Consultant: Rails will aid port’s success

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Friday, October 17, 2008 | 7 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Buy this photo
Previous Next
Photo 1 of 1
COOS BAY — Oregon International Port of Coos Bay officials don’t think the idled Coos Bay rail line is worth much, but they know it’s valuable for their future.

At a port commission meeting Thursday, consultants from Don Breazeale and Associates suggested Coos Bay could become the most competitive port on the West Coast — as long as it has rail service.

“We have to have a railroad to make that work,” said Jack Finholm, senior associate. “Access and egress is pretty difficult without the railroad.”

At the port’s request, Finholm and company president Don Breazeale met with 14 companies who deal with transpacific trade. Of those companies — such as Cosco, Evergreen and “K” Line — Breazeale said 85 percent felt the port should take over the railroad.

The consultants said there are many advantages to Coos Bay, including low-cost land, less congestion than Los Angeles and a shorter transit from Asian markets compared to Southern Californian ports.

That said, there are no guarantees businesses would come to the area, especially considering the aggressive sales and marketing organizations in California and Washington ports, Breazeale said. He recommended the port undertake a professional sales and marketing effort of its own to attract commodity, auto and, eventually, container ships.

But first, the port needs to resolve the rail line issue.

“The rail has got to be the answer,” Breazeale said.

The port should know whether it can buy the rail line from Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad by the end of this month. That’s when the U.S. Surface Transportation Board is expected to rule on the port’s feeder-line application and the railroad company’s abandonment application.

Port Executive Director Jeff Bishop said the economic downturn may actually benefit the port in its efforts to rehabilitate the line. He noted that steel and oil prices have dropped recently, making repairs less costly.

He also said the market for scrap metal has fallen, from $610 a ton at the start of the month to $275 a ton as of Oct. 15.

Given the change and the port’s argument that most of the value in the line is in the resale of its rails, Bishop said as of this morning the port is dropping its net liquidation value for the line to $2.3 million.

“If we see a radical decline between now and the end of the month, we may do another one,” he said.

Several people at the meeting said they were excited about the prospect of a container terminal coming to town. Others were pessimistic about the likelihood of businesses actually investing in the area.

Camby Collier of Barview asked how wide the channel would need to be to attract the shipping companies. The consultants said the largest ships coming to Coos Bay would be about four and a half stories tall. They would draw about 46 feet.

The port hired Don Breazeale and Associates as part of its due diligence in preparing plans to dredge the Coos Bay shipping channel to accommodate larger ships, Bishop said. The next phase of the dredging study will cost about $4 million, he said, and opposition groups were suggesting Coos Bay was not an attractive location to shippers.

“We wanted to make sure we weren’t wasting that $4 million,” Bishop said. “The commissioners wanted to have a reality check.”

The reality check came at a cost of $75,000, the consultants’ fee, Bishop said.

Bishop said port staff didn’t have a recommendation to present to the commission about the next stage of the dredging project.

“We’re all pretty much in the railroad business these days,” he said.

The port will return to the dredging issue next year, he said.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Camby Collier wrote on Oct 18, 2008 12:04 AM:

The taxpayers of Oregon will be paying for the railroad that will not make a profit until years and years of the cargo container business....thank you citizens of Oregon. If all goes forward it will be AT LEAST 2012 before we see any port action. I think next to Detroit area we are the most welfare County in the USA. 80% of the people in Coos county receive some sort of assistance. Timber money welfare, thank you citizens of all the USA states and thank you Al Gore for taking a vibrant community and shutting it down. We now need a different direction...I have the Jordan Cove Victorian Village and Business Park....that can go with the expo center...

ronop wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:23 PM:

Caution folks. The burden to buy the rail line falls on the entire state of Oregon now. The people outside of the Coos Bay area would never say OK to buying the rail line. So the port wants to establish a port district like the airport district so you, the local taxpayers, can pay the full $100 million. For all of this you are paying Mr. Bishop almost $150,000 annually and Gaul not much less. And, you folks think that LeTellier is overpaid?

Common Sense wrote on Oct 17, 2008 5:24 PM:

Sure glad the USA citizen tax payer doesn't have a say in how it's $$$ is being spent/wasted, because not many projects would happen here in Oregon, including this rail line! I can see why thise Port clowns aren't elected, because they would still be looking for a job...

P.S. Was that $75K consultants fee really necessary, since you were gonna waste tax payers $$$ in buying this anyways (Even though you can't run your regular job well by keeping raising fees for fishermen)???

Roger S wrote on Oct 17, 2008 5:00 PM:

You C.A.V.E. people will not be happy until we are all in the poor house.

Gene wrote on Oct 17, 2008 2:28 PM:

What about the railcars for containers? They can't travel on these track. Who plans to pay for the new tracks at a price tag of about 100 million dollars? Why aren't these questions put to the consulting people? Oh yeah, I forgot, they have to turn in the results they were paid for.

Thomas wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:09 PM:

Ludicrous ......... but at least this and the LNG scam are now dead-in-the-water for the foreseeable future.

No other comment is necessary.

Camby Collier wrote on Oct 17, 2008 11:26 AM:

By the way, the answer to my question was: the channel would need to be 600' wide to accomodate the container carriers. This is a smaller width than the previous Maersk carriers would have needed. Maersk vessels would need the channel to be 700' feet wide. And I heard the man say the depth needed to be 51' (not 46') They said the future of container carriers that the shipping businesses are going to be using is a '8500 series' which is smaller and faster ships.
That still does not take away from the width of the channel needing to be 690'-750' for 'risk management' for LNG vessels which the Coast Guard is blatantly ignoring.
*Cargo terminal - YES
*LNG - NO


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections