Panel proposes pay raises for Oregon lawmakers

By Brad Cain, Associated Press Writer
Friday, September 05, 2008 | 5 comment(s)

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news
SALEM — A citizen panel put the finishing touches on a package of proposed pay raises for legislators and other public officials Thursday. But a taxpayers group said it will work to derail any pay raises for lawmakers.

The salary hikes are being recommended by the Public Officials Compensation Commission for Oregon judges, legislators and statewide officeholders to bring their salaries closer to the national average.

The lawmaker pay increases could take effect next year if the Legislature approves them — and that’s far from certain at this point.

Jason Williams of the anti-tax group Taxpayers Association of Oregon said his organization will lobby against the commission’s plan for a 27 percent increase in legislators’ pay, from the current $19,884 a year to $25,200 a year.

Williams said lawmakers “have a long track record of overspending” and don’t deserve a pay raise.

He took particular aim at the 2007 Legislature’s move to spend $2 million on new furniture for lawmakers and their staffs and an additional $4 million for legislative staff.

“They have been quite lavish and generous with themselves ... and taxpayers have had to pick up the tab,” he said.

The public commission tentatively adopted the proposed pay package for lawmakers after the panel’s vice chairwoman, Barbara Fredericks of Beaverton, said the current pay is so low that it discourages some of the state’s “most talented” people from serving in the Legislature.

“My experience in my area in Washington County is that we had a number of excellent legislators who left because they didn’t have enough income to support their young families,” she said. “We need highly intelligent people to do this work.”

Fredericks also said she hoped the commission will consider boosting the proposed annual legislative salary higher the initial recommendation of $25,2000 after conducting a public hearing on the issue Sept. 18 in Salem.

A final recommendation will be forwarded to the Legislature by Nov. 10.

The 11-member citizen commission is conducting Oregon’s first detailed review of elected officials’ salaries in years.

Among its other recommendations, the commission is proposing to boost the governor’s salary from $93,600 to $130,000 while the Oregon attorney general’s $77,200 salary would be increased to $119,000.

The salaries of the secretary of state, state treasurer, state school superintendent and state labor commissioner all would go from the current $72,000 a year to $100,000 a year.

Circuit court judges around the state would see their annual salaries go from $114,468 to $132,000.

SALEM — A citizen panel put the finishing touches on a package of proposed pay raises for legislators and other public officials Thursday. But a taxpayers group said it will work to derail any pay raises for lawmakers.

The salary hikes are being recommended by the Public Officials Compensation Commission for Oregon judges, legislators and statewide officeholders to bring their salaries closer to the national average.

The lawmaker pay increases could take effect next year if the Legislature approves them — and that’s far from certain at this point.

Jason Williams of the anti-tax group Taxpayers Association of Oregon said his organization will lobby against the commission’s plan for a 27 percent increase in legislators’ pay, from the current $19,884 a year to $25,200 a year.

Williams said lawmakers “have a long track record of overspending” and don’t deserve a pay raise.

He took particular aim at the 2007 Legislature’s move to spend $2 million on new furniture for lawmakers and their staffs and an additional $4 million for legislative staff.

“They have been quite lavish and generous with themselves ... and taxpayers have had to pick up the tab,” he said.

The public commission tentatively adopted the proposed pay package for lawmakers after the panel’s vice chairwoman, Barbara Fredericks of Beaverton, said the current pay is so low that it discourages some of the state’s “most talented” people from serving in the Legislature.

“My experience in my area in Washington County is that we had a number of excellent legislators who left because they didn’t have enough income to support their young families,” she said. “We need highly intelligent people to do this work.”

Fredericks also said she hoped the commission will consider boosting the proposed annual legislative salary higher the initial recommendation of $25,2000 after conducting a public hearing on the issue Sept. 18 in Salem.

A final recommendation will be forwarded to the Legislature by Nov. 10.

The 11-member citizen commission is conducting Oregon’s first detailed review of elected officials’ salaries in years.

Among its other recommendations, the commission is proposing to boost the governor’s salary from $93,600 to $130,000 while the Oregon attorney general’s $77,200 salary would be increased to $119,000.

The salaries of the secretary of state, state treasurer, state school superintendent and state labor commissioner all would go from the current $72,000 a year to $100,000 a year.

Circuit court judges around the state would see their annual salaries go from $114,468 to $132,000.

 
Tags »
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

jl wrote on Sep 6, 2008 7:51 AM:

9-12 $ per hour upsets people?
starve yourself!
on the other end the raises are approx. 50 to 60 $ per hour.
just one more place that thinks the labor pool is worthless and those on top deserve more

Tom Q. Taxpayer wrote on Sep 6, 2008 3:58 AM:

Unbelievable! First, being a state Senator or Representative is a part-time position. Most have day jobs, others are retired and some of the retired are drawing PERS. All receive additional state benefits. If 27% isn't a large enough increase, consider the 39% increase for Secretary of State, etc. And the poor judges only get 15%? Second, how do the demographics in Oregon compare with the "national average?" Unbelievable!

What a Shame wrote on Sep 5, 2008 3:24 PM:

This is a total outrage; These people set in Salem making new laws that are affecting us and leaving with less money and THEY ARE GETTING A PAY RAISE? Listen folks in Salem: We are taxed out. Working two jobs to support the family is not fun, why don't YOU try that for a while. And ANYTIME, trade me paychecks. YOU try to live of of what the average citizen takes home. Yes "take home pay" NOT GROSS PAY. After the government takes all that they want out, there IS a major difference in Gross pay and take home pay. Times are difficult for the averge taxpayer and now YOU WANT A PAYRAISE. Any one of you that accepts the payraise should be kicked out of office. THIS IS VERY IRRITATING...A TOTAL WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY....and.....What a Shame

John Q. Taxpayer. wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:33 PM:

Pay raise? For what? This has got to be a joke. Maybe if they where actually doing a good job they should get a raise. So I have to pay more taxes so some idiot lawmaker can make more money. I am outraged.

Public wrote on Sep 5, 2008 12:02 PM:

You must be joking! At times like this when people in the private sector are getting laid off, taking cuts in their pay & struggling to make ends meet our state legislators & public officials should not even be willing to accept a pay hike!! Any one of them that accept it should ashamed...


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections