Region's property taxes rise, but values decline

By Jolene Guzman,Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 02, 2008 | 32 comment(s)

County assessor to host town hall meetings

Font Size: Shrink Font Enlarge Font | Submit your news

Related Links

Wading through the Oregon property tax system may give people a sinking feeling. The Coos County assessor-elect would like to throw out a rescue line.

Coos County Chief Deputy and Assessor-elect Adam Colby will give a series of presentations in cities around the county this month outlining how taxes are figured in the state.

“The Oregon property tax system is arguably one of the most complicated in the U.S.,” Colby said.

That will be especially true this year. When the tax rolls turn over on Sept. 25 and property owners start getting tax notices, they may pick up on something that seems a bit unusual: Their property’s assessed value — the value which taxes are based on — will have gone up, while the market value has gone down.

How is that possible?

The simple answer is market value and assessed value are figured on two different sets of criteria. According to Colby, real market value is defined as the price a property would sell for in a transaction between a willing buyer and willing seller on the assessment date for that tax year. The assessment date is Jan. 1, based on sales from the prior year. Colby said this value is based on a best-case scenario, in which neither the buyer or seller is rushed to make a deal.

Assessed value is figured on a predictable rate of growth. First established in 1997 after Oregon voters passed Measure 50, a measure which set limits on the growth of assessed values, the maximum assessed value on a property grows 3 percent annually. The first maximum assessed value on properties was set at the 1995-96 real market value minus 10 percent. Assessed values can grow more than 3 percent under some circumstances, such as if improvements have been made to a property.

Unlike assessed value, real market value has no limits on how much it can grow — or shrink.

That may be the rub for property owners this year. Some may see the property they own worth less than last year, yet they are obligated to pay more taxes. This is possible because assessed value often trails behind market value, and as long as the assessed value is the smaller of the two, it will continue to grow by 3 percent each year.

“We are anticipating this year that people will see this,” Colby said.

Staff at the assessor’s office don’t expect to see taxes going down. Real market values really would have to bottom out before assessed values would catch up in most cases.

“It would have to be a real draconian situation for that to happen,” Colby said.

On average, assessed value is about 56 percent of market value.

If people still think their property value is off, there is an appeals process available. First, property owners can request an appraisal review at any time during the tax year. The appraisal will be conducted by an assessor’s office appraiser.

“If our value is too high, we will lower it, “ Colby said.

If the review doesn’t lower the value and the owner still thinks something is amiss, the next step is a petition to the Board of Property Tax Appeals by no later than Dec. 31. If a satisfactory decision isn’t settled upon, property owners can take the appeal up three more levels, starting with the magistrate division, then moving to Oregon Tax Court and finally to the Oregon State Supreme Court.

This month’s presentations are not the only time people can ask questions about property taxes. Colby said staff at the assessor’s office are happy to answer questions at any time.

“The goal is to be helpful to people,” Colby said.

The Coos County Assessor’s Office is open Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to Noon and 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. For more information, those interested can call 396-3121, ext. 274 or go to http://assessor.cooscotax.com.
Average tax rates in Coos County


Properties in cites: $12 to $18 per $1,000 of assessed value.


Properties in the county: $8 to $15 per $1,000 of assessed value.


Real Market Value: This typically is the price a property would sell for in a transaction between a willing buyer and willing seller on the assessment date for the tax year.


Maximum Assessed Value: This is the taxable value limit established for each property. The first maximum assessed value was set after Measure 50 was passed by voters in 1997. The value was set at the 1995-96 real market value minus 10 percent. Assessed values can grow each year by 3 percent, and more if improvements have been made to a property.


Assessed values average: about 56 percent of real market value.


Repair vs. improvement: Replacing a roof or siding with the same quality roofing or siding are considered repairs by the assessor and will not increase a property’s assessed value, even through it may increase the market value. Improvements, such as additions, major remodels or materials upgrades in a property may increase the assessed value more than the standard 3 percent per year. For example, upgrading kitchen counters from Formica to granite would be considered an improvement, while just installing new Formica counters would be considered a repair. Improvements valued at more than $10,000 in a single year or $25,000 in any consecutive five years may increase assessed value more than the standard rate.

Other events that could trigger a change in assessed value: a property is partitioned or subdivided; a property is rezoned and used in a way that fits into the rezoning; the property is first taken into account as omitted property; and the property is no longer eligible for exemption, partial exemption or special assessment.


Taxing districts: Coos County has 77 taxing districts and 127 tax rates. Taxing rates depend on the where a property is located and the number of taxing districts covering a property.
Previous
Next

Have you checked out The World Link Forums?

Comments

The comments below are from users of theworldlink.com and do not necessarily represent the views of The World or Lee Enterprises. Participation Guidelines

Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Comment Policy

The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.

Please follow these basic rules:

  • No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
  • No deliberately false information.
  • No obscenity or racially offensive language.
  • No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
  • No information that invades another person's privacy.
  • No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.

Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.

The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.

Close Guidelines

Resident wrote on Sep 9, 2008 10:21 AM:

I have an idea for public schools: I wonder whether we could graduate everyone at age 16, unless the students wish to go on and study for college. I just see so many kids who don't want to go to school. That's what public school was originally for--everyone to learn the basics.

Dave from NB wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:58 AM:

Outraged,

How is any school bond issue related to physical property owed by Oregon citizens & their property values? They aren't, thus they should be seperated PERIOD! I never said, I wouldn't agree to pay property tax, but I do have a problem paying "equally" for other people's kids, when many are in Oregon's pathetic welfare system!

Common Sense wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:48 AM:

I'm very serious & your arguement is WEAK, because professional people like doctors, lawyers pay for their education themselves! Better READ my prior post again, because I said quote:

"Fairer system is people (Married or NOT) that have to have kids, should pay MORE for any school related costs PERIOD"

"Secondly, Oregon should become less of a welfare state to discourage people to plan ahead (Career first & children second) instead of having 3 kids before figuring it out that they couldn't afford 2 financially!"

As you can see I said pay "MORE" not all & secondly Oregon's welfare system only encourages poverty & dependence, instead of independence of trying to succeed in life & not just play the part as a victim & expecting the system (Tax payer) to bail you out full time on your BAD decisions on having children that you can't afford!

P.S. Obviously you have children in the system & don't want to pay your fair share (which should be MORE then people that do NOT have any children in the system)!

I hope youre not serious wrote on Sep 8, 2008 1:25 PM:

To Common Sense? & Dave B-I guess you and your relatives have not worked as school teachers and received pay, PERS retirement or medical benefits. Perhaps these people also didn't spend any money in your business or pay any taxes to help pay for your roads, parks etc. Just because you have kids doesn't mean you should be the only one to pay for an educational system that benefits everyone. The next time you need a dr. or a lawyer, or even a cashier at Wal-Mart - maybe you'll think about how idiotic that sounds.The question that ought to be asked is not how much property tax am I paying,but how is this money being used or wasted. Why are PERS costs going up at an astronomical rate? Why are public employee health insurance premiums off the scale?
Apparently we've got a community full of kooks, tree huggers and tax evaders who don't want to pay their fair share but still want all the benefits of a government and all the services it offers.

Outraged wrote on Sep 8, 2008 12:02 PM:

To the people who don't have kids and think they shouldn't have to pay property taxes -- When you had kids did you pay more to your local school district in order for your kids to have a school building, books or a bus ride?
A "civilized" democratic society collects these funds to provide for the "common good" - I guess you didn't read that in our Constitution.

just saying wrote on Sep 8, 2008 9:44 AM:

Just saying....

Lower taxes means less services.

Less security with fewer sherriffs and jail cells.

Fewer health services means more people using the emergency room; less disease control/response.

Less Road Dept services means more car maintenance and less safe roads.

...and more (or, actually, less).

Lady wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:31 PM:

Property taxes going to be higher this year even thought property values gone down. In November just remember to vote no no no on all bond measures they will really raise your property taxes.
All property owners should pay their fair share of taxes, Bandon Dunes was given a exemption by the county commissioners, and the Indians pulling in millions and no pay taxes.

Dave from NB wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:58 PM:

I agree Common Sense,

Property tax should be ONLY about property values & NOT about school bonds issues! There should be 2 seperate bills, one for property values tax & one for school bonds issues & ONLY mailed to people that have the children at home! I agree Oregon needs to also totally change it's welfare thinking point of view & make the people having children pay for them, instead of Oregon's taxpayers! This article really doesn't deal with the REAL issue of increased property tax's Oregon citizens pay each year, because school bonds cost are the real driver on unfair increases to people NOT having children in the school system!

Resident wrote on Sep 7, 2008 4:20 PM:

To Taxpaper--
You are right that Measure 50 brought us a limit, but if your home's assessed value is less than market value, consider yourself lucky.

Atendee wrote on Sep 7, 2008 2:48 PM:

I attended a town hall meeting and find the taxpayer's comment on 9/6 to be inaccurate. There was no discussion about repealing measure 50. The assessor elect's presentation provided an overview of the Oregon property tax system and answered taxpayer questions. Each attendee also received a packet of written information.

Common Sense wrote on Sep 7, 2008 9:36 AM:

Two words on why:

Welfare State

Fairer system is people (Married or NOT) that have to have kids, should pay MORE for any school related costs PERIOD! Secondly, Oregon should become less of a welfare state to discourage people to plan ahead (Career first & children second) instead of having 3 kids before figuring it out that they couldn't afford 2 financially! That's why Oregon will continue to be a dog chasin it's own tail on the road to financial success...

Ignorant wrote on Sep 6, 2008 8:49 PM:

Blame your financial troubles on Reaganomics, Period!
There IS NO such thing as trickle down. It just seeps.

TAXPAYER wrote on Sep 6, 2008 2:25 PM:

We do not want to repeal Measure 50. Otherwise you would be paying even more in taxes than you are now. If you don't add on or make major changes to your house (repairs are ok) than your tax can only go up 3% except for new taxes approved by voters (such as the fire station in coos bay). Right now my MAV (market assessed value) is around $102,000 but my MRV (market retail value) is around $190,000. The MRV is likely to go down but my MAV will go up. I will still be paying LESS TAXES than if they went of the MRV. The county is only giving you this information now because they want you to repeal Measure 50 so they can collect even more money. EVEN THOUGH YOU MAY PAY MORE, YOU WILL STILL BE PAYING LESS BECAUSE OF MEASURE 50.

rick wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:28 PM:

I'M ANGRY OVER THIS. I ALREADY PAY ALMOST $3,000 A YEAR.MY HOUSE VALUE WENT UP I GOT REAMED.NOW MY HOUSE VALUE HAS GONE DOWN AND I'M STILL GETTING REAMED!!.WHY IS IT THE HOME OWNERS ARE GETTING REAMED AND PAYING MORE THAN OUR SHARE OF TAXES.I SAY IT IS TIME FOR A REVOLUTION AGAINST THE POLITICIANS.WE NEED TO DO WHAT OUR FORE-FATHERS DID AGAINST THE ENGLISH BECAUSE OF OVER TAXATION!IT'S TIME US ALL TO WAKE UP AND RISE!
RICK.

TAXPAYER wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:57 PM:

I missed the meeting, does anyone have any idea how much the taxes are going up. I am affraid I did not save enough money to pay them..

TAXPAYER wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:13 PM:

This is certainly not good news to people on fixed incomes who were saving up to pay the property taxes and now this late in the year, we are told they are going to be higher, even tho our homes are worth less. How can we pay them, if we haven't saved enough out of our small social security checks. AND if we don't pay them, we can never save enough to pay them next year with penalities tacked on. OH MY, what do we do ????

Kudos wrote on Sep 4, 2008 3:16 PM:

It's refreshing and encouraging to see our Assessor-Elect, Adam Colby, out in the community at a time not-so-convenient to him but more so to us, to better inform property taxpayers of the reasons behind forecasted increases in property tax this fall. I, for one, would much rather hear a good explanation for the increase now than be unpleasantly surprised and confused when the tax statement arrives. Our property tax system is what we made it through voter initiative. Mr. Colby is making a commendable effort to inform us of the impact OUR property tax laws will have on us this year. Thank you Mr. Colby for your service to the taxpayers of Coos County.

Here We Go wrote on Sep 4, 2008 3:08 PM:

What meeting did this person attend.

Must of step out for dinner and got stuck in a rut.

jeancoos bay wrote on Sep 4, 2008 2:21 PM:

Thanks to the assessor elect for helping people understand measure 50. I appreciate the evening meetings so I can attend.

Dennis wrote on Sep 4, 2008 1:48 PM:

I would like to thank Mr. Colby for presenting these town hall meetings. Property taxes can be confusing and to have our new assessor so willing to sort this out for us is a breath of fresh air.

If we're not happy with the way our property taxes are set we need to nudge our legislators to repeal Measure 50.

Neil wrote on Sep 4, 2008 12:39 PM:

To the world Paper it is nice to have a local paper. Were articales deal with my community. This artical about the Market value and tax assessed value is informative. I look forward to hearing the presentation.

THANK YOU wrote on Sep 4, 2008 12:34 PM:

We learned a lot at the presentation about the tax statements the tax law. We are new to the community and found out how the tax present system works. Wish more departments at the county were so available to talk in our community. Thank you Mr. Colby!

Here We Go wrote on Sep 4, 2008 10:52 AM:

LEAVE IT UP TO THE REPUBS TO SCREW EVERYTHING UP AS THEY DID THE COUNTRY THE LAST EIGHT YEARS. I ALSO WENT BY THE REPUBS HQ AT PONY VILLAGE AND THE TWO SENIOR LADYS WERE REALLY RUDE. THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT.

Linda wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:32 AM:

Only in the USA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My worth is worth nothing. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Lizard King wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:54 AM:

This matter is just the tip of the iceberg from an outgoing County Assessor that has wasted a hundreds of thousands of tax payer money on frivolous tax cases against tax payers of Coos County involving over assessment and over charging by the county. The County has not prevailed in the bulk of these appeals, which has been expensive. I don't see meaningful change from the Assesor elect, and the sitting Assessor is on his way to Commissioner.

CB wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:42 AM:

Can't sell our homes, can't afford to live in them, no money for taxes, and now they raise them.
How about taxing the people who have the money to pay taxes and don't, like BANDON DUNES, who gets off tax free.
And of course all the land and businesses the Indians own that they don't have to pay taxes on, and NOTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT THAT THO ! ! ! !

Me Again wrote on Sep 2, 2008 9:58 PM:

Bend over here it comes

Dave A. wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:47 PM:

According to their logic, if the property value is down this year, the assessment will go down next year. Don't hold your breath! No matter how low the value of your property gets, your property taxes will continue to rise. The government figures out how much they WANT and work backward to figure out how much they need to shake you down. Keep on voting those same people into office, voters!! You'll never learn.

Tax Man wrote on Sep 2, 2008 4:39 PM:

Let's see...if I fix up my house, they jack up my property taxes?!? Gee, I wonder if I will fix up my house? Property taxes go up while the value of my home goes down - only in a "progressive" State like Oregon.

Citizen wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:57 PM:

Just one more reason people will be forced to move out of the area....

Thomas wrote on Sep 2, 2008 2:29 PM:

If a MEASURE or BOND is passed upon property tax, then why should non-landowners vote on it???

I'm so far Liberal that GOP regressives might not consider me credible on fiscal responsibility, but this insane policy is killing us!!!

coastal friend wrote on Sep 2, 2008 12:24 PM:

If even they agree it is the most complicated system in the country, then why not change it. There must be a way to make it more uniform. I have always wondered if they like to keep it this way to keep all of us in the dark.
These meetings should be interesting.


*Member ID:
*Password:
 

Not already registered?

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!



*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Would you like to be added to our mailing lists?
Daily Headlines
Breaking News
Special Offers
 
Advanced Search
Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Blogroll

Most Popular

Polls

» View Past Poll Results
» Suggest a Poll

Marketplace

Special Sections

More Special Sections