the levy for jail and drug enforcement costs was failing 20,904 to 7,371, or 74 percent to 26 percent.

The public health levy failed 19,070 to 8,862, or 68 percent to 32 percent.

The failure of the public health measure disappointed County Commissioner Nikki Whitty.

“I kind of thought public health would pass,” she said. “It wasn’t time to have a money measure on the ballot.”

Public Health Administrator Frances Smith said the levy would have provided $450,000 to the department each year for the next three years. Without that money, the county has some tough decisions to make.

 “The future of public health is uncertain in Coos County,” Smith said.

She added the department will run as frugally as it can for as long as it can, but ultimately the Board of Commissioners will have to decide public health’s future. As it stands, the department is operating on a loan from the county, but receives no general fund money otherwise.

The budget process starts in January, but Smith is thinking she will have meetings with county leadership before then.

The department had to borrow the funds to get through the fiscal year’s first quarter. Smith said she is uncertain whether her department will be able to pay it back.

“We are currently operating in the red,” she said.

Frasier had hoped for separate help from his office from a statewide initiative, Measure 62. The initiative would have allocated 15 percent of Oregon lottery proceeds to funding public safety, but it too was rejected by voters.

Sheriff Andy Jackson and Frasier have talked about creating law enforcement taxing districts in place of the failed tax levies. There would be two districts, one including cities and another limited to the unincorporated areas of the county. Frasier said the incorporated cities do not want to pay for sheriff’s deputies who mostly patrol rural areas, so the district including the cities would pay for the jail, the county Juvenile Department and the District Attorney’s Office. Unincorporated parts of the county would pay for deputies.

Creating the districts would make law enforcement within the county completely independent of the county’s general fund, Frasier said. Jackson and Frasier are aiming to seek voter approval for that concept in 2010.
Previous

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Coquille Resident wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:29 AM:

I don't typically vote for tax measures, (I like my money in my own bank as much as the next guy) but I was disappointed (although not surprised) the jail levy did not pass. Our county is in serious trouble - too many people committing crimes and not enough money to adequately investigate, prosecute, and jail guilty defendants. The Federal Timber money is just a short-term fix - here in a few short years that money will be gone. I'm sorry that not everyone in this county values safe streets and don't want to support, at minimum, slowing the revovling-door of criminals. I know times are tough with money for nearly everyone, but Coos County has relatively very low property taxes and I think the extra money would be well worth the sacrifice. I fear it's going to take a major event to open peoples eyes to how bad off we really are as things stand right now.

Vindicated wrote on Nov 8, 2008 1:57 AM:

I am glad that the county is not getting any more money. They squander what they got as it is.
Recently, I was arrested on false charges, and jailed for several weeks.
The case was shoddy from the start, and could have been rapidly dismissed had simple evidence been collected proving my innocence, as per my request, but it was not. Yet the district attorney's office felt justified to push with the case, spending thousands of dollars to jail me, and prosecute me, costing me a good job, forcing me to become yet another unfortunate soul needing state aid (more taxes). I was found not guilty on all charges after 5 minutes of jury deliberation. Good going, Coos County, in demonstrating why the Taxpayers don't want to feed you anymore.

coos native wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:34 AM:

I have said it before....Time to change things..We should elect 5 unpaid commissioners. And have ONE PROFESIONAL MANAGER. Its time to move forward. The people in there now just don't get it...Serve the people !!!

To I agree wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:16 PM:

Those of us living in the cities pay the same tax amount to the county as those who live in the unincorporated areas of the county. In addition we pay extra for city services. Given that, why should our cities pay more to keep people in jail than anyone else?

Hello Guys wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:11 PM:

Why are the commissioners getting paid? They should be doing a public service and volunteer to give up the salaries and benefits. That is true public service. Besides the commissioners only work (and I use that term work loosely) about 8 hours a month during meetings. In other words they are getting paid for doing nothing except raising taxes and giving themselves and their buddies raises that neither earn. But law enforcement officers get paid a 1/4 of their salaries and put their lives on the line everyday they go to work. Go figure. Thank God law enforcement officers do a service but the commissioners I question the reason we pay them.

Linda wrote on Nov 5, 2008 3:29 PM:

To Larry- I don't find it funny at all. I find it pretty damn smart.

Hoarding money wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:50 PM:

So should we just spend all our monies/reserves for security today?? There is no new money coming in. Trying to stretch four years into eight or ten to keep some level of operation/public safey is the most prudent course. Everyone wants something for nothing-well nothing is only four years away...Actually a decending four years away...

I agree.. wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:42 PM:

I agree with the taxing districts idea, but I think we should also charge the cities/agency's for the cost of housing, feeding and the medical care for subjects they arrest in their cities. If those in the cities don't want to pay for rural patrol/because they have their own police, fine, but why should rural citizens have to pay for the criminal activities or subjects arrested in the cities? We need to start billing cities/agencies properly, which includes housing (jail), feeding, medical, prosecution and any supervision cost.. Of course the cities which use the county the most would disagree.

Activist wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:54 PM:

The County Commissioners are totally out of touch with tax payers!!! All three measures they put on the ballot lost. Their two tax levies got stomped. Even the Forest Fund lost. Commissioner John Griffith lost reelection in the May Primary.

This citizen believes voters want public safety to be the highest priority. The County has millions in County Forest funds and Federal Timber money.

The Commissioners need to stop hoarding this money. I say use it for the jail, juvenile detention, patrol deputies and prosecuting criminals. Any Commissioner who won't adequately fund law enforcement needs to go.

The salary and benefits for the three Commissioners cost tax payers over $250,000.00 yearly. What do we get for that money?

Glen wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:56 PM:

They still don't get it! NO MORE TAXES and 2010 won't be any better.

Larry wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:34 AM:

I find it funny that you will vote in a man for president that wants to raise taxes for nothing, and turn down the taxes for health and security. It just does not seem right to do this then expect the rest of the country to pay for it.
Also understand that not just the home owners pay property taxes. The renters also pay them through the rent that they pay. The owner of the property takes all of his expenses into account when he figures out how much to charge for rent.

Frustrated wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:29 AM:

The next time these levies are proposed, try to tax every person instead of just the homeowner. I can't afford any more property tax increases!


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections