Group takes aim at medical marijuana law


Monday, October 27, 2008 | 10 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |

More Stories in this Section

ALBANY (AP) — Dan Harmon is not celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act.

Harmon chairs the Drugfree Workplace Legislative Work Group, which wants the state Legislature to make substantial changes to the law approved by voters in November 1998.

“We are going to push hard this next session,” Harmon told members of the Albany Area Chamber of Commerce last week. “We’ve told the legislative officers, ’You’d better tape your socks on, because we’re going to come hard.”’

One of the first orders of business, Harmon said, is to reintroduce Senate Bill 465, which would exempt employers from having to accommodate medical marijuana users, no matter when or where they use the drug. The Senate approved the bill in 2007, but it couldn’t clear the House.

The work group also wants to delete some of the conditions currently approved for treatment with marijuana, restrict the approval of new conditions, require employer notification when a worker applies for a medical-marijuana card and stiffen penalties for those who violate the act.

Besides leading the work group, Harmon is the executive vice chairman of a large Portland construction firm and a board member of Associated Oregon Industries, one of the state’s most powerful business groups.

In his talk to the Albany chamber, he cited several reasons why employers would want to think twice about hiring medical marijuana users, including concerns about workplace safety, legal liability and the potential loss of federal contracts. He also said Oregon’s medical marijuana law is being widely abused, and the law itself “says something about permissiveness in this state, and we’ve got to stop this permissiveness.”

More than 20,000 Oregonians have cards authorizing them to use marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Harmon has been touring the state for more than a year, giving similar presentations to chambers of commerce and other organizations.

A handful of medical marijuana advocates have attended or tried to attend Harmon’s presentations to challenge what they say are distorted claims about medicinal pot. A half-dozen activists who tried to attend the Albany forum were turned away.

“We’ve been haunting these people for a while now, and I’m sure they wish we’d go away,” said Sandee Burbank, executive director of Mothers Against Misuse and Abuse, an organization that lobbies for more liberal drug laws and operates a medical marijuana clinic in Portland.

“They get real loose with the facts when nobody’s around to call them on it.”
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

larry wrote on Dec 20, 2008 2:18 PM:

this hipocrite is probably has stock in pharmacuticls or something of that corrupt nature. Get over it people this plant is what it is, we all know the bad and good effects of it (which are far less then tobacco, alcohol or any pharmacutical combined) it is time to leagalize it put an age limit on it and move the hell on. The war on one of gods plants continues and will continue tell nuts like this are put out to pasture. I can just see ignorant managers or business leaders at one of his little seminars sitting their going hymm and buying into his crap and not seing the big picture.

Its ALL ABOUT THE MONEY wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:35 AM:

Our system is set up to make money on this plant. If this plant was legal, the big pharma companys, wouldn't be making as much money. The drug testing companys wouldn't be getting their share. The lawyers wouldn't be making so much. The list goes on...... There wouldn't be the need for as many prisons. TAXES WOULD GO DOWN. FAMILYS WOULDN'T BE DESTROYED....All because a plant is too helpful...... only in america.

fm wrote on Oct 29, 2008 12:56 PM:

Wait! If workdrugfree Oregon is really concerned about workplace safety, shouldn't they Also include all those nasty Impairment Issues that are Not drug related too? Like fatigue, pain, illness (colds, flu etc), Migraines, Sleeplessness, worry over finances, relationships, divorce etc all these things are "Distracting" and can make or cause you to loose focus on the tasks in front of you. Has anyone ever said "I'm sorry, I'm just not up to snuff today" or "I was up all night with my sick child" or "There was a death in our family"...If so...You/they Are Working Impaired....

So Lets get serious about Workplace Safety issues and confront ALL causes of Impairment, Stop relying on ineffective, wasteful UA's and start to use Sensible and effective methods of detecting real impairment by using "Direct Performance Testing".

Bryn wrote on Oct 28, 2008 8:05 PM:

So if the US Gov. says that MMJ has no use, why the hell did they file a Patent on it?

U.S. Patent # 6630507

In 2003, the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services filed for, and was awarded a patent on cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. U.S. Patent 6630507

THE GOVERNMENTS ARE OWNED BY CORPORATIONS WAKE UP

BRYN wrote on Oct 28, 2008 6:20 PM:

So if the US Gov. says that MMJ has no use, why the hell did they file a Patent on it?

U.S. Patent # 6630507
In 2003, the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services filed for, and was awarded a patent on cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. U.S. Patent 6630507

MrFixit wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:37 PM:

If you go after one you must go after them all.
They must include all those dangerous, addictive, prescription drugs including the killer aspirin and midol.

Why such a fuss over a plant anyway?

Mr E wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:24 PM:

I understand workplace rules (and even laws) against anyone under the influence at a job where safety is paramount (construction, for instance). However, I agree with others who mentioned that there are worse legal drugs out there.
I also believe that (like alcohol, in spite of the metabolic differences) there are differences between being "under the influence" and using the drug sparingly for pain (say, before you go to sleep). That being said, if you are in a dangerous profession, and need to use pot for pain constantly, you should probably think about another career (and maybe we should find ways for companies to shift these employees into new departments?).

Of course, when this man went on to the comment about "permissiveness," he lost any and all credibility with me. He's not looking to push this because of safety, he's doing it because of his 1950s mentality on the drug.

AnneofOregon wrote on Oct 27, 2008 12:12 PM:

If this group is really concerned about workplace safety and legal liability, then by all means they had better go after employees that use Vicodin, Oxycodone, Zoloft, Lexapro, Ativan, Valium, Lithium, Seroquil or any other legally prescribed medication that has side affects that can hinder the user's ability to think clearly, cause drowsiness or difficulty operating machinery.
Come on ~ give the employees the benefit of the doubt! Millions of people go to work every day that are under the influence of a medication; some of which have much worse side affects than pot does.
And I believe that requiring workplace notification if a patient applies or is accepted for a medical marijuana card would be a HIPPA violation, not to mention just plain ludicrous.

Linda wrote on Oct 27, 2008 11:18 AM:

Yeah well it doesn't say you can get stoned and drive either. so if you are going to use MJ follow the laws.

silly wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:44 AM:

I think there should be a group that takes aim, at the people ( doctors) who go and perscribe big pharma drugs,pain killers and anti depression meds, like its candy to anyone with a pulse. and let these drugged up people roam freely within our society everyday. Thats a much larger threat, Then the medical pot card holders.What the difference anyhow, THC or big Pharam drugs?? Its all drugs to me. Old Danny boy must be getting a big pay off from big pharma.Pharma hates to compete with anyone.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections