Complaints force county to move sex offender

By Jessica Musicar, Staff Writer
Friday, October 10, 2008 | 52 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font |
NORTH BEND — A registered sex offender convicted of sodomy, robbery and rape is essentially being driven out of a North Bend neighborhood after nearby residents learned of his presence.

Coos County Community Corrections director Roy Wright directed Frank A. Howard, 51, to move out of the Broadway Court neighborhood by 5 p.m. Thursday. He said he received several calls from a resident, and has chosen to relocate Howard.

“We’re not going to battle with the public,” Wright said.

Residents, including Jason Snelgrove and Tina Hickey, said they were not aware that the sex offender was living in their neighborhood until last Friday, although Howard has been staying there since July.

*Frank Howard


“This guy has talked to my wife before,” Snelgrove said. “I was afraid for my family.”

Howard was convicted in 1981 of three counts of sodomy, four counts of robbery and one count of rape after sexually assaulting and attempting to sexually assault six different women at gunpoint. According to a community notification on the Coos County Corrections Web site, all the victims of his crimes were strangers. The attacks were committed in Coos County. A  Coos County Circuit Court spokeswoman said he also was convicted in 2007 of second-degree theft.

Wright said he did not know where Howard would be moved, as housing is often an issue in these cases. Typically, parole orders for sex offenders prevent them from living near schools, playgrounds, or other places where people under 18 years of age regularly congregate, the director explained.

“We’re out looking for a place right now,” Wright said Thursday. “We try to respond to the community. ... It’s not going to work with him living there, so he’s gotta move.”

The complaints he received were based on Howard’s presence not his behavior, Wright noted.

“Some people just don’t like sex offenders living near them,” he said. “This is a very infrequent event, this kind of response from a person in the community.”

When community members do share their concerns, corrections administrators respond in different ways, Wright said. He did not detail the variety of circumstances or responses.

Despite the severity of Howard’s crimes, Wright said he does not fit the criteria to be considered a predatory sex offender. His status was determined through a risk assessment instrument prior to his release from the Oregon State Correctional Institution in 2005. Howard returned to Coos County following his release.

According to the Oregon State Police Sex Offender Registration Web site, Oregon law defines a predatory sex offender as a person who exhibits characteristics showing a tendency to victimize or injure others, and who has been convicted of certain sex crimes. The predatory designation allows law enforcement, or a supervising agency, to notify the community about a particular sex offender. Offenders are assessed on an individual basis. Assessments are based, in part, on previous history and the facts surrounding sex offense convictions, the site said.

Wright added that predatory sex offenders have to register for life and notification requirements are more rigorous.

In cases of predatory sex offenders, Wright said community notification flyers are sent out to local law enforcement, libraries, school districts, colleges, swimming pools, malls and organizations involving children, such as the Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Oregon, the North Bend Public Library, the Pony Village Mall and the North Bend School District, among others. Notice also may be given to local news agencies.

In non-predatory cases, notifications are sent to all law enforcement agencies in the area, the Department of Human Services and Child Welfare.

Although Wright said Howard is not considered predatory, Howard’s mug shot and name are featured under the heading Predatory Sex Offenders on one page of the county’s community corrections Web site.

Howard does not appear on the Oregon Predatory Sex Offender Inquiry System, which lists only predatory sex offenders, nor the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Web site, which is coordinated by the U.S. Department of Justice.

After Howard was released, Coos County Corrections didn’t completely trust the parole board’s assessment, Wright said, and notified his neighbors of his presence at the time.

 “Pretty rough looking crime, wouldn’t you say?” Wright said.

But when he moved to another location, the county didn’t repeat its notification.

Snelgrove said he believes he and his neighbors should have been notified nonetheless. While he is pleased Howard is moving, he’s concerned for people in Howard’s next neighborhood.

“I want people where he goes to next to be notified that he is a predatory sex offender,” Snelgrove said. “The point is, anyone should be notified in this circumstance, and why aren’t they?”

He said he first learned of Howard after a neighbor said the sex offender was staying on another neighbor’s land. A property owner later found Howard on the predatory offenders list on the Coos County site.

Someone in the neighborhood handed out copies of that notice.

“Basically, I wouldn’t live here, if he was living there,” Snelgrove said. “How could you live with yourself if something ever happened?”

Tina Hickey, who lives about four houses away with her young daughter, said she found one of the notices on her front door.

“It’s pretty creepy,” she said. “I want him out as quick as possible.”
Tags »
Offender watch lists




• The Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Web site, coordinated by the Department of Justice, is at http://www.nsopr.gov.




• The Oregon Sex Offender Inquiry System Web site offers information about sex offenders who have been designated as predatory, who also present the highest risk of reoffending or have been found to be a sexually violent dangerous offender. The data is made available by Oregon State Police at http://sexoffenders.oregon.gov.




• The Coos County Community Corrections Web site, provides a list of local sex offenders, as well as information about some of the department’s policies regarding offenders, at http://www.co.coos.or.us/cooscorr.
Previous Email this story to yourself or a friend Print this story Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

OBVIOUSLY wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:28 PM:

How did it become known that he was a sex offender? Did that come out when he and Mrs. Snelgrove were conversing over coffee, or when she was walking her dog? How long did he live there before it was out? Did he offend or attemp to offend while living there? Did Mr. Snelgrove ever converse with him? What was their opinion of him before they found out he was a sex offender?

fnord wrote on Oct 28, 2008 2:37 PM:

so this guy will get moved around and people will insist he leave their neighborhood, and then there will be no where to put him anymore, and he, like so many other people on the sex offender list, will be out living under your local bridges and in the woods, and not be trackable at all.

Good going.

Jason Snelgrove wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:28 PM:

In response to the comments from "Another Neighbor" on October 14th and 15th, not because they are worth responding too, but I want people to know what is true and what isn't. My wife keeps to herself. NOTHING he stated was true. My wife and kids are good people and should not have to live their lives in fear with a convicted rapist living next door. The guy was living in a motorhome hidden in the woods illegally. He was in and out of the house-on the property where there were 10 loaded guns,given 9 were in a safe, but one wasn't. How would anyone feel in this situation? Could you live with yourself if you just sat there, did nothing, and something happened?

Linda wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:12 AM:

Well said Citizen, and or the people in charge of the Parole Dept. can't be trusted either, but the commissioners seem to think that's okay. So exactly what is our point? Do you really think our complaining matters? At least complaining is free, isn't it?

Citizen wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:42 PM:

Why isn't this guy living in that place across from Gloria's bar? Here's another good question... Why are we all worried when, according to our system of justice, this guy is okay? We have all heard the reports of these people being released and then doing the crimes again. It seems like this guy is habitual. So we can have a sex offender living amoung us, but the LNG terminal isn't going to fit in?

moonpenny wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:09 PM:

Careful Cora, your bleeding heart is getting all over my shoes.

Cora wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:10 PM:

Hopefully next door to Moon Penny, or Roy Wright.

stupid wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:14 AM:

Where did they move the pervert is what I want to know? They just moved the problem to some other neighborhood??probably next to another school.

Shelly wrote on Oct 15, 2008 6:43 PM:

IS TREATMENT FOR SEX OFFENDERS EFFECTIVE?
Yes, if the offender is motivated and willing to change. Treatment can increase safety as long as the offender follows the treatment plan. There is no cure.
This is a quote from the Q&A section of Coos county corrections, Notice the part of IF they follow there treatment and there IS NO CURE

ANOTHER NIEGHBOR 2 wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:33 PM:

I wonder if Mr.Snelgrove keps his over- friendly wife locked up in the apartment now

Cora wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:02 PM:

Who the hell does Moon Penny think she is/ Someone from another world pehaps? That's my guess. Fly her to the moon where she came from.

Shelly wrote on Oct 15, 2008 7:33 AM:

caremore: you are a cj student not a phycoligist student. If you could only understand the human facter. Someone will get over a car accident and move on easily (yes if someone dont die) but you will never ever get over a rape. You can move on get counseling but you will be traumitized forever. I pray that you girlfriend, wife, daughter, or mother never get raped. Oh and that is if they report it. Do you know how hard it is. The thought of people, loved ones will be ashamed of you. Ashamed of youself, was it your fault. So many rapes dont get reported b/c of these questions and much more. Oh yeah jail, prison just makes BETTER criminals. you gonna argue that one.
I do however think they need to redo the laws when it comes to statitory rape to many guys get scrued with that one. I have known girls that turned them in just cause they got dumbed etc.

Grandma moses wrote on Oct 15, 2008 4:36 AM:

Howard was convicted in 1981 of three counts of sodomy, four counts of robbery and one count of rape after sexually assaulting and attempting to sexually assault six different women at gunpoint. According to a community notification on the Coos County Corrections Web site, all the victims of his crimes were strangers. The attacks were committed in Coos County. A Coos County Circuit Court spokeswoman said he also was convicted in 2007 of second-degree theft.

To hope for all of you. Pee behind a tree was not his crime.I see that a lot of times. No problem. Have you ever been raped at gun point. I will pray for you that you never are. It will change your life.

moonpenny wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:30 PM:

To: Hope for all of you.
One must learn to be Pro Active. Dont set yourself up to be in wrong places, ever. Dont expose yourself behind a tree. Educate your son's on statutory rape, daughters too, they are arrested now as well. Its your choice as to whether you lock your doors or leave them open. It was his choice to pick up a gun and commit so many crimes. He's lost the right to be accepted in a community of law abiding citizens. He wont ever get it back. He has his second chance, hes out of prison. What happens now is up to him.

moonpenny wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:19 PM:

3 counts of sodomy,4 counts of robbery, 1 count of rape after sexually assaulting and attempting to sexually assault 6 different women at GUNPOINT. Multiple crimes of the same type can and do constitute "serial". And a recent charge of second degree theft.
Even the corrections department didnt agree with the Parole Boards decision to release. The county placed him once, and the neighborhood was notiifed. He had to move because of the backlash, but then the county moved him into the NB Neighborhood quietly. Refusing to notify residents that a sexual predator was in their midst. Nice. Again, if any of you bleeding hearts feel sadness for this criminal, then please, open your home, let him date your daughters and sleep under your roof.
You were warned.

Reality: It's still an offense, period.

Ignorance is Bliss wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:40 PM:

Caremore, Not all alcoholics drink and drive. I do agree, drinking and driving is not only dangerous but stupid but you can't blame everyone who drinks of drinking and driving. As for the drug users, there is a difference between users and dealers. The dealers that sell to kids need to be shot plane and simple. Why waste the money to send them to jail when a 25 cent bullet will solve the problem. As for everyone else saying to rehab him, Once, OK people make mistakes but seven times?? The boy obviously has a screw loose somewhere. Perhaps castration would be a good idea.

Problem Solved wrote on Oct 14, 2008 6:18 PM:

To all you people who think this guy is an O.K. Joe this is what you do: IF you have a spare bedroom in your home and YOU think he is such a good guy and he is rehabilatated, offer it up to him. After all, he is safe right? He is a good guy, right? Poor soul he really needs a place to live and that would solve his problem and then you wouldn't have to listen to all of us naysayers and "NAZI'S" anymore. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!

hope for all of you wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:59 PM:

I just hope that tomorrow that your son doesn't have teenage sex with his girlfriend, or your husband take a pee behind a tree, or someone just say that you touched them, or someone send you an email with CP in it......because if any of this happens and Law Enforcement is notified, you too could be a sex offender and people will want you sent to the desert to live with your own kind. I, personally, will say a prayer for all of you that this doesn't happen, but just remember if it does, how you were so judgmental of others that you know nothing about. Have a good day!

ex neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:29 PM:

I have met Mr Howard before....he seems to be a normal likeable guy....however ...he was in prison for 24 years.....I would imagine that he would have had plenty of time to practice his alibi, and get his whole story straight. Those of you that think he has served his time and should be left alone.....It would be funny if he moved right next door to you...then Ill care what you have to say..

Reality wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:53 PM:

Moonpenny - YOU are the one who obviously did not read his "entire" record! His offense last year was for "second-degree theft", which, more than likely means a bounced check.

Mary - it is foolish "logic" like yours (since you obviously think he is responsible for every unsolved rape in Coos County) that politician love to exploit. There is a little thing called "evidence" that says you need to be able to PROVE someone did something before you punish them for it.

Except for ex-sex offenders that is.

That's ok - you sheeple just keep following in line in lockstep like good little Nazis.

Nurse wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:14 PM:

If you have the ability to sodomize, rape, or put a gun top anyone's face you absolutly forefit your right to "rights". So you if the community has an issue with a felon living amongst them specially a violent one then I am OK with that. All you "oh it happend so long ago" or all these other excuses does not take away the fact he could and cannot control himself and has lost his right to live along side the average citizen. This really is not up for debate, those that are tring to protect him need to figure it out! Even 1% is to high, violent offenders need harsh lifelong punishment for there act. Do you not think that the offenders actions affects his victim's quality of life for lifetime? A very bad act deserves big time punishment. I agree about other offenders needing to register. I think any felon should have to register.

Nurse wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:11 PM:

Look...Do you all really beleive that felony offenders really,..and I mean really can be rehabilitated? To the extent that they add value to the community? That they are able to work, pay bills and be responsible citizens like we are? Someone that has the DNA ability to put a gun in someone else's face has that for LIFE. That is DNA that we do not have. You think that counseling and working with the PO will really change the way these people think and act? Look in the 80's he offended in 07 he commited robbery. How much therapy did he have to go through to make parole? I'm sure he spent many hours with specialist. I do not beleive for one second that they can be "rehabbed" into law abidding value adding citizens. In my opinion, it is our privilage to live in this great country not our right!

coastal friend wrote on Oct 14, 2008 1:46 PM:

All of this back and forth viewpoints regarding this issue.
BOTTOM LINE, if those of you who are so concerned with HIS welfare, by all means, take him into your homes. Watch him carefully and report to us later.
I agree, just because he has not been caught lately, does not mean he has not reoffended. Lot of sexual crimes have not been solved as yet.

Another neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:41 AM:

Mr Snelgrove complained because his wife flirts with all the male neighbors. He just happened to luck out that he could make this one move.

concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:19 AM:

To Caremore, First off I am a her not a him, you need to read the article again. I agree I was wrong he may not have raped those women at gunpoint BUT it was ATTEMPTED! For one second let's put yourself in those womens shoes if you can do that, here is this total stranger wielding a gun at you, it is dark and you are scared to death and he is demanding the most unimanginable act a woman could ever face in her life! Do you think for one moment that even after 30 yrs. those women have forgotten that? I don't. How many unsolved rapes are there in Coos County? He may have reoffended and just hasn't been caught. I am sorry but I have no place in my heart or next door for a creep like this considering I live alone.

Caremore wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:59 AM:

I get my facts from US Dept of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics. I am a CJ student with a degree in Youth Services and worked my one internship with a PO.
They do not make people register only because "they are really likely to repeat". One can get on the sex offender registry by having consenual sex with a girl friend just a few years younger than themselves or downloading porn that has a minor in the porn package. Sex offenders are less likely to reoffend than any other crime except murder.
Alcoholics and drug addicts don't just walk and fall down drunk. They drive vehicles. Alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes kill someone every 31 minutes and nonfatally injure someone every two minutes (NHTSA 2006).Drugs other than alcohol (e.g., marijuana and cocaine) are involved in about 18% of motor vehicle driver deaths. These other drugs are generally used in combination with alcohol (Jones et al. 2003). Drug addicts sell to anyone, including children.
Check your statistics with the Dept of Justice or OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS RECIDIVISM OF NEW PAROLEES AND PROBATIONERS.

Shelly wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:53 AM:

When you are a victim of the reoffence that is enough. I have known quite a few. They are trying to protect them. Rape offects an entire family for the rest of their lives. damn straight I comply. Oh and 5.3% is alot in this small community.

Reality wrote on Oct 14, 2008 6:36 AM:

Shelly - get YOUR "facts" straight! According to the Department of Justice (hardly a liberal source) sex offenders have one of the lowest recividism rates of any ex-felon. Less than 5.3% re-offend.

Your government wants you to be afraid of everything and being the good sheeple you are, you comply.

Ignorance is Bliss wrote on Oct 14, 2008 1:14 AM:

Caremore, First of all learn how to spell. Second, how do you compare a rapist to an alcoholic? You are basically calling an apple a orange. The two have nothing in common. Alcoholics get drunk fall down and pass out, they hurt themselves not others. Rapists with little regard hurt other people for whatever simple pleasure they get from the crime. As for drug addicts, the same rule applies, they are only hurting themselves. I would rather live next to a drug addict than one of these perverts. Did you read the part about a gun being involved? That is called reakless endangerment at the least. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one don't want some freak with a gun living next to me. As for murderers, I agree they too should be on a watch list.

BeeSmart wrote on Oct 13, 2008 7:37 PM:

THIRTY YEARS! How many of you people would like to still have to pay for something you did THIRTY YEARS ago?

If Herr Director Wright had any stones he would have told the ONE person who complained to move, Not Mr. Howard. Who is Herr Director to supercede the State (who has people who do this stuff for a living) and list Mr. Howard as a predator.

I hope Mr. Howard finds a good lawyer (maybe one of those pesky ACLU lawyers) and sue Coos County & Herr Director.

Mary wrote on Oct 13, 2008 6:29 PM:

to Caremore -
Just because he has no recent convictions doesn't mean he is 100% clear. Could be he just hasn't been caught again!

A Concerned Mother wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:27 PM:

If I were living in that neighborhood, I would seriously think about moving elsewhere!! (Not because a Registered Sex Offender that law enforcement officials know about lives there, but because of the paranoid, short-sighted, holier-than-thou attitudes of all of the rest of the neighbors! It sounds to me as though Mr. Howard has 1) paid his debt to society, 2) has rehabilitated himself (since our prisons really aren't equipped to handle that aspect for any inmate), and 3) has not violated or re-offended in any way .... but it's only a matter of time before the vigilante neighbors find something to pin on him! My advice to Mr. Howard is: MOVE as fast as you can!!!

moonpenny wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:14 PM:

To Caremore:
Did you not read the entire history? He "has" re-offended as recent as last year. Hes shown he is NOT rehabilitated, the law still means nothing to him. Thats what the big deal is. Open YOUR doors then if you feel so inclined, but dont tell the rest of us that we need to subject our daughters, wifes, sisters or mothers to this freaks existence.

Dr. Levens wrote on Oct 13, 2008 3:18 PM:

The sex offender recidivism rate in the U.S. right now is at 5.7%

Of all the sex offenders I have evaluated and treated in the last 10 years, less than 1% have re-offended.

Statistics also prove that all other offenders, not to include sex offenders, have a current recidivism rate of 60%.

Your children have 94.3% greater chance of being sold drugs, hit by a drunk driver or killed during a random drive by shooting.

This clearly shows that sex offenders should not be your main concern.

caremore wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:44 PM:

No where in this article does it say that this man raped anyone at gunpoint yet six???? There was one count of rape in 1981 when this guy was 23 yrs old.
There needs to be a list for liars and for those for make up false alligations about people just to scare them. I don't know this guy but I can bet that he is a better neighbor than the creep that calls himself "concerned possible neighbor".

Bee13 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:35 PM:

THIRTY YEARS, PEOPLE! Would you want to be judged by choices you made THIRTY YEARS ago?

Have we lost all compassion and common sense in this country? ONE resident complained and he is forced to move? Please...if Herr Commissioner Wright had any stones he would have told that ONE resident to move!

He is NOT a predatory risk according to the State, for Herr Wright to override the state is ridulous! I hope Mr. Howard finds a good lawyer (maybe one of those radical ACLU lawyers you geniuses are always complaing about) and sue Cooz county and the gestapo there.

Running ex-felons underground doesn't keep any neighborhood or any child safe. Information and education does. Of course, that takes an open mind, which I don't see here.

Shelly wrote on Oct 13, 2008 12:34 PM:

Caremore:
get your facts straight, the reason they make them register is because they are the really likely to repeat, history and statistic prove it. Even if drug offenders do more, they also get caught more.
Murderes usually do it spur of the moment and dont repeat unless they are serial killers. You sound like you know how it feels for the guy.

caremore wrote on Oct 12, 2008 6:49 PM:

This man's crime was nearly 30 years ago. Thirty years people!! He has not reoffended and what is the big deal that he talked to someones wife. How horrible he probably said, "good morning".
This is hysteria, because he has a 30 year old offence. Do the math, he was 23 years old went he committed his offence. He served his time and has not had a sex offence since. How many of your neighbors have DUIs or are drug addicts? You should be more worried about these offenders that you are not notified about. A former murderer could live right next door and you wouldnt even know it since he served his time and society has given all other offenders a second chance.
Sex offenders have a really low rate of reoffending! Alcoholics and drug addicts have the highest, so you and your children have a good chance of getting victimized by most any other offender than a sex offender on the list who has gone through mandated counseling and has paid his dept to society.

concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:28 AM:

To UGH: This sicko HORRIBLY assaulted SIX women at gunpoint, not just your run of the mill rape, if there is such a thing. Those are the ones he was caught for how many more did he get away with? Who knows. How can you, as a rape survivor yourself try to defend these people? You also refer to us not knowing their "stories", I personally think that between Roy Wright and The World we pretty much have his story! What do YOU think we should do with this creep? Rub his belly and give him an atta boy? Offer him a home next door to you. My thanks go out to The World and Roy Wright for this story!

moonpenny wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:34 AM:

We all make our choices in life, he chose his. Now he will always be known as a pariah, a predator. Because of his crimes and his continued choices, the 2007 robbery, he cannot live among us anymore.
I’m sick and tired of the bleeding hearts wanting to “integrate” these diseased people back with law abiding citizens. To the ACLU “Take them home with you; don’t give them back to us. They are YOUR problem now.”
And now that we want to expand measure 11 to non-violent property and drug crimes (Measure 61), they are fighting hard to stop it. We are trying to put them away and the ACLU wants to unleash them back into our communities.
We don’t want these people! Put them in prison and throw the key away.

coastal friend wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:52 AM:

I agree, Oregon has the weakest sex offender laws I know. Never have understood why, everyone has the right to be safe.
The person who claims he has not offended since his release, is only guessing. Just because he has not been caught, does not mean he has been good.
There are sex crimes that have not been solved, who knows.

Gramma wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:40 AM:

The story stated that all his victims were stangers, I have to ask To Whom? To the rapist? Not only does the community have the right to be informed it is also the responsibility of the parents to find out how to keep our children safe in todays society. Most of the time it happens because the pervert knows the victim in some capacity.They also dont give a dang if its a boy or a girl. So Educate your babies and stay vigilant.

To Parole Dept. wrote on Oct 10, 2008 5:58 PM:

I say move them all on a reservation with their own kind with a big fence and razor wire around it.

Shelly wrote on Oct 10, 2008 5:15 PM:

I think they should make it madatory for violent offenders. He held a gun to women and raped them for goodness sake. If he lived in my neighborhood I would have big a stink too. I go through the sex offenders list ocasionally (i have 3 children) but I am also very aware that the majority of the time it is people that you trust. Alot of people dont think about that or think that people they KNOW would never do that.

former po thanx for the work that you did I am sure it was very difficult working with people like that. I also really aplaud them for doing something in this case.

concerned possible neighbor wrote on Oct 10, 2008 4:15 PM:

I sure hope that where ever it is that they decide they put this creep that they let the neighbors know ahead of time so we or they have a say in the matter! As far as I am concerned the sickos all need to be put on an island somewhere together and left to their own devices if you get my drift!

Dave A. wrote on Oct 10, 2008 4:10 PM:

“Some people just don’t like sex offenders living near them”; now who would have thought to complain about something like that? Somewhere the U.S. must own some desert island not good for anything else. Put all the people like this there......and forget them. They've forfeited their right to live in society. This guy probably gets enough government financial support to live better than some honest citizens.

Ugh wrote on Oct 10, 2008 3:38 PM:

I think that people are to mean about this. It was in 1981. It sounds like a terrible thing that he did- there is no doubt about that. BUT, he hasn't re-offended since he was released. Most sexual offenders, if they have serious issues, re-offend within a matter of weeks. I think it's sad how they are treated. Where is all the notification when a murderer is released from prison? Why do they not have to live in certain areas? Plus I say all of this as a rape survivor. Please, think of these people, we don't know their stories.

Rick James wrote on Oct 10, 2008 3:01 PM:

I know of a good place to move him. It's called prison. Why is he out of jail with his past record from the 1980's with an added theft conviction in 2007? We will see his name in the police reports again, I'm sure.

What next wrote on Oct 10, 2008 2:43 PM:

What do we do with these people? They are ostracized from public life, and forced to move no matter where they go, so what can be done? Keep them in prison forever? Create a "sex offender" colony somewhere away from cities, so they can't work (or maybe move work to the colony)? Force them to live under bridges, where parole officers can't keep track of them (as is sometimes the case in Florida and other places), and if they are not rehabilitated, they can commit more crimes? Should they wear a mark of shame on their clothing?

I am just curious... what can be done? What do people want to happen? I think this is an issue that needs to be discussed on a national level. How can we keep people away from the public, but also allow them to contribute to society?

I know a "sex offender" who was working just down the block from me. I went to school with the guy when he was convicted of his crime (from a consensual occurrence when he was a teenager), yet he doesn't cause trouble.

Former PO wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:22 PM:

What does it take to get the parole boards attention. Oregon has some of the weakest sex crime laws and registration requirements in the US. I should know I supervised sex offenders for over 12 years in another state. Just to let folks know the many of the distances from a place where children congregate is 1500 feet. So to the concerened teacher that is only a few blocks in a straight line. I also think that it should be farther but that is your/our law makers decision not the director or the probation/parole officers choice. Let's give all probation/parole officers a pat on the back for the jobs they do. It is not an easy job when the parole board and courts do not allow them to do their job. People want to know what the most thankless job is. Try being a probation/parole officer for a week. Then tell me that it is not a difficult job.

what a joke wrote on Oct 10, 2008 1:13 PM:

Roy Wright, whose wife (hmmm, not him)was busted for doing drugs in their own home...what an example (not) that he serves for this community.

Concerned Teacher wrote on Oct 10, 2008 11:47 AM:

The "Director" might want to take a geography lesson... the NB Middle School and NBHS are only a few blocks away from this guy..."Typically, parole orders for sex offenders prevent them from living near schools, playgrounds, or other places where people under 18 years of age regularly congregate, the director explained... WHAT WERE YOU THINKING???


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections