County puts assessor-elect on leave

By Jolene Guzman, Staff Writer
Friday, October 24, 2008 | 31 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Though Coos County’s chief deputy assessor is scheduled to take over the assessor’s office in January, he hasn’t been there since Sept. 30.

Adam Colby said he was placed on indefinite paid leave after he asked for an investigation of personnel issues in the office, but no one in county government will say who sent him home.

“I thought he was on vacation,” Assessor Bob Main said.

Main himself was on vacation during part of Colby’s absence, but he was back in the office this week. He said Wednesday he was surprised to hear his chief deputy was on leave.

Main was elected in May to replace Commissioner John Griffith, and Colby was elected assessor at the same time. Both will move to their new jobs in January.

Colby’s leave of absence appears to stem from a letter he sent to the commissioners on Sept. 29.

“I am concerned about the continuing personnel related issues in the assessor’s office, and request that a complete investigation be conducted at the earliest possible date,” Colby wrote. “I ask that this investigation include an evaluation of the professional conduct of all Assessor’s office personnel, including myself.”

Colby says he was placed on leave at 1 p.m. the next day. Other county officials would neither comment nor confirm an investigation or that Colby was placed on leave.

Commissioners John Griffith and Nikki Whitty referred questions to the county’s lawyer and Human Resources Department.

“All litigation related,” attorney Jacki Haggerty said. “I’m not going to comment.”

The litigation appears to be related to two recent tort claim notices filed with the county.

In August, Eugene lawyer Brian L. Pocock notified to Haggerty’s office that an assessor’s office employee, Angela Provost-Allen, intended to file a claim for damages due to adverse employment actions by Coos County.

The notice said her claims were based on sexual harassment, assault and negligence, including failure to investigate misconduct complaints, and negligent supervision. She also claims intentional infliction of extreme emotional distress. The document also cites defamation; gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Oregon Revised Statute 659A.030; and whistle blowing under Oregon Revised Statute 659A.203.

The tort claim notice says Provost-Allen’s complaints were documented in letters to Main on March 19 and Coos County Human Resources Manager Steve Allen on Aug. 19.

The claim named Colby and Main, but Pocock said it was for their actions after Provost-Allen was assaulted and harassed.

“Neither Main or Colby directly engaged in sexual harassment,” he said.

 Pocock said Provost-Allen also has filed a worker’s compensation claim in relation to the harassment. She’ll decide whether to follow through with a lawsuit depending on what the county’s insurance company decides to cover, Pocock said. He expects the decision to be issued soon.

Haggerty confirmed that a second tort claim had been issued to the county. Though she gave The World a copy of Provost-Allen’s notice, she refused to provide a copy of the other, saying the notice was exempt from disclosure under Oregon public records law.

Interpretation of the public records law appears to vary among Oregon counties. Clackamas County’s district attorney concluded in 2003 that tort claims are subject to disclosure.

“The exemption applies only to records developed or compiled by the public body for use in the litigation,” a 2003 opinion said.

It goes on to say:

“The written notice is notice of the litigation. It is not of the litigation itself such as records or notes that might be generated by the public body and exempted ...” the opinion said. “By way of analogy, a complaint filed by a party claiming damages against a public body would be public notice of a legal proceeding and therefore a public record. It follows that the notice that such a claim will be asserted against a public body would therefore also constitute a public record.”

Colby wouldn’t comment on the tort claims, but he did say he thought most likely the Human Resources Department would conduct the investigation.

“I’m not at liberty to discuss personnel issues,” he said Tuesday.

Main said Wednesday he had not been notified of the tort claims.

“I’ve heard rumors,” he said.

Allen, the human resources manager, refused to comment as well.

Colby said he has access to his work e-mail but has not been in the office since Sept. 30.
Details


What: Two tort claim notices have been filed regarding personnel complaints in the Coos County Assessor’s Office. One alleges sexual harassment and assault.




Number of assessor employees: 17




Out of the office: Coos County Assessor-elect Adam Colby says he has been placed on paid leave since Sept. 30 and will be for an undisclosed amount of time. His salary is $3,088 monthly.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

yes shoot the messenger wrote on Oct 30, 2008 4:00 PM:

forget the article, why don't you read the tort claim and see what it says. Colby is obviously, at least per the respondent, involved. At a minimum it sounds like condoning sexual harassment, if not committing it himself. Either way he needs to be taken out of there.

everyman wrote on Oct 29, 2008 3:55 PM:

Hmmmmm...interesting

Comment wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:40 AM:

Yes, shoot the messenger did not read Friday's article clearly. It stated that Colby and Main were not involved with sexual harassment per the plaintiff's attorney. Why don't people read carefully without making accusations and speaking non truths.

commenter wrote on Oct 29, 2008 8:07 AM:

I heard that All county employees were told by county council "do not talk with them before checking with Counsel’s Office. Make sure that the specific person is approved by Counsel’s Office. maybe that is why no one is talking.

Another observer wrote on Oct 29, 2008 7:52 AM:

This story leaves several unanswered questions. If Colby isn't involved in the harassment, then why is he on paid administrative leave and who put him on it? If Main received a formal complaint from the employee in March, why is he claiming that he's only heard "rumors" about it? Why is Adam Colby initiating the investigation and not Bob Main? What lies ahead if the Assessor's Office has been allowed to deteriorate to this degree?

How about... wrote on Oct 29, 2008 6:53 AM:

Mr. Grab & Tickle gets no raise for at three years?

He'll probably then think twice before laying hands on another co-worker.

And Mr. Main already is acting just like a full fledge commissioner, he knows nothing and is in the dark. Sounds like the normal stock political answer.

yes shoot the messenger wrote on Oct 28, 2008 7:52 PM:

I don't care how much "charitable" work, etc., you claim he is doing... if he's pinching butts and abusing the staff, get rid of him... unless of course you think that because he did a few evening presentations he should be able to treat the staff like dirt and get away with anything.

Linda wrote on Oct 27, 2008 4:43 PM:

Their all crooks, with our money. And they laugh at us all the way to the bank.

GO FIGURE wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:52 AM:

HOW DO SOME PEOPLE IN CHARGE ALWAYS TAKE THE I DONT KNOW OR CLAIM INNOCENCE. IT TAKES A BIGGER MAN TO ADMIT THEY DID SOMETHING WRONG AND BE HONEST. NO ONE IS PERFECT ESPECIALLY IN OUR GOVERNMENT. TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT YOU HAVE DONE THERE IS HONOR IN THAT. YOU CANT PUT A BANDAGE ON A COMPOUND FRACTURE AND IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT YOU HAVE IN THE ASSESSORS OFFICE. THERE IS DISSENTION IN THAT OFFICE AND YOU HAVE TO START AT THE TOP TO SEE WHAT THE PROBLEM IS. FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD ON THE INSIDE NO ONE WORKING IN THAT OFFICE WANTS TO BE THERE UNDER THE CURRENT SITUATION. THIS HAS BEEN BREWING FOR A LONG TIME.

Shooting the Messenger wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:11 AM:

County government, like all government can be wasteful. It seems that Mr. Colby has been doing a lot of work on his own time, i.e. presentations about the property tax system in the evenings. Are we just shooting the messenger? Seems like he has dedicated much of his time to create good p.r. for the county. He also dedicates charitable service to our community.

Just Wondering wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:58 AM:

Why is it that the person who asked for the investigation is the one on leave. Could it be that they are attacking the messenger? From my understanding Mr. Colby wants to make changes that will benefit the taxpayers. Isn't that what we pay him for?

DD wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:49 AM:

Landrum Schramdumb. Irrevelant blathering. Let's get some facts from this "closed session" oriented County Government and decide AFTER getting some facts.

How can this happen wrote on Oct 26, 2008 8:29 PM:

So, a Supervisor (Assessor) of a relatively small work group doesn't know what's going on in his office (the claims and a key staff member being on suspension). Can't wait until he starts running the County.

Fed Up wrote on Oct 26, 2008 3:46 PM:

Sounds like typical politics, all smoke and mirrors. How could Main as the Department Head not know if one of his employees are on vacation or not. Smells fishy to me. The charges must be serious if the Chief Deputy Assessor is gone during the Assessor's office busiest time of year. If there truly is a personel problem, my guess is it was created by the person on leave.

Tax Payer wrote on Oct 26, 2008 1:52 PM:

It is ridiculous for Coos County to make public one tort claim notice but keep a second secret. What are the County Commissioners and County Attorney hiding? I hope the World sues Coos County to force disclosure of the second claim.

Citizens have a right to know about misconduct allegations against public officials. It is our money at stake!

Does Coos County plan to pay this second claim without tax payers finding out anything about it?

NO GOVERNMENT BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!!

Feed Up wrote on Oct 26, 2008 1:50 PM:

Sounds like typical politics, all smoke and mirrors. How could Main as the Department Head not know if one of his employees are on vacation or not. Smells fishy to me. The charges must be serious if the Chief Deputy Assessor is gone during the Assessor's office busiest time of year. If there truly is a personel problem, my guess is it was created by the person on leave.

Hard Working County Employee wrote on Oct 26, 2008 11:59 AM:

So, a Supervisor (Assessor) of a relatively small work group doesn't know what's going on in his office (the claims and a key staff member being on suspension).
Can't wait until he starts running the County.

IDAMAE wrote on Oct 25, 2008 8:10 PM:

TO BAD SOME PEOPLE CAN'T READ. THE ARTICLE STATES THAT NEITHER MAIN OR COLBY WERE INVOLVED IN THE SEXUAL HARRASSMENT. MR. COLBY IS VERY PROFESSIONAL, BUT REMEMBER, MR. MAIN IS IN CHARGE UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2009, SO WHO IS TO BLAME FOR NO ACTION?

TR wrote on Oct 25, 2008 11:29 AM:

I have only known Adam Colby for a couple of years thru my business. He is a regular customer and has always been professional, kind and encouraging. Please do not judge him before all the facts are in.

hmmm wrote on Oct 25, 2008 9:46 AM:

Mr. Main and Mr. COlby have been in charge. If there are problems, I would say that they would have to close to the "root" of the problem. Maybe Mr. Main should not have let Mr. Colby take over. Maybe Mr. Colby doesn't have the maturity it takes to be a manager. Hope it all comes out.

Al the Pal wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:55 PM:

Told ya so World!

Geno Landrum wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:39 PM:

The Court of Public Opinion is now in session. The Honorable Citizen's of the State of Oregon presiding. This court's motto is "You are guilty till proven innocent" The person(s) on trial DO NOT get to face their accusers. Now, get out your poison pens. Fact: I know Bob Main and I know he has always been a gentleman to me and my wife. He went as far as trying to reduce the office hours to make it easier on the rest of the staff. Sounds like a person that creates a 'hostile working environment'. I met Mr.Colby when he first arrived in Coos County and was impressed with his 'open' attitude and forward thinking. We discussed his observations of Coos County, his remarks were very positive. We didn't discuss his roll in the assessor's office but from the discussion I felt (my opinion)him to be a hard working, friendly person based on him sharing with me his life's path. Now, jury how do you find, whose guilty and whose not guilty. Geno (P.S.)Who checks with their insurance company before filing a tort claim?

Citizen wrote on Oct 24, 2008 5:03 PM:

Adam Colby has tremendously improved the assessor's office. He has gotten out into the community and explained our very complex property tax system to the tax payers, opened the office up during the lunch hour, and encouraged everyone to call anytime with any questions or concerns about their taxes/property, etc. The county should be thankful to have him!!

Coos County Resident wrote on Oct 24, 2008 3:15 PM:

Liked the changes the assessor elect was making towards the taxpayers i.e. seminars, hours changes etc... Hope he continues to make things better for us taxpayers as our taxes do pay county employee salaries.

Taxpayer wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:58 PM:

I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Colby at one of his tax seminars. He was pleasant and the info was helpful. I appreciate him opening the assessor's office from noon to one. My company stays open all day to service their customers, why not the county. It seems he knows who his employer is - the taxpayers of Coos County. Hopefully this will be squared away soon.

Odotter wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:56 PM:

Jacki Haggerty needs to be tossed out of office, so far as never to be seen again.

This idiot is the perfect example of why this country is screwed up beyond repair.

The Founding Fathers gave their blood so we could have freedom and openess in all matters.

Coos County taxpayers why do you put up with this excuse of lawyer?

Shame on Jacki Haggerty...it's far past time to turn in your resignation and learn to work for a living.

bopeep wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:44 PM:

What did we elect as our new commissioner? 24 days after his key employee goes home and he thinks that he is on vacation? Certainly says that we are overstaffed in the assessor office if he isn't missed.

Glenn wrote on Oct 24, 2008 1:59 PM:

Clean out the rat nest!

An EX Coos County Employee wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:29 PM:

Typical Coos County, pretend the harrassment doesn't exist! They are the best at covering up these kinds of practices and the good old boy system is strong even when there is no money.

DD wrote on Oct 24, 2008 12:09 PM:

seems like the County has something to hide.
if I were Mr.Colby,I'd be pretty happy getting paid to do nothing but wait around.

Just An Observer wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:52 AM:

The Curry County sheriff denied wrongdoing in regards to sexual harassment. He wound up convicted in court. Maybe it's time to go from civil suits to a criminal case, get the state AG involved and see where things lie after an out-in-the-open trial. Then we the public can vote out the ones who were part of the mess (if any were) and those we do support with our votes can go about the business of straightening out the county departments. Letting things go on with minimal transparency only feeds rumors and cynicism about government and for good reason! What is being hidden or covered up?


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections