Firm plans apartment complex in Coos Bay

By Jo Rafferty, Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 | 24 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
Coos Bay may see construction of a 50- to 80-unit apartment complex if a marketing analysis proves the area needs it.

Guardian Management LLC, a Portland-based real estate management and investment firm, is planning the Park Plaza development for a 10-acre wooded site, located near the corner of LaClair and Thomas streets.

The analysis also will determine what size the apartments should be, what to charge for rent and whether it will be deemed affordable housing. The current design is for separate dwellings interspersed throughout the acreage.

“We think there’s a good demand for workforce housing — people employed gainfully in the area that haven’t found a good place to rent,” said Ross Cornelius, Guardian’s development manager.

The property is owned by the Jensen Family Trust and Guardian Management is leasing it with the option to buy.

Cornelius said the project could end up as affordable housing, which would involve rent restrictions that allow only lower-income households.

“We haven’t honed it down to rental prices yet,” Cornelius said. “That’s where the marketing analysis will help us.”

Cornelius anticipates the project will cost in the multi-millions.

“We’re getting entitlements in place for land subdivision and layout,” he said. “We’re looking to put the financing together now.”

Cornelius said Guardian’s development team has been eyeing the area for some time.

“It seems like there’s an opportunity for new, quality rental housing in the area,” Cornelius said.

Jose Rivera, with Adelante, a nonprofit community development corporation that’s working with Guardian on the project, said the development would feature one-, two- and three-bedroom units.

“It’s going to be a really nice development once we get a true picture of what we can do,” Rivera said.

Rivera became interested in the area a few years ago when he was visiting during a golfing trip, and he brought it to Guardian’s attention.

“I really liked the area,” he said. “When I went into the city, they said people had to commute a long way into Coos Bay. The last apartment complex built there was about 10 years ago.”

He said that once the marketing analysis is complete, developers will begin working with Coos Bay on the number of units that will be constructed.

“If everything goes according to plan, once the market analysis is completed, preliminary design, zoning approvals, final design and project financing is finalized, the time for (construction) completion is 12 to 14 months,” Rivera said.

The company focuses on multifamily properties, but so far has only rehabilitated existing buildings. This will be its first venture into new construction, Ross said.

The apartments would be part of a larger project with Oregon Coast Community Action, a nonprofit that manages a network of programs that feed, house, warm and educate people in the community. Three of the 10 acres are earmarked for Community Action, which wants to build a community campus to include a warehouse to house for food designated for local South Coast Food Share food banks, a Head Start building and a family resource center. The cost for the center hasn’t been determined, but the warehouse and Head Start building would cost about $4.9 million, to be paid for with federal and state grants and donations.

Community Action is working under a lease agreement with Guardian, according to Hallie Winchell, the agency’s development specialist.

Coos Bay Planning Administrator Laura Barron said that, although the Public Works Department has been working with Guardian and Community Action on the community campus development, she hasn’t seen any paperwork on the apartment complex yet.
Details


What: Guardian Management proposes to build a large apartment complex in Coos Bay.


Where: On 10 acres in Coos Bay near LaClair and Thomas streets.


What’s next: If a marketing analysis shows the idea is viable, the company would start the design and permit process.


About the company: Guardian Management, founded in 1971, manages more than 12,000 units on about 150 properties in the western U.S. In the last five years it has acquired more than 3,000 units, of which 1,600 are considered affordable housing, said Ross Cornelius, the company’s development manager. Its properties are located in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Arizona and Texas, according to the company Web site, http://www.guardianmanagementllc.com.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

RN wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:20 PM:

well thanks, however I believe local lady said was raised on it as in by her parents. I don't feel people should be judged by their families actions, just because she is supportive of her parents don't mean everyone should lash out at her,I think most people no matter how they were raised will always support their families and see the good and not the bad. I have seen many cases of kids who grew up in druggie homes and still will get very upset when people speak out against their family even if they grow up to be respectful non drug users.

to the RN wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:32 PM:

I believe that you used the system the way it was meant to be. But if you look at local lady's post she says she was raised on section 8, welfare and food stamps. That sounds like sustained use not temporary. You got an education and a well paying job. Congrats to you.

NewToArea wrote on Sep 17, 2008 11:24 AM:

I am new to the area and when I first arrived I expected to rent an apartment until we bought a home. I could not find any apartments in Coos Bay or North Bend that were not trash. Even if the apartments appeared decent on the outside there would be old abandoned cars or questionable people loitering outside at all hours, or hanging laundry out the windows...I would have welcomed non welfare apartments. I ended up having to rent a house. Bring the area up..not down with more welfare housing

to work for it wrote on Sep 17, 2008 6:27 AM:

how about if a mother is a stay at home mom and her husband leaves her and she can't find a job right away so she goes to college to better her life and gets welfare while in school? does that make her a lowlife? cause thats what i did and now i am an RN who is off of welfare. also how about if someone loses their job d/t downsizing, going out of business and to keep their family from starving gets on welfare for a few months? are they lowlifes? also I'd hate to say it but being from around here yes their are alot of druggies/lowlifes who abuse welfare but I'd rather have their kids fed with my tax money than starving to death. Before you judge everybody try walking in someone else's shoes. by the way your letter make you sound like a snob who thinks they are better than others I prefer the christian way of thinking thanks.

To work for it. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:48 PM:

So, I'm the one who said I oversee section 42.

Here's a typical "Welfare family"

Total allowances for a 2 person family

Section 8 Housing (For rent) 500
Food stamps(200)
Cash allowance (325)

And thats it

So..

I have women with two kids who live on 535.Boy they must be just rolling in it!
You have no concept of what happens in the real world.

Go section wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:46 PM:

Section 42 is bad if you have a crappy management team overseeing your properties.I work for a huge on in Eugene and we oversee over around 300 seperate families..Section 8 is very picky about how the apartments are kept..But that is a good thing.All the managers need to do is ensure routine apartment inspections (Which they will have to do anyways) Because when you are sectin 42 you are dependent on selling tax credits to various lenders who in turn will make sure that the property they invest in is staying in good shape.They also have to make sure they are staying up on their paperwork.. If you goof up you loose the tax credit for one unit which would cost you thousands of dollars from the IRS.

Go low income it's all the people in that town can afford!

Local Lady wrote on Sep 15, 2008 8:28 AM:

To Workforit-Who are you to say my family didn't work for their money? To begin with, you know how hard it is to find a decent family-wage job in this town let alone keep it. My parents worked, they worked damn hard to put food on our table. And I got a job as soon as I was old enough to. I graduated high school with honors AND went to college thank you very much. And we never EVER abused the system. How dare you say such things? And thank you, I don't have a teenage daughter, I am afterall only 22, and I don't have any kids period. You should think long and hard before you go judging those "lesser" than yourself.

 wrote on Sep 14, 2008 7:06 PM:

LaTanya probably grew up in West Oakland

South Coast Native wrote on Sep 14, 2008 1:04 PM:

These developers are working with the great folks at Oregon Coast Community Action to provide a campus for all their services, which will include a community garden and many other things that those in the older complex, and maybe the new housing, could really use to improve their lives. And despite this obvious community minded focus, all of you naysayers can't do anything except whine, complain and point fingers. Once again I read about something being done to try and help our economy, our community, and all of you would rather howl about the way it can go wrong. How about the increase in funds coming into the area during construction? How about the millions Community Action is bringing in for their buildings? In addition to the 7 million they bring in each year to this area, in wages and programs to help our local families. Why don't we try to figure out how this project can benefit our community instead of sitting back and criticizing every effort to make a difference in our region.

Bad Idea wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:06 PM:

These kind of places just end up looking like slums.
Nobody appreciates anything they get free.

To Apt. Builders wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:04 PM:

Beware section 8 !!!
I used to rent to them, and had to have everything perfect for them. The apts. were very nice to start with, but every little detail had to be PERFECT.
Then with problem after problem with the section 8 tenants, when they would move out, they would leave the apts. in shambles. Leave garbage, holes in walls, filth, etc. etc.
They did not appreciate the free or very low rent at all, just took advantage of it.
Had to re-do any apts, they moved out of. Very costly for me.

Coos Bay Kid wrote on Sep 12, 2008 1:51 PM:

Market analysis? Drive thru downtown CB or NB. Then you will have an obvious answer......don't do it.

WorkForIt wrote on Sep 12, 2008 10:33 AM:

To Local Lady- It's not that others have had a "silver spoon" it's that others actually worked for their money and didnt have babies they couldnt afford. I can't imagine being "proud" of being on welfare, housing or foodstamps. You should be proud of working hard at a job...not working hard at abusing the system. I bet you were proud of your teenage daughter getting pregnant too?

WorkForIt wrote on Sep 12, 2008 9:54 AM:

Having been a single mother who was never on welfare and did NOT get child support, I always made "too much money" for any type of assistance. I am so glad you were able to live off the government and go to school....I never had that option. I think anyone who gets housing assistance should have to do mandatory community service to work off the difference in rent. It would sure make the recipients more appreciative of their homes and communties.

Local Lady wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:22 AM:

I was raised in this area on section 8, with welfare AND food stamps. None of my family is nor have we ever been drug users/dealers, or "crack" heads as some of you are referring. If you have never had need of those systems, the more power to you but don't you dare judge those of us that needed it. My family struggled for every penny we got. So you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth. Get over yourself. I think a new complex would be great. Not that I myself would actually need it now but I respect the working class, the single mothers, the disabled that need that extra boost to help provide them with a good life. I think with the right screening application process, and if the would-be tenants provide good references then they should get some good people in there. To those of us that do need/have ever needed assistance. Way to go!!!

Better Off wrote on Sep 12, 2008 6:04 AM:

I lived in low income housing while attending college. I would not have been able to get off welfare without the low income housing and financial aid. I am not nor have I ever been a crack head, drug user or loser. I greatly appreciate the help I received and am glad it still exists for those who need it.

Samuel wrote on Sep 11, 2008 7:34 AM:

I keep hearing the complaints about Section 8 and Welfare Recipients being allowed in this new complex. All are warrented and I am sure that most understand the complaints, however, I think if the agencies who permit the undesirables on those programs would start tightening the belt a little harder maybe the people who do get on these programs would be more trustworthy to allow the housing to. Not all who are on Section 8 or Welfare are drug users, lazy, bad, evil or whatever you may call it! The Government needs to start enforcing its own rules and start making some alternatives for help so people will realize that hope is still there!

michael wrote on Sep 10, 2008 8:01 PM:

Section 42 would be a good idea...it's somewhat below "market rate" but too expensive and restrictive for crack heads and people on welfare/section 8. There are many of these in Portland and most of the residents are hard working people on modest incomes who take good care of their homes. In Portland it is about $550-650 a month under section 42 for a nice studio apartment, $900-1200 for a two bedroom. Market rate is usually $100-200 more a month.

LaTanya wrote on Sep 10, 2008 7:37 PM:

MOONPENNY what you describe is considered discrimination and is against the law in the "east bay" (Alameda County) area of Califonia. Try again.

ronop wrote on Sep 10, 2008 7:32 PM:

R U insane? The article writer needs a road map. There is no easy route to downtown Coos Bay. The nearby apartments are the drug dealing capital of the area; ask the Staples store manager who has the police on speed dial. The nearby woods are full of transients. Do you want to develop Empire and the nearby community with the Hollering Place and industry or with section 8 riff raff? Thanks Jeff McKeown.

Citizen wrote on Sep 10, 2008 4:19 PM:

Looks like we are looking at some affordable housing for the students at SWOCC. Bring in some family wage jobs and those who can't remember what it was like starting out after high school or working your way through college won't have to worry about what their peers have created in Coos County!

driver wrote on Sep 10, 2008 2:36 PM:

Weird complaints?

Where do these indignant people think all those down and outers attracted by our we'll-do-anything-cheap industries can live?

moonpenny wrote on Sep 10, 2008 2:09 PM:

Not if they restrict it to "working" families. I have seen a complex in California work great with the concept of a clean, secured apartment/condo complex for "working" people. No welfare, no vouchers, no Section 8. The rents are kept at a moderate rate, but you have to be working. No legal issues, no drugs and kids are welcome. It was one of the most attractive complexes in the East Bay.

WhyBother wrote on Sep 10, 2008 2:02 PM:

Great, more Government paid housing for our "area" crack heads to destroy. We have enough of these already. Build some apartments for the middle class who will take care of them....oh, that's right the government won't pay for non-druggies homes.....


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections