Note: There is a maximum of 200 words per comment. If you wish to post more, please visit our forum.
Remember what store were dealing with wrote on Sep 21, 2008 10:21 PM:
Ms. Howard deserves innocence until proven guilty with more than just the word of some overzealous wannabe security guard. I realize they get a lot of shoplifters and need to be diligent, but they HAVE been dead wrong before.
CB info wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:08 PM:
we want to know wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:34 PM:
but when this is done, we want the paper to cover this story
Now Hear This wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:26 PM:
Position wrote on Sep 3, 2008 6:34 PM:
presumed guilty wrote on Sep 3, 2008 6:12 PM:
You are an excellent example of pre-judging a person based on the selective reporting you read in this newspaper. May you never have occasion to appear in its pages!
killface wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:29 PM:
I HOPE WHEN THEY FIND OUT IT WAS A MISTAKE AND SHE SUES WALMART,THE WORLD NEWS PAPER,COOS BAY AND WHOM EVER ELSE BLEW THIS OUT OF PROPORTION ....RUINING A PERSONS CAREER WITH OUT ALL THE FACTS IS IN EXCUSEABLE .
stoptheslander wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:13 AM:
D.Taylor wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:58 AM:
lola wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:30 AM:
This story also appeared in "The Register-Guard", and I, for one, applaud "The World" for publishing it too.
Do you see the amount of this person's salary? The horror is that she's on paid leave!
You must consider her position and the implications of this charge regarding it! Finance director! Shoplifter! God help us!
It Happens wrote on Sep 2, 2008 1:28 PM:
crash wrote on Sep 1, 2008 4:06 PM:
moonpenny wrote on Sep 1, 2008 2:21 PM:
darla wrote on Aug 31, 2008 6:44 PM:
coos bay native wrote on Aug 30, 2008 1:00 PM:
fred wrote on Aug 30, 2008 7:51 AM:
Some Dude wrote on Aug 29, 2008 4:16 PM:
Hey wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:31 PM:
Curious wrote on Aug 29, 2008 11:39 AM:
What does the fact that she has been seen around town using coupons mean??? I know people who make three/four figure annual salaries use coupons, maybe that's why their rich...but I still don't understand your comment and how that fits into this story???
Help wrote on Aug 29, 2008 11:26 AM:
Citizen wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:31 PM:
I think this story gets more legs from the fact that the average wage is so low. Add to that all the fixed income folks.
Likely the video tape will show her taking the item. Intent will have to be sorted out. What about all those folks eating and drinking items before they pay for them? This is laughable.
WOW wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:25 PM:
Not a coincidence wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:25 PM:
Not Surprised wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:15 PM:
DP wrote on Aug 28, 2008 5:08 PM:
mom of wrote on Aug 28, 2008 5:02 PM:
STEVE B wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:26 PM:
BayView wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:10 PM:
The newspaper is all about news. That's why they have printed this story. They did give her a chance to comment and she didn't.
Greg wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:58 PM:
Citizen Q wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:53 PM:
Wondering wrote on Aug 28, 2008 2:37 PM:
Ironic wrote on Aug 28, 2008 2:19 PM:
Second, I find it ironic that some are saying this is not newsworthy and shouldn't be printed or become public until the investigation is complete. These same people would be screaming bloody murder and freedom of the press, if this had somehow been kept silent, then revealed a month later when the investigation is complete. Then they would be screaming cover-up! Conspiracy!
Concerned wrote on Aug 28, 2008 11:20 AM:
George wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:06 AM:
It sounds like a mistake, we all make them. I'll wait until I hear all the facts before I jump to a conclusion. That is called being sensible.
Matt wrote on Aug 28, 2008 9:34 AM:
A guy wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:45 AM:
FYI - did the World say Ms. Howard walked out of the store? Bet she wasn't even outside yet!
better things to do wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:30 AM:
How hard would it have been to escort her to customer service to let her pay for the forgotten item. Wal Mart lost my business years ago - they are incompentent. Why have 30 cash registers with 3 checkers. Ms. Howard my thoughts are with you and your family.
Jeez wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:23 AM:
HEY MIKE wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:09 AM:
What I can't figure out is if it was an accident why she did not pay for the items and leave it be. That's where I'm confused, we all make mistakes and a store will often times let you fix them.
Reader wrote on Aug 28, 2008 7:48 AM:
NB wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:41 AM:
allen wrote on Aug 28, 2008 12:16 AM:
local wrote on Aug 27, 2008 11:47 PM:
Carol Shaw wrote on Aug 27, 2008 9:00 PM:
Barb wrote on Aug 27, 2008 7:01 PM:
Joyce E wrote on Aug 27, 2008 6:40 PM:
Athena wrote on Aug 27, 2008 5:54 PM:
The rest of you may be willing to convict this woman on a public post but I would rather look at this as a silly mistake unless I see proof otherwise. Why would someone who makes $80K a year not pay for a $12 item? It makes no sense.
If you really want to be upset with her, be upset that she is shopping in an anti-union, anti-employee establishment.
presumed guilty wrote on Aug 27, 2008 5:38 PM:
Mike - auditing Ms. Howard's work won't cost the city an extra dime...it is done every single year!
JUST WONDERING..... wrote on Aug 27, 2008 4:36 PM:
PS this is tax payers dollars at work - he does not pay for it out of his own pocket
Observation wrote on Aug 27, 2008 4:31 PM:
UNFAIR wrote on Aug 27, 2008 4:26 PM:
It does happen wrote on Aug 27, 2008 4:07 PM:
I don't know Ms. Howard, but I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. Remember, in this country we are innocent until proven guilty.
world reader wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:38 PM:
Pete wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:36 PM:
Let's wait to hear what the investigation finds out before convicting her.
... wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:18 PM:
c.b.businessman wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:15 PM:
concerned wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:09 PM:
This reminds me of the old days with the old editor who would print stuff like this about people on the outs with the powers-that-be in the city of Coos Bay. Interesting.
Samuel wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:02 PM:
Mike wrote on Aug 27, 2008 1:26 PM:
fred wrote on Aug 27, 2008 12:55 PM:




The World welcomes your comments about stories, and we encourage a robust dialogue on this site. All comments must meet reasonable standards of decency and civility.
Please follow these basic rules:
- No defamatory comments about individuals or businesses.
- No deliberately false information.
- No obscenity or racially offensive language.
- No harassment, verbal abuse, threats or personal attacks.
- No information that invades another person's privacy.
- No business solicitations or charitable solicitations.
Comments that violate these standards will not be posted. Users with repeated violations may be banned from future posting.Comments will be approved throughout the day during business hours. After hours and weekend comments may not appear until the following business day. It may take a couple of hours before comments are approved.
The World generally does not edit comments, but we reserve the right to edit any comment that does not meet our standards.
Close Guidelines