Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
OBVIOUSLY wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:28 PM:
fnord wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:37 PM:
Good going.
Jason Snelgrove wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:28 PM:
Linda wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:12 AM:
Citizen wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:42 PM:
moonpenny wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:09 PM:
stupid wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:14 AM:
Shelly wrote on Oct 15, 2008 6:43 PM:
Yes, if the offender is motivated and willing to change. Treatment can increase safety as long as the offender follows the treatment plan. There is no cure.
This is a quote from the Q&A section of Coos county corrections, Notice the part of IF they follow there treatment and there IS NO CURE
ANOTHER NIEGHBOR 2 wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:33 PM:
Cora wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:02 PM:
Shelly wrote on Oct 15, 2008 7:33 AM:
I do however think they need to redo the laws when it comes to statitory rape to many guys get scrued with that one. I have known girls that turned them in just cause they got dumbed etc.
Grandma moses wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:36 AM:
To hope for all of you. Pee behind a tree was not his crime.I see that a lot of times. No problem. Have you ever been raped at gun point. I will pray for you that you never are. It will change your life.
moonpenny wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:30 PM:
One must learn to be Pro Active. Dont set yourself up to be in wrong places, ever. Dont expose yourself behind a tree. Educate your son's on statutory rape, daughters too, they are arrested now as well. Its your choice as to whether you lock your doors or leave them open. It was his choice to pick up a gun and commit so many crimes. He's lost the right to be accepted in a community of law abiding citizens. He wont ever get it back. He has his second chance, hes out of prison. What happens now is up to him.
moonpenny wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:19 PM:
Even the corrections department didnt agree with the Parole Boards decision to release. The county placed him once, and the neighborhood was notiifed. He had to move because of the backlash, but then the county moved him into the NB Neighborhood quietly. Refusing to notify residents that a sexual predator was in their midst. Nice. Again, if any of you bleeding hearts feel sadness for this criminal, then please, open your home, let him date your daughters and sleep under your roof.
You were warned.
Reality: It's still an offense, period.
Ignorance is Bliss wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:40 PM:
Problem Solved wrote on Oct 14, 2008 6:18 PM:
hope for all of you wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:59 PM:
ex neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:29 PM:
Reality wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:53 PM:
Mary - it is foolish "logic" like yours (since you obviously think he is responsible for every unsolved rape in Coos County) that politician love to exploit. There is a little thing called "evidence" that says you need to be able to PROVE someone did something before you punish them for it.
Except for ex-sex offenders that is.
That's ok - you sheeple just keep following in line in lockstep like good little Nazis.
Nurse wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:14 PM:
Nurse wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:11 PM:
coastal friend wrote on Oct 14, 2008 1:46 PM:
BOTTOM LINE, if those of you who are so concerned with HIS welfare, by all means, take him into your homes. Watch him carefully and report to us later.
I agree, just because he has not been caught lately, does not mean he has not reoffended. Lot of sexual crimes have not been solved as yet.
Another neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:41 AM:
concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:19 AM:
Caremore wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:59 AM:
They do not make people register only because "they are really likely to repeat". One can get on the sex offender registry by having consenual sex with a girl friend just a few years younger than themselves or downloading porn that has a minor in the porn package. Sex offenders are less likely to reoffend than any other crime except murder.
Alcoholics and drug addicts don't just walk and fall down drunk. They drive vehicles. Alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes kill someone every 31 minutes and nonfatally injure someone every two minutes (NHTSA 2006).Drugs other than alcohol (e.g., marijuana and cocaine) are involved in about 18% of motor vehicle driver deaths. These other drugs are generally used in combination with alcohol (Jones et al. 2003). Drug addicts sell to anyone, including children.
Check your statistics with the Dept of Justice or OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS RECIDIVISM OF NEW PAROLEES AND PROBATIONERS.
Shelly wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:53 AM:
Reality wrote on Oct 14, 2008 6:36 AM:
Your government wants you to be afraid of everything and being the good sheeple you are, you comply.
Ignorance is Bliss wrote on Oct 14, 2008 1:14 AM:
BeeSmart wrote on Oct 13, 2008 7:37 PM:
If Herr Director Wright had any stones he would have told the ONE person who complained to move, Not Mr. Howard. Who is Herr Director to supercede the State (who has people who do this stuff for a living) and list Mr. Howard as a predator.
I hope Mr. Howard finds a good lawyer (maybe one of those pesky ACLU lawyers) and sue Coos County & Herr Director.
Mary wrote on Oct 13, 2008 6:29 PM:
Just because he has no recent convictions doesn't mean he is 100% clear. Could be he just hasn't been caught again!
A Concerned Mother wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:27 PM:
moonpenny wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:14 PM:
Did you not read the entire history? He "has" re-offended as recent as last year. Hes shown he is NOT rehabilitated, the law still means nothing to him. Thats what the big deal is. Open YOUR doors then if you feel so inclined, but dont tell the rest of us that we need to subject our daughters, wifes, sisters or mothers to this freaks existence.
Dr. Levens wrote on Oct 13, 2008 3:18 PM:
Of all the sex offenders I have evaluated and treated in the last 10 years, less than 1% have re-offended.
Statistics also prove that all other offenders, not to include sex offenders, have a current recidivism rate of 60%.
Your children have 94.3% greater chance of being sold drugs, hit by a drunk driver or killed during a random drive by shooting.
This clearly shows that sex offenders should not be your main concern.
caremore wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:44 PM:
There needs to be a list for liars and for those for make up false alligations about people just to scare them. I don't know this guy but I can bet that he is a better neighbor than the creep that calls himself "concerned possible neighbor".
Bee13 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:35 PM:
Have we lost all compassion and common sense in this country? ONE resident complained and he is forced to move? Please...if Herr Commissioner Wright had any stones he would have told that ONE resident to move!
He is NOT a predatory risk according to the State, for Herr Wright to override the state is ridulous! I hope Mr. Howard finds a good lawyer (maybe one of those radical ACLU lawyers you geniuses are always complaing about) and sue Cooz county and the gestapo there.
Running ex-felons underground doesn't keep any neighborhood or any child safe. Information and education does. Of course, that takes an open mind, which I don't see here.
Shelly wrote on Oct 13, 2008 12:34 PM:
get your facts straight, the reason they make them register is because they are the really likely to repeat, history and statistic prove it. Even if drug offenders do more, they also get caught more.
Murderes usually do it spur of the moment and dont repeat unless they are serial killers. You sound like you know how it feels for the guy.
caremore wrote on Oct 12, 2008 6:49 PM:
This is hysteria, because he has a 30 year old offence. Do the math, he was 23 years old went he committed his offence. He served his time and has not had a sex offence since. How many of your neighbors have DUIs or are drug addicts? You should be more worried about these offenders that you are not notified about. A former murderer could live right next door and you wouldnt even know it since he served his time and society has given all other offenders a second chance.
Sex offenders have a really low rate of reoffending! Alcoholics and drug addicts have the highest, so you and your children have a good chance of getting victimized by most any other offender than a sex offender on the list who has gone through mandated counseling and has paid his dept to society.
concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:28 AM:
moonpenny wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:34 AM:
I’m sick and tired of the bleeding hearts wanting to “integrate” these diseased people back with law abiding citizens. To the ACLU “Take them home with you; don’t give them back to us. They are YOUR problem now.”
And now that we want to expand measure 11 to non-violent property and drug crimes (Measure 61), they are fighting hard to stop it. We are trying to put them away and the ACLU wants to unleash them back into our communities.
We don’t want these people! Put them in prison and throw the key away.
coastal friend wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:52 AM:
The person who claims he has not offended since his release, is only guessing. Just because he has not been caught, does not mean he has been good.
There are sex crimes that have not been solved, who knows.
Gramma wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:40 AM:
To Parole Dept. wrote on Oct 10, 2008 5:58 PM:
Shelly wrote on Oct 10, 2008 5:15 PM:
former po thanx for the work that you did I am sure it was very difficult working with people like that. I also really aplaud them for doing something in this case.
concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 10, 2008 4:15 PM:
Dave A. wrote on Oct 10, 2008 4:10 PM:
Ugh wrote on Oct 10, 2008 3:38 PM:
Rick James wrote on Oct 10, 2008 3:01 PM:
What next wrote on Oct 10, 2008 2:43 PM:
I am just curious... what can be done? What do people want to happen? I think this is an issue that needs to be discussed on a national level. How can we keep people away from the public, but also allow them to contribute to society?
I know a "sex offender" who was working just down the block from me. I went to school with the guy when he was convicted of his crime (from a consensual occurrence when he was a teenager), yet he doesn't cause trouble.
Former PO wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:22 PM:
what a joke wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:13 PM:
Concerned Teacher wrote on Oct 10, 2008 11:47 AM:
Frank Howard



The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines