Pentagon source: strike killed 30 Afghan civilians
By Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 |
WASHINGTON — U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan on Aug. 22 killed some 30 civilians, far more than the military has previously acknowledged, defense officials said Wednesday.
The probe found that the strikes against a suspected Taliban compound in the western province of Herat killed about 30 civilians — not the five to seven the U.S. originally acknowledged, according to a Pentagon official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record. The New York Times first reported the new finding in its Wednesday editions.
The Afghan government and U.N. had said that the August operation killed some 90 civilians. An original U.S. investigation found that up to 35 militants and seven civilians were killed in that strikes, which strained U.S.-Afghan relations.
Gen. David McKiernan, the commander of NATO troops in Afghanistan, ordered that a second U.S. military investigation be conducted shortly after pictures and video images surfaced that appeared to show 30 to 40 victims of the attack laid out in a mosque in Azizabad, including at least 10 dead children.
A joint delegation of Afghan lawmakers and local officials investigated the aftermath of the strike and concluded that around 90 Afghan civilians, including 60 children, were killed. That finding was backed by a preliminary U.N. report.
The new U.S. report concludes that fewer than 20 militants died in the operation, the Times reported.
Zemeri Bashary, Afghanistan’s Interior Ministry spokesman, said Wednesday that he had not yet seen the new U.S. report, but that the Afghan government stood by its original findings.
Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman would neither confirm nor deny the contents of the report, which he said was done in cooperation with Afghan officials and the Afghan population.
U.S. Central Command was close to being ready to publicly release the results of the new probe, but its acting commander, Lt. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, had not signed off on it yet, Whitman said.
Asked if the report will address where the initial investigation went wrong, Whitman said: “I wouldn’t necessarily characterize it as the initial investigation gone wrong, what I would say is that ... there was additional information that was obtained, there was further evidence that led them to question the results of their first investigation, that’s why they launched the second.”
“As you learn more information, sometimes the truth can change,” Whitman said.
———
Associated Press Writer Jason Straziuso contributed to this report from Kabul, Afghanistan.
Embed This Article
Feel free to embed this article onto your website by copying the
code below and pasting it into your site's HTML.
The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines
Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Not already registered?
The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines