Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Toothless Cajun wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:29 PM:
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:57 AM:
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:55 AM:
Ande wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:50 PM:
Ande wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:16 PM:
" so maybe you should get YOUR stories straight."
Excuse me, get my story straight? I never ONCE said you were a meth head. I said I've seen plenty of them at the store. Maybe YOU should get YOUR story correct.
I don't know her either and I don't really know if she was trying to steal or if it was an accident. I just know that not ALL the kids in this town are unruly.
Chris wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:14 AM:
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Sep 30, 2008 8:45 AM:
D.TAYLER... janelle DID "write" her side of the story, watch the video and LISTEN TO HER STATEMENT... she already explained what happened.
shopper with kids wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:41 AM:
You sound like you dont even like kids. I, however agree that most kids are unruly, mine are not. The parents that let their kids run around are obviosly not paying attention at all. My kids like to conversate alot and I pay attention to them, I dont just tell them to shutup I am bussy. Talking keeps them busy therefore I am splitting my attention. Do you understand now, probably not.
you said she tought her kids its ok to steal, she offered to pay for it and they refused.
I have worked in retail and at least 1 out of 12 people forgett something sometimes paid for and sometimes not. No one is perfect. Learn to see more than what a narrow mind can see.
D.Taylor wrote on Sep 30, 2008 2:55 AM:
Ande wrote on Sep 29, 2008 8:49 PM:
" i dont go shopping during certain hours because none of the children in the stores know how to behave."
I have two beautiful children who I take shopping with me every time. They are well behaved. I'm sure you have seen unruly kids in the store as I have seen meth head adults in the store. Do I judge everyone because of that? No. The kids has nothing to do with this incident. Watch the video. I didn't see the kids acting unruly.
OK wrote on Sep 29, 2008 6:57 PM:
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Sep 29, 2008 1:57 PM:
esya wrote on Sep 29, 2008 1:40 PM:
There is inadequate proof of a crime here, the professional crime staff declined to press charges based on a lack of evidence. Yet a person looses their job without an opportunity to prove their innocence. That is a presumption of guilt, not a presumption of innocence. If innocence were presumed she would have been given another chance at her job. Any decent financial office would have financial controls already in place and she would not have unfettered opportunity to steal money at her job. This is about someone being embarassed, that's all.
How would you like to be accused of a theft and loose your job without a chance to disprove it in court? If you say it's already happened to you, that's just exactly what is wrong with this country. It should not happen to anyone--not even the well-off.
Chris wrote on Sep 29, 2008 12:29 PM:
As for this case it never should have gotten as blown out of proportion as it was. She made a mistake ... move on. I don't think that this should have cost her the job that she worked so hard for. Those of you that are being negative about Janelle ... I hope that you never are caught in the same situation and if so I hope you lose your jobs!
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Sep 29, 2008 10:33 AM:
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Sep 29, 2008 10:27 AM:
shopper with kids wrote on Sep 27, 2008 8:56 AM:
When I take my kids shopping with me I always have a list yet I forget half of my items just from the distraction of "I wants" "brother wont leave me alone" and "I DONT LIKE THAT FOOD"
GET A CLUE PEOPLE
On another note, people are wondering why she got "favored" and didnt get charged. Probably because it would cost tax payers a whole lot more than $12 to try to prosicute duh
shopper with kids wrote on Sep 27, 2008 8:36 AM:
When I take my kids shopping with me I always have a list yet I forget half of my items just from the distraction of "I wants" "brother wont leave me alone" and "I DONT LIKE THAT FOOD"
GET A CLUE PEOPLE
WAY TO GO CITY OF COOS BAY... YOU DID SOMETHING RIGHT FOR ONCE wrote on Sep 27, 2008 12:39 AM:
Observer wrote on Sep 26, 2008 9:20 PM:
moonpenny wrote on Sep 26, 2008 2:07 PM:
D.Taylor wrote on Sep 26, 2008 2:02 PM:
Presumed Guilty wrote on Sep 26, 2008 11:43 AM:
I will certainly not be speaking to any agents of this newspaper in any capacity, on any subject and I pity the fool who does. I believe Ms. Howard would have a case against the City of Coos Bay and a defamation case against both The World and KCBY who ran sensational “tickers” in advance of a story with so few facts made public.
GET A CLUE wrote on Sep 26, 2008 9:22 AM:
curious wrote on Sep 26, 2008 8:49 AM:
Coos County DA STILL a joke wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:51 PM:
Also concerned wrote on Sep 25, 2008 5:42 PM:
Resident wrote on Sep 25, 2008 4:07 PM:
Mr. Mojo Rising wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:37 AM:
Nick wrote on Sep 25, 2008 10:30 AM:
This woman lost her job for a reason aside from this shoplifting accusation. If there is not another reason, I have a feeling that we are going to see a lawsuit on her part... and unlike the lawsuit by the former editor of the World, this one may have legs. I'd keep an eye on who is hired to replace her...
Sebastian wrote on Sep 25, 2008 9:17 AM:
nobody special wrote on Sep 25, 2008 8:30 AM:
Ms. Accountant wrote on Sep 25, 2008 8:01 AM:
Boone wrote on Sep 25, 2008 7:50 AM:
Ron wrote on Sep 25, 2008 7:37 AM:
Two questions need answers right away:
First, was the "unpaid for item concealed on her person" - yes or no.
Second, Chuck Freeman's statement that "she put us in the position she did" either needs elaboration or retraction and apology. One or the other as there is no reasonable third option.
I feel we should all insist on this before anyone goes further in their own chain of logic.
Conerned wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:26 PM:
another local cpa wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:59 PM:
I'm ashamed of the city.
Common Sense Peter wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:52 PM:
Moi wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:09 PM:
nothin new here wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:43 PM:
Amazed and confused wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:40 PM:
To Citizen wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:09 PM:
clarence wrote on Sep 24, 2008 6:51 PM:
WOW wrote on Sep 24, 2008 6:40 PM:
Local CPA wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:30 PM:
Citizen wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:30 PM:
Janell Supporter wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:21 PM:
GET A CLUE wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:20 PM:
in the dark wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:18 PM:
They obviously cannot fire someone on something that even law enforcement feels that they could not prove was done intentionally.
So, there is something more that we do not know and all this is speculation.
What wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:55 PM:
Lori Nelson wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:14 PM:
I agree with previous comment that this makes me have a MUCH LOWER level of trust in City, they seem to work their agenda without much regard of justice. Would not vote for mayor's reelection for anything, that clique has been in power too long.
The World also sickened me with its initial FRONT PAGE extensive story which was completely out of proportion. When's the last time any more than an inch of space was used for a $12 MAYBE crime? Just because a city employee involved does not make it ok to crucify their reputation. Shame on The World "news"paper.
Hmmmm wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:10 PM:
The City does and CAN NOT just fire someone!
Just think of this before you start bashing either side....
There are two sides to every story, and we do not have all of the information.
Time Enough wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:04 PM:
What is missing wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:50 PM:
Personnel wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:49 PM:
This is fishy, like so many other things with Freeman and the city of Coos Bay.
Shame on you Coos Bay wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:24 PM:
"demurred from commenting". I'm wondering if this was just a personal issue, because this doesn't make sense to any clear minded person. I happen to know that Jan has a few small children and don't you think they might have distracted her? All I have to say is THANK GOD I'M A BULLDOG.
Really wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:59 PM:
If the OSP, and the DA said there's no crime, I'm not sure what your complaint is.
I hope Ms. Howard gets herself a good attorney and lets the city know that this is not how your treat people. The whole matter is utterly ridiculous.
Fred wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:35 PM:
Its about time wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:05 PM:
Guilty BEFORE PROVEN INNOCENT wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:54 AM:
Dudley wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:43 AM:
Need more Info wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:41 AM:
GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:40 AM:
I can only imagine the upheaval this is causing in Janell's family. We don't have any similar positions in the area of the status as her present position, so not only did she loose her job, but I suspect she will be forced to seek employment elsewhere, in a different city. If it truly was an honest mistake, is the punishment worth the alleged crime?
duh wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:28 AM:
if she had really done something wrong, doncha think these punative idiots would have charged her? Pay attention.
Inquiring Minds Want To Know wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:16 AM:






The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines