Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Mr E wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:21 PM:
Granted, the students shouldn't have received unprofessional opinions from each member of the faculty regarding Ms. Hansen, but they did not deserve to be left out in the cold regarding the situation that has taken place over the last year. Heck, I remember some grumblings about Hansen when I was a student, not long after she was hired (but, NOT ONCE, did this take place in the classroom).
You are wrong wrote on Oct 9, 2008 6:07 PM:
Students were not oblivious? Many of us are well informative about the issues that were taking place. This is a very incorrect title to this article. The World did an "outstanding" job of reporting and asking only a handful of students out of thousands. Do not accuse students of false political views based on the paper's incomplete reporting. And those students that did not know...good for them. Their focus should be on education, not corrupt college employees.
Not quite oblivious wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:02 PM:
SWOCC is too much about tuition and not enough about teaching!
Silenced wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:47 PM:
Nothing will happen to Jill for speaking out because she supported Dr. Hansen's departure. If any of us dared to comment opposing this we would have been fired by the new interim President, Patty Scott.
Silenced wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:37 PM:
Nothing will happen to Jill for speaking out because she supported Dr. Hansen's departure. If any of us dared to comment opposing this we would have been fired by the new interim President, Patty Scott.
Just An Observer wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:22 PM:
SILVERSPOON wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:15 PM:
magna cu laude from Harvard Law or give up
a big six figure lawyer's salary to go into public
service. What a tragedy. You lack the intellect
to judge Obama's ability to assemble a team
capable of addressing the problems left by McCain,
Bush and their self serving hacks.
justmusin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:33 PM:








The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines