Port: Rail tunnels in good condition

By Alexander Rich, Staff Writer
Sunday, September 21, 2008 | 8 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
COOS BAY — The Oregon International Port of Coos Bay had some good news and some bad news to report at its regular meeting Thursday about the Coos Bay rail line.

The good news was that the bridges and tunnels seem to be in pretty good shape. There was some uncertainty about this after Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad closed the line in September 2007 because of safety concerns about tunnels.

“There have been no collapses or major degradation of the tunnels,” said executive director Jeff Bishop.

The not-so-good news was that a new estimate of the net liquidation value of the line is $14.4 million, significantly more than the previous estimate of $9.8 million. Bishop attributed the increase to the rise in the value of scrap metal since September 2007. He did note, though, that the scrap metal market has declined substantially recently, which may mean the value could drop before all is said and done.

The findings came after engineers contracted by the port finished inspecting the line earlier this week. The port requested permission to inspect the line as part of its feeder line application filed earlier this summer with the U.S. Surface Transportation Board.

The STB is expected to make a decision on the Coos Bay rail line’s fate on or about Oct. 31, when it will consider Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad’s abandonment and the port’s feeder line application. If the application is approved, Bishop said, the port will have 10 days to decide whether to go ahead and buy the line.

If it does, it will take at least until Feb. 9 for the port to take ownership.

Bishop also noted that the port has requested the STB to consider creating an escrow account so that $12.6 million of the $14.4 million of the sale would be used to make repairs to the rail line.

The port estimates repairs to the line will cost between $20 million and $50 million

Despite the potential steep cost of repairs, Bishop said there are no plans to hike taxes, though the port did consider the idea.

The port only has the ability to raise taxes within the port district, and even then there would need to be a vote. Since a good portion of the rail line lies outside the port district, Bishop said it would be unfair to impose the tax on port district taxpayers.

The only theoretical alternative would be to create a new tax district for the entire length of the 111 miles of track, though that has a number of hurdles.

For one thing, there is no such thing as a railroad tax district allowed under Oregon statute. Bishop explained that the state Legislature would need to pass a law to create such an entity and then put the issue to a vote of those within the district. But even if a scenario like this were to play out, a U.S. Surface Transportation Board procedure would prevent the district from taking ownership of the line.

If the port were to purchase the line from Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad, it can’t sell it to anyone else without first offering it back to the railroad. That would stymie any theoretical attempt to change ownership from the port to a taxing district.

So rather than look for taxes, the port is considering other options.

The port expects to have a preliminary business plan ready by the week of Oct. 14.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Gene wrote on Sep 27, 2008 8:40 PM:

Ron, just a quick response. If the line is "abandoned", it just means they don't have to operate it anymore. They do own the rails and can be required to remove them along with the wooden ties. At todays price for scrap iron, it would be worth a lot to junk the rails. As apposed to junking the Port Commisioners, who aren't worth very much.

Common Sense wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:27 AM:

Port Commission clowns/puppets & the clown/puppet master Gov Teddy,

Do everybody a favor (Especially the tax payer) & find someone (Outside of Oregon) that knows what they are doing to buy this rail line, instead of YOU!

P.S. I wish these so-called Oregon leaders would have to pay for this tax payer's nitemare out of their OWN pocket when it fails in the future!

Resident wrote on Sep 21, 2008 1:41 PM:

How about checking those tunnels in the winter? Come on, that's like buying a house or a used car here in the summer and saying it looks good. In the winter the basement starts leaking and the car trunk.

Ron wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:17 AM:

Wait just a minute! CORP is petitioning to "abandon" the line.

Why do we have to pay anything?????

Who does the purchase price to to - exactly who?

We need this line, no question about it. BUT why pay anything for an "abandoned" item? Seems to be a problem with the law here.....

George wrote on Sep 20, 2008 10:31 PM:

Given the cost situation presented in this article, it should have been headlined with something like: PORT'S TAKEOVER OF RAILROAD IS FINANCIALLY HOPELESS

Gene wrote on Sep 20, 2008 7:41 PM:

Hey Thomas, the Port is a part of the drain on the Oregon Taxpayer because it is supported by all the taxpayers in Oregon. You're right though, local people don't have anything to say about what they do. We gave up that right many years ago with the idea that the State would be able to bring in the money and jobs so badly needed. The only thing that was brought in is a bunch of people feeding off the state taxpayer. If you want to see this end, start a campaign to inform all the people in Oregon of the use of their hard earned money. Coos Bay is just a little Port with big ideas and a little knowlage of what they are doing.

Kay wrote on Sep 20, 2008 2:15 PM:

Here we go again, just like the Airport Authority clan:

BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME

How's that working for us?

Thomas wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:20 AM:

Before we are required to pay more taxes to pay for the International Port of Coos Bay's questionable projects, would The World please do an in depth article explaining to us exactly what this unelected but quasi-public, odd entity really is???

It seems to have far too powerful an effect upon us whilst being so unaccountable to us.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections